Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-09 03:22 UTC

bnb-chain / go-sdk

GoApache-2.0★ 202 stars⑂ 94 forkssince Oct 2018View on GitHub ↗

bnb-chain/go-sdk holds a health index of 25 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (67/100) and lowest on Vitality (21/100). It was last updated 925 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

25
overall / 100
At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

25
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 45 is calibrated to 42 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

bnb-chainOrganization
4,329 followers226 public repossince Dec 2018

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/bnb-chain/go-sdkv1.3.2-301232 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

21At Risk · 21% of overall
How it's scored
0/36Push recencylast push 925 days ago
0/36Commit cadence0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume0 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share0.96
days_since_last_push925
active_weeks_last_year0
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases30 releases published
0/36Release recencylatest release 1,232 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~109.6 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count30
latest_release_tagv1.3.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release1,232
mean_days_between_releases109.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

56Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
37.4/60Stars202 stars
16.4/25Forks94 forks
8/15Watchers28 watchers
Inputs used
forks94
stars202
watchers28
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

67Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
9.9/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 56% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth19 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled19
top_contributor_share0.558
How it's scored
41.4/42Issue resolution99% of issues closed
24.7/30PR acceptance94/114 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs94
open_issues1
closed_issues71
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.986
closed_unmerged_prs20
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
25/25Owner reach4,329 followers of bnb-chain
25/25Track record226 public repos, account ~7 yr old
Inputs used
followers4,329
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginbnb-chain
public_repos226
account_age_days2,835
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on go
4/35Publish recencylatest publish 1,232 days ago
20/20Version history30 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesgithub.com/bnb-chain/go-sdk
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish1,232

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

34At Risk · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests0 out of 22 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
10/10Topics1 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicssdk
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

41Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
0/2.5CI-Tests0 out of 22 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
0/2.5Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0/7.5Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
0/7.5Vulnerabilities37 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
5.2/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories3 affected: golang.org/x/crypto 0.10.0 (critical 10.0), github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk 0.25.0 (high 7.5), github.com/gorilla/websocket 1.5.0 (moderate 6.5)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
27.8/40No advisories left outstanding2 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 1,194 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories118
affected_packages11
assessed_packages84
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 2, high 5, moderate 2, unknown 2
direct_affected_packages3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 84 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

67Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
21.1/40Legible commit history38 of 96 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.396
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapMakefile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingGo (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance4 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0.04
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeGo (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/83 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes33,307
source_files_sampled83
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexample
Inputs used
example_dirsexample
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

202GitHub stars
19contributors
0commits, last 12 months
925days since last push
30releases
1bus factor
1open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 94 ⇿
0Stars
94Forks
29Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0204060801008832019-032022-042025-05
Major 0Minor 3Patch 23

Each point covers 6 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.0 / 10
4.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-09 03:22 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
0CI-Tests0 out of 22 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
0Contributorsproject has 0 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 0
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
0Vulnerabilities37 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 13
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/bnb-chain/nodev0.10.16go.mod
Gogithub.com/btcsuite/btcd/btcec/v2v2.3.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdkv0.25.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/cosmos/go-bip39v0.0.0-20180819234021-555e2067c45dgo.mod
Gogithub.com/gorilla/websocketv1.5.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/pkg/errorsv0.9.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.8.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/tendermint/btcdv0.1.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/tendermint/go-aminov0.15.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/tendermint/tendermintv0.35.9go.mod
Gogithub.com/zondax/ledger-cosmos-gov0.9.9go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.10.0go.mod
Gogopkg.in/resty.v1v1.12.0go.mod
All dependencies 84

