Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-17 17:36 UTC

beepboop2025 / seiche

Free AGPL funding and market-context research for international workflows. A LiquiLens product, connected to institution evidence and Undertow liquidity via API/MCP.

PythonAGPL-3.0★ 1 star⑂ 0 forkssince Jul 2026View on GitHub ↗

KindCommand-line toolNetwork serviceMCP serverWeb interfacehow this is determined

beepboop2025/seiche holds a health index of 77 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (84/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (47/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 66 is calibrated to 77 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Palimpsest MaintainerPersonal account

9 followers88 public repossince Jun 2025

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
PyPI	seiche	0.16.5	2,338	36	0 days ago	capital-markets financial-data funding-liquidity mcp model-context-protocol money-markets open-data research

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

84Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

74Good

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
10.4/36	Commit cadence — 15/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 1,096 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 7 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	1,096
human_commit_share	0.99
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	15

Release discipline

100Exceptional

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 29 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~1.8 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	29
latest_release_tag	v0.16.5
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	0
mean_days_between_releases	1.8

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

47Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

1Critical

How it's scored

0/60	Stars — 1 stars
0/25	Forks — 0 forks
0/15	Watchers — 1 watchers

Inputs used

forks	0
stars	1
watchers	1
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

92Excellent

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (AGPL-3.0)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
6.3/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	1
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	yes
readme_badge_services	shields.io
has_pull_request_template	yes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

56Moderate

How it's scored

44.9/80	Monthly downloads — 2,338 downloads/month across pypi
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	seiche
dependents	—
ecosystems	pypi
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	2,338
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

49Weak · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

17Critical

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.5/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 98% of commits
4.1/13.5	Contributor breadth — 3 contributors
3/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	3
top_contributor_share	0.977

Issue & PR responsiveness

54Moderate

How it's scored

21/42	Issue resolution — 50% of issues closed
26.4/30	PR acceptance — 287/326 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	287
open_issues	4
closed_issues	4
prs_merged_7d	28
prs_decided_7d	28
prs_merged_30d	55
prs_decided_30d	55
issue_closed_ratio	0.5
closed_unmerged_prs	39
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

41Weak

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
7.2/25	Owner reach — 9 followers of beepboop2025
15.7/25	Track record — 88 public repos, account ~1 yr old

Inputs used

followers	9
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	beepboop2025
public_repos	88
account_age_days	493

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20	Version history — 36 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	seiche
ecosystems	pypi
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

77Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

68Good

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 26 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 13 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

90Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://seiche.info
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 20 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	agpl, early-warning, federal-reserve, finance, fintech, liquidity, macroeconomics, market-data, money-markets, open-source, mcp, mcp-server, model-context-protocol, macro-finance, open-data, risk-monitoring, funding-markets, agent-skills, capital-markets, liquilens
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://seiche.info
docs_site	https://seiche.info
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

74Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

68Good

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 13 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 0/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5	Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 7 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
3/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 6
5/5	SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	17
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	1
scorecard_aggregate	6.8

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	0
affected_packages	0
assessed_packages	211
unassessed_packages	21
affected_by_severity	none
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 211 resolved dependencies against OSV. 21 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

66Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

74Good

How it's scored

45/45	Agent instructions — integrations/hermes/AGENTS.md
15/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://seiche.info/llms.txt)
14.5/40	Legible commit history — 27 of 99 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	yes
llms_txt_url	https://seiche.info/llms.txt
legible_history_share	0.273
agent_instruction_files	integrations/hermes/AGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes	5,192

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

57Moderate

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — frontend/tsconfig.json, integrations/openbb/openbb_seiche/py.typed
10/10	Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8	Automated maintenance — 1 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
6/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 6

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	package-lock.json, uv.lock
has_dockerfile	yes
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	frontend/tsconfig.json, integrations/openbb/openbb_seiche/py.typed
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.01

Code legibility for models

79Good

How it's scored

27/45	Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (frontend/tsconfig.json, integrations/openbb/openbb_seiche/py.typed)
52.3/55	Manageable file sizes — 37/759 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Python
largest_source_bytes	264,094
source_files_sampled	759
oversized_source_files	37

Machine-readable interfaces

60Moderate

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
20/20	MCP server
40/40	Runnable examples — notebooks

Inputs used

example_dirs	notebooks
has_mcp_signal	yes
api_schema_files	—
interfaces_expected_of	network-service

Key facts

1GitHub stars

3contributors

1,096commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

29releases

1bus factor

4open issues

npm, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
deps.dev does not index pypi:seiche@0.16.5; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.8 / 10

6.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-17 17:35 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
3	Branch-Protection	branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10	CI-Tests	13 out of 13 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 0/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3	Contributors	project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 7 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
6	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 6
10	SAST	SAST tool is run on all commits
10	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10	Vulnerabilities	0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 15

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
PyPI	fastapi	`>=0.115`	backend/pyproject.toml
PyPI	uvicorn	`>=0.30`	backend/pyproject.toml
PyPI	httpx	`>=0.27`	backend/pyproject.toml
PyPI	numpy	`>=1.26`	backend/pyproject.toml
PyPI	pandas	`>=2.2`	backend/pyproject.toml
PyPI	scikit-learn	`>=1.4`	backend/pyproject.toml
PyPI	scipy	`>=1.11`	backend/pyproject.toml
PyPI	arch	`>=7`	backend/pyproject.toml
PyPI	cryptography	`>=42`	backend/pyproject.toml
PyPI	tzdata	`>=2025.2`	backend/pyproject.toml
PyPI	holidays	`>=0.76`	backend/pyproject.toml
npm	lenis	`^1.3.26`	frontend/package.json
npm	react	`^18.3.1`	frontend/package.json
npm	react-dom	`^18.3.1`	frontend/package.json
npm	uplot	`^1.6.30`	frontend/package.json

All dependencies 232

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 25 direct and 207 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	lenis	`1.3.26`	direct
npm	react	`18.3.1`	direct
npm	react-dom	`18.3.1`	direct
npm	uplot	`1.6.32`	direct
PyPI	arch	`—`	direct
PyPI	cryptography	`—`	direct
PyPI	cryptography	`50.0.0`	direct
PyPI	fastapi	`—`	direct
PyPI	fastapi	`0.136.3`	direct
PyPI	fastapi	`0.143.0`	direct
PyPI	holidays	`—`	direct
PyPI	httpx	`—`	direct
PyPI	httpx	`0.28.1`	direct
PyPI	numpy	`—`	direct
PyPI	numpy	`2.2.6`	direct
PyPI	pandas	`—`	direct
PyPI	pandas	`2.3.3`	direct
PyPI	scikit-learn	`—`	direct
PyPI	scipy	`—`	direct
PyPI	tzdata	`—`	direct
PyPI	tzdata	`2026.4`	direct
PyPI	tzdata	`2026.5`	direct
PyPI	uvicorn	`—`	direct
PyPI	uvicorn	`0.40.0`	direct
PyPI	uvicorn	`0.54.0`	direct
npm	@babel/code-frame	`7.29.7`	indirect
npm	@babel/compat-data	`7.29.7`	indirect
npm	@babel/core	`7.29.7`	indirect
npm	@babel/generator	`7.29.7`	indirect
npm	@babel/helper-compilation-targets	`7.29.7`	indirect
npm	@babel/helper-globals	`7.29.7`	indirect
npm	@babel/helper-module-imports	`7.29.7`	indirect
npm	@babel/helper-module-transforms	`7.29.7`	indirect
npm	@babel/helper-plugin-utils	`7.29.7`	indirect
npm	@babel/helper-string-parser	`7.29.7`	indirect
npm	@babel/helper-validator-identifier	`7.29.7`	indirect
npm	@babel/helper-validator-option	`7.29.7`	indirect
npm	@babel/helpers	`7.29.7`	indirect
npm	@babel/parser	`7.29.7`	indirect
npm	@babel/plugin-transform-react-jsx-self	`7.29.7`	indirect
npm	@babel/plugin-transform-react-jsx-source	`7.29.7`	indirect
npm	@babel/template	`7.29.7`	indirect
npm	@babel/traverse	`7.29.7`	indirect
npm	@babel/types	`7.29.7`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/aix-ppc64	`0.25.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm	`0.25.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-arm64	`0.25.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/android-x64	`0.25.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-arm64	`0.25.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/darwin-x64	`0.25.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-arm64	`0.25.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/freebsd-x64	`0.25.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm	`0.25.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-arm64	`0.25.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ia32	`0.25.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-loong64	`0.25.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-mips64el	`0.25.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-ppc64	`0.25.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-riscv64	`0.25.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-s390x	`0.25.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/linux-x64	`0.25.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-arm64	`0.25.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/netbsd-x64	`0.25.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-arm64	`0.25.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openbsd-x64	`0.25.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/openharmony-arm64	`0.25.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/sunos-x64	`0.25.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-arm64	`0.25.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-ia32	`0.25.12`	indirect
npm	@esbuild/win32-x64	`0.25.12`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/gen-mapping	`0.3.13`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/remapping	`2.3.5`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/resolve-uri	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec	`1.5.5`	indirect
npm	@jridgewell/trace-mapping	`0.3.31`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/pluginutils	`1.0.0-beta.27`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-android-arm-eabi	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-android-arm64	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-darwin-arm64	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-darwin-x64	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-freebsd-arm64	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-freebsd-x64	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm-musleabihf	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-gnu	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-arm64-musl	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-gnu	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-loong64-musl	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-gnu	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-ppc64-musl	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-gnu	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-riscv64-musl	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-s390x-gnu	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-gnu	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-linux-x64-musl	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-openbsd-x64	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-openharmony-arm64	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-arm64-msvc	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-ia32-msvc	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-gnu	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@rollup/rollup-win32-x64-msvc	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	@types/babel__core	`7.20.5`	indirect
npm	@types/babel__generator	`7.27.0`	indirect
npm	@types/babel__template	`7.4.4`	indirect
npm	@types/babel__traverse	`7.28.0`	indirect
npm	@types/estree	`1.0.9`	indirect
npm	@types/prop-types	`15.7.15`	indirect
npm	@types/react	`18.3.31`	indirect
npm	@types/react-dom	`18.3.7`	indirect
npm	@vitejs/plugin-react	`4.7.0`	indirect
npm	baseline-browser-mapping	`2.11.20`	indirect
npm	browserslist	`4.28.8`	indirect
npm	caniuse-lite	`1.0.30001810`	indirect
npm	convert-source-map	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	csstype	`3.2.3`	indirect
npm	debug	`4.4.3`	indirect
npm	electron-to-chromium	`1.5.420`	indirect
npm	esbuild	`0.25.12`	indirect
npm	escalade	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	fdir	`6.5.0`	indirect
npm	fsevents	`2.3.3`	indirect
npm	gensync	`1.0.0-beta.2`	indirect
npm	js-tokens	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	jsesc	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	json5	`2.2.3`	indirect
npm	loose-envify	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	lru-cache	`5.1.1`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.1.3`	indirect
npm	nanoid	`3.3.18`	indirect
npm	node-releases	`2.0.54`	indirect
npm	picocolors	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`4.0.5`	indirect
npm	postcss	`8.5.26`	indirect
npm	react-refresh	`0.17.0`	indirect
npm	rollup	`4.62.2`	indirect
npm	scheduler	`0.23.2`	indirect
npm	semver	`6.3.1`	indirect
npm	source-map-js	`1.2.2`	indirect
npm	tinyglobby	`0.2.17`	indirect
npm	typescript	`5.9.3`	indirect
npm	update-browserslist-db	`1.3.2`	indirect
npm	vite	`6.4.3`	indirect
npm	yallist	`3.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	aiohappyeyeballs	`2.7.1`	indirect
PyPI	aiohttp	`3.14.3`	indirect
PyPI	aiosignal	`1.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	annotated-doc	`0.0.5`	indirect
PyPI	annotated-types	`0.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	anyio	`4.15.1`	indirect
PyPI	async-timeout	`5.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	attrs	`26.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	backports-asyncio-runner	`1.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	build	`1.6.1`	indirect
PyPI	certifi	`2026.7.22`	indirect
PyPI	cffi	`2.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	charset-normalizer	`3.5.2`	indirect
PyPI	click	`8.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	colorama	`0.4.6`	indirect
PyPI	exceptiongroup	`1.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	frozenlist	`1.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	h11	`0.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	hatchling	`1.32.0`	indirect
PyPI	html5lib	`1.1`	indirect
PyPI	httpcore	`1.0.9`	indirect
PyPI	httpx-sse	`0.4.3`	indirect
PyPI	httpx2	`—`	indirect
PyPI	idna	`3.20`	indirect
PyPI	importlib-metadata	`9.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	iniconfig	`2.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	iniconfig	`2.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	jsonschema	`4.26.0`	indirect
PyPI	jsonschema-specifications	`2025.9.1`	indirect
PyPI	mcp	`1.30.0`	indirect
PyPI	multidict	`6.9.1`	indirect
PyPI	openbb-core	`1.6.13`	indirect
PyPI	openpyxl	`—`	indirect
PyPI	opentelemetry-api	`1.45.1`	indirect
PyPI	opentimestamps	`—`	indirect
PyPI	packaging	`26.3`	indirect
PyPI	pathspec	`1.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	pillow	`12.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	pluggy	`1.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	propcache	`0.5.4`	indirect
PyPI	psycopg	`—`	indirect
PyPI	psycopg	`3.3.6`	indirect
PyPI	psycopg-binary	`3.3.6`	indirect
PyPI	pyarrow	`—`	indirect
PyPI	pycparser	`3.11`	indirect
PyPI	pycryptodome	`3.23.0`	indirect
PyPI	pydantic	`2.13.5`	indirect
PyPI	pydantic	`2.14.0`	indirect
PyPI	pydantic-core	`2.46.5`	indirect
PyPI	pydantic-core	`2.50.0`	indirect
PyPI	pydantic-settings	`2.15.0`	indirect
PyPI	pygments	`2.21.0`	indirect
PyPI	pyjwt	`2.15.1`	indirect
PyPI	pyproject-hooks	`1.3.3`	indirect
PyPI	pytest	`—`	indirect
PyPI	pytest	`9.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-asyncio	`—`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-asyncio	`1.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-memray	`—`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-pystack	`—`	indirect
PyPI	python-dateutil	`2.9.0.post0`	indirect
PyPI	python-dotenv	`1.2.3`	indirect
PyPI	python-dotenv	`1.2.4`	indirect
PyPI	python-multipart	`0.0.32`	indirect
PyPI	pytz	`2026.4`	indirect
PyPI	pywin32	`312`	indirect
PyPI	referencing	`0.37.0`	indirect
PyPI	requests	`2.34.2`	indirect
PyPI	rpds-py	`2026.9.1`	indirect
PyPI	ruff	`0.15.22`	indirect
PyPI	seiche-agent-activity	`0.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	seiche-agent-network	`0.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	six	`1.17.0`	indirect
PyPI	sqlalchemy	`2.1.4`	indirect
PyPI	sse-starlette	`3.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	starlette	`1.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	starlette	`1.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	tomli	`2.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	tomlkit	`0.15.1`	indirect
PyPI	trove-classifiers	`2026.6.1.19`	indirect
PyPI	typing-extensions	`4.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	typing-inspection	`0.4.4`	indirect
PyPI	urllib3	`2.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	uuid7	`0.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	webencodings	`0.6.1`	indirect
PyPI	websockets	`16.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	xlrd	`—`	indirect
PyPI	yarl	`1.25.1`	indirect
PyPI	zipp	`4.1.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 211 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 21 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records