Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-13 20:27 UTC

buggregator / trap

A local debug server and utilities set for PHP projects

PHPBSD-3-Clause★ 274 stars⑂ 16 forkssince May 2023View on GitHub ↗

KindLibraryCommand-line toolNetwork servicehow this is determined

#bugregator #cli #console #debug #dump #smtp #hacktoberfest #php #buggregator #sentry #composer #composer-package

buggregator/trap holds a health index of 78 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (78/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (55/100). It was last updated 58 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 67 is calibrated to 78 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

BuggregatorOrganization

81 followers19 public repossince Sep 2021

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
Packagist	buggregator/trap	1.16.0	167,458	69	58 days ago	debug cli dump console server smtp websockets helper sentry dev dumper binary-dump fibers

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

63Moderate · 21% of overall

Development activity

40Weak

How it's scored

18/36	Push recency — last push 58 days ago
4.2/36	Commit cadence — 6/52 weeks with commits
13.4/18	Commit volume — 30 commits in the last year
4/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 4 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 4

Inputs used

commits_last_year	30
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	58
active_weeks_last_year	6

Release discipline

98Exceptional

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 51 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 58 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~41.8 days
8/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.

Inputs used

releases_count	51
latest_release_tag	1.16.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	58
mean_days_between_releases	41.8

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

74Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

53Moderate

How it's scored

39.5/60	Stars — 274 stars
9.8/25	Forks — 16 forks
3.9/15	Watchers — 6 watchers

Inputs used

forks	16
stars	274
watchers	6
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

92Excellent

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (BSD-3-Clause)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
6.3/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	8
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	yes
readme_badge_services	shields.io
has_pull_request_template	yes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

81Excellent

How it's scored

69.7/80	Monthly downloads — 167,458 downloads/month across packagist
11/20	Registry dependents — 43 packages depend on it

Inputs used

packages	buggregator/trap
dependents	43
ecosystems	packagist
total_downloads	2,412,755
monthly_downloads	167,458
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

66Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

38Weak

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
5.5/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 76% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 12 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 26 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	12
top_contributor_share	0.757

Issue & PR responsiveness

61Moderate

How it's scored

23.1/42	Issue resolution — 55% of issues closed
28.8/30	PR acceptance — 138/144 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 2/19 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1

Inputs used

merged_prs	138
open_issues	31
closed_issues	38
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	0.551
closed_unmerged_prs	6
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

79Good

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
13.8/25	Owner reach — 81 followers of buggregator
19.3/25	Track record — 19 public repos, account ~4 yr old

Inputs used

followers	81
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	—
owner_login	buggregator
public_repos	19
account_age_days	1,801

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 58 days ago
20/20	Version history — 69 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	buggregator/trap
ecosystems	packagist
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	58

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

78Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

86Excellent

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 9 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — .php-cs-fixer.dist.php
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4	.editorconfig
16/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 14 out of 17 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	yes
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

65Good

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://buggregator.dev
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 12 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	bugregator, cli, console, debug, dump, smtp, hacktoberfest, php, buggregator, sentry, composer, composer-package
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://buggregator.dev
docs_site	https://buggregator.dev
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

56Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

45Weak

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
2/2.5	CI-Tests — 14 out of 17 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5	Code-Review — Found 2/19 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 26 contributing companies or organizations
0/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
3/7.5	Maintained — 4 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 4
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
6/7.5	Signed-Releases — 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — no data
7.5/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	13
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	5
scorecard_aggregate	4.5

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	2
affected_packages	2
assessed_packages	88
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	high 2
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 88 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

55Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 98 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.98
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

72Good

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — .php-cs-fixer.dist.php
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
4/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 2 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	composer.lock
has_dockerfile	yes
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	Makefile
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0.02
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

54Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
54/55	Manageable file sizes — 5/265 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	PHP
largest_source_bytes	460,475
source_files_sampled	265
oversized_source_files	5

Machine-readable interfaces

40Weak

How it's scored

40/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — src/Test/message.proto
0/20	MCP server
0/40	Runnable examples

Inputs used

example_dirs	—
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	src/Test/message.proto
interfaces_expected_of	network-service

Key facts

274GitHub stars

12contributors

30commits, last 12 months

58days since last push

51releases

1bus factor

31open issues

Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 16 ⇿

0Stars

16Forks

41Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 12Patch 29

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.5 / 10

4.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-13 20:27 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
8	CI-Tests	14 out of 17 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1	Code-Review	Found 2/19 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
10	Contributors	project has 26 contributing companies or organizations
n/a	Dangerous-Workflow	no workflows found
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
4	Maintained	4 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 4
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
n/a	Pinned-Dependencies	no dependencies found
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
8	Signed-Releases	5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
n/a	Token-Permissions	No tokens found
10	Vulnerabilities	0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 9

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Packagist	clue/stream-filter	`^1.6`	composer.json
Packagist	internal/destroy	`^1.0`	composer.json
Packagist	nyholm/psr7	`^1.8`	composer.json
Packagist	psr/container	`^1.1 \|\| ^2.0`	composer.json
Packagist	psr/http-message	`^1.1 \|\| ^2`	composer.json
Packagist	psr/log	`^2 \|\| ^3`	composer.json
Packagist	symfony/console	`^6.4 \|\| ^7 \|\| ^8`	composer.json
Packagist	symfony/var-dumper	`^6.3 \|\| ^7 \|\| ^8`	composer.json
Packagist	yiisoft/injector	`^1.2`	composer.json

All dependencies 88

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 9 direct and 79 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Packagist	clue/stream-filter	`1.7.0`	direct
Packagist	internal/destroy	`1.0.0`	direct
Packagist	nyholm/psr7	`1.8.2`	direct
Packagist	psr/container	`2.0.2`	direct
Packagist	psr/http-message	`2.0`	direct
Packagist	psr/log	`3.0.2`	direct
Packagist	symfony/console	`6.4.30`	direct
Packagist	symfony/var-dumper	`6.4.26`	direct
Packagist	yiisoft/injector	`1.2.1`	direct
Packagist	amphp/amp	`3.1.1`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/byte-stream	`2.1.2`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/cache	`2.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/dns	`2.4.0`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/parallel	`2.3.3`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/parser	`1.1.1`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/pipeline	`1.2.3`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/process	`2.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/serialization	`1.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/socket	`2.3.1`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/sync	`2.3.0`	indirect
Packagist	composer/pcre	`3.3.2`	indirect
Packagist	composer/semver	`3.4.4`	indirect
Packagist	composer/xdebug-handler	`3.0.5`	indirect
Packagist	danog/advanced-json-rpc	`3.2.2`	indirect
Packagist	daverandom/libdns	`2.1.0`	indirect
Packagist	dereuromark/composer-prefer-lowest	`0.1.10`	indirect
Packagist	dnoegel/php-xdg-base-dir	`0.1.1`	indirect
Packagist	doctrine/deprecations	`1.1.5`	indirect
Packagist	ergebnis/phpunit-slow-test-detector	`2.20.0`	indirect
Packagist	felixfbecker/language-server-protocol	`1.5.3`	indirect
Packagist	fidry/cpu-core-counter	`1.3.0`	indirect
Packagist	google/protobuf	`4.33.2`	indirect
Packagist	kelunik/certificate	`1.1.3`	indirect
Packagist	league/uri	`7.7.0`	indirect
Packagist	league/uri-interfaces	`7.7.0`	indirect
Packagist	myclabs/deep-copy	`1.13.4`	indirect
Packagist	netresearch/jsonmapper	`5.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	nikic/php-parser	`5.7.0`	indirect
Packagist	phar-io/manifest	`2.0.4`	indirect
Packagist	phar-io/version	`3.2.1`	indirect
Packagist	php-cs-fixer/shim	`3.92.3`	indirect
Packagist	php-http/message	`1.16.2`	indirect
Packagist	phpdocumentor/reflection-common	`2.2.0`	indirect
Packagist	phpdocumentor/reflection-docblock	`5.6.6`	indirect
Packagist	phpdocumentor/type-resolver	`1.12.0`	indirect
Packagist	phpstan/phpdoc-parser	`2.3.0`	indirect
Packagist	phpstan/phpstan	`1.12.32`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-code-coverage	`10.1.16`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-file-iterator	`4.1.0`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-invoker	`4.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-text-template	`3.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-timer	`6.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/phpunit	`10.5.60`	indirect
Packagist	psr/http-factory	`1.1.0`	indirect
Packagist	rector/rector	`1.2.10`	indirect
Packagist	revolt/event-loop	`1.0.8`	indirect
Packagist	roxblnfk/unpoly	`1.8.1.1`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/cli-parser	`2.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/code-unit	`2.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/code-unit-reverse-lookup	`3.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/comparator	`5.0.4`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/complexity	`3.2.0`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/diff	`5.1.1`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/environment	`6.1.0`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/exporter	`5.1.4`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/global-state	`6.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/lines-of-code	`2.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/object-enumerator	`5.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/object-reflector	`3.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/recursion-context	`5.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/type	`4.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/version	`4.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	spatie/array-to-xml	`3.4.4`	indirect
Packagist	spiral/code-style	`2.3.1`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/deprecation-contracts	`3.6.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/filesystem	`6.4.30`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/finder	`6.4.27`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-ctype	`1.33.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-intl-grapheme	`1.33.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-intl-normalizer	`1.33.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-mbstring	`1.33.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-php84	`1.33.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/service-contracts	`3.6.1`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/string	`6.4.30`	indirect
Packagist	ta-tikoma/phpunit-architecture-test	`0.8.5`	indirect
Packagist	theseer/tokenizer	`1.3.1`	indirect
Packagist	vimeo/psalm	`6.14.3`	indirect
Packagist	webmozart/assert	`1.12.1`	indirect

Dependency advisories 2

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 88 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 2 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
google/protobuf	`4.33.2`	indirect	high	1	`4.33.6`
phpunit/phpunit	`10.5.60`	indirect	high	1	`12.5.8`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records