Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-15 02:15 UTC

bavix / laravel-wallet

It's easy to work with a virtual wallet

PHPMIT★ 1,336 stars⑂ 247 forkssince Nov 2018View on GitHub ↗

bavix/laravel-wallet holds a health index of 89 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (92/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (38/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

89
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

89
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 75 is calibrated to 89 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

bavixOrganization · verified domain
15 followers133 public repossince Apr 2017

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistbavix/laravel-wallet12.1.080,56116618 days agocurrencypaymentsvirtuallaravelwalletcreditslaravel-packagelaravel-walletbavix

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

92Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
22.2/36Commit cadence — 32/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 213 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year213
human_commit_share0.83
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year32

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 18 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~18 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tag12.1.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release18
mean_days_between_releases18
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

68Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
50.7/60Stars — 1,336 stars
19.9/25Forks — 247 forks
8.9/15Watchers — 41 watchers
Inputs used
forks247
stars1,336
watchers41
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges9
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicescoveralls.io, opencollective.com, poser.pugx.org, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
65.4/80Monthly downloads — 80,561 downloads/month across packagist
7.6/20Registry dependents — 13 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesbavix/laravel-wallet
dependents13
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads1,502,643
monthly_downloads80,561
unverified_packages_excluded—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

73Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.6/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 93% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 25 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 7 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled25
top_contributor_share0.93
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
24/30PR acceptance — 579/724 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 2/2 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
7.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 2/4 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
merged_prs579
open_issues0
closed_issues373
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d3
prs_decided_30d3
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs145
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d2
first_time_prs_decided_30d2
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
8.7/25Owner reach — 15 followers of bavix
25/25Track record — 133 public repos, account ~9 yr old
Inputs used
followers15
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_loginbavix
public_repos133
account_age_days3,430

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 18 days ago
20/20Version history — 166 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesbavix/laravel-wallet
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish18

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

77Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 9 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 14 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://bavix.github.io/laravel-wallet/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 10 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicswallet, virtual, laravel, balance, eloquent, php, laravel-wallet, composer, purchase, multi-wallet
has_wikino
homepagehttps://bavix.github.io/laravel-wallet/
docs_sitehttps://bavix.github.io/laravel-wallet/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

68Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 14 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 2/4 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 7 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages136
unassessed_packages13
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 136 resolved dependencies against OSV. 13 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

38Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
23.1/40Legible commit history — 36 of 83 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.434
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
2/10Demonstrated agent practice — 1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 17 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.01
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.17
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/347 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes25,695
source_files_sampled347
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

1,336GitHub stars
25contributors
213commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npm, Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch npm package 'laravel-wallet' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 247 ⇿
0Stars
247Forks
99Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0408012016020024024052018-112022-102026-08
Major 6Minor 19Patch 55

Each point covers 8 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.0 / 10
6.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-15 02:14 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests14 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5Code-ReviewFound 2/4 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
10Contributorsproject has 7 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 5
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistbrick/math>=0.18.0 <1.0.0composer.json
Packagistilluminate/contracts^13.0composer.json
Packagistilluminate/database^13.0composer.json
Packagistramsey/uuid^4.0composer.json
npmvitepress^2.0.0-alpha.20package.json
All dependencies 149

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 5 direct and 144 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npmvitepress2.0.0-alpha.20direct
Packagistbrick/math—direct
Packagistilluminate/contracts—direct
Packagistilluminate/database—direct
Packagistramsey/uuid—direct
npm@babel/helper-string-parser7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/helper-validator-identifier7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/parser7.29.8indirect
npm@babel/types7.29.8indirect
npm@docsearch/css4.7.0indirect
npm@docsearch/js4.7.0indirect
npm@docsearch/sidepanel-js4.7.0indirect
npm@iconify-json/simple-icons1.2.93indirect
npm@iconify/types2.0.0indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@oxc-project/types0.148.0indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm-eabi1.2.7indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm641.2.7indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm641.2.7indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-x641.2.7indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x641.2.7indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.2.7indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu1.2.7indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl1.2.7indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu1.2.7indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu1.2.7indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu1.2.7indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl1.2.7indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm641.2.7indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc1.2.7indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc1.2.7indirect
npm@rolldown/pluginutils1.0.1indirect
npm@shikijs/core4.4.3indirect
npm@shikijs/engine-javascript4.4.3indirect
npm@shikijs/engine-oniguruma4.4.3indirect
npm@shikijs/langs4.4.3indirect
npm@shikijs/primitive4.4.3indirect
npm@shikijs/themes4.4.3indirect
npm@shikijs/transformers4.4.3indirect
npm@shikijs/types4.4.3indirect
npm@shikijs/vscode-textmate10.0.2indirect
npm@types/hast3.0.5indirect
npm@types/linkify-it5.0.0indirect
npm@types/markdown-it14.1.2indirect
npm@types/mdast4.0.4indirect
npm@types/mdurl2.0.0indirect
npm@types/unist3.0.3indirect
npm@types/web-bluetooth0.0.21indirect
npm@ungap/structured-clone1.4.0indirect
npm@vitejs/plugin-vue6.0.8indirect
npm@vue/compiler-core3.5.41indirect
npm@vue/compiler-dom3.5.41indirect
npm@vue/compiler-sfc3.5.41indirect
npm@vue/compiler-ssr3.5.41indirect
npm@vue/devtools-api8.2.1indirect
npm@vue/devtools-kit8.2.1indirect
npm@vue/devtools-shared8.2.1indirect
npm@vue/reactivity3.5.41indirect
npm@vue/runtime-core3.5.41indirect
npm@vue/runtime-dom3.5.41indirect
npm@vue/server-renderer3.5.41indirect
npm@vue/shared3.5.41indirect
npm@vueuse/core14.4.0indirect
npm@vueuse/integrations14.4.0indirect
npm@vueuse/metadata14.4.0indirect
npm@vueuse/shared14.4.0indirect
npmbirpc2.9.0indirect
npmccount2.0.1indirect
npmcharacter-entities-html42.1.0indirect
npmcharacter-entities-legacy3.0.0indirect
npmcomma-separated-tokens2.0.3indirect
npmcsstype3.2.3indirect
npmdequal2.0.3indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmdevlop1.1.0indirect
npmentities7.0.1indirect
npmestree-walker2.0.2indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmfocus-trap8.2.2indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmhast-util-to-html9.0.5indirect
npmhast-util-whitespace3.0.0indirect
npmhookable5.5.3indirect
npmhtml-void-elements3.0.0indirect
npmlightningcss1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-android-arm641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-arm641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-x641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-freebsd-x641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-musl1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-gnu1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-musl1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-x64-msvc1.33.0indirect
npmmagic-string0.30.21indirect
npmmark.js8.11.1indirect
npmmdast-util-to-hast13.2.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-character2.1.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-encode2.0.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-sanitize-uri2.0.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-symbol2.0.1indirect
npmmicromark-util-types2.0.2indirect
npmminisearch7.2.0indirect
npmnanoid3.3.18indirect
npmoniguruma-parser0.12.2indirect
npmoniguruma-to-es4.3.6indirect
npmperfect-debounce2.1.0indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.5indirect
npmpostcss8.5.28indirect
npmproperty-information7.2.0indirect
npmregex6.1.0indirect
npmregex-recursion6.0.2indirect
npmregex-utilities2.3.0indirect
npmrolldown1.2.7indirect
npmshiki4.4.3indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.1indirect
npmspace-separated-tokens2.0.2indirect
npmstringify-entities4.0.4indirect
npmtabbable6.5.0indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.17indirect
npmtrim-lines3.0.1indirect
npmunist-util-is6.0.1indirect
npmunist-util-position5.0.0indirect
npmunist-util-stringify-position4.0.0indirect
npmunist-util-visit5.1.0indirect
npmunist-util-visit-parents6.0.2indirect
npmvfile6.0.3indirect
npmvfile-message4.0.3indirect
npmvite8.2.2indirect
npmvue3.5.41indirect
npmzwitch2.0.4indirect
Packagistdeptrac/deptrac—indirect
Packagistdriftingly/rector-laravel2.5.0indirect
Packagistergebnis/phpstan-rules2.13.1indirect
Packagistext-json—indirect
Packagistext-pdo—indirect
Packagistinfection/infection—indirect
Packagistlarastan/larastan3.11.0indirect
Packagistlaravel/cashier—indirect
Packagistnunomaduro/collision—indirect
Packagistorchestra/testbench—indirect
Packagistphp—indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan2.2.13indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit—indirect
Packagistrector/rector2.6.6indirect
Packagistsymplify/easy-coding-standard13.3.2indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 136 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 13 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.