Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-15 20:00 UTC

bearsunday / BEAR.Resource

A hypermedia framework for an object as a service

PHPMIT★ 46 stars⑂ 20 forkssince Oct 2011View on GitHub ↗

bearsunday/BEAR.Resource holds a health index of 88 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (90/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (38/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

88
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

88
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 74 is calibrated to 88 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

BEAR.SundayOrganization
9 followers69 public repossince Nov 2011

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistbear/resource1.33.014,91714724 days agoresthypermediaobject-as-a-service

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

87Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
14.5/36Commit cadence21/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume183 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 7 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year183
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year21

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases100 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 24 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~37.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tag1.33.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release24
mean_days_between_releases37.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

58Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
26.8/60Stars46 stars
10.7/25Forks20 forks
4.7/15Watchers8 watchers
Inputs used
forks20
stars46
watchers8
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
55.6/80Monthly downloads14,917 downloads/month across packagist
10.5/20Registry dependents37 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagesbear/resource
dependents37
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads695,495
monthly_downloads14,917
unverified_packages_excluded

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

72Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.7/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 97% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth16 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 9 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled16
top_contributor_share0.968
How it's scored
41.3/42Issue resolution98% of issues closed
27.1/30PR acceptance285/316 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
9/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 5/8 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
merged_prs285
open_issues1
closed_issues58
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.983
closed_unmerged_prs31
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
7.2/25Owner reach9 followers of bearsunday
25/25Track record69 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers9
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginbearsunday
public_repos69
account_age_days5,346
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 24 days ago
20/20Version history147 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesbear/resource
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish24

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

90Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter configphpcs.xml, phpstan.neon
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

100Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://packagist.org/packages/bear/resource
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics4 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsrest, hypermedia, api, bearsunday
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://packagist.org/packages/bear/resource
docs_sitehttps://packagist.org/packages/bear/resource
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

67Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4.5/7.5Code-ReviewFound 5/8 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 9 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 7 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate6.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

38Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format configphpcs.xml, phpstan.neon
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
5/8Automated maintenancedependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilescomposer.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codePHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes0/406 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes17,114
source_files_sampled406
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

46GitHub stars
16contributors
183commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
1open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.7 / 10
6.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-15 20:00 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests7 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6Code-ReviewFound 5/8 approved changesets -- score normalized to 6
10Contributorsproject has 9 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 7 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 9
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistjustinrainbow/json-schema^5.3 || ^6.0composer.json
Packagistkoriym/http-constants^1.1composer.json
Packagistkoriym/hal^1.1composer.json
Packagistpsr/log^1.1 || ^2.0 || ^3.0composer.json
Packagistray/aop^2.18.0composer.json
Packagistray/di^2.18.0composer.json
Packagistrize/uri-template^0.4.1composer.json
Packagistray/input-query^1.1composer.json
Packagistkoriym/file-upload^1.0composer.json
All dependencies 93

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 10 direct and 83 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistjustinrainbow/json-schemadirect
Packagistkoriym/file-uploaddirect
Packagistkoriym/haldirect
Packagistkoriym/http-constantsdirect
Packagistpsr/logdirect
Packagistpsr/log3.0.2direct
Packagistray/aopdirect
Packagistray/didirect
Packagistray/input-querydirect
Packagistrize/uri-templatedirect
Packagistamphp/amp3.1.1indirect
Packagistamphp/byte-stream2.1.2indirect
Packagistamphp/cache2.0.1indirect
Packagistamphp/dns2.4.0indirect
Packagistamphp/parallel2.4.0indirect
Packagistamphp/parser1.1.1indirect
Packagistamphp/pipeline1.2.4indirect
Packagistamphp/process2.0.3indirect
Packagistamphp/serialization1.1.0indirect
Packagistamphp/socket2.4.0indirect
Packagistamphp/sync2.3.0indirect
Packagistbamarni/composer-bin-pluginindirect
Packagistbear/devtoolsindirect
Packagistcomposer/pcre3.3.2indirect
Packagistcomposer/semver3.4.4indirect
Packagistcomposer/xdebug-handler3.0.5indirect
Packagistdanog/advanced-json-rpc3.2.3indirect
Packagistdaverandom/libdns2.1.0indirect
Packagistdealerdirect/phpcodesniffer-composer-installer1.1.2indirect
Packagistdnoegel/php-xdg-base-dir0.1.1indirect
Packagistdoctrine/coding-standard14.0.0indirect
Packagistdoctrine/deprecations1.1.6indirect
Packagistext-ctypeindirect
Packagistext-curlindirect
Packagistext-fileinfoindirect
Packagistext-filterindirect
Packagistfelixfbecker/language-server-protocol1.5.3indirect
Packagistfidry/cpu-core-counter1.3.0indirect
Packagistkelunik/certificate1.1.3indirect
Packagistkoriym/json-schema-fakerindirect
Packagistkoriym/php-serverindirect
Packagistleague/uri7.8.1indirect
Packagistleague/uri-interfaces7.8.1indirect
Packagistmaglnet/composer-require-checker4.7.1indirect
Packagistnetresearch/jsonmapper5.0.1indirect
Packagistnikic/php-parser4.19.4indirect
Packagistnikic/php-parser5.7.0indirect
Packagistpdepend/pdepend2.16.2indirect
Packagistphpindirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/reflection-common2.2.0indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/reflection-docblockindirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/reflection-docblock6.0.3indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/type-resolver2.0.0indirect
Packagistphpmd/phpmd2.15.0indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpdoc-parser2.3.2indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan2.2.1indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunitindirect
Packagistpsalm/psalm-plugin-api0.1.0indirect
Packagistpsr/container2.0.2indirect
Packagistpsr/http-factory1.1.0indirect
Packagistpsr/http-message2.0indirect
Packagistray/compilerindirect
Packagistrevolt/event-loop1.0.9indirect
Packagistsebastian/diff8.3.0indirect
Packagistslevomat/coding-standard8.24.0indirect
Packagistspatie/array-to-xml3.4.4indirect
Packagistsquizlabs/php_codesniffer4.0.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/config7.3.6indirect
Packagistsymfony/console6.4.27indirect
Packagistsymfony/console8.0.13indirect
Packagistsymfony/dependency-injection7.3.6indirect
Packagistsymfony/deprecation-contracts3.6.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/deprecation-contracts3.7.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/filesystem7.4.11indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-ctype1.33.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-ctype1.37.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-grapheme1.33.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-grapheme1.38.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-normalizer1.33.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-normalizer1.38.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-mbstring1.33.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-mbstring1.38.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php841.38.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/service-contracts3.6.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/service-contracts3.7.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/string6.4.26indirect
Packagistsymfony/string8.1.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/var-exporter7.3.4indirect
Packagistvimeo/psalmindirect
Packagistwebmozart/assertindirect
Packagistwebmozart/assert1.12.1indirect
Packagistwebmozart/assert2.4.0indirect
Packagistwebmozart/glob4.7.0indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPackagist.