Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-21 17:40 UTC

bytecodealliance / wit-bindgen

A language binding generator for WebAssembly interface types

RustApache-2.0★ 1,470 stars⑂ 298 forkssince Feb 2021View on GitHub ↗

KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

#webassembly #interface-types #wasi #rust #module-linking #wasmtime

bytecodealliance/wit-bindgen holds a health index of 90 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (93/100) and lowest on Security (56/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 76 is calibrated to 90 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Bytecode AllianceOrganization · verified domain

2,135 followers103 public repossince Aug 2019

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
crates.io	wit-bindgen-cli	0.63.0	4,164	71	6 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

93Exceptional · 21% of overall

Development activity

95Exceptional

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
31.2/36	Commit cadence — 45/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 213 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 11 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	213
human_commit_share	0.91
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	45

Release discipline

90Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 69 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 6 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~20.3 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.

Inputs used

releases_count	69
latest_release_tag	v0.63.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	6
mean_days_between_releases	20.3

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

64Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

80Excellent

How it's scored

51.4/60	Stars — 1,470 stars
20.6/25	Forks — 298 forks
8.1/15	Watchers — 30 watchers

Inputs used

forks	298
stars	1,470
watchers	30
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

50Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	2
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

60Moderate

How it's scored

48.3/80	Monthly downloads — 4,164 downloads/month across crates
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	wit-bindgen-cli
dependents	—
ecosystems	crates
total_downloads	198,612
monthly_downloads	4,164
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

84Excellent · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

61Moderate

How it's scored

25.2/54	Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
12.7/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 44% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 99 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 41 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	2
contributors_sampled	99
top_contributor_share	0.435

Issue & PR responsiveness

83Excellent

How it's scored

30.5/42	Issue resolution — 73% of issues closed
27.9/30	PR acceptance — 1,101/1,184 decided PRs merged
9.5/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — 8/11 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
15/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed

Inputs used

merged_prs	1,101
open_issues	144
closed_issues	382
prs_merged_7d	6
prs_decided_7d	6
prs_merged_30d	22
prs_decided_30d	25
issue_closed_ratio	0.726
closed_unmerged_prs	83
first_time_authors_30d	8
first_time_prs_merged_30d	8
first_time_prs_decided_30d	11

Ownership & stewardship

99Exceptional

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20	Verified domain
23.9/25	Owner reach — 2,135 followers of bytecodealliance
25/25	Track record — 103 public repos, account ~7 yr old

Inputs used

followers	2,135
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	yes
owner_login	bytecodealliance
public_repos	103
account_age_days	2,626

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on crates
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 6 days ago
20/20	Version history — 71 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	wit-bindgen-cli
ecosystems	crates
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	6

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

75Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

82Excellent

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — Cargo.toml ([lints], [workspace.lints])
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
18/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 29 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

65Good

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://docs.rs/wit-bindgen-cli
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 6 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	webassembly, interface-types, wasi, rust, module-linking, wasmtime
has_wiki	no
homepage	—
docs_site	https://docs.rs/wit-bindgen-cli
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

56Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

45Weak

How it's scored

1.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — binaries present in source code
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
2.2/2.5	CI-Tests — 29 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5	Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 41 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 11 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	16
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	2
scorecard_aggregate	4.5

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	0
affected_packages	0
assessed_packages	175
unassessed_packages	15
affected_by_severity	none
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 175 resolved dependencies against OSV. 15 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

69Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 90 of 91 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.989
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

69Good

How it's scored

12.6/18	One-command bootstrap — Cargo.toml, crates/c/Cargo.toml, crates/core/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — Cargo.toml ([lints], [workspace.lints])
11/11	Static type checking — Rust (statically typed)
10/10	Reproducible environment — devcontainer, Dockerfile, lockfile
2/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	Cargo.lock
has_dockerfile	yes
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	yes
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0.01
toolchain_manifests	Cargo.toml, crates/c/Cargo.toml, crates/core/Cargo.toml, crates/cpp/Cargo.toml, crates/csharp/Cargo.toml, crates/d/Cargo.toml, crates/go/Cargo.toml, crates/guest-rust/Cargo.toml, crates/guest-rust/macro/Cargo.toml, crates/markdown/Cargo.toml, crates/moonbit/Cargo.toml, crates/rust/Cargo.toml, crates/test-helpers/Cargo.toml, crates/test-helpers/codegen-macro/Cargo.toml, crates/test/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Code legibility for models

99Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
53.7/55	Manageable file sizes — 12/497 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Rust
largest_source_bytes	160,900
source_files_sampled	497
oversized_source_files	12

Machine-readable interfaces

100Exceptional

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20	MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40	Runnable examples — examples

Inputs used

example_dirs	examples
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	—
interfaces_expected_of	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

1,470GitHub stars

99contributors

213commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

69releases

2bus factor

144open issues

crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
First-time contributor figures cover 12 of 15 authors (cap 12)

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 298 ⇿

0Stars

298Forks

68Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 44Patch 8

Each point covers 5 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.5 / 10

4.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-21 17:40 UTC

2	Binary-Artifacts	binaries present in source code
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
9	CI-Tests	29 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10	Code-Review	all changesets reviewed
10	Contributors	project has 41 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 11 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
0	Signed-Releases	Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10	Vulnerabilities	0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 15

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
crates.io	anyhow	`—`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	clap	`—`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	wit-bindgen-core	`—`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	wit-bindgen-rust	`—`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	wit-bindgen-c	`—`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	wit-bindgen-cpp	`—`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	wit-bindgen-markdown	`—`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	wit-bindgen-moonbit	`—`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	wit-bindgen-csharp	`—`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	wit-bindgen-go	`—`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	wit-bindgen-d	`—`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	wit-bindgen-test	`—`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	wit-component	`—`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	wasm-encoder	`—`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	env_logger	`0.11.7`	Cargo.toml

