Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-15 16:44 UTC

chainguard-dev / bincapz

#supply #chain #attack #detection

Go · YARAApache-2.0★ 670 stars⑂ 62 forkssince Feb 2024View on GitHub ↗
KindTerminal interfacehow this is determined

chainguard-dev/bincapz holds a health index of 95 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (99/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (59/100). It was last updated 1 day ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

95
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

95
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 82 is calibrated to 95 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

ChainguardOrganization
840 followers116 public repossince Jul 2021

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/chainguard-dev/malcontentpoints to another repo — not scoredv1.25.3-1172 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

99Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 1 days ago
35.3/36Commit cadence51/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume488 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year488
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push1
active_weeks_last_year51

Release discipline

100Exceptional
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases100 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 2 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~9.3 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv1.25.3
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release2
mean_days_between_releases9.3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

59Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
45.8/60Stars670 stars
14.9/25Forks62 forks
5.3/15Watchers10 watchers
Inputs used
forks62
stars670
watchers10
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

82Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
15.5/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 31% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth34 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 7 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled34
top_contributor_share0.309
How it's scored
40.7/42Issue resolution97% of issues closed
26.2/30PR acceptance1,243/1,424 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs1,243
open_issues6
closed_issues180
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.968
closed_unmerged_prs181
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
21/25Owner reach840 followers of chainguard-dev
23/25Track record116 public repos, account ~5 yr old
Inputs used
followers840
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginchainguard-dev
public_repos116
account_age_days1,827
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

74Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows13 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.golangci.yml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics6 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsbinary, reverse-engineering, linux, macos, malware-analysis, no-ghaudit-default-permissions
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

95Exceptional · 16% of overall

Security posture

95Exceptional
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
6/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 7 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
5/5Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
5/5Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
5/5SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
7.5/7.5Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
6.8/7.5Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate9.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

64Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapMakefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.golangci.yml
11/11Static type checkingGo (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
5/8Automated maintenancedependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeGo (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes0/105 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes43,027
source_files_sampled105
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

670GitHub stars
34contributors
488commits, last 12 months
1days since last push
100releases
2bus factor
6open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • go package 'github.com/chainguard-dev/malcontent' points at a different repository (https://github.com/chainguard-dev/malcontent); excluded from ecosystem scoring

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 9.5 / 10
9.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-15 16:43 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
8Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
10Contributorsproject has 7 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
10Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
10Pinned-Dependenciesall dependencies are pinned
10SASTSAST tool is run on all commits
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
10Token-PermissionsGitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
9Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 27
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/VirusTotal/yara-x/gov1.19.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/cavaliergopher/cpiov1.0.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/cavaliergopher/rpmv1.3.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/chainguard-dev/clogv1.8.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/bubblesv1.0.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/bubbleteav1.3.10go.mod
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/lipglossv1.1.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/cosnicolaou/pbzip2v1.0.6go.mod
Gogithub.com/egibs/go-debianv0.19.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/egibs/reconcilev1.0.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/fatih/colorv1.19.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/gabriel-vasile/mimetypev1.4.13go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/go-cmpv0.7.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/go-containerregistryv0.21.7go.mod
Gogithub.com/klauspost/compressv1.19.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/klauspost/pgzipv1.2.6go.mod
Gogithub.com/minio/sha256-simdv1.0.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/olekukonko/tablewriterv1.1.4go.mod
Gogithub.com/puzpuzpuz/xsync/v4v4.5.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/shirou/gopsutil/v4v4.26.6go.mod
Gogithub.com/ulikunitz/xzv0.5.15go.mod
Gogithub.com/urfave/cli/v3v3.10.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/wk8/go-ordered-map/v2v2.1.8go.mod
Gogo.uber.org/goleakv1.3.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.22.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/termv0.45.0go.mod
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1go.mod
All dependencies 76

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 27 direct and 49 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/cavaliergopher/cpiov1.0.1direct
Gogithub.com/cavaliergopher/rpmv1.3.0direct
Gogithub.com/chainguard-dev/clogv1.8.1direct
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/bubblesv1.0.0direct
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/bubbleteav1.3.10direct
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/lipglossv1.1.0direct
Gogithub.com/cosnicolaou/pbzip2v1.0.6direct
Gogithub.com/egibs/go-debianv0.19.3direct
Gogithub.com/egibs/reconcilev1.0.0direct
Gogithub.com/fatih/colorv1.19.0direct
Gogithub.com/gabriel-vasile/mimetypev1.4.13direct
Gogithub.com/google/go-cmpv0.7.0direct
Gogithub.com/google/go-containerregistryv0.21.7direct
Gogithub.com/klauspost/compressv1.19.0direct
Gogithub.com/klauspost/pgzipv1.2.6direct
Gogithub.com/minio/sha256-simdv1.0.1direct
Gogithub.com/olekukonko/tablewriterv1.1.4direct
Gogithub.com/puzpuzpuz/xsync/v4v4.5.0direct
Gogithub.com/shirou/gopsutil/v4v4.26.6direct
Gogithub.com/ulikunitz/xzv0.5.15direct
Gogithub.com/urfave/cli/v3v3.10.1direct
Gogithub.com/virustotal/yara-x/gov1.19.0direct
Gogithub.com/wk8/go-ordered-map/v2v2.1.8direct
Gogo.uber.org/goleakv1.3.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.22.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/termv0.45.0direct
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1direct
Gogithub.com/aymanbagabas/go-osc52/v2v2.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/bahlo/generic-list-gov0.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/buger/jsonparserv1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/cespare/xxhash/v2v2.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/colorprofilev0.4.3indirect
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/x/ansiv0.11.7indirect
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/x/cellbufv0.0.15indirect
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/x/termv0.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/clipperhouse/displaywidthv0.11.0indirect
Gogithub.com/clipperhouse/uax29/v2v2.7.0indirect
Gogithub.com/docker/cliv29.6.1+incompatibleindirect
Gogithub.com/docker/docker-credential-helpersv0.9.8indirect
Gogithub.com/ebitengine/puregov0.10.1indirect
Gogithub.com/erikgeiser/coninputv0.0.0-20211004153227-1c3628e74d0findirect
Gogithub.com/go-ole/go-olev1.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/goccy/go-jsonv0.10.6indirect
Gogithub.com/klauspost/cpuid/v2v2.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/kr/prettyv0.3.1indirect
Gogithub.com/lucasb-eyer/go-colorfulv1.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/lufia/plan9statsv0.0.0-20260627054121-477a66015f15indirect
Gogithub.com/mailru/easyjsonv0.9.2indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-colorablev0.1.15indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-isattyv0.0.22indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-localereaderv0.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-runewidthv0.0.24indirect
Gogithub.com/muesli/ansiv0.0.0-20230316100256-276c6243b2f6indirect
Gogithub.com/muesli/cancelreaderv0.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/muesli/termenvv0.16.0indirect
Gogithub.com/olekukonko/catv0.0.0-20250911104152-50322a0618f6indirect
Gogithub.com/olekukonko/errorsv1.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/olekukonko/llv0.1.8indirect
Gogithub.com/opencontainers/go-digestv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/opencontainers/image-specv1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/pmezard/go-difflibv1.0.1-0.20181226105442-5d4384ee4fb2indirect
Gogithub.com/power-devops/perfstatv0.0.0-20240221224432-82ca36839d55indirect
Gogithub.com/rivo/unisegv0.4.7indirect
Gogithub.com/rogpeppe/go-internalv1.14.1indirect
Gogithub.com/sirupsen/logrusv1.9.4indirect
Gogithub.com/tklauser/go-sysconfv0.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/tklauser/numcpusv0.12.0indirect
Gogithub.com/xo/terminfov0.0.0-20220910002029-abceb7e1c41eindirect
Gogithub.com/yusufpapurcu/wmiv1.2.4indirect
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.54.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.47.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.40.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.36.11indirect
Gogopkg.in/check.v1v1.0.0-20201130134442-10cb98267c6cindirect
Gogotest.tools/v3v3.5.2indirect
Gopault.ag/go/topsortv0.1.1indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsGo.