Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-11 18:56 UTC

baizhiheizi / mixin_bot

A simple API wrapper for Mixin Network in Ruby

RubyMIT★ 16 stars⑂ 3 forkssince Sep 2018View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined
#mixin#ruby#rails#gem#api-wrapper#mixin-sdk-ruby

baizhiheizi/mixin_bot holds a health index of 75 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (88/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (35/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

75
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

75
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 65 is calibrated to 75 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

白纸黑字Organization
4 followers20 public repossince Apr 2020

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
RubyGemsmixin_botpoints to another repo — not scored2.6.0-874 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

82Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

76Good
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
12.5/36Commit cadence — 18/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 206 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year206
human_commit_share0.62
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year18

Release discipline

90Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 20 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 4 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~12.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count20
latest_release_tagv2.6.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release4
mean_days_between_releases12.2

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

35Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

22At Risk
How it's scored
19.1/60Stars — 16 stars
2.5/25Forks — 3 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks3
stars16
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges1
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

50Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

18Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.5/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 98% of commits
5.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 4 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled4
top_contributor_share0.98

Issue & PR responsiveness

80Excellent
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
27.3/30PR acceptance — 140/154 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs140
open_issues0
closed_issues61
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d2
prs_decided_30d2
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs14
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

57Moderate
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
5/25Owner reach — 4 followers of baizhiheizi
21.6/25Track record — 20 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers4
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginbaizhiheizi
public_repos20
account_age_days2,329

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

83Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

82Excellent
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 9 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .rubocop.yml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
18/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 11 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

85Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 6 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsmixin, ruby, rails, gem, api-wrapper, mixin-sdk-ruby
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

70Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

63Moderate
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.2/2.5CI-Tests — 11 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
4/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
6.8/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate6.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages113
unassessed_packages18
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 113 resolved dependencies against OSV. 18 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

88Excellent · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt present
40/40Legible commit history — 49 of 62 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.79
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes4,087

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

87Excellent
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — mise.toml
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .rubocop.yml
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice — 17 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 28 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
8/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesGemfile.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesmise.toml
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.17
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.28

Code legibility for models

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — Ruby without a type-check config
54.7/55Manageable file sizes — 1/175 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRuby
largest_source_bytes93,868
source_files_sampled175
oversized_source_files1

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
20/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalyes
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

16GitHub stars
4contributors
206commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
20releases
1bus factor
0open issues
RubyGemspackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • rubygems package 'mixin_bot' points at a different repository (https://github.com/an-lee/mixin_bot); excluded from ecosystem scoring

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 3 ⇿
0Stars
3Forks
2Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

111222212019-052019-112020-06
Major 0Minor 0Patch 2
OpenSSF Scorecard 6.3 / 10
6.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-11 18:56 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
9CI-Tests11 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
8Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
9Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 12
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
RubyGemsfastimage—Gemfile
RubyGemsminitest-reporters—Gemfile
RubyGemsminitest-stub-const—Gemfile
RubyGemsparallel~> 1.26Gemfile
RubyGemspry—Gemfile
RubyGemsrake—Gemfile
RubyGemsrdoc—Gemfile
RubyGemsrubocop—Gemfile
RubyGemsrubocop-rake—Gemfile
RubyGemssimplecov—Gemfile
RubyGemswebmock—Gemfile
RubyGemsyard—Gemfile
All dependencies 131

