Public recordExcellent
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-16 12:53 UTC
bugsnag / bugsnag-php
BugSnag error monitoring and crash reporting tool for PHP apps
bugsnag/bugsnag-php holds a health index of 81 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (88/100) and lowest on Security (48/100). It was last updated today. 3 contributors account for most of its recent work.
81
overall / 100Software health index
Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.
81
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
Score profile
Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.
The weighted overall 69 is calibrated to 81 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).
Ownership
BugSnagOrganization
145 followers140 public repossince Sep 2011
This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.
Package ecosystems
| Registry | Package | Version | Downloads / mo | Versions | Last publish | Tags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Packagist | bugsnag/bugsnag | v3.30.1 | 675,495 | 101 | 174 days ago | loggingerrorsexceptionsbugsnagtracking |
Metrics by category
Vitality
Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?
57
Development activity
50Moderate
How it's scored
| 36/36 | Push recency — last push 0 days ago |
| 3.5/36 | Commit cadence — 5/52 weeks with commits |
| 10.3/18 | Commit volume — 13 commits in the last year |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0 |
Inputs used
| commits_last_year | 13 |
| human_commit_share | — |
| days_since_last_push | 0 |
| active_weeks_last_year | 5 |
Release discipline
67Good
How it's scored
| 27/27 | Ships releases — 66 releases published |
| 27/36 | Release recency — latest release 174 days ago |
| 12.6/27 | Release cadence — a release every ~177.3 days |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |
Inputs used
| releases_count | 66 |
| latest_release_tag | v3.30.1 |
| releases_from_tags | no |
| days_since_latest_release | 174 |
| mean_days_between_releases | 177.3 |
Community & Adoption
Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?
77
Popularity & adoption
69Good
How it's scored
| 44.6/60 | Stars — 563 stars |
| 15.8/25 | Forks — 79 forks |
| 8.7/15 | Watchers — 37 watchers |
Inputs used
| forks | 79 |
| stars | 563 |
| watchers | 37 |
| growth_state | unverified |
| growth_factor_pct | 100 |
| growth_unverified_reason | no_history |
Community health
77Good
How it's scored
| 22.5/22.5 | README |
| 22.5/22.5 | License — recognized license (MIT) |
| 18/18 | CONTRIBUTING guide |
| 0/13.5 | Code of conduct |
| 0/7.2 | Issue template |
| 6.3/6.3 | PR template |
Inputs used
| has_readme | yes |
| has_license | yes |
| readme_badges | — |
| has_contributing | yes |
| has_issue_template | no |
| has_code_of_conduct | no |
| readme_badge_services | — |
| has_pull_request_template | yes |
Ecosystem adoption (downloads)
91Excellent
How it's scored
| 77.7/80 | Monthly downloads — 675,495 downloads/month across packagist |
| 12.9/20 | Registry dependents — 85 packages depend on it |
Inputs used
| packages | bugsnag/bugsnag |
| dependents | 85 |
| ecosystems | packagist |
| total_downloads | 49,503,027 |
| monthly_downloads | 675,495 |
| unverified_packages_excluded | — |
Sustainability & Governance
Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?
88
How it's scored
| 36/54 | Bus factor — 3 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| 16.2/22.5 | Commit distribution — top contributor authored 28% of commits |
| 13.5/13.5 | Contributor breadth — 54 contributors |
| 10/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 28 contributing companies or organizations |
Inputs used
| bus_factor | 3 |
| contributors_sampled | 54 |
| top_contributor_share | 0.281 |
Issue & PR responsiveness
94Exceptional
How it's scored
| 40.2/42 | Issue resolution — 96% of issues closed |
| 26.5/30 | PR acceptance — 505/572 decided PRs merged |
| 0/13 | Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d |
| 15/15 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed |
Inputs used
| merged_prs | 505 |
| open_issues | 5 |
| closed_issues | 113 |
| prs_merged_7d | — |
| prs_decided_7d | — |
| prs_merged_30d | — |
| prs_decided_30d | — |
| issue_closed_ratio | 0.958 |
| closed_unmerged_prs | 67 |
| first_time_authors_30d | — |
| first_time_prs_merged_30d | — |
| first_time_prs_decided_30d | — |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
Ownership & stewardship
88Excellent
How it's scored
| 30/30 | Ownership backing — organization-owned |
| 0/20 | Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization |
| 15.6/25 | Owner reach — 145 followers of bugsnag |
| 25/25 | Track record — 140 public repos, account ~14 yr old |
Inputs used
| followers | 145 |
| owner_type | Organization |
| is_verified | — |
| owner_login | bugsnag |
| public_repos | 140 |
| account_age_days | 5,415 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
Package maintenance
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 25/25 | Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist |
| 35/35 | Publish recency — latest publish 174 days ago |
| 20/20 | Version history — 101 published versions |
| 20/20 | Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked |
Inputs used
| packages | bugsnag/bugsnag |
| ecosystems | packagist |
| any_deprecated | no |
| min_days_since_publish | 174 |
Engineering Quality
Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?
