Public record
Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-17 12:40 UTC

byang37 / 3x-ui

Xray panel supporting multi-protocol multi-user expire day & traffic & IP limit (Vmess, Vless, Trojan, ShadowSocks, Wireguard, Hysteria, Tunnel, Mixed, HTTP, Tun)

Go · TypeScriptGPL-3.0★ 1 star⑂ 0 forkssince May 2026forkView on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork serviceWeb interfacehow this is determined

byang37/3x-ui holds a health index of 21 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Vitality (87/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (12/100). It was last updated 7 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

21
overall / 100
At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

21
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 45 is calibrated to 42 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02). High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 50% multiplier to weighted overall health and gives it an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Ownership

rayby36Personal account
0 followers9 public repossince Jul 2025

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/mhsanaei/3x-ui/v3points to another repo — not scoredv3.6.0-1618 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

87Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 7 days ago
31.2/36Commit cadence45/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume1,408 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
Inputs used
commits_last_year1,408
human_commit_share0.97
days_since_last_push7
active_weeks_last_year45
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases4 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 7 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~25 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count4
latest_release_tagdev-latest
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release7
mean_days_between_releases25

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

12Critical · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars1 stars
0/25Forks0 forks
0/15Watchers0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars1
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
0/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (GPL-3.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeno
has_licenseno
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

22At Risk · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
6.6/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 71% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth99 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 5 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled99
top_contributor_share0.708
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolutionno issues or no data
0/30PR acceptanceno decided pull requests or no data
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, PR acceptance, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
0/25Owner reach0 followers of byang37
9.5/25Track record9 public repos, account ~1 yr old
Inputs used
followers0
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginbyang37
public_repos9
account_age_days412
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

68Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows10 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.golangci.yml, eslint.config.js, eslint.config.mjs
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
0/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://t.me/XrayUI
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://t.me/XrayUI
docs_sitehttps://t.me/XrayUI
has_readmeno
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

22At Risk · 16% of overall
How it's scored
6.8/7.5Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Testsno data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 5 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
5/5Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0/7.5Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
0/5Packagingno data
0.5/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
5/5SASTSAST tool detected: CodeQL
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
2.2/7.5Vulnerabilities7 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4.3
high_risk_jurisdiction_cap34
high_risk_jurisdiction_multiplier50
security_posture_after_multiplier22
security_posture_before_jurisdiction43
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized. High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy applies a 50% multiplier and gives Security posture an At risk ceiling of 34.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

83Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructionsCLAUDE.md, frontend/CLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history96 of 97 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.99
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md, frontend/CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes10,497
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapMakefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.golangci.yml, eslint.config.js, eslint.config.mjs
11/11Static type checkingdocs/tsconfig.json, frontend/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile, lockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice10 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance3 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
1/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum, package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsdocs/tsconfig.json, frontend/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share0.1
toolchain_manifestsgo.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0.03
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeGo (statically typed)
54.6/55Manageable file sizes7/1,078 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes94,675
source_files_sampled1,078
oversized_source_files7
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)docs/public/openapi.json, frontend/public/openapi.json
0/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_filesdocs/public/openapi.json, frontend/public/openapi.json
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

1GitHub stars
99contributors
1,408commits, last 12 months
7days since last push
4releases
1bus factor
0open issues
Go, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Community profile unavailable
  • go package 'github.com/mhsanaei/3x-ui/v3' points at a different repository (https://github.com/mhsanaei/3x-ui); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.3 / 10
4.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-17 12:39 UTC

9Binary-Artifactsbinaries present in source code
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 5 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
10Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintainedproject was created within the last 90 days. Please review its contents carefully
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
1Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
10SASTSAST tool detected: CodeQL
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
3Vulnerabilities7 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 55
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@ant-design/icons^6.3.2frontend/package.json
npm@codemirror/lang-json^6.0.2frontend/package.json
npm@codemirror/theme-one-dark^6.1.3frontend/package.json
npm@hookform/resolvers^5.7.1frontend/package.json
npm@noble/hashes^2.2.0frontend/package.json
npm@tanstack/react-query^5.101.4frontend/package.json
npm@tanstack/react-query-devtools^5.101.4frontend/package.json
npmantd^6.5.3frontend/package.json
npmcodemirror^6.0.2frontend/package.json
npmdayjs^1.11.21frontend/package.json
npmi18next^26.3.6frontend/package.json
npmotpauth^9.5.1frontend/package.json
npmpersian-calendar-suite^1.5.5frontend/package.json
npmreact^19.2.8frontend/package.json
npmreact-dom^19.2.8frontend/package.json
npmreact-hook-form^7.84.0frontend/package.json
npmreact-i18next^17.0.11frontend/package.json
npmreact-router^8.3.0frontend/package.json
npmswagger-ui-react^5.32.12frontend/package.json
npmuplot^1.6.32frontend/package.json
npmzod^4.4.3frontend/package.json
Gogithub.com/gin-contrib/gzipv1.2.6go.mod
Gogithub.com/gin-contrib/sessionsv1.1.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/gin-gonic/ginv1.12.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/go-ldap/ldap/v3v3.4.14go.mod
Gogithub.com/go-playground/validator/v10v10.30.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/goccy/go-jsonv0.10.6go.mod
Gogithub.com/goccy/go-yamlv1.19.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/gorilla/websocketv1.5.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/joho/godotenvv1.5.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-sqlite3v1.14.49go.mod
Gogithub.com/mymmrac/telegov1.11.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/nicksnyder/go-i18n/v2v2.6.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/op/go-loggingv0.0.0-20160315200505-970db520ece7go.mod
Gogithub.com/robfig/cron/v3v3.0.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/shirou/gopsutil/v4v4.26.7go.mod
Gogithub.com/skip2/go-qrcodev0.0.0-20200617195104-da1b6568686ego.mod
Gogithub.com/valyala/fasthttpv1.73.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/xlzd/gotpv0.1.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/xtls/xray-corev1.260327.1-0.20260728075948-5ca6f4b7d4dcgo.mod
Gogo.uber.org/atomicv1.11.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.54.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.47.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.40.0go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpcv1.83.0go.mod
Gogopkg.in/natefinch/lumberjack.v2v2.2.1go.mod
Gogorm.io/driver/postgresv1.6.2go.mod
Gogorm.io/driver/sqlitev1.6.0go.mod
Gogorm.io/gormv1.31.2go.mod
Gopgregory.net/rapidv1.3.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/klauspost/compressv1.19.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/refraction-networking/utlsv1.8.3-0.20260301010127-aa6edf4b11afgo.mod
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.57.0go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.36.11go.mod
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsGo.