Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-13 06:44 UTC

centreon / centreon-test-lib

Library for implement Behat acceptance test and PHPUnit unittest

PHPApache-2.0★ 8 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Mar 2016View on GitHub ↗

centreon/centreon-test-lib holds a health index of 57 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (76/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (37/100). It was last updated 42 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

57
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

57
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 55 is calibrated to 57 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

CentreonOrganization · verified domain
125 followers17 public repossince Jun 2012

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
Packagistcentreon/centreon-test-libdev-master1,805-51 days agobehat

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

37Weak · 21% of overall
How it's scored
18/36Push recency — last push 42 days ago
6.2/36Commit cadence — 9/52 weeks with commits
11.5/18Commit volume — 18 commits in the last year
4/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 5 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
commits_last_year18
human_commit_share0.86
days_since_last_push42
active_weeks_last_year9
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 1 version tags (no GitHub releases)
0/36Release recency — latest release 2,571 days ago
12.6/27Release cadence — cadence unknown (single release)
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count1
latest_release_tag18.10.0
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release2,571
mean_days_between_releases—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

55Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
13.7/60Stars — 8 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
8/15Watchers — 29 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars8
watchers29
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

100Exceptional
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
7.2/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateyes
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateyes
How it's scored
43.4/80Monthly downloads — 1,805 downloads/month across packagist
0/20Registry dependents — 0 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagescentreon/centreon-test-lib
dependents0
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads2,038,821
monthly_downloads1,805
unverified_packages_excluded—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

76Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
11.7/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 48% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 21 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled21
top_contributor_share0.48
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolution — no issues or no data
27.6/30PR acceptance — 270/293 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
6/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 14/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
merged_prs270
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio—
closed_unmerged_prs23
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20Verified domain
15.1/25Owner reach — 125 followers of centreon
21.1/25Track record — 17 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers125
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedyes
owner_logincentreon
public_repos17
account_age_days5,192

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 51 days ago
0/20Version history — no data
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagescentreon/centreon-test-lib
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish51
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Version history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

52Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .php-cs-fixer.dist.php
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
8/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 7 out of 17 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 4
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

54Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3.8/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
1/2.5CI-Tests — 7 out of 17 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 4
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3/7.5Code-Review — Found 14/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
3/7.5Maintained — 5 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 4
0/5Packaging — no data
1.5/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 16 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
14.8/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: guzzlehttp/guzzle 7.9.3 (high 7.2)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
40/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory has been public longer than 90 days
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories16
affected_packages3
assessed_packages51
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 1, moderate 2
direct_affected_packages1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 51 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

37Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 85 of 86 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.988
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
0/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .php-cs-fixer.dist.php
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
5/8Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfilescomposer.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/142 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes39,896
source_files_sampled142
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

8GitHub stars
21contributors
18commits, last 12 months
42days since last push
1releases
2bus factor
0open issues
Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.9 / 10
4.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-13 06:44 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
4CI-Tests7 out of 17 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 4
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4Code-ReviewFound 14/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
4Maintained5 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 4
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
3Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities16 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 9
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistbehat/behat3.23.*composer.json
Packagistguzzlehttp/guzzle7.9.*composer.json
Packagistjustinrainbow/json-schema5.3.*composer.json
Packagistleague/openapi-psr7-validator0.17.*composer.json
Packagistnyholm/psr71.8.*composer.json
Packagistpsr/http-client1.0.*composer.json
Packagistsymfony/http-client7.4.*composer.json
Packagistsymfony/property-access7.4.*composer.json
Packagistwebmozart/assert1.11.*composer.json
All dependencies 51

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 9 direct and 42 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistbehat/behat3.23.0direct
Packagistguzzlehttp/guzzle7.9.3direct
Packagistjustinrainbow/json-schema5.3.4direct
Packagistleague/openapi-psr7-validator0.17direct
Packagistnyholm/psr71.8.2direct
Packagistpsr/http-client1.0.3direct
Packagistsymfony/http-client7.4.9direct
Packagistsymfony/property-access7.4.8direct
Packagistwebmozart/assert1.11.0direct
Packagistbehat/gherkin4.16.1indirect
Packagistcebe/php-openapi1.8.0indirect
Packagistcomposer/pcre3.3.2indirect
Packagistcomposer/xdebug-handler3.0.5indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/promises2.3.0indirect
Packagistguzzlehttp/psr72.9.0indirect
Packagistleague/uri6.8.0indirect
Packagistleague/uri-interfaces2.3.0indirect
Packagistnikic/php-parser5.7.0indirect
Packagistpsr/cache3.0.0indirect
Packagistpsr/container2.0.2indirect
Packagistpsr/event-dispatcher1.0.0indirect
Packagistpsr/http-factory1.1.0indirect
Packagistpsr/http-message1.1indirect
Packagistpsr/http-server-handler1.0.2indirect
Packagistpsr/http-server-middleware1.0.2indirect
Packagistpsr/log3.0.2indirect
Packagistralouphie/getallheaders3.0.3indirect
Packagistrespect/stringifier1.0.0indirect
Packagistrespect/validation2.4.12indirect
Packagistriverline/multipart-parser2.2.2indirect
Packagistsymfony/config7.4.10indirect
Packagistsymfony/console7.4.11indirect
Packagistsymfony/dependency-injection7.4.10indirect
Packagistsymfony/deprecation-contracts3.7.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher7.4.9indirect
Packagistsymfony/event-dispatcher-contracts3.7.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/filesystem8.0.11indirect
Packagistsymfony/http-client-contracts3.7.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-ctype1.37.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-grapheme1.37.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-intl-normalizer1.37.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-mbstring1.37.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/polyfill-php831.37.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/property-info8.0.8indirect
Packagistsymfony/service-contracts3.7.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/string8.0.11indirect
Packagistsymfony/translation7.4.10indirect
Packagistsymfony/translation-contracts3.7.0indirect
Packagistsymfony/type-info8.0.9indirect
Packagistsymfony/var-exporter8.0.9indirect
Packagistsymfony/yaml7.4.11indirect
Dependency advisories 3

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 51 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 3 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
guzzlehttp/guzzle7.9.3directhigh98.0.1
guzzlehttp/psr72.9.0indirectmoderate42.12.3
symfony/yaml7.4.11indirectmoderate38.0.12

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.