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 13 direct and 71 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/bnb-chain/node0.10.16direct
Gogithub.com/btcsuite/btcd/btcec/v22.3.2direct
Gogithub.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk0.25.0direct
Gogithub.com/cosmos/go-bip390.0.0-20180819234021-555e2067c45ddirect
Gogithub.com/gorilla/websocket1.5.0direct
Gogithub.com/pkg/errors0.9.1direct
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testify1.8.2direct
Gogithub.com/tendermint/btcd0.1.1direct
Gogithub.com/tendermint/go-amino0.15.0direct
Gogithub.com/tendermint/tendermint0.35.9direct
Gogithub.com/zondax/ledger-cosmos-go0.9.9direct
Gogolang.org/x/crypto0.10.0direct
Gogopkg.in/resty.v11.12.0direct
Gogithub.com/bartekn/go-bip390.0.0-20171116152956-a05967ea095dindirect
Gogithub.com/beorn7/perks1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/bgentry/speakeasy0.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/bnb-chain/ics230.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/btcsuite/btcd/btcutil1.1.3indirect
Gogithub.com/cespare/xxhash/v22.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/cosmos/ledger-go0.9.2indirect
Gogithub.com/davecgh/go-spew1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/decred/dcrd/dcrec/secp256k1/v44.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/etcd-io/bbolt1.3.3indirect
Gogithub.com/ethereum/go-ethereum1.11.3indirect
Gogithub.com/fsnotify/fsnotify1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-kit/kit0.10.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logfmt/logfmt0.5.1indirect
Gogithub.com/gogo/protobuf1.3.2indirect
Gogithub.com/golang/protobuf1.5.3indirect
Gogithub.com/golang/snappy0.0.4indirect
Gogithub.com/google/btree1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/gorilla/mux1.8.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/golang-lru0.5.5-0.20210104140557-80c98217689dindirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/hcl1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/herumi/bls-eth-go-binary0.0.0-20210917013441-d37c07cfda4eindirect
Gogithub.com/inconshreveable/mousetrap1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/jcmturner/gofork1.7.6indirect
Gogithub.com/jmhodges/levigo1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/klauspost/cpuid/v22.2.4indirect
Gogithub.com/libp2p/go-buffer-pool0.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/magiconair/properties1.8.5indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-isatty0.0.18indirect
Gogithub.com/matttproud/golang_protobuf_extensions1.0.4indirect
Gogithub.com/minio/sha256-simd1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/go-homedir1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/mapstructure1.4.1indirect
Gogithub.com/mohae/deepcopy0.0.0-20170929034955-c48cc78d4826indirect
Gogithub.com/pelletier/go-toml1.9.3indirect
Gogithub.com/pmezard/go-difflib1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/client_golang1.14.0indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/client_model0.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/common0.42.0indirect
Gogithub.com/prometheus/procfs0.9.0indirect
Gogithub.com/prysmaticlabs/fastssz0.0.0-20220628121656-93dfe28febabindirect
Gogithub.com/prysmaticlabs/gohashtree0.0.3-alphaindirect
Gogithub.com/prysmaticlabs/prysm/v44.0.2indirect
Gogithub.com/rcrowley/go-metrics0.0.0-20190826022208-cac0b30c2563indirect
Gogithub.com/rs/cors1.7.0indirect
Gogithub.com/sirupsen/logrus1.9.0indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/afero1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/cast1.3.1indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobra1.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/jwalterweatherman1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/pflag1.0.5indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/viper1.8.1indirect
Gogithub.com/subosito/gotenv1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/supranational/blst0.3.8-0.20220526154634-513d2456b344indirect
Gogithub.com/syndtr/goleveldb1.0.1-0.20220721030215-126854af5e6dindirect
Gogithub.com/tendermint/iavl0.12.4indirect
Gogithub.com/thomaso-mirodin/intmath0.0.0-20160323211736-5dc6d854e46eindirect
Gogithub.com/zondax/hid0.9.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/net0.11.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sys0.9.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/text0.10.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto0.0.0-20210624195500-8bfb893ecb84indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpc1.40.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobuf1.30.0indirect
Gogopkg.in/ini.v11.67.0indirect
Gogopkg.in/jcmturner/aescts.v11.0.1indirect
Gogopkg.in/jcmturner/dnsutils.v11.0.1indirect
Gogopkg.in/jcmturner/gokrb5.v77.5.0indirect
Gogopkg.in/jcmturner/rpc.v11.1.0indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v22.4.0indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v33.0.1indirect
Dependency advisories 11

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 84 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 11 carry known advisories, of which 3 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
golang.org/x/crypto0.10.0directcritical413.4.0
google.golang.org/grpc1.40.0indirectcritical91.85.0-dev.0.20260825072537-93e31b48545e
github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk0.25.0directhigh200.53.3
github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum1.11.3indirecthigh151.17.0
github.com/sirupsen/logrus1.9.0indirecthigh21.9.3
golang.org/x/net0.11.0indirecthigh2312.0.2
google.golang.org/protobuf1.30.0indirecthigh21.33.0
github.com/gorilla/websocket1.5.0directmoderate21.5.3
github.com/supranational/blst0.3.8-0.20220526154634-513d2456b344indirectmoderate20.3.11
golang.org/x/sys0.9.0indirectunknown10.44.0
golang.org/x/text0.10.0indirectunknown10.39.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsGo.