Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-22 07:16 UTC

basilisk-labs / agentplane

🛩️ Git-native workflow control for coding agents: approved plans, verification, and reviewable evidence for Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, and Aider.

TypeScript · JavaScriptMIT★ 88 stars⑂ 12 forkssince Jan 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

basilisk-labs/agentplane holds a health index of 86 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (90/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (60/100). It was last updated 2 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

86
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

86
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 72 is calibrated to 86 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Basilisk LabsOrganization
17 followers16 public repossince Nov 2025

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

90Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 2 days ago
26.3/36Commit cadence — 38/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 14,271 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year14,271
human_commit_share0.99
days_since_last_push2
active_weeks_last_year38
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 22 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~4.6 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv0.7.12
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release22
mean_days_between_releases4.6

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

64Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
31.5/60Stars — 88 stars
8.7/25Forks — 12 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks12
stars88
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges5
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
51.6/80Monthly downloads — 7,390 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@agentplaneorg/core, @agentplaneorg/recipes, agentplane
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads7,390
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

60Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2.7/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 88% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth — 3 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.881
How it's scored
41.9/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
27.6/30PR acceptance — 2,367/2,576 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/4 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs2,367
open_issues6
closed_issues3,567
prs_merged_7d6
prs_decided_7d6
prs_merged_30d54
prs_decided_30d54
issue_closed_ratio0.998
closed_unmerged_prs209
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
9/25Owner reach — 17 followers of basilisk-labs
10.8/25Track record — 16 public repos, account ~0 yr old
Inputs used
followers17
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginbasilisk-labs
public_repos16
account_age_days335

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 3 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 22 days ago
20/20Version history — 110 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@agentplaneorg/core, @agentplaneorg/recipes, agentplane
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish22

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

80Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 8 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 5 out of 5 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://agentplane.org
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 19 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsai-agents, cli, developer-tools, claude-code, codex, coding-agents, cursor, aider, agentplane, audit-trail, typescript, git-workflow, workflow-automation, agent-change-record, agentic-coding, ai-code-review, governance, local-first, verification
has_wikino
homepagehttps://agentplane.org
docs_sitehttps://agentplane.org
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

61Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
2.2/7.5Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 5 out of 5 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/4 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
1/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
4.5/5SAST — SAST tool detected but not run on all commits
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 22 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate5.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages37
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:agentplane@0.7.12 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 37 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

76Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, context/wiki/AGENTS.md, context/wiki/release-docs/concepts/agents.md, docs/examples/recipes-v2/agent.md, packages/agentplane/assets/AGENTS.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://agentplane.org/llms.txt)
24.2/40Legible commit history — 45 of 99 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://agentplane.org/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.455
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md, context/wiki/AGENTS.md, context/wiki/release-docs/concepts/agents.md, docs/examples/recipes-v2/agent.md, packages/agentplane/assets/AGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes11,751
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — packages/agentplane/tsconfig.json, packages/core/tsconfig.json, packages/recipes/tsconfig.json, packages/testkit/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 1 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
2/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configspackages/agentplane/tsconfig.json, packages/core/tsconfig.json, packages/recipes/tsconfig.json, packages/testkit/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.01
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
54.9/55Manageable file sizes — 4/2,921 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes867,701
source_files_sampled2,921
oversized_source_files4
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples, recipes
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples, recipes
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

88GitHub stars
3contributors
14,271commits, last 12 months
2days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
6open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 12 ⇿
0Stars
12Forks
100Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0246810121222026-022026-062026-10
Major 0Minor 5Patch 95
OpenSSF Scorecard 5.2 / 10
5.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-22 07:16 UTC

3Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests5 out of 5 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/4 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
2Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
9SASTSAST tool detected but not run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities22 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 15
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@agentplaneorg/core0.7.12packages/agentplane/package.json
npm@agentplaneorg/recipes0.7.12packages/agentplane/package.json
npm@clack/prompts^1.8.1packages/agentplane/package.json
npmyaml^2.7.1packages/agentplane/package.json
npmyauzl^3.4.0packages/agentplane/package.json
npmzod4.6.5packages/agentplane/package.json
npmzod-validation-error^5.0.0packages/agentplane/package.json
npmcanonicalize^3.0.0packages/core/package.json
npmexeca^9.6.1packages/core/package.json
npmyaml^2.8.2packages/core/package.json
npmzod4.6.5packages/core/package.json
npmzod-validation-error^5.0.0packages/core/package.json
npm@agentplaneorg/core0.7.12packages/recipes/package.json
npmzod4.6.5packages/recipes/package.json
npm@agentplaneorg/core0.7.12packages/testkit/package.json
All dependencies 73

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 19 direct and 54 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@agentplaneorg/core0.7.12direct
npm@agentplaneorg/core0.7.8direct
npm@agentplaneorg/recipes0.7.12direct
npm@agentplaneorg/recipes0.7.8direct
npm@clack/prompts1.8.1direct
npm@clack/prompts^1.8.1direct
npmcanonicalize3.0.0direct
npmcanonicalize^3.0.0direct
npmexeca9.6.1direct
npmexeca^9.6.1direct
npmyaml2.9.1direct
npmyaml^2.7.1direct
npmyaml^2.8.2direct
npmyauzl3.4.0direct
npmyauzl^3.4.0direct
npmzod4.6.4direct
npmzod4.6.5direct
npmzod-validation-error5.0.0direct
npmzod-validation-error^5.0.0direct
npm@agentplane/testkit0.0.0indirect
npm@clack/core1.5.1indirect
npm@eslint/js^10.0.1indirect
npm@sec-ant/readable-stream0.4.1indirect
npm@sindresorhus/merge-streams4.0.0indirect
npm@types/node^26.6.5indirect
npm@types/yauzl^3.4.0indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin^8.71.1indirect
npm@typescript-eslint/parser^8.71.1indirect
npm@vitest/coverage-v85.0.3indirect
npmagentplane0.7.8indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.6indirect
npmdependency-cruiser^18.5.0indirect
npmeslint^10.12.0indirect
npmeslint-config-prettier^10.1.8indirect
npmeslint-import-resolver-typescript^4.4.5indirect
npmeslint-plugin-import^2.32.0indirect
npmeslint-plugin-n^18.4.1indirect
npmeslint-plugin-promise^7.3.0indirect
npmeslint-plugin-unicorn^66.0.0indirect
npmfast-string-truncated-width3.0.3indirect
npmfast-string-width3.0.2indirect
npmfast-wrap-ansi0.2.2indirect
npmfigures6.1.0indirect
npmget-stream9.0.1indirect
npmglobals^17.13.0indirect
npmhuman-signals8.0.1indirect
npmis-plain-obj4.1.0indirect
npmis-stream4.0.1indirect
npmis-unicode-supported2.1.0indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmjscpd^5.4.1indirect
npmknip^6.41.0indirect
npmlefthook^2.2.1indirect
npmnpm-run-path6.0.0indirect
npmparse-ms4.0.0indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmpath-key4.0.0indirect
npmpend1.2.0indirect
npmprettier3.9.9indirect
npmpretty-ms9.3.1indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmsignal-exit4.1.0indirect
npmsisteransi1.0.5indirect
npmstrip-final-newline4.0.0indirect
npmtsup^8.5.1indirect
npmturbo^2.11.7indirect
npmtypescript6.0.3indirect
npmtypescript7.0.2indirect
npmunicorn-magic0.3.0indirect
npmvitest5.0.3indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmyoctocolors2.2.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:agentplane@0.7.12 pulls in 37 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.