Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-17 11:41 UTC

bramus / js-pagination-sequence

Generate a sequence of numbers for use in a pagination system, the clever way.

JavaScriptMIT★ 141 stars⑂ 4 forkssince Dec 2021View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined

bramus/js-pagination-sequence holds a health index of 31 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (59/100) and lowest on Security (18/100). It was last updated 1094 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

31
overall / 100
At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

31
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 37 is calibrated to 31 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

BramusPersonal account
911 followers141 public repossince Mar 2010Google

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npm@bramus/pagination-sequence1.2.15,703111094 days agopaginationsequence

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

20At Risk · 21% of overall

Development activity

1Critical
How it's scored
0/36Push recency — last push 1,094 days ago
0/36Commit cadence — 0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume — 0 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push1,094
active_weeks_last_year0

Release discipline

48Weak
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 7 version tags (no GitHub releases)
0/36Release recency — latest release 1,672 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count7
latest_release_tagv1.1.2
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release1,672
mean_days_between_releases2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

49Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

40Weak
How it's scored
34.8/60Stars — 141 stars
4/25Forks — 4 forks
1.7/15Watchers — 3 watchers
Inputs used
forks4
stars141
watchers3
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

63Moderate
How it's scored
50.1/80Monthly downloads — 5,703 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@bramus/pagination-sequence
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads5,703
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

59Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

22At Risk
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.7/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 97% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.969

Issue & PR responsiveness

83Excellent
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
30/30PR acceptance — 1/1 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 1/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs1
open_issues0
closed_issues6
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

70Good
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
21.3/25Owner reach — 911 followers of bramus
25/25Track record — 141 public repos, account ~16 yr old
Inputs used
followers911
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginbramus
public_repos141
account_age_days5,982
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

69Good
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on npm
4/35Publish recency — latest publish 1,094 days ago
20/20Version history — 11 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@bramus/pagination-sequence
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish1,094

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

38Weak · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

30At Risk
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

18Critical · 16% of overall

Security posture

18Critical
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — 0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 1/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 18 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate1.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

31At Risk · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

44Weak
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
0/8Automated maintenance — no data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance, OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — JavaScript without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/2 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes6,868
source_files_sampled2
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

141GitHub stars
2contributors
0commits, last 12 months
1,094days since last push
7releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 1.8 / 10
1.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-17 11:41 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 1 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 1/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
0Vulnerabilities18 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 1
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@bramus/range^1.1.2package.json
All dependencies 99

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 1 direct and 98 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@bramus/range1.1.2direct
npm@ungap/promise-all-settled1.1.2indirect
npmansi-colors4.1.1indirect
npmansi-regex5.0.1indirect
npmansi-styles4.3.0indirect
npmanymatch3.1.2indirect
npmargparse2.0.1indirect
npmbalanced-match1.0.2indirect
npmbinary-extensions2.2.0indirect
npmbrace-expansion1.1.11indirect
npmbraces3.0.2indirect
npmbrowser-stdout1.3.1indirect
npmcamelcase6.2.1indirect
npmchalk4.1.2indirect
npmchokidar3.5.2indirect
npmcliui7.0.4indirect
npmcolor-convert2.0.1indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.4indirect
npmconcat-map0.0.1indirect
npmdebug4.3.2indirect
npmdecamelize4.0.0indirect
npmdiff5.0.0indirect
npmemoji-regex8.0.0indirect
npmesbuild0.14.5indirect
npmesbuild-android-arm640.14.5indirect
npmesbuild-darwin-640.14.5indirect
npmesbuild-darwin-arm640.14.5indirect
npmesbuild-freebsd-640.14.5indirect
npmesbuild-freebsd-arm640.14.5indirect
npmesbuild-linux-320.14.5indirect
npmesbuild-linux-640.14.5indirect
npmesbuild-linux-arm0.14.5indirect
npmesbuild-linux-arm640.14.5indirect
npmesbuild-linux-mips64le0.14.5indirect
npmesbuild-linux-ppc64le0.14.5indirect
npmesbuild-netbsd-640.14.5indirect
npmesbuild-openbsd-640.14.5indirect
npmesbuild-sunos-640.14.5indirect
npmesbuild-windows-320.14.5indirect
npmesbuild-windows-640.14.5indirect
npmesbuild-windows-arm640.14.5indirect
npmescalade3.1.1indirect
npmescape-string-regexp4.0.0indirect
npmfill-range7.0.1indirect
npmfind-up5.0.0indirect
npmflat5.0.2indirect
npmfs.realpath1.0.0indirect
npmfsevents2.3.2indirect
npmget-caller-file2.0.5indirect
npmglob7.1.7indirect
npmglob-parent5.1.2indirect
npmgrowl1.10.5indirect
npmhas-flag4.0.0indirect
npmhe1.2.0indirect
npminflight1.0.6indirect
npminherits2.0.4indirect
npmis-binary-path2.1.0indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-fullwidth-code-point3.0.0indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmis-number7.0.0indirect
npmis-plain-obj2.1.0indirect
npmis-unicode-supported0.1.0indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmjs-yaml4.1.0indirect
npmlocate-path6.0.0indirect
npmlog-symbols4.1.0indirect
npmminimatch3.0.4indirect
npmmocha9.1.3indirect
npmms2.1.2indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnanoid3.1.25indirect
npmnormalize-path3.0.0indirect
npmonce1.4.0indirect
npmp-limit3.1.0indirect
npmp-locate5.0.0indirect
npmpath-exists4.0.0indirect
npmpath-is-absolute1.0.1indirect
npmpicomatch2.3.0indirect
npmrandombytes2.1.0indirect
npmreaddirp3.6.0indirect
npmrequire-directory2.1.1indirect
npmsafe-buffer5.2.1indirect
npmserialize-javascript6.0.0indirect
npmstring-width4.2.3indirect
npmstrip-ansi6.0.1indirect
npmstrip-json-comments3.1.1indirect
npmsupports-color7.2.0indirect
npmsupports-color8.1.1indirect
npmto-regex-range5.0.1indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmworkerpool6.1.5indirect
npmwrap-ansi7.0.0indirect
npmwrappy1.0.2indirect
npmy18n5.0.8indirect
npmyargs16.2.0indirect
npmyargs-parser20.2.4indirect
npmyargs-unparser2.0.0indirect
npmyocto-queue0.1.0indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with bramus/js-pagination-sequence. Read them side by side →

98ag-grid/ag-gridThe best JavaScript Data Table for building Enterprise Applications. Supports React / Angular / Vue / Plain JavaScript.Exceptional94TanStack/table🤖 Headless UI for building powerful tables & datagrids for TS/JS - React-Table, Vue-Table, Solid-Table, Svelte-TableExceptional94immutable-js/immutable-jsImmutable persistent data collections for Javascript which increase efficiency and simplicity.Exceptional93ihor-sokoliuk/mcp-searxngPrivate web search for AI assistants via SearXNG — supports Claude, Cursor, and any MCP clientExceptional90alovajs/alovaThe request strategy layer for JavaScript. 20+ ready-made strategies cut your request code by up to 70%Excellent90jbetancur/react-data-table-componentA responsive table library with built-in sorting, pagination, selection, expandable rows, and customizable styling.Excellent

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.