Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-15 12:31 UTC

balena-io / balena-sdk

The SDK to make balena powered JavaScript applications

TypeScriptApache-2.0★ 148 stars⑂ 49 forkssince Jan 2015View on GitHub ↗

balena-io/balena-sdk holds a health index of 92 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (90/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (54/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

92
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

92
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 78 is calibrated to 92 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

balenaOrganization
1,176 followers91 public repossince Dec 2013

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmbalena-sdk23.2.1568,2972,43733 days agosdkresinresin.iobalenabalena.ioiotdevices

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

88Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
22.8/36Commit cadence33/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume211 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained16 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year211
human_commit_share0.41
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year33
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases100 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 33 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~7.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv23.2.15
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release33
mean_days_between_releases7.1

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

66Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
35.2/60Stars148 stars
14/25Forks49 forks
7.8/15Watchers26 watchers
Inputs used
forks49
stars148
watchers26
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
7.2/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateyes
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesbadge.fury.io, ci.appveyor.com, travis-ci.org
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
64.5/80Monthly downloads68,297 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesbalena-sdk
dependents
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads
monthly_downloads68,297
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

76Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
13.1/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 42% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth40 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 30 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled40
top_contributor_share0.42
How it's scored
32.5/42Issue resolution77% of issues closed
26.7/30PR acceptance1,104/1,242 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
3/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 4/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
merged_prs1,104
open_issues84
closed_issues288
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.774
closed_unmerged_prs138
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
22.1/25Owner reach1,176 followers of balena-io
25/25Track record91 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers1,176
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginbalena-io
public_repos91
account_age_days4,661

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 33 days ago
20/20Version history2,437 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesbalena-sdk
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish33

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

90Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter configeslint.config.js
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests10 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://docs.balena.io/reference/sdk/node-sdk/latest/introduction
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://docs.balena.io/reference/sdk/node-sdk/latest/introduction
docs_sitehttps://docs.balena.io/reference/sdk/node-sdk/latest/introduction
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

70Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests10 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1.5/7.5Code-ReviewFound 4/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 30 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained16 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
5/5SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
7.5/7.5Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate6.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriesno indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages112
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:balena-sdk@23.2.15 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 112 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

54Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)llms.txt served by the project website (https://docs.balena.io/llms.txt)
31.2/40Legible commit history24 of 41 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://docs.balena.io/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.585
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format configeslint.config.js
11/11Static type checkingtsconfig.json, typing_tests/tsconfig.json
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configstsconfig.json, typing_tests/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeTypeScript (statically typed)
53.5/55Manageable file sizes3/111 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes137,917
source_files_sampled111
oversized_source_files3

Key facts

148GitHub stars
40contributors
211commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
2bus factor
84open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 49 ⇿
0Stars
49Forks
74Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

010203040504932015-022020-082026-03
Major 3Minor 14Patch 57

Each point covers 11 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.2 / 10
6.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-15 12:31 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests10 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2Code-ReviewFound 4/14 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
10Contributorsproject has 30 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained16 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 18
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@balena/abstract-sql-to-typescript^5.1.1package.json
npm@balena/es-version^1.0.0package.json
npm@types/json-schema^7.0.9package.json
npm@types/node^22.19.7package.json
npmbalena-auth^6.1.1package.json
npmbalena-errors^5.0.0package.json
npmbalena-hup-action-utils~7.0.0package.json
npmbalena-register-device^9.0.4package.json
npmbalena-request^14.1.6package.json
npmbalena-semver^4.0.0package.json
npmbalena-settings-client^6.0.0package.json
npmhandlebars^4.7.7package.json
npmmemoizee^0.4.15package.json
npmmime^3.0.0package.json
npmndjson^2.0.0package.json
npmp-throttle^4.1.1package.json
npmpinejs-client-core^8.4.0package.json
npmtslib^2.1.0package.json
All dependencies 65

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 18 direct and 47 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@balena/abstract-sql-to-typescript^5.1.1direct
npm@balena/es-version^1.0.0direct
npm@types/json-schema^7.0.9direct
npm@types/node^22.19.7direct
npmbalena-auth^6.1.1direct
npmbalena-errors^5.0.0direct
npmbalena-hup-action-utils~7.0.0direct
npmbalena-register-device^9.0.4direct
npmbalena-request^14.1.6direct
npmbalena-semver^4.0.0direct
npmbalena-settings-client^6.0.0direct
npmhandlebars^4.7.7direct
npmmemoizee^0.4.15direct
npmmime^3.0.0direct
npmndjson^2.0.0direct
npmp-throttle^4.1.1direct
npmpinejs-client-core^8.4.0direct
npmtslib^2.1.0direct
npm@balena/env-parsing^1.2.6indirect
npm@balena/lint^9.3.12indirect
npm@types/chai4.3.20indirect
npm@types/lodash4.17.24indirect
npm@types/memoizee0.4.12indirect
npm@types/mime3.0.4indirect
npm@types/mocha10.0.10indirect
npm@types/ndjson2.0.4indirect
npm@types/sinon21.0.1indirect
npmassert2.1.0indirect
npmbalena-config-karma4.0.3indirect
npmbuffer6.0.3indirect
npmcatch-uncommitted2.0.0indirect
npmchai4.5.0indirect
npmcrypto-browserify3.12.1indirect
npmdomain-browser5.7.0indirect
npmdotenv17.4.2indirect
npmhusky9.1.7indirect
npmjs-polyfills0.1.43indirect
npmjsdoc-to-markdown9.1.3indirect
npmkarma6.4.4indirect
npmlint-staged17.1.1indirect
npmlodash4.18.1indirect
npmmjs-mocha3.0.0indirect
npmmocha11.7.6indirect
npmmocha.parallel0.15.6indirect
npmmockttp3.17.1indirect
npmos-browserify0.3.0indirect
npmotplib12.0.1indirect
npmprocess0.11.10indirect
npmquerystring-es30.2.1indirect
npmrimraf6.1.3indirect
npmrindle2.0.0indirect
npmsinon22.1.0indirect
npmstream-browserify3.0.0indirect
npmtemp0.9.4indirect
npmterser-webpack-plugin5.6.1indirect
npmtmp0.2.7indirect
npmts-node10.9.2indirect
npmts-toolbelt9.6.0indirect
npmtypescript6.0.3indirect
npmurl0.11.4indirect
npmutil0.12.5indirect
npmwatch1.0.2indirect
npmwebpack5.108.4indirect
npmwebpack-bundle-analyzer4.10.2indirect
npmwebpack-cli7.2.1indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:balena-sdk@23.2.15 pulls in 112 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.