Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-19 08:45 UTC

bytedeco / javacv

Java interface to OpenCV, FFmpeg, and more

JavaCustom license★ 8,348 stars⑂ 1,615 forkssince Apr 2014View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryApplicationhow this is determined

bytedeco/javacv holds a health index of 65 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (73/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (50/100). It was last updated 68 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

65
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

65
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 60 is calibrated to 65 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

BytedecoOrganization
329 followers37 public repossince Nov 2013

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Mavenorg.bytedeco:javacv1.5.14-3170 days ago
Mavenorg.bytedeco:javacv-platform1.5.14-2470 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

54Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
18/36Push recency — last push 68 days ago
6.9/36Commit cadence — 10/52 weeks with commits
10.6/18Commit volume — 14 commits in the last year
4/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 5 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
commits_last_year14
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push68
active_weeks_last_year10
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 15 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 69 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — a release every ~220.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count15
latest_release_tag1.5.14
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release69
mean_days_between_releases220.1

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

73Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
60/60Stars — 8,348 stars
25/25Forks — 1,615 forks
13.2/15Watchers — 236 watchers
Inputs used
forks1,615
stars8,348
watchers236
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges3
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesshields.io, travis-ci.org
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

66Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
4.5/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 80% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 76 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 14 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled76
top_contributor_share0.801
How it's scored
33.2/42Issue resolution — 79% of issues closed
24.9/30PR acceptance — 122/147 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 4/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs122
open_issues457
closed_issues1,720
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.79
closed_unmerged_prs25
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
18.1/25Owner reach — 329 followers of bytedeco
23.5/25Track record — 37 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers329
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginbytedeco
public_repos37
account_age_days4,731

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on maven
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 70 days ago
20/20Version history — 31 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesorg.bytedeco:javacv, org.bytedeco:javacv-platform
ecosystemsmaven
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish70

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

55Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
4/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 1 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 8 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsjavacv, java, opencv, ffmpeg, computer-vision, multimedia, maven, opencv-java
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

56Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — no data
0.5/2.5CI-Tests — 1 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 2
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 4/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 14 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5License — license file detected
3/7.5Maintained — 5 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 4
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages16
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the maven:org.bytedeco:javacv@1.5.14 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 16 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

50Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
6.4/40Legible commit history — 12 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.12
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — platform/pom.xml, pom.xml, samples/pom.xml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — Java (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsplatform/pom.xml, pom.xml, samples/pom.xml
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Java (statically typed)
54/55Manageable file sizes — 2/111 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJava
largest_source_bytes69,964
source_files_sampled111
oversized_source_files2
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — samples
Inputs used
example_dirssamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

8,348GitHub stars
76contributors
14commits, last 12 months
68days since last push
15releases
1bus factor
457open issues
Mavenpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 1,615 ⇿
0Stars
1,615Forks
15Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

5007501,0001,2501,5001,7501,615102018-022022-062026-09
Major 0Minor 0Patch 14

Each point covers 8 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.5 / 10
4.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-19 08:44 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
2CI-Tests1 out of 4 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 2
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 4/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
10Contributorsproject has 14 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
4Maintained5 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 4
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 38
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Mavenorg.bytedeco:javacv${project.version}platform/pom.xml
Mavenorg.bytedeco:javacpp-platform${javacpp.version}platform/pom.xml
Mavenorg.bytedeco:openblas-platform0.3.34-${javacpp.version}platform/pom.xml
Mavenorg.bytedeco:opencv-platform4.14.0-${javacpp.version}platform/pom.xml
Mavenorg.bytedeco:ffmpeg-platform8.1.2-${javacpp.version}platform/pom.xml
Mavenorg.bytedeco:flycapture-platform2.13.3.31-1.5.9platform/pom.xml
Mavenorg.bytedeco:libdc1394-platform2.2.6-1.5.9platform/pom.xml
Mavenorg.bytedeco:libfreenect-platform0.5.7-1.5.9platform/pom.xml
Mavenorg.bytedeco:libfreenect2-platform0.2.0-1.5.9platform/pom.xml
Mavenorg.bytedeco:librealsense-platform1.12.4-1.5.9platform/pom.xml
Mavenorg.bytedeco:librealsense2-platform2.53.1-1.5.9platform/pom.xml
Mavenorg.bytedeco:videoinput-platform0.200-1.5.9platform/pom.xml
Mavenorg.bytedeco:artoolkitplus-platform2.3.1-1.5.9platform/pom.xml
Mavenorg.bytedeco:leptonica-platform1.87.0-${javacpp.version}platform/pom.xml
Mavenorg.bytedeco:tesseract-platform5.5.3-${javacpp.version}platform/pom.xml
Mavenorg.bytedeco:javacpp${javacpp.version}pom.xml
Mavenorg.bytedeco:openblas0.3.34-${javacpp.version}pom.xml
Mavenorg.bytedeco:opencv4.14.0-${javacpp.version}pom.xml
Mavenorg.bytedeco:ffmpeg8.1.2-${javacpp.version}pom.xml
Mavenorg.bytedeco:flycapture2.13.3.31-1.5.9pom.xml
Mavenorg.bytedeco:libdc13942.2.6-1.5.9pom.xml
Mavenorg.bytedeco:libfreenect0.5.7-1.5.9pom.xml
Mavenorg.bytedeco:libfreenect20.2.0-1.5.9pom.xml
Mavenorg.bytedeco:librealsense1.12.4-1.5.9pom.xml
Mavenorg.bytedeco:librealsense22.53.1-1.5.9pom.xml
Mavenorg.bytedeco:videoinput0.200-1.5.9pom.xml
Mavenorg.bytedeco:artoolkitplus2.3.1-1.5.9pom.xml
Mavenorg.bytedeco:leptonica1.87.0-${javacpp.version}pom.xml
Mavenorg.bytedeco:tesseract5.5.3-${javacpp.version}pom.xml
Mavencom.google.android:android4.1.1.4pom.xml
Mavenorg.jogamp.gluegen:gluegen-rt-main2.6.0pom.xml
Mavenorg.jogamp.jogl:jogl-all-main2.6.0pom.xml
Mavenorg.jogamp.jocl:jocl-main2.6.0pom.xml
Mavencom.badlogicgames.gdx:gdx1.14.0pom.xml
Mavenorg.openjfx:javafx-graphics11pom.xml
Mavenorg.openjfx:javafx-graphics17pom.xml
Mavenorg.openjfx:javafx-graphics21pom.xml
Mavenorg.openjfx:javafx-graphics25pom.xml
All dependencies 47

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 38 direct and 9 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Mavencom.badlogicgames.gdx:gdx1.14.0direct
Mavencom.google.android:android4.1.1.4direct
Mavenorg.bytedeco:artoolkitplus2.3.1-1.5.9direct
Mavenorg.bytedeco:artoolkitplus-platform2.3.1-1.5.9direct
Mavenorg.bytedeco:ffmpeg—direct
Mavenorg.bytedeco:ffmpeg-platform—direct
Mavenorg.bytedeco:flycapture2.13.3.31-1.5.9direct
Mavenorg.bytedeco:flycapture-platform2.13.3.31-1.5.9direct
Mavenorg.bytedeco:javacpp—direct
Mavenorg.bytedeco:javacpp-platform—direct
Mavenorg.bytedeco:javacv1.5.15-SNAPSHOTdirect
Mavenorg.bytedeco:leptonica—direct
Mavenorg.bytedeco:leptonica-platform—direct
Mavenorg.bytedeco:libdc13942.2.6-1.5.9direct
Mavenorg.bytedeco:libdc1394-platform2.2.6-1.5.9direct
Mavenorg.bytedeco:libfreenect0.5.7-1.5.9direct
Mavenorg.bytedeco:libfreenect-platform0.5.7-1.5.9direct
Mavenorg.bytedeco:libfreenect20.2.0-1.5.9direct
Mavenorg.bytedeco:libfreenect2-platform0.2.0-1.5.9direct
Mavenorg.bytedeco:librealsense1.12.4-1.5.9direct
Mavenorg.bytedeco:librealsense-platform1.12.4-1.5.9direct
Mavenorg.bytedeco:librealsense22.53.1-1.5.9direct
Mavenorg.bytedeco:librealsense2-platform2.53.1-1.5.9direct
Mavenorg.bytedeco:openblas—direct
Mavenorg.bytedeco:openblas-platform—direct
Mavenorg.bytedeco:opencv—direct
Mavenorg.bytedeco:opencv-platform—direct
Mavenorg.bytedeco:tesseract—direct
Mavenorg.bytedeco:tesseract-platform—direct
Mavenorg.bytedeco:videoinput0.200-1.5.9direct
Mavenorg.bytedeco:videoinput-platform0.200-1.5.9direct
Mavenorg.jogamp.gluegen:gluegen-rt-main2.6.0direct
Mavenorg.jogamp.jocl:jocl-main2.6.0direct
Mavenorg.jogamp.jogl:jogl-all-main2.6.0direct
Mavenorg.openjfx:javafx-graphics11direct
Mavenorg.openjfx:javafx-graphics17direct
Mavenorg.openjfx:javafx-graphics21direct
Mavenorg.openjfx:javafx-graphics25direct
Mavenjunit:junit4.13.2indirect
Mavennet.java.openjfx.backport:openjfx-78-backport1.8.0-ea-b96.1indirect
Mavenorg.bytedeco:ffmpeg-platform-gpl—indirect
Mavenorg.bytedeco:ffmpeg-platform-gpl8.1.2-1.5.14indirect
Mavenorg.bytedeco:javacv-platform1.5.14indirect
Mavenorg.bytedeco:opencv-platform-gpu—indirect
Mavenorg.bytedeco:opencv-platform-gpu4.14.0-1.5.14indirect
Mavenorg.moditect:moditect-maven-plugin1.3.0indirect
Mavenorg.sonatype.central:central-publishing-maven-plugin0.8.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing maven:org.bytedeco:javacv@1.5.14 pulls in 16 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Maven.