Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-14 04:07 UTC

cdpdriver / zendriver

A blazing fast, async-first, undetectable webscraping/web automation framework based on ultrafunkamsterdam/nodriver. Now with Docker support!

PythonAGPL-3.0★ 1,429 stars⑂ 109 forkssince Oct 2024View on GitHub ↗

cdpdriver/zendriver holds a health index of 84 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (84/100) and lowest on Security (52/100). It was last updated 28 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

84
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

84
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 71 is calibrated to 84 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

CDP DriverOrganization
17 followers8 public repossince Jul 2025

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
PyPIzendriver0.16.0121,9314428 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

77Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recencylast push 28 days ago
10.4/36Commit cadence15/52 weeks with commits
13.6/18Commit volume32 commits in the last year
8/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained9 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
commits_last_year32
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push28
active_weeks_last_year15

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases43 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 28 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~39.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count43
latest_release_tagv0.16.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release28
mean_days_between_releases39.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

83Excellent · 17% of overall
How it's scored
51.2/60Stars1,429 stars
16.9/25Forks109 forks
7.2/15Watchers21 watchers
Inputs used
forks109
stars1,429
watchers21
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (AGPL-3.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges5
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicescodecov.io, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

61Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
8.3/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 63% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth31 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 10 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled31
top_contributor_share0.632
How it's scored
24.1/42Issue resolution57% of issues closed
24.8/30PR acceptance76/92 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
6/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 14/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
merged_prs76
open_issues75
closed_issues101
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio0.574
closed_unmerged_prs16
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d1
first_time_prs_decided_30d1
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domain
9/25Owner reach17 followers of cdpdriver
9.3/25Track record8 public repos, account ~1 yr old
Inputs used
followers17
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_logincdpdriver
public_repos8
account_age_days432

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 28 days ago
20/20Version history44 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packageszendriver
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish28

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

84Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter configpyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
16/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests13 out of 16 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://zendriver.dev
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics15 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicschrome, chrome-devtools-protocol, python, webscraping, async, anti-bot, bot-detection, browser, captcha, chromedriver, cloudflare, cloudflare-bypass, selenium, webdriver, browser-automation
has_wikino
homepagehttps://zendriver.dev
docs_sitehttps://zendriver.dev
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

52Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3.8/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2/2.5CI-Tests13 out of 16 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3/7.5Code-ReviewFound 14/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 10 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
6/7.5Maintained9 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 8
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities21 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriesno indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages7
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:zendriver@0.16.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 7 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

57Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
26.7/40Legible commit history50 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.5
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format configpyproject.toml ([tool.ruff])
11/11Static type checkingzendriver/cdp/py.typed, zendriver/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenanceno automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesuv.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configszendriver/cdp/py.typed, zendriver/py.typed
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable codePython with type-check config (zendriver/cdp/py.typed, zendriver/py.typed)
51.6/55Manageable file sizes7/113 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes199,119
source_files_sampled113
oversized_source_files7
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

1,429GitHub stars
31contributors
32commits, last 12 months
28days since last push
43releases
1bus factor
75open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 109 ⇿
0Stars
109Forks
41Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

02040608010012010642024-112025-102026-09
Major 0Minor 14Patch 27

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.0 / 10
4.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-14 04:06 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
8CI-Tests13 out of 16 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4Code-ReviewFound 14/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
10Contributorsproject has 10 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
8Maintained9 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 8
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities21 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 6
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIasyncio-atexit>=1.0.1pyproject.toml
PyPIdeprecated>=1.2.14pyproject.toml
PyPIemoji>=2.14.1pyproject.toml
PyPIgrapheme>=0.6.0pyproject.toml
PyPImss>=9.0.2pyproject.toml
PyPIwebsockets>=14.0pyproject.toml
All dependencies 60

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 6 direct and 54 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIasyncio-atexit1.0.1direct
PyPIdeprecated1.2.15direct
PyPIemoji2.14.1direct
PyPIgrapheme0.6.0direct
PyPImss10.0.0direct
PyPIwebsockets14.1direct
PyPIbabel2.16.0indirect
PyPIcertifi2024.8.30indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.0indirect
PyPIclick8.1.7indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcoverage7.9.2indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.2.2indirect
PyPIghp-import2.1.0indirect
PyPIgriffe1.5.1indirect
PyPIidna3.10indirect
PyPIinflection0.5.1indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.0.0indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.4indirect
PyPImarkdown3.7indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.2indirect
PyPImergedeep1.3.4indirect
PyPImkdocs1.6.1indirect
PyPImkdocs-autorefs1.2.0indirect
PyPImkdocs-get-deps0.2.0indirect
PyPImkdocs-material9.5.44indirect
PyPImkdocs-material-extensions1.3.1indirect
PyPImkdocstrings0.27.0indirect
PyPImkdocstrings-python1.12.2indirect
PyPImypy1.13.0indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.0.0indirect
PyPIpackaging24.2indirect
PyPIpaginate0.5.7indirect
PyPIpathspec0.12.1indirect
PyPIplatformdirs4.3.6indirect
PyPIpluggy1.5.0indirect
PyPIpsutil7.1.3indirect
PyPIpygments2.18.0indirect
PyPIpymdown-extensions10.12indirect
PyPIpytest8.3.3indirect
PyPIpytest-asyncio0.24.0indirect
PyPIpytest-cov6.2.1indirect
PyPIpytest-mock3.14.0indirect
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.2indirect
PyPIpyyaml-env-tag0.1indirect
PyPIregex2024.11.6indirect
PyPIrequests2.32.3indirect
PyPIruff0.7.4indirect
PyPIsix1.16.0indirect
PyPItomli2.1.0indirect
PyPItypes-deprecated1.2.15.20241117indirect
PyPItypes-psutil7.0.0.20251001indirect
PyPItypes-pyyaml6.0.12.20240917indirect
PyPItypes-requests2.32.0.20241016indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.12.2indirect
PyPIurllib32.2.3indirect
PyPIwatchdog6.0.0indirect
PyPIwrapt1.16.0indirect
PyPIzendriver0.16.0indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:zendriver@0.16.0 pulls in 7 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPyPI.