Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-12 04:08 UTC

barisusakli / nodebb-plugin-imgur

A plugin that uploads images to imgur

JavaScript · Go TemplateNo license detected★ 17 stars⑂ 18 forkssince Feb 2014View on GitHub ↗

barisusakli/nodebb-plugin-imgur holds a health index of 35 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (57/100) and lowest on Security (21/100). It was last updated 57 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 40 is calibrated to 35 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Barış UşaklıPersonal account

171 followers122 public repossince Oct 2012@NodeBB

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
npm	nodebb-plugin-imgur	5.0.0	209,640	54	57 days ago	nodebb plugin imgur

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

43Weak · 21% of overall

Development activity

24At Risk

How it's scored

18/36	Push recency — last push 57 days ago
0.7/36	Commit cadence — 1/52 weeks with commits
4.3/18	Commit volume — 2 commits in the last year
1/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1

Inputs used

commits_last_year	2
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	57
active_weeks_last_year	1

Release discipline

72Good

How it's scored

16.2/27	Ships releases — 53 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36	Release recency — latest release 57 days ago
12.6/27	Release cadence — a release every ~237.9 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	53
latest_release_tag	v5.0.0
releases_from_tags	yes
days_since_latest_release	57
mean_days_between_releases	237.9

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

43Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

30At Risk

How it's scored

19.5/60	Stars — 17 stars
10.3/25	Forks — 18 forks
0/15	Watchers — 1 watchers

Inputs used

forks	18
stars	17
watchers	1
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

25At Risk

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
0/22.5	License — no license file detected
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	no
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

89Excellent

How it's scored

71/80	Monthly downloads — 209,640 downloads/month across npm
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	nodebb-plugin-imgur
dependents	—
ecosystems	npm
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	209,640
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

57Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

22At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.2/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 95% of commits
5.4/13.5	Contributor breadth — 4 contributors
6/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	4
top_contributor_share	0.948

Issue & PR responsiveness

58Moderate

How it's scored

33.6/42	Issue resolution — 80% of issues closed
16.7/30	PR acceptance — 5/9 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	5
open_issues	6
closed_issues	24
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	0.8
closed_unmerged_prs	4
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

64Moderate

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
16.1/25	Owner reach — 171 followers of barisusakli
25/25	Track record — 122 public repos, account ~13 yr old

Inputs used

followers	171
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	barisusakli
public_repos	122
account_age_days	5,077

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 57 days ago
20/20	Version history — 54 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	nodebb-plugin-imgur
ecosystems	npm
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	57

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

32At Risk · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

20At Risk

How it's scored

0/24	CI workflows
0/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — eslint.config.mjs
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
0/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data

Inputs used

has_ci	no
has_tests	no
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

50Moderate

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
10/10	Repository description
0/10	Topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	—
has_wiki	yes
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

21At Risk · 16% of overall

Security posture

15Critical

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5	CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
1.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
0/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
0/2.5	License — license file not detected
0.8/7.5	Maintained — 2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5	SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — no data
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 11 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	12
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	6
scorecard_aggregate	1.4

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

46Weak

How it's scored

17.9/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: request 2.88.2 (moderate 6.1)
6.7/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — 4 affected: form-data 2.3.3 (high 7.5), uuid 3.4.0 (high 7.5), qs 6.5.5 (moderate 5.3), +1 more
21.9/40	No advisories left outstanding — 5 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 1,275 days ago

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	7
affected_packages	5
assessed_packages	47
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	high 2, moderate 3
direct_affected_packages	1

Matched the npm:nodebb-plugin-imgur@5.0.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 47 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

24At Risk · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

11Critical

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
11.2/40	Legible commit history — 21 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.21
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

23At Risk

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
0/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — eslint.config.mjs
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	no
lockfiles	package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — JavaScript without a type-check config
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/2 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	JavaScript
largest_source_bytes	6,962
source_files_sampled	2
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

17GitHub stars

4contributors

2commits, last 12 months

57days since last push

53releases

1bus factor

6open issues

npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 18 ⇿

0Stars

18Forks

29Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 1Minor 2Patch 26

Each point covers 6 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 1.4 / 10

1.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-12 04:07 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/a	CI-Tests	no pull request found
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
6	Contributors	project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
n/a	Dangerous-Workflow	no workflows found
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
0	License	license file not detected
1	Maintained	2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
n/a	Pinned-Dependencies	no dependencies found
0	SAST	no SAST tool detected
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
n/a	Token-Permissions	No tokens found
0	Vulnerabilities	11 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 1

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
npm	request	`^2.88.2`	package.json

All dependencies 118

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 1 direct and 117 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	request	`2.88.2`	direct
npm	@eslint-community/eslint-utils	`4.9.1`	indirect
npm	@eslint-community/regexpp	`4.12.2`	indirect
npm	@eslint/config-array	`0.23.5`	indirect
npm	@eslint/config-helpers	`0.6.0`	indirect
npm	@eslint/core	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	@eslint/js	`10.0.1`	indirect
npm	@eslint/object-schema	`3.0.5`	indirect
npm	@eslint/plugin-kit	`0.7.2`	indirect
npm	@humanfs/core	`0.19.2`	indirect
npm	@humanfs/node	`0.16.8`	indirect
npm	@humanfs/types	`0.15.0`	indirect
npm	@humanwhocodes/module-importer	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@humanwhocodes/retry	`0.4.3`	indirect
npm	@stylistic/eslint-plugin	`5.10.0`	indirect
npm	@types/esrecurse	`4.3.1`	indirect
npm	@types/estree	`1.0.9`	indirect
npm	@types/json-schema	`7.0.15`	indirect
npm	@typescript-eslint/types	`8.64.0`	indirect
npm	acorn	`8.17.0`	indirect
npm	acorn-jsx	`5.3.2`	indirect
npm	ajv	`6.15.0`	indirect
npm	asn1	`0.2.4`	indirect
npm	assert-plus	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	asynckit	`0.4.0`	indirect
npm	aws-sign2	`0.7.0`	indirect
npm	aws4	`1.10.1`	indirect
npm	balanced-match	`4.0.4`	indirect
npm	bcrypt-pbkdf	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`5.0.7`	indirect
npm	caseless	`0.12.0`	indirect
npm	combined-stream	`1.0.8`	indirect
npm	core-util-is	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	cross-spawn	`7.0.6`	indirect
npm	dashdash	`1.14.1`	indirect
npm	debug	`4.4.3`	indirect
npm	deep-is	`0.1.4`	indirect
npm	delayed-stream	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	ecc-jsbn	`0.1.2`	indirect
npm	escape-string-regexp	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	eslint	`10.7.0`	indirect
npm	eslint-config-nodebb	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	eslint-scope	`9.1.2`	indirect
npm	eslint-visitor-keys	`3.4.3`	indirect
npm	eslint-visitor-keys	`4.2.1`	indirect
npm	eslint-visitor-keys	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	espree	`10.4.0`	indirect
npm	espree	`11.2.0`	indirect
npm	esquery	`1.7.0`	indirect
npm	esrecurse	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	estraverse	`5.3.0`	indirect
npm	esutils	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	extend	`3.0.2`	indirect
npm	extsprintf	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	fast-deep-equal	`3.1.3`	indirect
npm	fast-json-stable-stringify	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	fast-levenshtein	`2.0.6`	indirect
npm	file-entry-cache	`8.0.0`	indirect
npm	find-up	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	flat-cache	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	flatted	`3.4.2`	indirect
npm	forever-agent	`0.6.1`	indirect
npm	form-data	`2.3.3`	indirect
npm	getpass	`0.1.7`	indirect
npm	glob-parent	`6.0.2`	indirect
npm	globals	`17.3.0`	indirect
npm	har-schema	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	har-validator	`5.1.5`	indirect
npm	http-signature	`1.2.0`	indirect
npm	ignore	`5.2.0`	indirect
npm	imurmurhash	`0.1.4`	indirect
npm	is-extglob	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	is-glob	`4.0.3`	indirect
npm	is-typedarray	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	isexe	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	isstream	`0.1.2`	indirect
npm	jsbn	`0.1.1`	indirect
npm	json-buffer	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	json-schema	`0.2.3`	indirect
npm	json-schema-traverse	`0.4.1`	indirect
npm	json-stable-stringify-without-jsonify	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	json-stringify-safe	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	jsprim	`1.4.1`	indirect
npm	keyv	`4.5.4`	indirect
npm	levn	`0.4.1`	indirect
npm	locate-path	`6.0.0`	indirect
npm	mime-db	`1.44.0`	indirect
npm	mime-types	`2.1.27`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`10.2.5`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.1.3`	indirect
npm	natural-compare	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	oauth-sign	`0.9.0`	indirect
npm	optionator	`0.9.4`	indirect
npm	p-limit	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	p-locate	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	path-exists	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	path-key	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	performance-now	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`4.0.5`	indirect
npm	prelude-ls	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	psl	`1.8.0`	indirect
npm	punycode	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	qs	`6.5.2`	indirect
npm	safe-buffer	`5.2.1`	indirect
npm	safer-buffer	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	shebang-command	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	shebang-regex	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	sshpk	`1.16.1`	indirect
npm	tough-cookie	`2.5.0`	indirect
npm	tunnel-agent	`0.6.0`	indirect
npm	tweetnacl	`0.14.5`	indirect
npm	type-check	`0.4.0`	indirect
npm	uri-js	`4.4.0`	indirect
npm	uuid	`3.4.0`	indirect
npm	verror	`1.10.0`	indirect
npm	which	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	word-wrap	`1.2.5`	indirect
npm	yocto-queue	`0.1.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 5

Installing npm:nodebb-plugin-imgur@5.0.0 pulls in 47 packages, direct and transitive: 5 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct dependencies.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
form-data	`2.3.3`	indirect	high	2	`4.0.6`
uuid	`3.4.0`	indirect	high	1	`13.0.1`
request	`2.88.2`	direct	moderate	1	`3.0.0`
qs	`6.5.5`	indirect	moderate	2	`6.16.0`
tough-cookie	`2.5.0`	indirect	moderate	1	`4.1.3`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records