74
Engineering practices
80Excellent
How it's scored
| 24/24 | CI workflows — 2 workflow(s) |
| 24/24 | Tests present |
| 16/16 | Linter config — phpcs.xml |
| 0/9.6 | Pre-commit hooks |
| 6.4/6.4 | .editorconfig |
| 10/20 | OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 7 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5 |
Inputs used
| has_ci | yes |
| has_tests | yes |
| has_editorconfig | yes |
| has_linter_config | yes |
| has_precommit_config | no |
Documentation
65Good
How it's scored
| 30/30 | README |
| 0/25 | Documentation directory |
| 15/15 | Documentation / homepage site — https://docs.bugsnag.com/platforms/php |
| 10/10 | Repository description |
| 10/10 | Topics — 20 topics |
| 0/10 | Wiki |
Inputs used
| topics | bugsnag, php, crash, error-monitoring, error-reporting, error-handling, exception-reporting, exception-handling, debug, errors, bugs, exceptions, crash-reporting, bug-tracking-tool, crash-reporting-tool, error-notification, php-error-monitoring, notifier, platforms, debugging-tool |
| has_wiki | no |
| homepage | https://docs.bugsnag.com/platforms/php |
| docs_site | https://docs.bugsnag.com/platforms/php |
| has_readme | yes |
| has_docs_dir | no |
| has_description | yes |
Security
Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?
48
Security posture
48Weak
How it's scored
| 7.5/7.5 | Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo |
| 0/7.5 | Branch-Protection — no data |
| 1.2/2.5 | CI-Tests — 7 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5 |
| 0/2.5 | CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| 7.5/7.5 | Code-Review — all changesets reviewed |
| 2.5/2.5 | Contributors — project has 28 contributing companies or organizations |
| 0/10 | Dangerous-Workflow — no data |
| 0/7.5 | Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected |
| 0/5 | Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed |
| 2.5/2.5 | License — license file detected |
| 0/7.5 | Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0/5 | Packaging — no data |
| 0/5 | Pinned-Dependencies — no data |
| 0/5 | SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0 |
| 5/5 | Security-Policy — security policy file detected |
| 0/7.5 | Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |
| 0/7.5 | Token-Permissions — no data |
| 7.5/7.5 | Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected |
Inputs used
| source | openssf_scorecard |
| checks_evaluated | 13 |
| scorecard_version | v5.5.0 |
| checks_inconclusive | 5 |
| scorecard_aggregate | 4.8 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.
AI Readiness
How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.
57
Agent context & guidance
1Critical
How it's scored
| 0/45 | Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules |
| 0/15 | Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) |
| 0/40 | Legible commit history — no data |
Inputs used
| has_llms_txt | no |
| llms_txt_url | — |
| legible_history_share | — |
| agent_instruction_files | — |
| agent_instruction_max_bytes | — |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)
85Excellent
How it's scored
| 18/18 | One-command bootstrap — Makefile |
| 22/22 | Automated tests |
| 11/11 | Lint / format config — phpcs.xml |
| 0/11 | Static type checking |
| 10/10 | Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile |
| 0/10 | Demonstrated agent practice — no data |
| 0/8 | Automated maintenance — no data |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data |
Inputs used
| has_nix | no |
| has_tests | yes |
| lockfiles | composer.lock |
| has_dockerfile | yes |
| typed_language | no |
| bootstrap_files | Makefile |
| has_devcontainer | no |
| has_linter_config | yes |
| typecheck_configs | — |
| agent_commit_share | — |
| toolchain_manifests | — |
| dependency_bot_commit_share | — |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance, OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
Code legibility for models
54Moderate
How it's scored
| 0/45 | Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config |
| 54.2/55 | Manageable file sizes — 2/141 source files over 60KB |
Inputs used
| primary_language | PHP |
| largest_source_bytes | 86,351 |
| source_files_sampled | 141 |
| oversized_source_files | 2 |
Machine-readable interfaces
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 0/40 | API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software |
| 0/20 | MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software |
| 40/40 | Runnable examples — example |
Inputs used
| example_dirs | example |
| has_mcp_signal | no |
| api_schema_files | — |
| interfaces_expected_of | — |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.
Key facts
563GitHub stars
54contributors
13commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
66releases
3bus factor
5open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems
More detail
OpenSSF Scorecard 4.8 / 10
4.8aggregate
Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).
| 10 | Binary-Artifacts | no binaries found in the repo |
| n/a | Branch-Protection | internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md |
| 5 | CI-Tests | 7 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5 |
| 0 | CII-Best-Practices | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| 10 | Code-Review | all changesets reviewed |
| 10 | Contributors | project has 28 contributing companies or organizations |
| n/a | Dangerous-Workflow | no workflows found |
| 0 | Dependency-Update-Tool | no update tool detected |
| 0 | Fuzzing | project is not fuzzed |
| 10 | License | license file detected |
| 0 | Maintained | 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0 |
| n/a | Packaging | packaging workflow not detected |
| n/a | Pinned-Dependencies | no dependencies found |
| 0 | SAST | SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0 |
| 10 | Security-Policy | security policy file detected |
| 0 | Signed-Releases | Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |
| n/a | Token-Permissions | No tokens found |
| 10 | Vulnerabilities | 0 existing vulnerabilities detected |
Direct dependencies 1
| Registry | Package | Version constraint | Manifest |
|---|---|---|---|
| Packagist | guzzlehttp/guzzle | ^5.0|^6.0|^7.0 | composer.json |
All dependencies 59
Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 2 direct and 57 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.
| Registry | Package | Version | Relation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Packagist | guzzlehttp/guzzle | — | direct |
| Packagist | guzzlehttp/guzzle | 6.3.0 | direct |
| Packagist | bcit-ci/codeigniter | 3.1.6 | indirect |
| Packagist | bugsnag/bugsnag | — | indirect |
| Packagist | bugsnag/bugsnag | 3.8.1 | indirect |
| Packagist | composer/ca-bundle | — | indirect |
| Packagist | composer/ca-bundle | 1.0.9 | indirect |
| Packagist | container-interop/container-interop | 1.2.0 | indirect |
| Packagist | doctrine/instantiator | 1.1.0 | indirect |
| Packagist | guzzlehttp/promises | 1.3.1 | indirect |
| Packagist | guzzlehttp/psr7 | — | indirect |
| Packagist | guzzlehttp/psr7 | 1.4.2 | indirect |
| Packagist | mikey179/vfsstream | 1.1.0 | indirect |
| Packagist | mtdowling/burgomaster | — | indirect |
| Packagist | myclabs/deep-copy | 1.7.0 | indirect |
| Packagist | php | — | indirect |
| Packagist | php-mock/php-mock-phpunit | — | indirect |
| Packagist | phpdocumentor/reflection-common | 1.0.1 | indirect |
| Packagist | phpdocumentor/reflection-docblock | 4.1.1 | indirect |
| Packagist | phpdocumentor/type-resolver | 0.4.0 | indirect |
| Packagist | phpspec/prophecy | 1.7.2 | indirect |
| Packagist | phpunit/php-code-coverage | 4.0.8 | indirect |
| Packagist | phpunit/php-file-iterator | 1.4.2 | indirect |
| Packagist | phpunit/php-text-template | 1.2.1 | indirect |
| Packagist | phpunit/php-timer | 1.0.9 | indirect |
| Packagist | phpunit/php-token-stream | 2.0.1 | indirect |
| Packagist | phpunit/phpunit | — | indirect |
| Packagist | phpunit/phpunit | 5.7.23 | indirect |
| Packagist | phpunit/phpunit-mock-objects | 3.4.4 | indirect |
| Packagist | psr/container | 1.0.0 | indirect |
| Packagist | psr/http-message | 1.0.1 | indirect |
| Packagist | sebastian/code-unit-reverse-lookup | 1.0.1 | indirect |
| Packagist | sebastian/comparator | 1.2.4 | indirect |
| Packagist | sebastian/diff | 1.4.3 | indirect |
| Packagist | sebastian/environment | 2.0.0 | indirect |
| Packagist | sebastian/exporter | 2.0.0 | indirect |
| Packagist | sebastian/global-state | 1.1.1 | indirect |
| Packagist | sebastian/object-enumerator | 2.0.1 | indirect |
| Packagist | sebastian/recursion-context | 2.0.0 | indirect |
| Packagist | sebastian/resource-operations | 1.0.0 | indirect |
| Packagist | sebastian/version | — | indirect |
| Packagist | sebastian/version | 2.0.1 | indirect |
| Packagist | symfony/yaml | 3.3.12 | indirect |
| Packagist | webmozart/assert | 1.2.0 | indirect |
| Packagist | zendframework/zend-component-installer | 0.7.0 | indirect |
| Packagist | zendframework/zend-config | 2.6.0 | indirect |
| Packagist | zendframework/zend-escaper | 2.5.2 | indirect |
| Packagist | zendframework/zend-eventmanager | 3.1.0 | indirect |
| Packagist | zendframework/zend-http | 2.6.0 | indirect |
| Packagist | zendframework/zend-loader | 2.5.1 | indirect |
| Packagist | zendframework/zend-modulemanager | 2.7.2 | indirect |
| Packagist | zendframework/zend-mvc | 3.0.4 | indirect |
| Packagist | zendframework/zend-router | 3.0.2 | indirect |
| Packagist | zendframework/zend-servicemanager | 3.3.0 | indirect |
| Packagist | zendframework/zend-stdlib | 3.1.0 | indirect |
| Packagist | zendframework/zend-uri | 2.5.2 | indirect |
| Packagist | zendframework/zend-validator | 2.8.2 | indirect |
| Packagist | zendframework/zend-view | 2.8.1 | indirect |
| Packagist | zfcampus/zf-development-mode | 3.1.0 | indirect |
Raw JSON report machine-readable
Feedback
Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.
Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.
Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.
How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.