Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-09 18:27 UTC

bircni / get-size2

Determine the size in bytes an object occupies inside RAM.

RustMIT★ 10 stars⑂ 13 forkssince Sep 2024View on GitHub ↗

bircni/get-size2 holds a health index of 75 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (72/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (52/100). It was last updated 37 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

75
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

75
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 65 is calibrated to 75 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

bircniPersonal account
34 followers30 public repossince Dec 2020

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
crates.ioget-size20.11.01,358,1672937 days agoget-sizeheapmemoryramsizecachingmemory-management
crates.ioget-size-derive20.11.01,294,5222937 days agoget-sizeheapmemoryramsizecachingmemory-management

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

72Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
18/36Push recencylast push 37 days ago
10.4/36Commit cadence15/52 weeks with commits
14.9/18Commit volume45 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained13 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year45
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push37
active_weeks_last_year15

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases24 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 37 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~31.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count24
latest_release_tag0.11.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release37
mean_days_between_releases31.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

52Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
15.5/60Stars10 stars
9/25Forks13 forks
0/15Watchers1 watchers
Inputs used
forks13
stars10
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads2,652,689 downloads/month across crates
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesget-size2, get-size-derive2
dependents
ecosystemscrates
total_downloads14,371,758
monthly_downloads2,652,689
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

68Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
10.8/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 52% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth13 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 7 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled13
top_contributor_share0.519
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution100% of issues closed
27.6/30PR acceptance46/50 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
4.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 8/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
merged_prs46
open_issues0
closed_issues8
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs4
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
11.1/25Owner reach34 followers of bircni
22.4/25Track record30 public repos, account ~5 yr old
Inputs used
followers34
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginbircni
public_repos30
account_age_days2,099
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable2 package(s) on crates
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 37 days ago
20/20Version history29 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesget-size2, get-size-derive2
ecosystemscrates
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish37

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

72Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter configCargo.toml ([workspace.lints]), crates/get-size-derive2/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/get-size2/Cargo.toml ([lints])
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests12 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

55Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://crates.io/crates/get-size2
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikino
homepagehttps://crates.io/crates/get-size2
docs_sitehttps://crates.io/crates/get-size2
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

60Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests12 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2.2/7.5Code-ReviewFound 8/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 7 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained13 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
19/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories1 affected: orx-split-vec 3.23.0 (unknown)
40/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory has been public longer than 90 days
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories1
affected_packages1
assessed_packages76
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityunknown 1
direct_affected_packages0
Matched the crates:get-size2@0.11.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 76 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

64Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
35.7/40Legible commit history67 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.67
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrapCargo.toml, crates/get-size-derive2/Cargo.toml, crates/get-size2/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format configCargo.toml ([workspace.lints]), crates/get-size-derive2/Cargo.toml ([lints]), crates/get-size2/Cargo.toml ([lints])
11/11Static type checkingRust (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml, crates/get-size-derive2/Cargo.toml, crates/get-size2/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeRust (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/45 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes22,741
source_files_sampled45
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

10GitHub stars
13contributors
45commits, last 12 months
37days since last push
24releases
1bus factor
0open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 13 ⇿
0Stars
13Forks
16Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

03581013151322025-042025-112026-07
Major 0Minor 8Patch 8

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.2 / 10
5.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-09 18:26 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests12 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3Code-ReviewFound 8/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
10Contributorsproject has 7 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained13 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 20
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.iosyncrates/get-size-derive2/Cargo.toml
crates.ioquotecrates/get-size-derive2/Cargo.toml
crates.ioattribute-derivecrates/get-size-derive2/Cargo.toml
crates.ioget-size-derive2crates/get-size2/Cargo.toml
crates.iobytes1crates/get-size2/Cargo.toml
crates.iochrono0.4crates/get-size2/Cargo.toml
crates.iochrono-tz0.10crates/get-size2/Cargo.toml
crates.iocompact_str0.10crates/get-size2/Cargo.toml
crates.iodashmap6crates/get-size2/Cargo.toml
crates.iohalf2crates/get-size2/Cargo.toml
crates.iohashbrown0.17crates/get-size2/Cargo.toml
crates.ioindexmap2.14crates/get-size2/Cargo.toml
crates.ioordermap1.2crates/get-size2/Cargo.toml
crates.ioorx-concurrent-vec3.10crates/get-size2/Cargo.toml
crates.ioparking_lot0.12crates/get-size2/Cargo.toml
crates.ioportable-atomic1crates/get-size2/Cargo.toml
crates.ioroaring0.11crates/get-size2/Cargo.toml
crates.iosmallvec1crates/get-size2/Cargo.toml
crates.iothin-vec0.2crates/get-size2/Cargo.toml
crates.iourl2crates/get-size2/Cargo.toml
All dependencies 16

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 16 direct and 0 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.iobytesdirect
crates.iochronodirect
crates.iochrono-tzdirect
crates.iocompact_strdirect
crates.iodashmapdirect
crates.iohalfdirect
crates.iohashbrowndirect
crates.ioindexmapdirect
crates.ioordermapdirect
crates.ioorx-concurrent-vecdirect
crates.ioparking_lotdirect
crates.ioportable-atomicdirect
crates.ioroaringdirect
crates.iosmallvecdirect
crates.iothin-vecdirect
crates.iourldirect
Dependency advisories 1

Installing crates:get-size2@0.11.0 pulls in 76 packages, direct and transitive: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
orx-split-vec3.23.0indirectunknown14.0.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticscrates.io.