Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-08 19:59 UTC

bearsunday / BEAR.Resource

A hypermedia framework for an object as a service

PHPMIT★ 47 stars⑂ 20 forkssince Oct 2011View on GitHub ↗

bearsunday/BEAR.Resource holds a health index of 89 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (90/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (58/100). It was last updated 3 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 75 is calibrated to 89 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

BEAR.SundayOrganization

9 followers69 public repossince Nov 2011

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
Packagist	bear/resource	1.34.0	31,717	148	11 days ago	rest hypermedia object-as-a-service

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

88Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

80Excellent

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 3 days ago
15.9/36	Commit cadence — 23/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 190 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 16 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	190
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	3
active_weeks_last_year	23

Release discipline

100Exceptional

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 11 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~43.9 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	100
latest_release_tag	1.34.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	11
mean_days_between_releases	43.9

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

59Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

42Weak

How it's scored

27/60	Stars — 47 stars
10.7/25	Forks — 20 forks
4.7/15	Watchers — 8 watchers

Inputs used

forks	20
stars	47
watchers	8
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

70Good

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	2
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	codecov.io, github.com
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

71Good

How it's scored

60/80	Monthly downloads — 31,717 downloads/month across packagist
10.6/20	Registry dependents — 38 packages depend on it

Inputs used

packages	bear/resource
dependents	38
ecosystems	packagist
total_downloads	738,345
monthly_downloads	31,717
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

67Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

33At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.7/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 97% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 15 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 9 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	15
top_contributor_share	0.97

Issue & PR responsiveness

86Excellent

How it's scored

40.6/42	Issue resolution — 97% of issues closed
27.1/30	PR acceptance — 287/318 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
7.5/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 6/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5

Inputs used

merged_prs	287
open_issues	2
closed_issues	58
prs_merged_7d	1
prs_decided_7d	1
prs_merged_30d	2
prs_decided_30d	2
issue_closed_ratio	0.967
closed_unmerged_prs	31
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

62Moderate

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
7.2/25	Owner reach — 9 followers of bearsunday
25/25	Track record — 69 public repos, account ~14 yr old

Inputs used

followers	9
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	no
owner_login	bearsunday
public_repos	69
account_age_days	5,401

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 11 days ago
20/20	Version history — 148 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	bear/resource
ecosystems	packagist
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	11

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

90Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

84Excellent

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — phpcs.xml, phpstan.neon
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 9 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

100Exceptional

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://packagist.org/packages/bear/resource
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 4 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	rest, hypermedia, api, bearsunday
has_wiki	yes
homepage	https://packagist.org/packages/bear/resource
docs_site	https://packagist.org/packages/bear/resource
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

72Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

65Good

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 9 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3.8/7.5	Code-Review — Found 6/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 9 contributing companies or organizations
0/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 16 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — no data
6.8/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 1 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	12
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	6
scorecard_aggregate	6.5

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	1
affected_packages	1
assessed_packages	70
unassessed_packages	23
affected_by_severity	high 1
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 70 resolved dependencies against OSV. 23 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

58Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

52Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://bearsunday.github.io/llms.txt)
36.8/40	Legible commit history — 69 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	yes
llms_txt_url	https://bearsunday.github.io/llms.txt
legible_history_share	0.69
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

64Moderate

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — phpcs.xml, phpstan.neon
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 26 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
5/8	Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	composer.lock
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0.26
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/408 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	PHP
largest_source_bytes	17,114
source_files_sampled	408
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

47GitHub stars

15contributors

190commits, last 12 months

3days since last push

100releases

1bus factor

2open issues

Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 20 ⇿

0Stars

20Forks

91Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 22Patch 69

Each point covers 12 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.5 / 10

6.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-08 19:58 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10	CI-Tests	9 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
5	Code-Review	Found 6/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
10	Contributors	project has 9 contributing companies or organizations
n/a	Dangerous-Workflow	no workflows found
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	16 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
n/a	Pinned-Dependencies	no dependencies found
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
n/a	Token-Permissions	No tokens found
9	Vulnerabilities	1 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 9

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Packagist	justinrainbow/json-schema	`^5.3 \|\| ^6.0`	composer.json
Packagist	koriym/http-constants	`^1.1`	composer.json
Packagist	koriym/hal	`^1.1`	composer.json
Packagist	psr/log	`^1.1 \|\| ^2.0 \|\| ^3.0`	composer.json
Packagist	ray/aop	`^2.18.0`	composer.json
Packagist	ray/di	`^2.18.0`	composer.json
Packagist	rize/uri-template	`^0.4.1`	composer.json
Packagist	ray/input-query	`^1.1`	composer.json
Packagist	koriym/file-upload	`^1.0`	composer.json

All dependencies 93

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 10 direct and 83 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Packagist	justinrainbow/json-schema	`—`	direct
Packagist	koriym/file-upload	`—`	direct
Packagist	koriym/hal	`—`	direct
Packagist	koriym/http-constants	`—`	direct
Packagist	psr/log	`—`	direct
Packagist	psr/log	`3.0.2`	direct
Packagist	ray/aop	`—`	direct
Packagist	ray/di	`—`	direct
Packagist	ray/input-query	`—`	direct
Packagist	rize/uri-template	`—`	direct
Packagist	amphp/amp	`3.1.1`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/byte-stream	`2.1.2`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/cache	`2.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/dns	`2.4.0`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/parallel	`2.4.0`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/parser	`1.1.1`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/pipeline	`1.2.4`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/process	`2.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/serialization	`1.1.0`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/socket	`2.4.0`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/sync	`2.3.0`	indirect
Packagist	bamarni/composer-bin-plugin	`—`	indirect
Packagist	bear/devtools	`—`	indirect
Packagist	composer/pcre	`3.3.2`	indirect
Packagist	composer/semver	`3.4.4`	indirect
Packagist	composer/xdebug-handler	`3.0.5`	indirect
Packagist	danog/advanced-json-rpc	`3.2.3`	indirect
Packagist	daverandom/libdns	`2.1.0`	indirect
Packagist	dealerdirect/phpcodesniffer-composer-installer	`1.1.2`	indirect
Packagist	dnoegel/php-xdg-base-dir	`0.1.1`	indirect
Packagist	doctrine/coding-standard	`14.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	doctrine/deprecations	`1.1.6`	indirect
Packagist	ext-ctype	`—`	indirect
Packagist	ext-curl	`—`	indirect
Packagist	ext-fileinfo	`—`	indirect
Packagist	ext-filter	`—`	indirect
Packagist	felixfbecker/language-server-protocol	`1.5.3`	indirect
Packagist	fidry/cpu-core-counter	`1.3.0`	indirect
Packagist	kelunik/certificate	`1.1.3`	indirect
Packagist	koriym/json-schema-faker	`—`	indirect
Packagist	koriym/php-server	`—`	indirect
Packagist	league/uri	`7.8.1`	indirect
Packagist	league/uri-interfaces	`7.8.1`	indirect
Packagist	maglnet/composer-require-checker	`4.7.1`	indirect
Packagist	netresearch/jsonmapper	`5.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	nikic/php-parser	`4.19.4`	indirect
Packagist	nikic/php-parser	`5.7.0`	indirect
Packagist	pdepend/pdepend	`2.16.2`	indirect
Packagist	php	`—`	indirect
Packagist	phpdocumentor/reflection-common	`2.2.0`	indirect
Packagist	phpdocumentor/reflection-docblock	`—`	indirect
Packagist	phpdocumentor/reflection-docblock	`6.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	phpdocumentor/type-resolver	`2.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	phpmd/phpmd	`2.15.0`	indirect
Packagist	phpstan/phpdoc-parser	`2.3.2`	indirect
Packagist	phpstan/phpstan	`2.2.1`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/phpunit	`—`	indirect
Packagist	psalm/psalm-plugin-api	`0.1.0`	indirect
Packagist	psr/container	`2.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	psr/http-factory	`1.1.0`	indirect
Packagist	psr/http-message	`2.0`	indirect
Packagist	ray/compiler	`—`	indirect
Packagist	revolt/event-loop	`1.0.9`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/diff	`8.3.0`	indirect
Packagist	slevomat/coding-standard	`8.24.0`	indirect
Packagist	spatie/array-to-xml	`3.4.4`	indirect
Packagist	squizlabs/php_codesniffer	`4.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/config	`7.3.6`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/console	`6.4.27`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/console	`8.0.13`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/dependency-injection	`7.3.6`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/deprecation-contracts	`3.6.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/deprecation-contracts	`3.7.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/filesystem	`7.4.11`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-ctype	`1.33.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-ctype	`1.37.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-intl-grapheme	`1.33.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-intl-grapheme	`1.38.1`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-intl-normalizer	`1.33.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-intl-normalizer	`1.38.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-mbstring	`1.33.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-mbstring	`1.38.1`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-php84	`1.38.1`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/service-contracts	`3.6.1`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/service-contracts	`3.7.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/string	`6.4.26`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/string	`8.1.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/var-exporter	`7.3.4`	indirect
Packagist	vimeo/psalm	`—`	indirect
Packagist	webmozart/assert	`—`	indirect
Packagist	webmozart/assert	`1.12.1`	indirect
Packagist	webmozart/assert	`2.4.0`	indirect
Packagist	webmozart/glob	`4.7.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 70 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 23 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
squizlabs/php_codesniffer	`4.0.1`	indirect	high	1	`4.0.2`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records