Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-14 13:37 UTC

bearsunday / BEAR.QueryRepository

Resource Query Responsibility Segregation (RQRS) is a caching framework for BEAR.Sunday that optimizes performance by separating query and command responsibilities. It features event-driven cache invalidation, dependency resolution, donut caching, CDN integration, and conditional requests.

PHPMIT★ 6 stars⑂ 9 forkssince Dec 2014View on GitHub ↗

bearsunday/BEAR.QueryRepository holds a health index of 84 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (84/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (48/100). It was last updated 6 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

84
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

84
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 71 is calibrated to 84 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

BEAR.SundayOrganization
9 followers69 public repossince Nov 2011

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistbear/query-repository1.16.221,5058577 days agocachingetagevent-driven-contentdonut-caching

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

83Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 6 days ago
13.2/36Commit cadence19/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume323 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 13 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year323
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push6
active_weeks_last_year19
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases73 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 77 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~59.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count73
latest_release_tag1.16.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release77
mean_days_between_releases59.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

48Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
11.3/60Stars6 stars
7.5/25Forks9 forks
1.7/15Watchers3 watchers
Inputs used
forks9
stars6
watchers3
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicescodecov.io, github.com
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
57.8/80Monthly downloads21,505 downloads/month across packagist
5.2/20Registry dependents5 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesbear/query-repository
dependents5
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads632,891
monthly_downloads21,505
unverified_packages_excluded

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

65Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.1/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 95% of commits
12.2/13.5Contributor breadth9 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 8 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled9
top_contributor_share0.953
How it's scored
34/42Issue resolution81% of issues closed
27.1/30PR acceptance175/194 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
7.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 4/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
merged_prs175
open_issues4
closed_issues17
prs_merged_7d2
prs_decided_7d2
prs_merged_30d22
prs_decided_30d22
issue_closed_ratio0.81
closed_unmerged_prs19
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
7.2/25Owner reach9 followers of bearsunday
25/25Track record69 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers9
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginbearsunday
public_repos69
account_age_days5,407

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 77 days ago
20/20Version history85 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesbear/query-repository
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish77

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

84Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter configphpcs.xml, phpstan.neon
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

85Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics4 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsbearsunday, bearsunday-module, cqrs, php
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

73Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3.8/7.5Code-ReviewFound 4/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 8 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 13 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate6.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories1
affected_packages1
assessed_packages60
unassessed_packages20
affected_by_severityhigh 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 60 resolved dependencies against OSV. 20 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

70Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructionsCLAUDE.md
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)llms.txt present
40/40Legible commit history83 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.83
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes6,526
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format configphpcs.xml, phpstan.neon
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
5/8Automated maintenancedependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilescomposer.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codePHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes0/359 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes24,640
source_files_sampled359
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

6GitHub stars
9contributors
323commits, last 12 months
6days since last push
73releases
1bus factor
4open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 9 ⇿
0Stars
9Forks
63Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0246810912015-032020-042025-04
Major 1Minor 12Patch 49

Each point covers 10 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.6 / 10
6.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-14 13:36 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5Code-ReviewFound 4/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
10Contributorsproject has 8 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 13 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 11
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistbear/resource^1.16.1composer.json
Packagistbear/sunday^1.5composer.json
Packagistkoriym/semantic-logger^0.9composer.json
Packagistpsr/cache^1.0 || ^2.0 || ^3.0composer.json
Packagistpsr/log^1.1 || ^2.0 || ^3.0composer.json
Packagistray/aop^2.19.1composer.json
Packagistray/di^2.20composer.json
Packagistray/psr-cache-module^1.5.1composer.json
Packagistsymfony/cache^5.3 || ^6.0 || ^7.3composer.json
Packagistsymfony/cache-contracts^2.4 || ^3.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php83^v1.32.0composer.json
All dependencies 80

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 12 direct and 68 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistbear/resourcedirect
Packagistbear/sundaydirect
Packagistkoriym/semantic-loggerdirect
Packagistpsr/cachedirect
Packagistpsr/logdirect
Packagistpsr/log3.0.2direct
Packagistray/aopdirect
Packagistray/didirect
Packagistray/psr-cache-moduledirect
Packagistsymfony/cachedirect
Packagistsymfony/cache-contractsdirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php83direct
Packagistamphp/amp3.1.1indirect
Packagistamphp/byte-stream2.1.2indirect
Packagistamphp/cache2.0.1indirect
Packagistamphp/dns2.4.0indirect
Packagistamphp/parallel2.3.2indirect
Packagistamphp/parser1.1.1indirect
Packagistamphp/pipeline1.2.3indirect
Packagistamphp/process2.0.3indirect
Packagistamphp/serialization1.0.0indirect
Packagistamphp/socket2.3.1indirect
Packagistamphp/sync2.3.0indirect
Packagistbamarni/composer-bin-pluginindirect
Packagistbear/fastly-moduleindirect
Packagistcomposer/pcre3.3.2indirect
Packagistcomposer/semver3.4.4indirect
Packagistcomposer/xdebug-handler3.0.5indirect
Packagistdanog/advanced-json-rpc3.2.2indirect
Packagistdaverandom/libdns2.1.0indirect
Packagistdealerdirect/phpcodesniffer-composer-installer1.1.2indirect
Packagistdnoegel/php-xdg-base-dir0.1.1indirect
Packagistdoctrine/coding-standard14.0.0indirect
Packagistdoctrine/deprecations1.1.5indirect
Packagistfelixfbecker/language-server-protocol1.5.3indirect
Packagistfidry/cpu-core-counter1.3.0indirect
Packagistkelunik/certificate1.1.3indirect
Packagistleague/uri7.5.1indirect
Packagistleague/uri-interfaces7.5.0indirect
Packagistmadapaja/twig-moduleindirect
Packagistmobiledetect/mobiledetectlibindirect
Packagistnetresearch/jsonmapper5.0.0indirect
Packagistnikic/php-parser5.6.2indirect
Packagistpdepend/pdepend2.16.2indirect
Packagistphpindirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/reflection-common2.2.0indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/reflection-docblock5.6.3indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/type-resolver1.10.0indirect
Packagistphpmd/phpmd2.15.0indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpdoc-parser2.3.0indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan2.1.31indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunitindirect
Packagistpredis/predisindirect
Packagistpsr/container2.0.2indirect
Packagistpsr/http-factory1.1.0indirect
Packagistpsr/http-message2.0indirect
Packagistrector/rector2.2.7indirect
Packagistrector/swiss-knife2.3.3indirect
Packagistrevolt/event-loop1.0.7indirect
Packagistsebastian/diff7.0.0indirect
Packagistslevomat/coding-standard8.24.0indirect
Packagistspatie/array-to-xml3.4.0indirect
Packagistsquizlabs/php_codesniffer4.0.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/config7.3.6indirect
Packagistsymfony/console7.3.6indirect
Packagistsymfony/dependency-injection7.3.6indirect
Packagistsymfony/deprecation-contracts3.6.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/filesystem7.3.6indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-ctype1.33.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-grapheme1.33.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-normalizer1.33.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-mbstring1.33.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php841.33.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/processindirect
Packagistsymfony/service-contracts3.6.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/string7.3.4indirect
Packagistsymfony/var-exporter7.3.4indirect
Packagisttwig/twigindirect
Packagistvimeo/psalm6.13.1indirect
Packagistwebmozart/assert1.12.1indirect
Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 60 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 20 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
squizlabs/php_codesniffer4.0.0indirecthigh14.0.2

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPackagist.