Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-10 21:39 UTC

callowayproject / bump-my-version

A small command line tool to simplify releasing software by updating all version strings in your source code by the correct increment and optionally commit and tag the changes.

PythonMIT★ 625 stars⑂ 43 forkssince Apr 2023View on GitHub ↗

KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

#bumpversion #version #versioning #hacktoberfest

callowayproject/bump-my-version holds a health index of 92 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (96/100) and lowest on Security (59/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 78 is calibrated to 92 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

CallowayOrganization

5 followers97 public repossince Jun 2010

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
PyPI	bump-my-version	1.5.1	1,140,812	92	35 days ago	bumpversion release version

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

86Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

83Excellent

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 1 days ago
19.4/36	Commit cadence — 28/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 126 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	126
human_commit_share	0.85
days_since_last_push	1
active_weeks_last_year	28

Release discipline

90Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 91 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 35 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~36.3 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.

Inputs used

releases_count	91
latest_release_tag	1.5.1
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	35
mean_days_between_releases	36.3

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

82Excellent · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

62Moderate

How it's scored

45.3/60	Stars — 625 stars
13.5/25	Forks — 43 forks
3.3/15	Watchers — 5 watchers

Inputs used

forks	43
stars	625
watchers	5
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

93Exceptional

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5	Code of conduct
7.2/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	5
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	yes
has_code_of_conduct	yes
readme_badge_services	codecov.io, github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

100Exceptional

How it's scored

80/80	Monthly downloads — 1,140,812 downloads/month across pypi
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	bump-my-version
dependents	—
ecosystems	pypi
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	1,140,812
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

65Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

34At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.4/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 94% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 29 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	29
top_contributor_share	0.94

Issue & PR responsiveness

78Good

How it's scored

37.8/42	Issue resolution — 90% of issues closed
28.5/30	PR acceptance — 232/244 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 2/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1

Inputs used

merged_prs	232
open_issues	16
closed_issues	142
prs_merged_7d	1
prs_decided_7d	1
prs_merged_30d	1
prs_decided_30d	1
issue_closed_ratio	0.899
closed_unmerged_prs	12
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

61Moderate

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
5.6/25	Owner reach — 5 followers of callowayproject
25/25	Track record — 97 public repos, account ~16 yr old

Inputs used

followers	5
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	no
owner_login	callowayproject
public_repos	97
account_age_days	5,931

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 35 days ago
20/20	Version history — 92 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	bump-my-version
ecosystems	pypi
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	35

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

96Exceptional · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

94Exceptional

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
9.6/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4	.editorconfig
14/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 7 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	yes
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	yes

Documentation

100Exceptional

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://callowayproject.github.io/bump-my-version/
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 4 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	bumpversion, version, versioning, hacktoberfest
has_wiki	yes
homepage	https://callowayproject.github.io/bump-my-version/
docs_site	https://callowayproject.github.io/bump-my-version/
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

59Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

49Weak

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
1.8/2.5	CI-Tests — 7 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5	Code-Review — Found 2/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
2.5/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 5
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 23 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	17
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	1
scorecard_aggregate	4.9

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	0
affected_packages	0
assessed_packages	25
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	none
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:bump-my-version@1.5.1 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 25 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

72Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

84Excellent

How it's scored

45/45	Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
15/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://docs.pydantic.dev/llms.txt)
23.8/40	Legible commit history — 38 of 85 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	yes
llms_txt_url	https://docs.pydantic.dev/llms.txt
legible_history_share	0.447
agent_instruction_files	AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes	3,460

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

69Good

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — justfile
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — pyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8	Automated maintenance — 7 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	uv.lock
has_dockerfile	yes
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	justfile
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.07

Code legibility for models

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — Python without a type-check config
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/88 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Python
largest_source_bytes	23,796
source_files_sampled	88
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

625GitHub stars

29contributors

126commits, last 12 months

1days since last push

91releases

1bus factor

16open issues

PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 43 ⇿

0Stars

43Forks

87Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 1Minor 32Patch 54

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.9 / 10

4.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-10 21:39 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
7	CI-Tests	7 out of 9 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 7
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1	Code-Review	Found 2/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
10	Contributors	project has 4 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
5	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 5
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
0	Signed-Releases	Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0	Vulnerabilities	23 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 9

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
PyPI	pydantic	`>=2.0.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	pydantic-settings	`—`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	questionary	`—`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	rich-click	`—`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	rich	`—`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	tomlkit	`—`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	wcmatch	`>=8.5.1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	httpx2	`—`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	click	`!=8.4`	pyproject.toml

All dependencies 169

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 13 direct and 156 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
PyPI	click	`8.1.8`	direct
PyPI	click	`8.5.0`	direct
PyPI	httpx2	`2.0.0`	direct
PyPI	httpx2	`2.12.0`	direct
PyPI	pydantic	`2.13.5`	direct
PyPI	pydantic-settings	`2.11.0`	direct
PyPI	pydantic-settings	`2.15.0`	direct
PyPI	questionary	`2.1.1`	direct
PyPI	rich	`15.0.0`	direct
PyPI	rich-click	`1.9.9`	direct
PyPI	tomlkit	`0.15.1`	direct
PyPI	wcmatch	`10.1`	direct
PyPI	wcmatch	`11.0.1`	direct
PyPI	annotated-types	`0.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	annotated-types	`0.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	anyio	`4.12.1`	indirect
PyPI	anyio	`4.15.1`	indirect
PyPI	argopt	`0.9.1`	indirect
PyPI	babel	`2.18.0`	indirect
PyPI	backrefs	`6.2`	indirect
PyPI	backrefs	`8.0`	indirect
PyPI	beautifulsoup4	`4.15.0`	indirect
PyPI	boltons	`26.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	bracex	`2.6`	indirect
PyPI	bracex	`3.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	build	`1.4.4`	indirect
PyPI	build	`1.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	certifi	`2026.7.22`	indirect
PyPI	cffi	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	cffi	`2.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	cfgv	`3.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	cfgv	`3.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	charset-normalizer	`3.5.1`	indirect
PyPI	click-extra	`9.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	cloup	`3.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	colorama	`0.4.6`	indirect
PyPI	coverage	`7.10.7`	indirect
PyPI	coverage	`7.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	cryptography	`47.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	cryptography	`50.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	deepmerge	`3.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	distlib	`0.4.3`	indirect
PyPI	exceptiongroup	`1.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	extra-platforms	`13.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	filelock	`3.19.1`	indirect
PyPI	filelock	`3.32.6`	indirect
PyPI	freezegun	`1.5.5`	indirect
PyPI	generate-changelog	`0.17.0`	indirect
PyPI	ghp-import	`2.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	git-fame	`4.2.1`	indirect
PyPI	gitdb	`4.0.12`	indirect
PyPI	gitpython	`3.1.62`	indirect
PyPI	griffe	`1.14.0`	indirect
PyPI	griffelib	`2.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	h11	`0.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	httpcore2	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	httpcore2	`2.12.0`	indirect
PyPI	httpx2-jsfetch	`1.0`	indirect
PyPI	identify	`2.6.15`	indirect
PyPI	identify	`2.6.19`	indirect
PyPI	idna	`3.19`	indirect
PyPI	importlib-metadata	`8.7.1`	indirect
PyPI	importlib-metadata	`9.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	iniconfig	`2.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	iniconfig	`2.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	jinja2	`3.1.6`	indirect
PyPI	lxml	`6.1.3`	indirect
PyPI	markdown	`3.10.3`	indirect
PyPI	markdown	`3.9`	indirect
PyPI	markdown-it-py	`3.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	markdown-it-py	`4.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	markupsafe	`3.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	mdformat	`0.7.22`	indirect
PyPI	mdformat	`1.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	mdurl	`0.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	mdx-truly-sane-lists	`1.3`	indirect
PyPI	mergedeep	`1.3.4`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs	`1.6.1`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-autorefs	`1.4.4`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-click	`0.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-drawio	`1.16.3`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-gen-files	`0.6.1`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-get-deps	`0.2.2`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-git-authors-plugin	`0.10.0`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-git-committers-plugin	`0.2.3`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-git-revision-date-localized-plugin	`1.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-git-revision-date-localized-plugin	`1.5.4`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-include-markdown-plugin	`7.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-literate-nav	`0.6.3`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-material	`9.7.7`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocs-material-extensions	`1.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocstrings	`0.30.1`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocstrings	`1.0.6`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocstrings-python	`1.18.2`	indirect
PyPI	mkdocstrings-python	`2.0.8`	indirect
PyPI	more-itertools	`10.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	more-itertools	`11.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	nodeenv	`1.10.0`	indirect
PyPI	packaging	`26.3`	indirect
PyPI	paginate	`0.5.7`	indirect
PyPI	pathspec	`1.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	pip	`26.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	pip	`26.2.1`	indirect
PyPI	pip-tools	`7.6.1`	indirect
PyPI	platformdirs	`4.11.8`	indirect
PyPI	platformdirs	`4.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	pluggy	`1.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	pre-commit	`4.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	pre-commit	`4.6.2`	indirect
PyPI	prompt-toolkit	`3.0.52`	indirect
PyPI	prompt-toolkit	`3.0.53`	indirect
PyPI	properdocs	`1.6.7`	indirect
PyPI	pycparser	`2.23`	indirect
PyPI	pycparser	`3.0`	indirect
PyPI	pydantic-core	`2.46.5`	indirect
PyPI	pygithub	`2.10.0`	indirect
PyPI	pygithub	`2.9.1`	indirect
PyPI	pygments	`2.21.0`	indirect
PyPI	pyjwt	`2.13.0`	indirect
PyPI	pymdown-extensions	`10.21.3`	indirect
PyPI	pymdown-extensions	`11.0.2`	indirect
PyPI	pynacl	`1.6.2`	indirect
PyPI	pypng	`0.20220715.0`	indirect
PyPI	pyproject-hooks	`1.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytest	`8.4.2`	indirect
PyPI	pytest	`9.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-agent-digest	`0.3.2`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-cov	`7.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-localserver	`0.10.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-mock	`3.15.1`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-sugar	`1.1.1`	indirect
PyPI	python-dateutil	`2.9.0.post0`	indirect
PyPI	python-discovery	`1.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	python-dotenv	`1.2.1`	indirect
PyPI	python-dotenv	`1.2.3`	indirect
PyPI	python-frontmatter	`1.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	python-frontmatter	`1.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	pyyaml	`6.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	pyyaml-env-tag	`1.1`	indirect
PyPI	requests	`2.32.5`	indirect
PyPI	requests	`2.34.2`	indirect
PyPI	ruamel-yaml	`0.19.1`	indirect
PyPI	setuptools	`82.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	setuptools	`84.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	shtab	`1.12.1`	indirect
PyPI	six	`1.17.0`	indirect
PyPI	smmap	`5.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	soupsieve	`2.8.4`	indirect
PyPI	soupsieve	`2.9.2`	indirect
PyPI	tabulate	`0.10.0`	indirect
PyPI	tabulate	`0.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	termcolor	`3.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	termcolor	`3.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	tomli	`2.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	tqdm	`4.70.0`	indirect
PyPI	truststore	`0.10.4`	indirect
PyPI	typing-extensions	`4.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	typing-inspection	`0.4.2`	indirect
PyPI	typing-inspection	`0.4.4`	indirect
PyPI	tzdata	`2026.3`	indirect
PyPI	urllib3	`2.6.3`	indirect
PyPI	urllib3	`2.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	virtualenv	`21.7.9`	indirect
PyPI	watchdog	`6.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	wcwidth	`0.8.3`	indirect
PyPI	werkzeug	`3.1.8`	indirect
PyPI	wheel	`0.48.0`	indirect
PyPI	zipp	`3.23.1`	indirect
PyPI	zipp	`4.1.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:bump-my-version@1.5.1 pulls in 25 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records