Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-20 04:47 UTC

bobthecow / psysh

A REPL for PHP

PHPMIT★ 9,829 stars⑂ 331 forkssince Jun 2012View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryCommand-line toolhow this is determined

bobthecow/psysh holds a health index of 87 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (89/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (47/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

87
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

87
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 73 is calibrated to 87 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Justin HilemanPersonal account
0 followers276 public repossince Feb 2009@DataDog

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistpsy/psyshv0.12.2419,348,848126112 days agoconsoleshellinteractiverepl

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

89Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 1 days ago
30.5/36Commit cadence — 44/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 402 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year402
human_commit_share0.91
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year44
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
27/36Release recency — latest release 112 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~22.7 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv0.12.24
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release112
mean_days_between_releases22.7

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

86Excellent · 17% of overall
How it's scored
60/60Stars — 9,829 stars
21/25Forks — 331 forks
11/15Watchers — 97 watchers
Inputs used
forks331
stars9,829
watchers97
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
80/80Monthly downloads — 19,348,848 downloads/month across packagist
19.6/20Registry dependents — 876 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagespsy/psysh
dependents876
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads640,078,489
monthly_downloads19,348,848
unverified_packages_excluded—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

61Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
3.6/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 84% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 91 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 67 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled91
top_contributor_share0.84
How it's scored
41.5/42Issue resolution — 99% of issues closed
20.5/30PR acceptance — 323/473 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs323
open_issues6
closed_issues481
prs_merged_7d1
prs_decided_7d1
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio0.988
closed_unmerged_prs150
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
0/25Owner reach — 0 followers of bobthecow
25/25Track record — 276 public repos, account ~17 yr old
Inputs used
followers0
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginbobthecow
public_repos276
account_age_days6,459
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 112 days ago
20/20Version history — 126 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagespsy/psysh
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish112

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

72Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 9 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
16/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 4 out of 5 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage site — https://psysh.org
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 5 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicspsysh, php, repl, cli, shell
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://psysh.org
docs_sitehttps://psysh.org
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

61Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2/2.5CI-Tests — 4 out of 5 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 1/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 67 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated14
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive4
scorecard_aggregate5.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages59
unassessed_packages14
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 59 resolved dependencies against OSV. 14 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

47Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
14.7/40Legible commit history — 25 of 91 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.275
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
2/10Demonstrated agent practice — 1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance — 9 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilescomposer.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0.01
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.09
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
54.8/55Manageable file sizes — 3/688 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes104,205
source_files_sampled688
oversized_source_files3

Key facts

9,829GitHub stars
91contributors
402commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
6open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch packagist package 'psy/psysh-build' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 331 ⇿
0Stars
331Forks
100Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0125250375329132013-062020-022026-10
Major 0Minor 8Patch 92

Each point covers 13 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.1 / 10
5.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-20 04:47 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
8CI-Tests4 out of 5 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 1/20 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 67 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 8
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistnikic/php-parser^5.0 || ^4.0build/composer.json
Packagistsymfony/console^8.0 || ^7.0 || ^6.0 || ^5.0 || ^4.0 || ^3.4build/composer.json
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-iconv^1.0build/composer.json
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-mbstring^1.0build/composer.json
Packagistsymfony/var-dumper^8.0 || ^7.0 || ^6.0 || ^5.0 || ^4.0 || ^3.4build/composer.json
Packagistnikic/php-parser^5.0 || ^4.0composer.json
Packagistsymfony/console^8.0 || ^7.0 || ^6.0 || ^5.0 || ^4.0 || ^3.4composer.json
Packagistsymfony/var-dumper^8.0 || ^7.0 || ^6.0 || ^5.0 || ^4.0 || ^3.4composer.json
All dependencies 73

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 9 direct and 64 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistnikic/php-parser—direct
Packagistnikic/php-parser4.19.5direct
Packagistnikic/php-parser5.9.0direct
Packagistsymfony/console—direct
Packagistsymfony/console5.4.47direct
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-iconv1.43.0direct
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-mbstring1.43.0direct
Packagistsymfony/var-dumper—direct
Packagistsymfony/var-dumper5.4.48direct
Packagistamphp/amp2.6.5indirect
Packagistamphp/byte-stream1.8.2indirect
Packagistamphp/parallel1.4.4indirect
Packagistamphp/parallel-functions1.1.0indirect
Packagistamphp/parser1.1.1indirect
Packagistamphp/process1.1.9indirect
Packagistamphp/serialization1.1.0indirect
Packagistamphp/sync1.4.2indirect
Packagistbamarni/composer-bin-plugin—indirect
Packagistcomposer/class-map-generator—indirect
Packagistcomposer/class-map-generator1.8.0indirect
Packagistcomposer/package-versions-deprecated1.11.99.5indirect
Packagistcomposer/pcre3.4.0indirect
Packagistcomposer/semver3.5.1indirect
Packagistcomposer/xdebug-handler3.0.5indirect
Packagistdoctrine/deprecations1.1.6indirect
Packagistext-json—indirect
Packagistext-tokenizer—indirect
Packagistfidry/console0.5.5indirect
Packagisthumbug/box3.16.0indirect
Packagisthumbug/php-scoper0.17.5indirect
Packagistjetbrains/phpstorm-stubs2022.3indirect
Packagistjustinrainbow/json-schema5.3.4indirect
Packagistlaravel/serializable-closure1.3.7indirect
Packagistnikic/iter2.4.1indirect
Packagistparagonie/constant_time_encoding2.8.2indirect
Packagistparagonie/pharaoh0.6.1indirect
Packagistparagonie/random_compat9.99.100indirect
Packagistparagonie/sodium_compat1.24.2indirect
Packagistphan/phan—indirect
Packagistphp—indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/reflection-common2.2.1indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/reflection-docblock5.6.7indirect
Packagistphpdocumentor/type-resolver1.12.0indirect
Packagistphpstan/extension-installer—indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpdoc-parser2.3.6indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan—indirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-phpunit—indirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunit—indirect
Packagistpsr/container1.1.2indirect
Packagistpsr/event-dispatcher1.0.0indirect
Packagistpsr/log1.1.4indirect
Packagistroave/security-advisories—indirect
Packagistseld/jsonlint1.12.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/deprecation-contracts2.5.4indirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher-contracts2.5.4indirect
Packagistsymfony/filesystem5.4.45indirect
Packagistsymfony/finder5.4.45indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-ctype1.33.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-ctype1.37.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-grapheme1.33.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-grapheme1.43.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-normalizer1.33.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-normalizer1.43.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php731.33.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php801.43.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php811.38.1indirect
Packagistsymfony/process5.4.51indirect
Packagistsymfony/service-contracts2.5.4indirect
Packagistsymfony/string5.4.47indirect
Packagistthecodingmachine/safe1.3.3indirect
Packagistulrichsg/getopt-php3.4.0indirect
Packagistwebmozart/assert1.12.1indirect
Packagistwebmozart/path-util2.3.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 59 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 14 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.