Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-20 03:41 UTC

bendoerr-terraform-modules / terraform-aws-fargate-on-demand

Ben's Terraform AWS Fargate on Demand Module

HCL · Go · PythonMIT★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Sep 2023View on GitHub ↗

bendoerr-terraform-modules/terraform-aws-fargate-on-demand holds a health index of 69 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (86/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (24/100). It was last updated 5 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

69
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

69
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 62 is calibrated to 69 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

2 followers16 public repossince Sep 2023

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

86Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 5 days ago
13.2/36Commit cadence — 19/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 221 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 8 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year221
human_commit_share0.16
days_since_last_push5
active_weeks_last_year19

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 2 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 51 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~40.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count2
latest_release_tagv0.2.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release51
mean_days_between_releases40.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

24At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 0 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges5
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

44Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
10.3/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 54% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth — 3 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.543
How it's scored
16.8/42Issue resolution — 40% of issues closed
14/30PR acceptance — 283/608 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs283
open_issues9
closed_issues6
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d6
prs_decided_30d6
issue_closed_ratio0.4
closed_unmerged_prs325
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
3.4/25Owner reach — 2 followers of bendoerr-terraform-modules
15/25Track record — 16 public repos, account ~3 yr old
Inputs used
followers2
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginbendoerr-terraform-modules
public_repos16
account_age_days1,112

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

80Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 8 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .golangci.yml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 3 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsterraform, terraform-module, terraform-module-aws
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

79Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 8 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
5/5Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
7.5/7.5Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 10 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate7.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories20
affected_packages11
assessed_packages150
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitymoderate 1, unknown 10
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 150 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

53Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — modules/dns-record/test/go.mod, modules/efs-access/test/go.mod, modules/launcher/test/go.mod (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .golangci.yml
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 84 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsmodules/dns-record/test/go.mod, modules/efs-access/test/go.mod, modules/launcher/test/go.mod, modules/notice-discord/test/go.mod, modules/notice-github/test/go.mod, modules/notice-parameter-store/test/go.mod, modules/persistence/test/go.mod, modules/service/test/go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0.84
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — HCL without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/14 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageHCL
largest_source_bytes10,365
source_files_sampled14
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

0GitHub stars
3contributors
221commits, last 12 months
5days since last push
2releases
1bus factor
9open issues
—package ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 7.4 / 10
7.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-20 03:41 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
4Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
10Contributorsproject has 4 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 8 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
10Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
0Vulnerabilities10 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 150

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 150 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gofilippo.io/edwards25519v1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/agext/levenshteinv1.2.3indirect
Gogithub.com/apparentlymart/go-textseg/v15v15.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2v1.45.1indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/aws/protocol/eventstreamv1.7.20indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/configv1.33.1indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/credentialsv1.20.1indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/feature/ec2/imdsv1.19.1indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/feature/s3/transfermanagerv0.1.17indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/configsourcesv1.5.1indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/endpoints/v2v2.8.1indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/v4av1.5.1indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/acmv1.38.2indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/autoscalingv1.66.1indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/cloudwatchlogsv1.84.1indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/dynamodbv1.57.2indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/ec2v1.297.1indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/ecrv1.57.1indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/ecrpublicv1.39.6indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/ecsv1.93.0indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/iamv1.61.1indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/accept-encodingv1.13.19indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/checksumv1.9.14indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/checksumv1.9.22indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/endpoint-discoveryv1.11.22indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/presigned-urlv1.14.1indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/s3sharedv1.19.22indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/s3sharedv1.19.29indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/kmsv1.50.5indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/lambdav1.89.1indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/lambdav1.92.3indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/rdsv1.118.1indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/route53v1.67.1indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/s3v1.103.3indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/s3v1.99.1indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/secretsmanagerv1.41.6indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/signinv1.7.1indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/snsv1.44.1indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/sqsv1.42.26indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/ssmv1.75.1indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/ssov1.35.1indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/ssooidcv1.40.1indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/stsv1.47.1indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/smithy-gov1.28.1indirect
Gogithub.com/bgentry/go-netrcv0.0.0-20140422174119-9fd32a8b3d3dindirect
Gogithub.com/boombuler/barcodev1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/boombuler/barcodev1.0.1-0.20190219062509-6c824513baccindirect
Gogithub.com/bwmarrin/discordgov0.29.0indirect
Gogithub.com/cpuguy83/go-md2man/v2v2.0.5indirect
Gogithub.com/davecgh/go-spewv1.1.2-0.20180830191138-d8f796af33ccindirect
Gogithub.com/emicklei/go-restful/v3v3.13.0indirect
Gogithub.com/fxamacker/cbor/v2v2.9.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-errors/errorsv1.0.2-0.20180813162953-d98b870cc4e0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-errors/errorsv1.5.1indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/logrv1.4.3indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/jsonpointerv0.21.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/jsonreferencev0.20.2indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/jsonreferencev0.20.4indirect
Gogithub.com/go-openapi/swagv0.23.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-sql-driver/mysqlv1.8.1indirect
Gogithub.com/google/gnostic-modelsv0.7.0indirect
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/gorilla/websocketv1.5.4-0.20250319132907-e064f32e3674indirect
Gogithub.com/gruntwork-io/go-commonsv0.17.1indirect
Gogithub.com/gruntwork-io/go-commonsv0.8.0indirect
Gogithub.com/gruntwork-io/terratestv1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/errwrapv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/errwrapv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-cleanhttpv0.5.2indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-getter/v2v2.2.3indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-multierrorv1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-safetempv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-versionv1.7.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-versionv1.8.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/hcl/v2v2.22.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-jsonv0.23.0indirect
Gogithub.com/jackc/pgpassfilev1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/jackc/pgservicefilev0.0.0-20240606120523-5a60cdf6a761indirect
Gogithub.com/jackc/pgx/v5v5.9.2indirect
Gogithub.com/jackc/puddle/v2v2.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/jinzhu/copierv0.0.0-20190924061706-b57f9002281aindirect
Gogithub.com/jinzhu/copierv0.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/josharian/internv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/json-iterator/gov1.1.12indirect
Gogithub.com/klauspost/compressv1.16.5indirect
Gogithub.com/klauspost/compressv1.17.9indirect
Gogithub.com/klauspost/compressv1.18.2indirect
Gogithub.com/klauspost/compressv1.18.5indirect
Gogithub.com/kr/prettyv0.3.1indirect
Gogithub.com/kr/textv0.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mailru/easyjsonv0.7.7indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-zglobv0.0.2-0.20190814121620-e3c945676326indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-zglobv0.0.4indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/go-homedirv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/go-testing-interfacev1.14.1indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/go-wordwrapv1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/moby/spdystreamv0.5.1indirect
Gogithub.com/modern-go/concurrentv0.0.0-20180306012644-bacd9c7ef1ddindirect
Gogithub.com/modern-go/reflect2v1.0.3-0.20250322232337-35a7c28c31eeindirect
Gogithub.com/munnerz/goautonegv0.0.0-20191010083416-a7dc8b61c822indirect
Gogithub.com/pmezard/go-difflibv1.0.1-0.20181226105442-5d4384ee4fb2indirect
Gogithub.com/pquerna/otpv1.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/rogpeppe/go-internalv1.14.1indirect
Gogithub.com/russross/blackfriday/v2v2.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/pflagv1.0.9indirect
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.11.1indirect
Gogithub.com/tmccombs/hcl2jsonv0.6.4indirect
Gogithub.com/ulikunitz/xzv0.5.14indirect
Gogithub.com/ulikunitz/xzv0.5.15indirect
Gogithub.com/urfave/cliv1.22.16indirect
Gogithub.com/urfave/cli/v2v2.27.1indirect
Gogithub.com/x448/float16v0.8.4indirect
Gogithub.com/xrash/smetricsv0.0.0-20231213231151-1d8dd44e695eindirect
Gogithub.com/zclconf/go-ctyv1.15.0indirect
Gogo.yaml.in/yaml/v2v2.4.3indirect
Gogo.yaml.in/yaml/v3v3.0.4indirect
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.52.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.54.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/expv0.0.0-20240119083558-1b970713d09aindirect
Gogolang.org/x/modv0.35.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/modv0.37.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.55.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.56.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/oauth2v0.36.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.20.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.22.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.45.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.47.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/termv0.43.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/termv0.45.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.37.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.40.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/timev0.15.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/toolsv0.44.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/toolsv0.47.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.36.12-0.20260120151049-f2248ac996afindirect
Gogopkg.in/evanphx/json-patch.v4v4.13.0indirect
Gogopkg.in/inf.v0v0.9.1indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1indirect
Gok8s.io/apiv0.36.2indirect
Gok8s.io/apimachineryv0.36.2indirect
Gok8s.io/client-gov0.36.2indirect
Gok8s.io/klog/v2v2.140.0indirect
Gok8s.io/kube-openapiv0.0.0-20260317180543-43fb72c5454aindirect
Gok8s.io/streamingv0.36.2indirect
Gok8s.io/utilsv0.0.0-20260210185600-b8788abfbbc2indirect
Gosigs.k8s.io/jsonv0.0.0-20250730193827-2d320260d730indirect
Gosigs.k8s.io/randfillv1.0.0indirect
Gosigs.k8s.io/structured-merge-diff/v6v6.3.2indirect
Gosigs.k8s.io/yamlv1.6.0indirect
Dependency advisories 11

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 150 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 11 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
github.com/ulikunitz/xzv0.5.14indirectmoderate20.5.15
github.com/klauspost/compressv1.16.5indirectunknown11.18.7
github.com/klauspost/compressv1.17.9indirectunknown11.18.7
github.com/klauspost/compressv1.18.2indirectunknown11.18.7
github.com/klauspost/compressv1.18.5indirectunknown11.18.7
golang.org/x/cryptov0.52.0indirectunknown40.56.0
golang.org/x/cryptov0.54.0indirectunknown40.56.0
golang.org/x/modv0.35.0indirectunknown21.27.0-rc.3
golang.org/x/modv0.37.0indirectunknown21.27.0-rc.3
golang.org/x/netv0.55.0indirectunknown11.27.0-rc.3
golang.org/x/textv0.37.0indirectunknown10.39.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.