Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-17 06:09 UTC

camusdb / camusdb-dotnet

CamusDB Dotnet

C#MIT★ 1 star⑂ 0 forkssince Nov 2023View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined

camusdb/camusdb-dotnet holds a health index of 29 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Vitality (54/100) and lowest on Security (1/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

29
overall / 100
At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

29
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 35 is calibrated to 29 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Camus DBPersonal account
0 followers7 public repossince Nov 2021

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetCamusDB.Client0.6.3-250 days agodotnetcamusdbadodatabase
NuGetCamusDB.EntityFrameworkCore0.6.3-250 days agodotnetcamusdbentityframeworkefcore

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

54Moderate · 21% of overall

Development activity

60Moderate
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
4.8/36Commit cadence — 7/52 weeks with commits
13.1/18Commit volume — 28 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — no data
Inputs used
commits_last_year28
human_commit_share—
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year7

Release discipline

44Weak
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 1 releases published
0/36Release recency — latest release 926 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — cadence unknown (single release)
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count1
latest_release_tagv0.0.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release926
mean_days_between_releases—

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

33At Risk · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

1Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 1 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 2 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars1
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

59Moderate
How it's scored
47.5/80Total downloads — 37,414 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesCamusDB.Client, CamusDB.EntityFrameworkCore
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads37,414
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

43Weak · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

14Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.5/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 98% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — no data
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.977

Ownership & stewardship

32At Risk
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
0/25Owner reach — 0 followers of camusdb
15.8/25Track record — 7 public repos, account ~4 yr old
Inputs used
followers0
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_logincamusdb
public_repos7
account_age_days1,692
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 25 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesCamusDB.Client, CamusDB.EntityFrameworkCore
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

38Weak · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

30At Risk
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

1Critical · 16% of overall

Security posture

1Critical
How it's scored
0/30Security policy (SECURITY.md)
0/25Dependabot config
0/25Dependency lockfiles — published library — lockfiles are an application concern, not expected
0/20CodeQL workflow
Inputs used
sourcefile_signals
lockfiles—
manifestsCamusDB.Client.Tests/CamusDB.Client.Tests.csproj, CamusDB.Client/CamusDB.Client.csproj, CamusDB.EntityFrameworkCore/CamusDB.EntityFrameworkCore.csproj
has_codeql_workflowno
has_security_policyno
has_dependabot_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dependency lockfiles. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

25At Risk · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit history — no data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share—
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

15Critical
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no data
0/8Automated maintenance — no data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share—
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/122 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes36,779
source_files_sampled122
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

1GitHub stars
2contributors
28commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
1releases
1bus factor
0open issues
NuGetpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • OpenSSF Scorecard timed out after 240s; skipping Scorecard checks

More detail

Direct dependencies 10
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.12.0CamusDB.Client.Tests/CamusDB.Client.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore10.0.9CamusDB.Client.Tests/CamusDB.Client.Tests.csproj
NuGetxunit2.9.3CamusDB.Client.Tests/CamusDB.Client.Tests.csproj
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio3.0.1CamusDB.Client.Tests/CamusDB.Client.Tests.csproj
NuGetcoverlet.collector6.0.4CamusDB.Client.Tests/CamusDB.Client.Tests.csproj
NuGetFlurl4.0.0CamusDB.Client/CamusDB.Client.csproj
NuGetFlurl.Http4.0.2CamusDB.Client/CamusDB.Client.csproj
NuGetPolly8.7.0CamusDB.Client/CamusDB.Client.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Relational10.0.9CamusDB.EntityFrameworkCore/CamusDB.EntityFrameworkCore.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Design10.0.9CamusDB.EntityFrameworkCore/CamusDB.EntityFrameworkCore.csproj
All dependencies 10

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 10 direct and 0 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetcoverlet.collector6.0.4direct
NuGetFlurl4.0.0direct
NuGetFlurl.Http4.0.2direct
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore10.0.9direct
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Design10.0.9direct
NuGetMicrosoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Relational10.0.9direct
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.12.0direct
NuGetPolly8.7.0direct
NuGetxunit2.9.3direct
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio3.0.1direct
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with camusdb/camusdb-dotnet. Read them side by side →

97ravendb/ravendbACID Document DatabaseExceptional94NLog/NLogNLog - Flexible and Structured Logging for various .NET PlatformsExceptional92snowflakedb/snowflake-connector-netSnowflake Connector for .NETExcellent91mysql-net/MySqlConnectorMySQL Connector for .NETExcellent91ClickHouse/clickhouse-csOfficial .NET client for ClickHouse DBExcellent100dotnet/aspnetcoreASP.NET Core is a cross-platform .NET framework for building modern cloud-based web applications on Windows, Mac, or Linux.Exceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.