All dependencies 190

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 6 direct and 184 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
crates.io	anyhow	`1.0.104`	direct
crates.io	clap	`4.6.6`	direct
crates.io	env_logger	`0.11.11`	direct
crates.io	wasm-encoder	`0.258.0`	direct
crates.io	wasm-encoder	`0.262.0`	direct
crates.io	wit-component	`0.262.0`	direct
crates.io	adler2	`2.0.1`	indirect
crates.io	ahash	`0.8.12`	indirect
crates.io	aho-corasick	`1.1.5`	indirect
crates.io	allocator-api2	`0.2.21`	indirect
crates.io	anstream	`1.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	anstyle	`1.0.14`	indirect
crates.io	anstyle-parse	`1.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	anstyle-query	`1.1.5`	indirect
crates.io	anstyle-wincon	`3.0.11`	indirect
crates.io	arraydeque	`0.5.1`	indirect
crates.io	auditable-serde	`0.9.0`	indirect
crates.io	beef	`0.5.2`	indirect
crates.io	bitflags	`1.3.2`	indirect
crates.io	bitflags	`2.13.1`	indirect
crates.io	bumpalo	`3.20.3`	indirect
crates.io	bytes	`—`	indirect
crates.io	bytes	`1.12.1`	indirect
crates.io	cfg-if	`1.0.4`	indirect
crates.io	clap_builder	`4.6.6`	indirect
crates.io	clap_derive	`4.6.4`	indirect
crates.io	clap_lex	`1.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	colorchoice	`1.0.5`	indirect
crates.io	core_detect	`1.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	crc32fast	`1.5.1`	indirect
crates.io	defmt	`1.1.1`	indirect
crates.io	defmt-macros	`1.1.1`	indirect
crates.io	defmt-parser	`1.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	displaydoc	`0.2.7`	indirect
crates.io	encoding_rs	`0.8.41`	indirect
crates.io	env_filter	`2.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	equivalent	`1.0.2`	indirect
crates.io	errno	`0.3.14`	indirect
crates.io	escape8259	`0.5.3`	indirect
crates.io	fixedbitset	`0.4.2`	indirect
crates.io	flate2	`1.1.10`	indirect
crates.io	fnv	`1.0.7`	indirect
crates.io	foldhash	`0.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	form_urlencoded	`1.2.2`	indirect
crates.io	futures	`—`	indirect
crates.io	futures	`0.3.34`	indirect
crates.io	futures-channel	`0.3.34`	indirect
crates.io	futures-core	`0.3.34`	indirect
crates.io	futures-executor	`0.3.34`	indirect
crates.io	futures-io	`0.3.34`	indirect
crates.io	futures-macro	`0.3.34`	indirect
crates.io	futures-sink	`0.3.34`	indirect
crates.io	futures-task	`0.3.34`	indirect
crates.io	futures-util	`0.3.34`	indirect
crates.io	hashbrown	`0.14.5`	indirect
crates.io	hashbrown	`0.17.1`	indirect
crates.io	hashlink	`0.8.4`	indirect
crates.io	heck	`0.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	icu_collections	`2.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	icu_locale_core	`2.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	icu_normalizer	`2.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	icu_normalizer_data	`2.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	icu_properties	`2.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	icu_properties_data	`2.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	icu_provider	`2.3.1`	indirect
crates.io	id-arena	`2.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	idna	`1.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	idna_adapter	`1.2.2`	indirect
crates.io	indexmap	`2.14.2`	indirect
crates.io	is_terminal_polyfill	`1.70.2`	indirect
crates.io	itoa	`1.0.18`	indirect
crates.io	jiff	`0.2.35`	indirect
crates.io	jiff-core	`0.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	jiff-static	`0.2.35`	indirect
crates.io	lazy_static	`1.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	leb128fmt	`0.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	libc	`0.2.189`	indirect
crates.io	libtest-mimic	`—`	indirect
crates.io	libtest-mimic	`0.8.2`	indirect
crates.io	linux-raw-sys	`0.12.1`	indirect
crates.io	litemap	`0.8.3`	indirect
crates.io	log	`—`	indirect
crates.io	log	`0.4.34`	indirect
crates.io	logos	`0.14.4`	indirect
crates.io	logos-codegen	`0.14.4`	indirect
crates.io	logos-derive	`0.14.4`	indirect
crates.io	macro-string	`0.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	memchr	`2.8.3`	indirect
crates.io	miette	`7.6.0`	indirect
crates.io	miette-derive	`7.6.0`	indirect
crates.io	miniz_oxide	`0.9.1`	indirect
crates.io	multiversion	`0.9.0`	indirect
crates.io	multiversion-macros	`0.9.0`	indirect
crates.io	multiversion_no_op	`1.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	once_cell	`1.21.4`	indirect
crates.io	once_cell_polyfill	`1.70.2`	indirect
crates.io	percent-encoding	`2.3.2`	indirect
crates.io	petgraph	`0.6.5`	indirect
crates.io	pin-project-lite	`0.2.17`	indirect
crates.io	portable-atomic	`1.15.0`	indirect
crates.io	portable-atomic-util	`0.2.8`	indirect
crates.io	potential_utf	`0.1.6`	indirect
crates.io	prettyplease	`0.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	proc-macro2	`—`	indirect
crates.io	proc-macro2	`1.0.107`	indirect
crates.io	pulldown-cmark	`0.13.4`	indirect
crates.io	pulldown-cmark-escape	`0.11.0`	indirect
crates.io	quote	`—`	indirect
crates.io	quote	`1.0.47`	indirect
crates.io	regex	`—`	indirect
crates.io	regex	`1.13.1`	indirect
crates.io	regex-automata	`0.4.18`	indirect
crates.io	regex-syntax	`0.8.11`	indirect
crates.io	rustc-std-workspace-alloc	`—`	indirect
crates.io	rustc-std-workspace-alloc	`1.0.1`	indirect
crates.io	rustc-std-workspace-core	`—`	indirect
crates.io	rustc-std-workspace-core	`1.0.1`	indirect
crates.io	rustix	`1.1.4`	indirect
crates.io	rustversion	`1.0.23`	indirect
crates.io	scopeguard	`1.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	semver	`1.0.28`	indirect
crates.io	serde	`1.0.229`	indirect
crates.io	serde_core	`1.0.229`	indirect
crates.io	serde_derive	`1.0.229`	indirect
crates.io	serde_json	`1.0.151`	indirect
crates.io	serde_spanned	`1.1.1`	indirect
crates.io	serde_yaml2	`0.1.3`	indirect
crates.io	simd-adler32	`0.3.10`	indirect
crates.io	simdutf8	`0.1.5`	indirect
crates.io	slab	`0.4.12`	indirect
crates.io	smallvec	`1.16.0`	indirect
crates.io	spdx	`0.13.5`	indirect
crates.io	stable_deref_trait	`1.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	strsim	`0.11.1`	indirect
crates.io	syn	`2.0.119`	indirect
crates.io	syn	`3.0.5`	indirect
crates.io	synstructure	`0.13.2`	indirect
crates.io	terminal_size	`0.4.4`	indirect
crates.io	thiserror	`1.0.69`	indirect
crates.io	thiserror	`2.0.20`	indirect
crates.io	thiserror-impl	`1.0.69`	indirect
crates.io	thiserror-impl	`2.0.20`	indirect
crates.io	tinystr	`0.8.4`	indirect
crates.io	toml	`—`	indirect
crates.io	toml	`1.1.5+spec-1.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	toml_datetime	`1.1.1+spec-1.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	toml_parser	`1.1.3+spec-1.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	toml_writer	`1.1.2+spec-1.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	topological-sort	`0.2.2`	indirect
crates.io	unicase	`2.9.0`	indirect
crates.io	unicode-ident	`1.0.24`	indirect
crates.io	unicode-width	`0.1.14`	indirect
crates.io	unicode-width	`0.2.2`	indirect
crates.io	url	`2.5.8`	indirect
crates.io	utf8_iter	`1.0.4`	indirect
crates.io	utf8parse	`0.2.2`	indirect
crates.io	version_check	`0.9.5`	indirect
crates.io	wac-graph	`—`	indirect
crates.io	wac-graph	`0.11.0`	indirect
crates.io	wac-parser	`—`	indirect
crates.io	wac-parser	`0.11.0`	indirect
crates.io	wac-types	`—`	indirect
crates.io	wac-types	`0.11.0`	indirect
crates.io	wasi-preview1-component-adapter-provider	`—`	indirect
crates.io	wasi-preview1-component-adapter-provider	`48.0.1`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-compose	`0.262.0`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-metadata	`0.258.0`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-metadata	`0.262.0`	indirect
crates.io	wasmparser	`0.258.0`	indirect
crates.io	wasmparser	`0.262.0`	indirect
crates.io	wast	`262.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	wat	`1.262.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows-link	`0.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	windows-sys	`0.61.2`	indirect
crates.io	winnow	`1.0.4`	indirect
crates.io	wit-bindgen-rust-macro	`—`	indirect
crates.io	wit-parser	`0.262.0`	indirect
crates.io	writeable	`0.6.4`	indirect
crates.io	yaml-rust2	`0.8.1`	indirect
crates.io	yoke	`0.8.3`	indirect
crates.io	yoke-derive	`0.8.2`	indirect
crates.io	zerocopy	`0.8.57`	indirect
crates.io	zerocopy-derive	`0.8.57`	indirect
crates.io	zerofrom	`0.1.8`	indirect
crates.io	zerofrom-derive	`0.1.7`	indirect
crates.io	zerotrie	`0.2.5`	indirect
crates.io	zerovec	`0.11.8`	indirect
crates.io	zerovec-derive	`0.11.6`	indirect
crates.io	zlib-rs	`0.6.7`	indirect
crates.io	zmij	`1.0.23`	indirect

Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 175 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 15 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records