Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-15 03:37 UTC

cerbos / cerbos-sdk-php

PHP SDK for interacting with the Cerbos PDP

PHPApache-2.0★ 4 stars⑂ 2 forkssince Jun 2022View on GitHub ↗

cerbos/cerbos-sdk-php holds a health index of 81 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Security (86/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (47/100). It was last updated 3 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 69 is calibrated to 81 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

CerbosOrganization · verified domain

211 followers89 public repossince Mar 2021

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
Packagist	cerbos/cerbos-sdk-php	v1.13.1	701	44	12 days ago	cerbos pdp

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

83Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

80Excellent

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 3 days ago
17.3/36	Commit cadence — 25/52 weeks with commits
16.5/18	Commit volume — 67 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 12 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	67
human_commit_share	0.22
days_since_last_push	3
active_weeks_last_year	25

Release discipline

88Excellent

How it's scored

16.2/27	Ships releases — 44 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36	Release recency — latest release 12 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~23.8 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	44
latest_release_tag	v1.13.1
releases_from_tags	yes
days_since_latest_release	12
mean_days_between_releases	23.8

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

47Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

11Critical

How it's scored

7.7/60	Stars — 4 stars
0/25	Forks — 2 forks
3.3/15	Watchers — 5 watchers

Inputs used

forks	2
stars	4
watchers	5
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

92Excellent

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
6.3/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	3
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	yes
readme_badge_services	poser.pugx.org
has_pull_request_template	yes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

41Weak

How it's scored

38/80	Monthly downloads — 701 downloads/month across packagist
3.2/20	Registry dependents — 2 packages depend on it

Inputs used

packages	cerbos/cerbos-sdk-php
dependents	2
ecosystems	packagist
total_downloads	8,103
monthly_downloads	701
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

71Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

18Critical

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.5/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 94% of commits
4.1/13.5	Contributor breadth — 3 contributors
3/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	3
top_contributor_share	0.935

Issue & PR responsiveness

90Excellent

How it's scored

36/42	Issue resolution — 86% of issues closed
27.2/30	PR acceptance — 178/196 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed

Inputs used

merged_prs	178
open_issues	1
closed_issues	6
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	0.857
closed_unmerged_prs	18
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

91Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
20/20	Verified domain
16.7/25	Owner reach — 211 followers of cerbos
24.2/25	Track record — 89 public repos, account ~5 yr old

Inputs used

followers	211
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	yes
owner_login	cerbos
public_repos	89
account_age_days	2,037

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on packagist
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 12 days ago
20/20	Version history — 44 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	cerbos/cerbos-sdk-php
ecosystems	packagist
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	12

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

61Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

68Good

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

50Moderate

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 5 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	cerbos, php, client, pdp, sdk
has_wiki	no
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

86Excellent · 16% of overall

Security posture

83Excellent

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5	Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
0.8/2.5	Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 12 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
5/5	Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned
5/5	SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
7.5/7.5	Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
7.5/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	15
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	3
scorecard_aggregate	8.3

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	0
affected_packages	0
assessed_packages	107
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	none
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 107 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

59Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://docs.cerbos.dev/llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 22 of 22 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	yes
llms_txt_url	https://docs.cerbos.dev/llms.txt
legible_history_share	1
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

68Good

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — .justfile
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8	Automated maintenance — 78 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — all dependencies are pinned

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	composer.lock
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	.justfile
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.78

Code legibility for models

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — PHP without a type-check config
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/442 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	PHP
largest_source_bytes	28,279
source_files_sampled	442
oversized_source_files	0

Machine-readable interfaces

50Moderate

How it's scored

40/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — protos/authzen/authorization/v1/evaluation.proto, protos/authzen/authorization/v1/svc.proto, protos/buf/validate/validate.proto, protos/cerbos/audit/v1/audit.proto, protos/cerbos/cloud/apikey/v1/apikey.proto, protos/cerbos/cloud/auth/v1/auth.proto, protos/cerbos/cloud/store/v1/store.proto, protos/cerbos/effect/v1/effect.proto, protos/cerbos/engine/v1/engine.proto, protos/cerbos/policy/v1/policy.proto, protos/cerbos/request/v1/request.proto, protos/cerbos/response/v1/response.proto, protos/cerbos/schema/v1/schema.proto, protos/cerbos/svc/v1/svc.proto, protos/cerbos/telemetry/v1/telemetry.proto, protos/google/api/annotations.proto, protos/google/api/expr/v1alpha1/checked.proto, protos/google/api/expr/v1alpha1/syntax.proto, protos/google/api/field_behavior.proto, protos/google/api/http.proto, protos/google/api/visibility.proto, protos/grpc/health/v1/health.proto, protos/protoc-gen-openapiv2/options/annotations.proto, protos/protoc-gen-openapiv2/options/openapiv2.proto
0/20	MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
0/40	Runnable examples

Inputs used

example_dirs	—
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	protos/authzen/authorization/v1/evaluation.proto, protos/authzen/authorization/v1/svc.proto, protos/buf/validate/validate.proto, protos/cerbos/audit/v1/audit.proto, protos/cerbos/cloud/apikey/v1/apikey.proto, protos/cerbos/cloud/auth/v1/auth.proto, protos/cerbos/cloud/store/v1/store.proto, protos/cerbos/effect/v1/effect.proto, protos/cerbos/engine/v1/engine.proto, protos/cerbos/policy/v1/policy.proto, protos/cerbos/request/v1/request.proto, protos/cerbos/response/v1/response.proto, protos/cerbos/schema/v1/schema.proto, protos/cerbos/svc/v1/svc.proto, protos/cerbos/telemetry/v1/telemetry.proto, protos/google/api/annotations.proto, protos/google/api/expr/v1alpha1/checked.proto, protos/google/api/expr/v1alpha1/syntax.proto, protos/google/api/field_behavior.proto, protos/google/api/http.proto, protos/google/api/visibility.proto, protos/grpc/health/v1/health.proto, protos/protoc-gen-openapiv2/options/annotations.proto, protos/protoc-gen-openapiv2/options/openapiv2.proto
interfaces_expected_of	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

4GitHub stars

3contributors

67commits, last 12 months

3days since last push

44releases

1bus factor

1open issues

Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 2 ⇿

0Stars

2Forks

24Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 1Minor 10Patch 13

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 8.3 / 10

8.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-15 03:37 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10	CI-Tests	30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10	Code-Review	all changesets reviewed
3	Contributors	project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	12 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
10	Pinned-Dependencies	all dependencies are pinned
10	SAST	SAST tool is run on all commits
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
10	Token-Permissions	GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
10	Vulnerabilities	0 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 4

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Packagist	google/common-protos	`^4.12`	composer.json
Packagist	google/protobuf	`^v5.0.0`	composer.json
Packagist	grpc/grpc	`^1.74`	composer.json
Packagist	ramsey/uuid	`^4.9`	composer.json

All dependencies 107

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 4 direct and 103 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Packagist	google/common-protos	`4.14.3`	direct
Packagist	google/protobuf	`5.36.2`	direct
Packagist	grpc/grpc	`1.82.0`	direct
Packagist	ramsey/uuid	`4.9.4`	direct
Packagist	amphp/amp	`3.1.3`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/byte-stream	`2.1.2`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/cache	`2.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/dns	`2.4.1`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/parallel	`2.4.0`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/parser	`1.1.1`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/pipeline	`1.2.7`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/process	`2.1.0`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/serialization	`1.1.0`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/socket	`2.4.1`	indirect
Packagist	amphp/sync	`2.3.0`	indirect
Packagist	beluga-php/docker-php	`1.45.8`	indirect
Packagist	beluga-php/docker-php-api	`7.1.45.5`	indirect
Packagist	brick/math	`1.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	clue/stream-filter	`1.7.0`	indirect
Packagist	composer/pcre	`3.4.0`	indirect
Packagist	composer/semver	`3.5.0`	indirect
Packagist	composer/xdebug-handler	`3.0.5`	indirect
Packagist	danog/advanced-json-rpc	`3.2.3`	indirect
Packagist	daverandom/libdns	`2.1.0`	indirect
Packagist	dnoegel/php-xdg-base-dir	`0.1.1`	indirect
Packagist	doctrine/deprecations	`1.1.6`	indirect
Packagist	felixfbecker/language-server-protocol	`1.5.3`	indirect
Packagist	fidry/cpu-core-counter	`1.4.1`	indirect
Packagist	jane-php/json-schema-runtime	`7.14.4`	indirect
Packagist	jane-php/open-api-runtime	`7.14.4`	indirect
Packagist	kelunik/certificate	`1.1.3`	indirect
Packagist	league/uri	`7.8.1`	indirect
Packagist	league/uri-interfaces	`7.8.1`	indirect
Packagist	myclabs/deep-copy	`1.14.0`	indirect
Packagist	netresearch/jsonmapper	`5.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	nikic/php-parser	`5.9.0`	indirect
Packagist	nyholm/psr7	`1.8.2`	indirect
Packagist	phar-io/manifest	`2.0.4`	indirect
Packagist	phar-io/version	`3.2.1`	indirect
Packagist	php-http/client-common	`2.7.3`	indirect
Packagist	php-http/discovery	`1.20.0`	indirect
Packagist	php-http/httplug	`2.4.1`	indirect
Packagist	php-http/message	`1.16.2`	indirect
Packagist	php-http/multipart-stream-builder	`1.4.2`	indirect
Packagist	php-http/promise	`1.3.1`	indirect
Packagist	php-http/socket-client	`2.4.0`	indirect
Packagist	php-jsonpointer/php-jsonpointer	`4.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	php-parallel-lint/php-parallel-lint	`1.4.0`	indirect
Packagist	phpdocumentor/reflection-common	`2.2.1`	indirect
Packagist	phpdocumentor/reflection-docblock	`6.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	phpdocumentor/type-resolver	`2.1.0`	indirect
Packagist	phpstan/phpdoc-parser	`2.3.6`	indirect
Packagist	phpstan/phpstan	`2.2.17`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-code-coverage	`14.4.1`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-file-iterator	`7.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-invoker	`7.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-text-template	`6.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/php-timer	`9.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	phpunit/phpunit	`13.4.0`	indirect
Packagist	psr/container	`2.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	psr/http-client	`1.0.3`	indirect
Packagist	psr/http-factory	`1.1.0`	indirect
Packagist	psr/http-message	`2.0`	indirect
Packagist	psr/log	`3.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	ramsey/collection	`2.1.1`	indirect
Packagist	revolt/event-loop	`1.0.9`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/cli-parser	`5.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/comparator	`8.4.0`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/complexity	`6.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/diff	`9.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/environment	`9.3.3`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/exporter	`8.2.1`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/file-filter	`1.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/git-state	`1.0.0`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/global-state	`9.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/lines-of-code	`5.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/object-enumerator	`8.1.0`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/object-reflector	`6.1.0`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/recursion-context	`8.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/type	`7.0.2`	indirect
Packagist	sebastian/version	`7.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	spatie/array-to-xml	`3.4.4`	indirect
Packagist	staabm/side-effects-detector	`1.0.5`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/console	`8.1.8`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/deprecation-contracts	`3.7.1`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/filesystem	`8.1.6`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/http-client	`8.1.8`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/http-client-contracts	`3.7.3`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/options-resolver	`8.1.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-ctype	`1.37.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-intl-grapheme	`1.43.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-intl-normalizer	`1.43.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-mbstring	`1.43.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-php80	`1.43.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-php84	`1.43.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/polyfill-php85	`1.43.0`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/process	`8.1.7`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/serializer	`8.1.8`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/service-contracts	`3.7.3`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/string	`8.1.7`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/translation-contracts	`3.7.1`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/validator	`8.1.8`	indirect
Packagist	symfony/yaml	`8.1.8`	indirect
Packagist	testcontainers/testcontainers	`1.1.0`	indirect
Packagist	theseer/tokenizer	`2.0.1`	indirect
Packagist	vimeo/psalm	`6.19.1`	indirect
Packagist	webmozart/assert	`2.4.1`	indirect

Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 107 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Packagist.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records