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 12 direct and 119 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
RubyGemsfastimage2.4.1direct
RubyGemsminitest-reporters1.8.0direct
RubyGemsminitest-stub-const0.6direct
RubyGemsparallel1.28.0direct
RubyGemspry0.16.0direct
RubyGemsrake13.4.2direct
RubyGemsrdoc8.0.0direct
RubyGemsrubocop1.90.0direct
RubyGemsrubocop-rake0.7.1direct
RubyGemssimplecov1.1.1direct
RubyGemswebmock3.26.4direct
RubyGemsyard0.9.45direct
RubyGemsactivesupport—indirect
RubyGemsactivesupport8.1.3.1indirect
RubyGemsaddressable2.9.0indirect
RubyGemsansi1.6.0indirect
RubyGemsast2.4.3indirect
RubyGemsasync2.45.1indirect
RubyGemsasync-http0.103.0indirect
RubyGemsasync-pool0.12.0indirect
RubyGemsasync-websocket—indirect
RubyGemsasync-websocket0.30.1indirect
RubyGemsawesome_print—indirect
RubyGemsawesome_print1.9.2indirect
RubyGemsbase58—indirect
RubyGemsbase580.2.3indirect
RubyGemsbase640.3.0indirect
RubyGemsbcrypt—indirect
RubyGemsbcrypt3.1.22indirect
RubyGemsbenchmark—indirect
RubyGemsbenchmark0.5.0indirect
RubyGemsbigdecimal3.3.1indirect
RubyGemsblake3-rb—indirect
RubyGemsblake3-rb1.8.3.0indirect
RubyGemsbls12-3810.3.1indirect
RubyGemsbuilder3.3.0indirect
RubyGemscli-ui—indirect
RubyGemscli-ui2.7.0indirect
RubyGemscoderay1.1.3indirect
RubyGemsconcurrent-ruby1.3.8indirect
RubyGemsconnection_pool3.0.2indirect
RubyGemsconsole1.37.0indirect
RubyGemscrack1.0.1indirect
RubyGemsdrb2.2.3indirect
RubyGemsecdsa1.2.0indirect
RubyGemserb6.0.4indirect
RubyGemseth—indirect
RubyGemseth0.5.17indirect
RubyGemseventmachine1.2.7indirect
RubyGemsfaraday—indirect
RubyGemsfaraday2.14.3indirect
RubyGemsfaraday-multipart—indirect
RubyGemsfaraday-multipart1.2.0indirect
RubyGemsfaraday-net_http3.4.4indirect
RubyGemsfaraday-retry—indirect
RubyGemsfaraday-retry2.4.0indirect
RubyGemsfaye-websocket—indirect
RubyGemsfaye-websocket0.12.0indirect
RubyGemsffi1.17.4indirect
RubyGemsffi-compiler1.4.2indirect
RubyGemsfiber-annotation0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsfiber-local1.1.0indirect
RubyGemsfiber-storage1.0.1indirect
RubyGemsforwardable1.4.0indirect
RubyGemsh2c0.2.1indirect
RubyGemshashdiff1.2.1indirect
RubyGemshttp-21.2.1indirect
RubyGemshttpx1.8.1indirect
RubyGemsi18n1.15.2indirect
RubyGemsimmutable-ruby0.2.0indirect
RubyGemsio-console0.8.2indirect
RubyGemsio-endpoint0.18.0indirect
RubyGemsio-event1.21.1indirect
RubyGemsio-stream0.14.0indirect
RubyGemsjose—indirect
RubyGemsjose1.2.0indirect
RubyGemsjson2.21.2indirect
RubyGemskeccak1.3.3indirect
RubyGemskonstructor1.0.2indirect
RubyGemslanguage_server-protocol3.17.0.6indirect
RubyGemslint_roller1.1.0indirect
RubyGemslogger1.7.0indirect
RubyGemsmethod_source1.1.0indirect
RubyGemsmini_portile22.8.9indirect
RubyGemsminitest6.0.6indirect
RubyGemsmsgpack—indirect
RubyGemsmsgpack1.8.4indirect
RubyGemsmultipart-post2.4.1indirect
RubyGemsnet-http0.9.1indirect
RubyGemsopenssl3.3.3indirect
RubyGemsparser3.3.12.0indirect
RubyGemspkg-config1.6.5indirect
RubyGemsprism1.9.0indirect
RubyGemsprotocol-hpack1.5.1indirect
RubyGemsprotocol-http0.71.0indirect
RubyGemsprotocol-http10.41.0indirect
RubyGemsprotocol-http20.28.0indirect
RubyGemsprotocol-rack0.22.1indirect
RubyGemsprotocol-url0.18.0indirect
RubyGemsprotocol-websocket0.21.1indirect
RubyGemspublic_suffix7.0.5indirect
RubyGemsracc1.8.1indirect
RubyGemsrack3.2.7indirect
RubyGemsrainbow3.1.1indirect
RubyGemsrake-compiler-dock1.12.0indirect
RubyGemsrb_sys0.9.128indirect
RubyGemsrbnacl—indirect
RubyGemsrbnacl7.1.2indirect
RubyGemsrbs4.0.3indirect
RubyGemsrbsecp256k16.0.0indirect
RubyGemsrbtree0.4.7indirect
RubyGemsregexp_parser2.12.0indirect
RubyGemsreline0.6.3indirect
RubyGemsrexml3.4.4indirect
RubyGemsrubocop-ast1.50.0indirect
RubyGemsruby-progressbar1.13.0indirect
RubyGemsrubyzip2.4.1indirect
RubyGemsscrypt3.1.0indirect
RubyGemssecurerandom0.4.1indirect
RubyGemssha3—indirect
RubyGemssha32.2.4indirect
RubyGemssorted_set1.1.0indirect
RubyGemsthor—indirect
RubyGemsthor1.5.0indirect
RubyGemstsort0.2.0indirect
RubyGemstzinfo2.0.6indirect
RubyGemsunicode-display_width3.2.0indirect
RubyGemsunicode-emoji4.2.0indirect
RubyGemsuri1.1.1indirect
RubyGemswebsocket-driver0.8.2indirect
RubyGemswebsocket-extensions0.1.5indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 113 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 18 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with baizhiheizi/mixin_bot. Read them side by side →

98rails/railsRuby on RailsExceptional98chatwoot/chatwootOpen-source live-chat, email support, omni-channel desk. An alternative to Intercom, Zendesk, Salesforce Service Cloud etc. 🔥💬Exceptional97discourse/discourseA platform for community discussion. Free, open, simple.Exceptional97primer/octiconsA scalable set of icons handcrafted with ❤️ by GitHubExceptional96avo-hq/avoThe Essential Toolkit for building Internal Tools and admin panels with Ruby on RailsExceptional96activeadmin/activeadminThe administration framework for Ruby on Rails applications.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — RubyGems.