Public record
Software health reportschema 0.15.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-20 04:36 UTC

baizhiheizi / mixin_bot

A simple API wrapper for Mixin Network in Ruby

RubyMIT★ 16 stars⑂ 3 forkssince Sep 2018View on GitHub ↗

baizhiheizi/mixin_bot holds a health index of 69 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (86/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (35/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

69
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

69
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 62 is calibrated to 69 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

白纸黑字Organization
4 followers18 public repossince Apr 2020

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
RubyGemsmixin_botpoints to another repo — not scored2.4.0-840 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

74Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
7.6/36Commit cadence11/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume141 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year141
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year11
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases16 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 54 days ago
12.6/27Release cadencea release every ~190.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count16
latest_release_tagv2.3.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release54
mean_days_between_releases190.4

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

35Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
19.1/60Stars16 stars
2.5/25Forks3 forks
0/15Watchers1 watchers
Inputs used
forks3
stars16
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

54Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
3/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 87% of commits
9.5/13.5Contributor breadth7 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled7
top_contributor_share0.868
How it's scored
37.3/42Issue resolution89% of issues closed
26.9/30PR acceptance120/134 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/5 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs120
open_issues6
closed_issues48
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.889
closed_unmerged_prs14
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
5/25Owner reach4 followers of baizhiheizi
21.3/25Track record18 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers4
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginbaizhiheizi
public_repos18
account_age_days2,276
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

80Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows9 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.rubocop.yml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
12/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests15 out of 22 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

85Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics6 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsmixin, ruby, rails, gem, api-wrapper, mixin-sdk-ruby
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

62Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
1.5/2.5CI-Tests15 out of 22 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/5 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
4/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
6.8/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate6.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

86Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructionsAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)llms.txt present
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes4,053
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapmise.toml
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.rubocop.yml
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
5/8Automated maintenancedependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
8/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesGemfile.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesmise.toml
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codeRuby without a type-check config
54.7/55Manageable file sizes1/164 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRuby
largest_source_bytes93,868
source_files_sampled164
oversized_source_files1
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
20/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

16GitHub stars
7contributors
141commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
16releases
1bus factor
6open issues
RubyGemspackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • rubygems package 'mixin_bot' points at a different repository (https://github.com/an-lee/mixin_bot); excluded from ecosystem scoring

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.2 / 10
6.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-20 04:36 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
6CI-Tests15 out of 22 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/5 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
8Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
9Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 12
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
RubyGemsfastimageGemfile
RubyGemsminitest-reportersGemfile
RubyGemsminitest-stub-constGemfile
RubyGemsparallel~> 1.26Gemfile
RubyGemspryGemfile
RubyGemsrakeGemfile
RubyGemsrdocGemfile
RubyGemsrubocopGemfile
RubyGemsrubocop-rakeGemfile
RubyGemssimplecovGemfile
RubyGemswebmockGemfile
RubyGemsyardGemfile
All dependencies 111

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 12 direct and 99 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
RubyGemsfastimage2.4.1direct
RubyGemsminitest-reporters1.8.0direct
RubyGemsminitest-stub-const0.6direct
RubyGemsparallel1.28.0direct
RubyGemspry0.16.0direct
RubyGemsrake13.4.2direct
RubyGemsrdoc8.0.0direct
RubyGemsrubocop1.88.2direct
RubyGemsrubocop-rake0.7.1direct
RubyGemssimplecov1.0.1direct
RubyGemswebmock3.26.2direct
RubyGemsyard0.9.45direct
RubyGemsactivesupportindirect
RubyGemsactivesupport8.1.3indirect
RubyGemsaddressable2.9.0indirect
RubyGemsansi1.6.0indirect
RubyGemsast2.4.3indirect
RubyGemsawesome_printindirect
RubyGemsawesome_print1.9.2indirect
RubyGemsbase58indirect
RubyGemsbase580.2.3indirect
RubyGemsbase640.3.0indirect
RubyGemsbcryptindirect
RubyGemsbcrypt3.1.22indirect
RubyGemsbenchmarkindirect
RubyGemsbenchmark0.5.0indirect
RubyGemsbigdecimal3.3.1indirect
RubyGemsblake3-rbindirect
RubyGemsblake3-rb1.8.3.0indirect
RubyGemsbls12-3810.3.1indirect
RubyGemsbuilder3.3.0indirect
RubyGemscli-uiindirect
RubyGemscli-ui2.7.0indirect
RubyGemscoderay1.1.3indirect
RubyGemsconcurrent-ruby1.3.7indirect
RubyGemsconnection_pool3.0.2indirect
RubyGemscrack1.0.1indirect
RubyGemsdrb2.2.3indirect
RubyGemsecdsa1.2.0indirect
RubyGemserb6.0.4indirect
RubyGemsethindirect
RubyGemseth0.5.17indirect
RubyGemseventmachine1.2.7indirect
RubyGemsfaradayindirect
RubyGemsfaraday2.14.3indirect
RubyGemsfaraday-multipartindirect
RubyGemsfaraday-multipart1.2.0indirect
RubyGemsfaraday-net_http3.4.4indirect
RubyGemsfaraday-retryindirect
RubyGemsfaraday-retry2.4.0indirect
RubyGemsfaye-websocketindirect
RubyGemsfaye-websocket0.12.0indirect
RubyGemsffi1.17.4indirect
RubyGemsffi-compiler1.4.2indirect
RubyGemsforwardable1.4.0indirect
RubyGemsh2c0.2.1indirect
RubyGemshashdiff1.2.1indirect
RubyGemshttp-21.1.3indirect
RubyGemshttpx1.7.8indirect
RubyGemsi18n1.14.8indirect
RubyGemsimmutable-ruby0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsio-console0.8.2indirect
RubyGemsjoseindirect
RubyGemsjose1.2.0indirect
RubyGemsjson2.20.0indirect
RubyGemskeccak1.3.3indirect
RubyGemskonstructor1.0.2indirect
RubyGemslanguage_server-protocol3.17.0.6indirect
RubyGemslint_roller1.1.0indirect
RubyGemslogger1.7.0indirect
RubyGemsmethod_source1.1.0indirect
RubyGemsmini_portile22.8.9indirect
RubyGemsminitest6.0.6indirect
RubyGemsmsgpackindirect
RubyGemsmsgpack1.8.3indirect
RubyGemsmultipart-post2.4.1indirect
RubyGemsnet-http0.9.1indirect
RubyGemsopenssl3.3.3indirect
RubyGemsparser3.3.11.1indirect
RubyGemspkg-config1.6.5indirect
RubyGemsprism1.9.0indirect
RubyGemspublic_suffix7.0.5indirect
RubyGemsracc1.8.1indirect
RubyGemsrainbow3.1.1indirect
RubyGemsrake-compiler-dock1.12.0indirect
RubyGemsrb_sys0.9.128indirect
RubyGemsrbnaclindirect
RubyGemsrbnacl7.1.2indirect
RubyGemsrbs4.0.3indirect
RubyGemsrbsecp256k16.0.0indirect
RubyGemsrbtree0.4.6indirect
RubyGemsregexp_parser2.12.0indirect
RubyGemsreline0.6.3indirect
RubyGemsrexml3.4.4indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-ast1.50.0indirect
RubyGemsruby-progressbar1.13.0indirect
RubyGemsrubyzip2.4.1indirect
RubyGemsscrypt3.1.0indirect
RubyGemssecurerandom0.4.1indirect
RubyGemssha3indirect
RubyGemssha32.2.4indirect
RubyGemssorted_set1.1.0indirect
RubyGemsthorindirect
RubyGemsthor1.5.0indirect
RubyGemstsort0.2.0indirect
RubyGemstzinfo2.0.6indirect
RubyGemsunicode-display_width3.2.0indirect
RubyGemsunicode-emoji4.2.0indirect
RubyGemsuri1.1.1indirect
RubyGemswebsocket-driver0.8.1indirect
RubyGemswebsocket-extensions0.1.5indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.15.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsRubyGems.