Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-17 06:55 UTC

changkun / wallfacer

Chat, specs, tasks, and code. An autonomous engineering platform. Full autonomy when you trust it. Full control when you don't.

Go · Vue · TypeScriptMIT★ 76 stars⑂ 9 forkssince Feb 2026View on GitHub ↗
KindWeb interfacehow this is determined

changkun/wallfacer holds a health index of 78 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (86/100) and lowest on Security (42/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

78
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

78
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 67 is calibrated to 78 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Changkun OuPersonal account
4,834 followers147 public repossince Sep 2013Researcher @mimuc Staff Engineer @sixt Founder @latere-ai

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Golatere.ai/x/wallfacerv0.0.20-424 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

83Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
14.5/36Commit cadence21/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume3,955 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year3,955
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year21
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases33 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 4 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~1.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count33
latest_release_tagv0.0.20
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release4
mean_days_between_releases1.9

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

53Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
30.4/60Stars76 stars
7.5/25Forks9 forks
0/15Watchers2 watchers
Inputs used
forks9
stars76
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

64Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 100% of commits
4.1/13.5Contributor breadth3 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 12 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled3
top_contributor_share0.998
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution100% of issues closed
21.8/30PR acceptance8/11 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs8
open_issues0
closed_issues2
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs3
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
25/25Owner reach4,834 followers of changkun
25/25Track record147 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers4,834
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_loginchangkun
public_repos147
account_age_days4,683
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 4 days ago
20/20Version history42 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packageslatere.ai/x/wallfacer
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish4

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

84Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.golangci.yml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://wf.latere.ai/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics15 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsai-agents, orchestration, claude-code, developer-tools, golang, sandbox, task-board, autonomous-coding, codex, kanban, task-orchestration, autonomous-engineering, coding-agents, llm, spec-driven-development
has_wikino
homepagehttps://wf.latere.ai/
docs_sitehttps://wf.latere.ai/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

42Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Testsno data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 12 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
5/5Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTno SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilitiesno data
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Vulnerabilities. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

86Excellent · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructionsCLAUDE.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_filesCLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes659
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapMakefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.golangci.yml
11/11Static type checkingfrontend/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentDockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
0/8Automated maintenanceno data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configsfrontend/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeGo (statically typed)
54.6/55Manageable file sizes7/865 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes162,009
source_files_sampled865
oversized_source_files7

Key facts

76GitHub stars
3contributors
3,955commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
33releases
1bus factor
0open issues
Go, npmpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.2 / 10
4.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-17 06:55 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 12 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
10Fuzzingproject is fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
n/aVulnerabilitiesinternal error: vulnerabilitiesClient.ListUnfixedVulnerabilities: osvscanner.DoScan: client error: status="400 Bad Request" body={"code":3,"message":"error in query at index 414: rpc error: code = InvalidArgument desc = invalid hash"}
Direct dependencies 46
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@codemirror/commands^6.8.0frontend/package.json
npm@codemirror/language^6.10.8frontend/package.json
npm@codemirror/language-data^6.5.1frontend/package.json
npm@codemirror/state^6.5.2frontend/package.json
npm@codemirror/theme-one-dark^6.1.2frontend/package.json
npm@codemirror/view^6.36.2frontend/package.json
npm@excalidraw/excalidraw^0.18.1frontend/package.json
npm@opentelemetry/api^1.9.1frontend/package.json
npm@opentelemetry/context-zone^2.7.1frontend/package.json
npm@opentelemetry/exporter-trace-otlp-http^0.218.0frontend/package.json
npm@opentelemetry/instrumentation^0.218.0frontend/package.json
npm@opentelemetry/instrumentation-document-load^0.63.0frontend/package.json
npm@opentelemetry/instrumentation-fetch^0.218.0frontend/package.json
npm@opentelemetry/instrumentation-xml-http-request^0.218.0frontend/package.json
npm@opentelemetry/resources^2.7.1frontend/package.json
npm@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-web^2.7.1frontend/package.json
npm@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions^1.41.1frontend/package.json
npm@unhead/vue^2.0.0frontend/package.json
npm@xterm/addon-fit^0.11.0frontend/package.json
npm@xterm/xterm^6.0.0frontend/package.json
npmcodemirror^6.0.1frontend/package.json
npmhighlight.js^11.11.1frontend/package.json
npmlatere-uigithub:latere-ai/latere-ui#v1.26.2frontend/package.json
npmmarkdown-it^14.1.0frontend/package.json
npmmarkdown-it-anchor^9.2.0frontend/package.json
npmmermaid^11.14.0frontend/package.json
npmpinia^2.2.6frontend/package.json
npmreact^19.2.7frontend/package.json
npmreact-dom^19.2.7frontend/package.json
npmvite-ssg^28.3.0frontend/package.json
npmvue^3.5.13frontend/package.json
npmvue-router^4.4.5frontend/package.json
npmvuedraggable^4.1.0frontend/package.json
Gogithub.com/coder/websocketv1.8.14go.mod
Gogithub.com/fsnotify/fsnotifyv1.9.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/golang-migrate/migrate/v4v4.19.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/jackc/pgx/v5v5.10.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/oklog/ulid/v2v2.1.1go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/oauth2v0.36.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.20.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.43.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.36.0go.mod
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1go.mod
Golatere.ai/x/pkgv0.29.0go.mod
Golatere.ai/x/toposv0.1.0go.mod
All dependencies 84

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 45 direct and 39 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/coder/websocketv1.8.14direct
Gogithub.com/fsnotify/fsnotifyv1.9.0direct
Gogithub.com/golang-migrate/migrate/v4v4.19.1direct
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0direct
Gogithub.com/jackc/pgx/v5v5.10.0direct
Gogithub.com/oklog/ulid/v2v2.1.1direct
Gogolang.org/x/oauth2v0.36.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.20.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.43.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.36.0direct
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1direct
Golatere.ai/x/pkgv0.29.0direct
Golatere.ai/x/toposv0.1.0direct
npm@codemirror/commands^6.8.0direct
npm@codemirror/language^6.10.8direct
npm@codemirror/language-data^6.5.1direct
npm@codemirror/state^6.5.2direct
npm@codemirror/theme-one-dark^6.1.2direct
npm@codemirror/view^6.36.2direct
npm@excalidraw/excalidraw^0.18.1direct
npm@opentelemetry/api^1.9.1direct
npm@opentelemetry/context-zone^2.7.1direct
npm@opentelemetry/exporter-trace-otlp-http^0.218.0direct
npm@opentelemetry/instrumentation^0.218.0direct
npm@opentelemetry/instrumentation-document-load^0.63.0direct
npm@opentelemetry/instrumentation-fetch^0.218.0direct
npm@opentelemetry/instrumentation-xml-http-request^0.218.0direct
npm@opentelemetry/resources^2.7.1direct
npm@opentelemetry/sdk-trace-web^2.7.1direct
npm@opentelemetry/semantic-conventions^1.41.1direct
npm@unhead/vue^2.0.0direct
npm@xterm/addon-fit^0.11.0direct
npm@xterm/xterm^6.0.0direct
npmcodemirror^6.0.1direct
npmhighlight.js^11.11.1direct
npmmarkdown-it^14.1.0direct
npmmarkdown-it-anchor^9.2.0direct
npmmermaid^11.14.0direct
npmpinia^2.2.6direct
npmreact^19.2.7direct
npmreact-dom^19.2.7direct
npmvite-ssg^28.3.0direct
npmvue^3.5.13direct
npmvue-router^4.4.5direct
npmvuedraggable^4.1.0direct
Gogithub.com/cenkalti/backoff/v5v5.0.3indirect
Gogithub.com/cespare/xxhash/v2v2.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/felixge/httpsnoopv1.0.4indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/logrv1.4.3indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/stdrv1.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/grpc-ecosystem/grpc-gateway/v2v2.28.0indirect
Gogithub.com/jackc/pgerrcodev0.0.0-20220416144525-469b46aa5efaindirect
Gogithub.com/jackc/pgpassfilev1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/jackc/pgservicefilev0.0.0-20240606120523-5a60cdf6a761indirect
Gogithub.com/jackc/puddle/v2v2.2.2indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/auto/sdkv1.2.1indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/contrib/bridges/otelslogv0.18.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/net/http/otelhttpv0.67.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otelv1.43.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlplog/otlploghttpv0.19.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlpmetric/otlpmetrichttpv1.43.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptracev1.43.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/exporters/otlp/otlptrace/otlptracehttpv1.43.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/logv0.19.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/metricv1.43.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdkv1.43.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdk/logv0.19.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/sdk/metricv1.43.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/tracev1.43.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/proto/otlpv1.10.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.53.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/apiv0.0.0-20260401024825-9d38bb4040a9indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpcv0.0.0-20260401024825-9d38bb4040a9indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpcv1.80.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.36.11indirect
npm@types/markdown-it^14.1.2indirect
npm@types/react^19.2.17indirect
npm@types/react-dom^19.2.3indirect
npm@vitejs/plugin-vue^5.2.1indirect
npmhappy-dom^20.9.0indirect
npmtypescript^5.6.3indirect
npmvite^6.0.3indirect
npmvitest^4.1.5indirect
npmvue-tsc^2.1.10indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsGo.