Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-21 16:43 UTC

bancolombia / devsecops-engine-tools

Toolchain for the evaluation of different devsecops practices

Python · TypeScriptAGPL-3.0★ 42 stars⑂ 19 forkssince Mar 2023View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined
#devsecops#scan

bancolombia/devsecops-engine-tools holds a health index of 95 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (100/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (62/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. 3 contributors account for most of its recent work.

95
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

95
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 82 is calibrated to 95 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Bancolombia S.AOrganization
513 followers102 public repossince Apr 2019

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
PyPIdevsecops-engine-tools1.174.22,96937712 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

94Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

97Exceptional
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 1 days ago
33.2/36Commit cadence — 48/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 663 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year663
human_commit_share0.98
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year48

Release discipline

90Excellent
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 12 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~4.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv1.174.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release12
mean_days_between_releases4.1

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

62Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

38Weak
How it's scored
26.2/60Stars — 42 stars
10.5/25Forks — 19 forks
1.7/15Watchers — 3 watchers
Inputs used
forks19
stars42
watchers3
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (AGPL-3.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges8
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io, sonarcloud.io, www.bestpractices.dev
has_pull_request_templateyes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

58Moderate
How it's scored
46.3/80Monthly downloads — 2,969 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesdevsecops-engine-tools
dependents—
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads2,969
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

82Excellent · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

77Good
How it's scored
36/54Bus factor — 3 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
17.4/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 22% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 30 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor3
contributors_sampled30
top_contributor_share0.225

Issue & PR responsiveness

83Excellent
How it's scored
38.3/42Issue resolution — 91% of issues closed
26.6/30PR acceptance — 607/684 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
7.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 7/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
merged_prs607
open_issues2
closed_issues21
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d5
prs_decided_30d5
issue_closed_ratio0.913
closed_unmerged_prs77
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

74Good
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
19.5/25Owner reach — 513 followers of bancolombia
25/25Track record — 102 public repos, account ~7 yr old
Inputs used
followers513
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginbancolombia
public_repos102
account_age_days2,731

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 12 days ago
20/20Version history — 377 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesdevsecops-engine-tools
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish12

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

100Exceptional · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

100Exceptional
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 13 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .eslintrc.json
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 9 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://bancolombia.github.io/devsecops-engine-tools/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 2 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsdevsecops, scan
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://bancolombia.github.io/devsecops-engine-tools/
docs_sitehttps://bancolombia.github.io/devsecops-engine-tools/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

69Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

65Good
How it's scored
6.8/7.5Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
3.8/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 9 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
1.2/2.5CII-Best-Practices — badge detected: Passing
3.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 7/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
4/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 8
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6/7.5Vulnerabilities — 2 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate6.5

Dependency advisories

85Excellent
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
10.2/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: certifi 2026.10.18 (high 7.4)
40/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory has been public longer than 90 days
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories2
affected_packages1
assessed_packages49
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 1
direct_affected_packages0
Matched the pypi:devsecops-engine-tools@1.174.2 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 49 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

64Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 97 of 98 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.99
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

76Good
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — ide_extension/intellij/build.gradle.kts (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .eslintrc.json
11/11Static type checking — ide_extension/vscode/devsecops/tsconfig.json, remote_config_generator/config-tool-generator/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 2 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
1/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configside_extension/vscode/devsecops/tsconfig.json, remote_config_generator/config-tool-generator/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestside_extension/intellij/build.gradle.kts
dependency_bot_commit_share0.02

Code legibility for models

82Excellent
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (ide_extension/vscode/devsecops/tsconfig.json, remote_config_generator/config-tool-generator/tsconfig.json)
54.9/55Manageable file sizes — 1/918 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes62,068
source_files_sampled918
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

42GitHub stars
30contributors
663commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
100releases
3bus factor
2open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 19 ⇿
0Stars
19Forks
94Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0481216201922024-102025-102026-09
Major 0Minor 49Patch 32

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.5 / 10
6.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-21 16:42 UTC

9Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests9 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
5CII-Best-Practicesbadge detected: Passing
5Code-ReviewFound 7/13 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
1Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
8SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 8
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
8Vulnerabilities2 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 97

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 97 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@angular-devkit/build-angular^17.2.3indirect
npm@angular/animations^17.2.0indirect
npm@angular/cli^17.2.3indirect
npm@angular/common^17.2.0indirect
npm@angular/compiler^17.2.0indirect
npm@angular/compiler-cli^17.2.0indirect
npm@angular/core^17.2.0indirect
npm@angular/forms^17.2.0indirect
npm@angular/platform-browser^17.2.0indirect
npm@angular/platform-browser-dynamic^17.2.0indirect
npm@angular/router^17.2.0indirect
npm@docusaurus/core^3.10.0indirect
npm@docusaurus/module-type-aliases^3.10.0indirect
npm@docusaurus/preset-classic^3.10.0indirect
npm@docusaurus/theme-mermaid^3.10.0indirect
npm@docusaurus/types^3.10.0indirect
npm@mdx-js/react^3.1.0indirect
npm@orama/plugin-docusaurus-v3^3.0.4indirect
npm@popperjs/core^2.11.8indirect
npm@semantic-release/changelog^6.0.3indirect
npm@semantic-release/commit-analyzer^13.0.1indirect
npm@semantic-release/git^10.0.1indirect
npm@semantic-release/github^11.0.2indirect
npm@semantic-release/release-notes-generator^14.0.3indirect
npm@types/archiver^7.0.0indirect
npm@types/form-data^2.5.2indirect
npm@types/jasmine~5.1.0indirect
npm@types/mocha^10.0.9indirect
npm@types/node^20.19.35indirect
npm@types/sinon^17.0.4indirect
npm@types/vscode^1.91.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin^7.18.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/parser^7.18.0indirect
npm@vscode/test-cli^0.0.9indirect
npm@vscode/test-electron^2.4.1indirect
npmarchiver^7.0.1indirect
npmbootstrap^5.3.3indirect
npmbootstrap-icons^1.11.3indirect
npmclsx^2.1.1indirect
npmeslint^8.57.1indirect
npmeslint-config-prettier^10.1.5indirect
npmform-data^4.0.5indirect
npmgenerator-code^1.11.9indirect
npmhusky^9.1.7indirect
npmjasmine-core~5.1.0indirect
npmkarma~6.4.0indirect
npmkarma-chrome-launcher~3.2.0indirect
npmkarma-coverage~2.2.0indirect
npmkarma-jasmine~5.1.0indirect
npmkarma-jasmine-html-reporter~2.1.0indirect
npmlint-staged^16.0.0indirect
npmmocha^11.1.0indirect
npmmocha-lcov-reporter^1.3.0indirect
npmnyc^17.1.0indirect
npmprettier^3.5.3indirect
npmprism-react-renderer^2.4.1indirect
npmreact^19.1.0indirect
npmreact-dom^19.1.0indirect
npmrxjs~7.8.0indirect
npmsemantic-release^24.2.4indirect
npmsinon^20.0.0indirect
npmtslib^2.3.0indirect
npmtypescript^5.4.5indirect
npmtypescript~5.3.2indirect
npmzone.js~0.14.3indirect
PyPIauthlib1.6.12indirect
PyPIazure-devops7.1.0b4indirect
PyPIblack26.3.1indirect
PyPIboto31.40.70indirect
PyPIcoverage-badge1.1.2indirect
PyPIcpe1.3.1indirect
PyPIdistro1.9.0indirect
PyPIdocker7.1.0indirect
PyPIflake87.1.1indirect
PyPIholidays0.81indirect
PyPImarshmallow4.1.2indirect
PyPIpackageurl-python0.13.4indirect
PyPIpexpect4.9.0indirect
PyPIpre-commit3.5.0indirect
PyPIprettytable3.16.0indirect
PyPIpyarrow23.0.1indirect
PyPIpyfiglet1.0.4indirect
PyPIpygithub2.8.1indirect
PyPIpyjwt2.15.0indirect
PyPIpytest9.0.3indirect
PyPIpytest-cov5.0.0indirect
PyPIpython-decouple3.8indirect
PyPIpytz2025.2indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.3indirect
PyPIrequests2.33.0indirect
PyPIrequests-toolbelt1.0.0indirect
PyPIrich14.1.0indirect
PyPIruamel-yaml0.18.15indirect
PyPIsetuptools83.0.0indirect
PyPIsympy1.14.0indirect
PyPItabulate0.9.0indirect
PyPIurllib32.8.0indirect
Dependency advisories 1

Installing pypi:devsecops-engine-tools@1.174.2 pulls in 49 packages, direct and transitive: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
certifi2026.10.18indirecthigh22026.10.19

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with bancolombia/devsecops-engine-tools. Read them side by side →

90pyupio/safetySafety checks Python dependencies for known security vulnerabilities and suggests the proper remediations for vulnerabilities detected.Excellent86jimmy058910/jmo-security-repoJMo Security Suite - Terminal-first security audit toolkit with many tools, multi-target scanning, & complianceExcellent99prowler-cloud/prowlerProwler is the world’s most widely used open-source cloud security platform that automates security and compliance across any cloud environment.Exceptional97CrowdStrike/falconpyThe CrowdStrike Falcon SDK for PythonExceptional96GitGuardian/ggshieldDetect and validate 500+ types of hardcoded secrets with advanced checks. Use it as a pre-commit hook, GitHub Action, or CLI for proactive secret detection and security.Exceptional96hashgraph-online/hol-guardOpen-source antivirus for AI agents: block risky tools, secret access, prompt injection, malicious packages, MCP servers, plugins, and skills at runtime.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.