Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-20 05:07 UTC

bodrovis / lokalise-node-file-exchange

This package enables you to easily exchange translation files between your JavaScript/TypeScript project and Lokalise TMS.

TypeScriptCustom license★ 3 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Dec 2024View on GitHub ↗

bodrovis/lokalise-node-file-exchange holds a health index of 80 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (90/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (38/100). It was last updated 4 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

80
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

80
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 68 is calibrated to 80 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Elijah S. KrukowskiPersonal account
534 followers86 public repossince Mar 2011@lokalise

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

90Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 4 days ago
18.7/36Commit cadence — 27/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume — 105 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 26 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year105
human_commit_share0.72
days_since_last_push4
active_weeks_last_year27

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 17 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 4 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~38 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count17
latest_release_tagv6.0.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release4
mean_days_between_releases38
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

38Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
4.9/60Stars — 3 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 1 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars3
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges2
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
66.7/80Monthly downloads — 100,569 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packageslokalise-file-exchange
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads100,569
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

62Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
25.4/30PR acceptance — 50/59 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs50
open_issues0
closed_issues4
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs9
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
19.6/25Owner reach — 534 followers of bodrovis
25/25Track record — 86 public repos, account ~15 yr old
Inputs used
followers534
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginbodrovis
public_repos86
account_age_days5,710
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 4 days ago
20/20Version history — 16 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packageslokalise-file-exchange
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish4

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

70Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — biome.json
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 10 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 4 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsapi-client, lokalise, translation-files, lokalise-api
has_wikino
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

76Good · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests — 10 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 26 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
5/5Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
5/5SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
7.5/7.5Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages4
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:lokalise-file-exchange@6.0.1 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 4 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

64Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://docs.lokalise.com/llms.txt)
21.5/40Legible commit history — 29 of 72 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtyes
llms_txt_urlhttps://docs.lokalise.com/llms.txt
legible_history_share0.403
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — biome.json
11/11Static type checking — test/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 28 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configstest/tsconfig.json, tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0.28
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — TypeScript (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/56 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageTypeScript
largest_source_bytes15,068
source_files_sampled56
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

3GitHub stars
1contributors
105commits, last 12 months
4days since last push
17releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 7.0 / 10
7.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-20 05:06 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10CI-Tests10 out of 10 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/10 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained26 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
10Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 3
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@lokalise/node-api^16.1.0package.json
npmkliedz^3.0.0package.json
npmyauzl^3.2.0package.json
All dependencies 142

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 3 direct and 139 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@lokalise/node-api16.6.0direct
npmkliedz3.0.0direct
npmyauzl3.4.0direct
npm@babel/helper-string-parser7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/helper-validator-identifier7.29.7indirect
npm@babel/parser7.29.9indirect
npm@babel/types7.29.8indirect
npm@bcoe/v8-coverage1.0.2indirect
npm@biomejs/biome2.5.15indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-darwin-arm642.5.15indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-darwin-x642.5.15indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-linux-arm642.5.15indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-linux-arm64-musl2.5.15indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-linux-x642.5.15indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-linux-x64-musl2.5.15indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-win32-arm642.5.15indirect
npm@biomejs/cli-win32-x642.5.15indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.6.0indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.31indirect
npm@oxc-project/types0.154.0indirect
npm@quansync/fs1.1.0indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm-eabi1.2.14indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-android-arm641.2.14indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm641.2.14indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-darwin-x641.2.14indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x641.2.14indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.2.14indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu1.2.14indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl1.2.14indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu1.2.14indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu1.2.14indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu1.2.14indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl1.2.14indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm641.2.14indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc1.2.14indirect
npm@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc1.2.14indirect
npm@rolldown/pluginutils1.0.1indirect
npm@types/chai5.2.3indirect
npm@types/deep-eql4.0.2indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.9indirect
npm@types/node26.6.5indirect
npm@types/yauzl3.4.0indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-aix-ppc647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-darwin-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-darwin-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-freebsd-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-freebsd-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-arm7.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-loong647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-mips64el7.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-ppc647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-riscv647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-s390x7.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-linux-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-netbsd-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-netbsd-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-openbsd-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-openbsd-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-sunos-x647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-win32-arm647.0.2indirect
npm@typescript/typescript-win32-x647.0.2indirect
npm@vitest/coverage-v85.0.5indirect
npm@vitest/istanbul-lib-coverage1.0.2indirect
npm@vitest/istanbul-lib-report1.0.2indirect
npm@vitest/mocker5.0.5indirect
npm@vitest/spy5.0.5indirect
npm@yuku-core/binding-android-arm640.19.0indirect
npm@yuku-core/binding-darwin-arm640.19.0indirect
npm@yuku-core/binding-darwin-x640.19.0indirect
npm@yuku-core/binding-freebsd-x640.19.0indirect
npm@yuku-core/binding-linux-arm-gnu0.19.0indirect
npm@yuku-core/binding-linux-arm-musl0.19.0indirect
npm@yuku-core/binding-linux-arm64-gnu0.19.0indirect
npm@yuku-core/binding-linux-arm64-musl0.19.0indirect
npm@yuku-core/binding-linux-x64-gnu0.19.0indirect
npm@yuku-core/binding-linux-x64-musl0.19.0indirect
npm@yuku-core/binding-win32-arm640.19.0indirect
npm@yuku-core/binding-win32-x640.19.0indirect
npm@yuku-toolchain/types0.19.0indirect
npmassertion-error2.0.1indirect
npmast-v8-to-istanbul1.0.7indirect
npmcac7.1.0indirect
npmchai6.3.0indirect
npmdefu6.1.7indirect
npmdetect-libc2.1.2indirect
npmdts-resolver3.0.0indirect
npmempathic2.1.0indirect
npmes-module-lexer2.3.2indirect
npmestree-walker3.0.3indirect
npmexpect-type1.4.0indirect
npmfdir6.5.0indirect
npmfsevents2.3.3indirect
npmget-tsconfig5.0.0-beta.6indirect
npmhookable6.1.2indirect
npmimport-without-cache0.4.1indirect
npmjs-tokens10.0.0indirect
npmlightningcss1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-android-arm641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-arm641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-darwin-x641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-freebsd-x641.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-arm64-musl1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-gnu1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-linux-x64-musl1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc1.33.0indirect
npmlightningcss-win32-x64-msvc1.33.0indirect
npmmagic-string1.4.3indirect
npmmagicast0.5.5indirect
npmnanoid3.3.20indirect
npmobug3.0.0indirect
npmpend1.2.0indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpicomatch4.0.7indirect
npmpostcss8.5.30indirect
npmquansync1.0.0indirect
npmresolve-pkg-maps1.0.0indirect
npmrolldown1.2.14indirect
npmrolldown-plugin-dts0.28.8indirect
npmsource-map-js1.2.2indirect
npmstd-env4.3.0indirect
npmtinybench6.2.2indirect
npmtinyexec1.3.1indirect
npmtinyglobby0.2.17indirect
npmtinyrainbow3.2.0indirect
npmtree-kill1.2.2indirect
npmtsdown0.23.1indirect
npmtypescript7.0.2indirect
npmunconfig-core7.5.0indirect
npmundici8.12.1indirect
npmundici-types8.9.0indirect
npmverkit0.5.0indirect
npmvite8.3.4indirect
npmvitest5.0.5indirect
npmwhy-is-node-running3.2.1indirect
npmyuku-ast0.19.0indirect
npmyuku-codegen0.19.0indirect
npmyuku-core0.19.0indirect
npmyuku-parser0.19.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:lokalise-file-exchange@6.0.1 pulls in 4 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.