Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-20 09:13 UTC

charmbracelet / soft-serve

The mighty, self-hostable Git server for the command line🍦

GoMIT★ 7,224 stars⑂ 242 forkssince Jul 2021View on GitHub ↗

KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

charmbracelet/soft-serve holds a health index of 89 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (84/100) and lowest on Security (64/100). It was last updated 19 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 75 is calibrated to 89 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

CharmOrganization

16,235 followers56 public repossince Nov 2019

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/soft-serve	v0.12.2	-	55	43 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

84Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

74Good

How it's scored

28.8/36	Push recency — last push 19 days ago
17.3/36	Commit cadence — 25/52 weeks with commits
17.4/18	Commit volume — 86 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	86
human_commit_share	0.68
days_since_last_push	19
active_weeks_last_year	25

Release discipline

98Exceptional

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 52 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 43 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~30.4 days
8/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.

Inputs used

releases_count	52
latest_release_tag	v0.12.2
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	43
mean_days_between_releases	30.4

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

83Excellent · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

88Excellent

How it's scored

60/60	Stars — 7,224 stars
19.9/25	Forks — 242 forks
8.6/15	Watchers — 36 watchers

Inputs used

forks	242
stars	7,224
watchers	36
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

77Good

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
6.3/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	3
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_template	yes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

69Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

40Weak

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
7.2/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 68% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 53 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 26 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	53
top_contributor_share	0.679

Issue & PR responsiveness

68Good

How it's scored

30.2/42	Issue resolution — 72% of issues closed
23/30	PR acceptance — 479/624 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
6/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 12/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4

Inputs used

merged_prs	479
open_issues	72
closed_issues	184
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	0.719
closed_unmerged_prs	145
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

80Excellent

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
25/25	Owner reach — 16,235 followers of charmbracelet
24.8/25	Track record — 56 public repos, account ~6 yr old

Inputs used

followers	16,235
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	no
owner_login	charmbracelet
public_repos	56
account_age_days	2,511

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on go
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 43 days ago
20/20	Version history — 55 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	github.com/charmbracelet/soft-serve
ecosystems	go
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	43

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

76Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

86Excellent

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 7 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — .golangci.yml
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4	.editorconfig
16/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 16 out of 18 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	yes
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

60Moderate

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 3 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	git, golang, ssh
has_wiki	yes
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

64Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

58Moderate

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2/2.5	CI-Tests — 16 out of 18 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3/7.5	Code-Review — Found 12/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 26 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5	Security-Policy — security policy file detected
6/7.5	Signed-Releases — 5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
4.5/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 4 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	17
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	1
scorecard_aggregate	5.8

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

89Excellent

How it's scored

26.6/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: golang.org/x/crypto v0.54.0 (unknown)
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
40/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory has been public longer than 90 days

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	4
affected_packages	1
assessed_packages	95
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	unknown 1
direct_affected_packages	1

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 95 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

73Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 64 of 68 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.941
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

88Excellent

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — Taskfile.yaml
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — .golangci.yml
11/11	Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10	Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
8/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 4 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8	Automated maintenance — 31 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	go.sum
has_dockerfile	yes
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	Taskfile.yaml
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0.04
toolchain_manifests	go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.31

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/240 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Go
largest_source_bytes	28,544
source_files_sampled	240
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

7,224GitHub stars

53contributors

86commits, last 12 months

19days since last push

52releases

1bus factor

72open issues

Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 242 ⇿

0Stars

242Forks

52Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 10Patch 42

Each point covers 5 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.8 / 10

5.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-20 09:13 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
8	CI-Tests	16 out of 18 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4	Code-Review	Found 12/27 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
10	Contributors	project has 26 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10	Security-Policy	security policy file detected
8	Signed-Releases	5 out of the last 5 releases have a total of 5 signed artifacts.
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6	Vulnerabilities	4 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 42

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Go	charm.land/bubbles/v2	`v2.1.1`	go.mod
Go	charm.land/bubbletea/v2	`v2.0.8`	go.mod
Go	charm.land/glamour/v2	`v2.0.1`	go.mod
Go	charm.land/lipgloss/v2	`v2.0.5`	go.mod
Go	charm.land/log/v2	`v2.0.0`	go.mod
Go	charm.land/ssh	`v0.4.3`	go.mod
Go	charm.land/wish/v2	`v2.0.3`	go.mod
Go	github.com/alecthomas/chroma/v2	`v2.27.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/aymanbagabas/git-module	`v1.8.4-0.20250826192401-1f81c5471e53`	go.mod
Go	github.com/caarlos0/duration	`v0.0.0-20241219124531-2bb7dc683aa4`	go.mod
Go	github.com/caarlos0/env/v11	`v11.4.1`	go.mod
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/colorprofile	`v0.4.3`	go.mod
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/git-lfs-transfer	`v0.1.1-0.20240708204110-bacbfdb68d92`	go.mod
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/keygen	`v0.5.4`	go.mod
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/x/ansi	`v0.11.7`	go.mod
Go	github.com/dustin/go-humanize	`v1.0.1`	go.mod
Go	github.com/go-git/go-git/v5	`v5.19.2`	go.mod
Go	github.com/go-jose/go-jose/v3	`v3.0.5`	go.mod
Go	github.com/gobwas/glob	`v0.2.3`	go.mod
Go	github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v5	`v5.3.1`	go.mod
Go	github.com/google/go-querystring	`v1.2.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/google/uuid	`v1.6.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/gorilla/handlers	`v1.5.2`	go.mod
Go	github.com/gorilla/mux	`v1.8.1`	go.mod
Go	github.com/hashicorp/golang-lru/v2	`v2.0.7`	go.mod
Go	github.com/jmoiron/sqlx	`v1.4.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/lib/pq	`v1.12.3`	go.mod
Go	github.com/lrstanley/bubblezone/v2	`v2.0.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/matryer/is	`v1.4.1`	go.mod
Go	github.com/muesli/mango-cobra	`v1.3.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/muesli/reflow	`v0.3.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/muesli/roff	`v0.1.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/prometheus/client_golang	`v1.24.1`	go.mod
Go	github.com/robfig/cron/v3	`v3.0.1`	go.mod
Go	github.com/rogpeppe/go-internal	`v1.16.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/sergi/go-diff	`v1.4.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/spf13/cobra	`v1.10.2`	go.mod
Go	go.uber.org/automaxprocs	`v1.6.0`	go.mod
Go	golang.org/x/crypto	`v0.54.0`	go.mod
Go	golang.org/x/sync	`v0.22.0`	go.mod
Go	gopkg.in/yaml.v3	`v3.0.1`	go.mod
Go	modernc.org/sqlite	`v1.56.0`	go.mod

All dependencies 95

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 42 direct and 53 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Go	charm.land/bubbles/v2	`v2.1.1`	direct
Go	charm.land/bubbletea/v2	`v2.0.8`	direct
Go	charm.land/glamour/v2	`v2.0.1`	direct
Go	charm.land/lipgloss/v2	`v2.0.5`	direct
Go	charm.land/log/v2	`v2.0.0`	direct
Go	charm.land/ssh	`v0.4.3`	direct
Go	charm.land/wish/v2	`v2.0.3`	direct
Go	github.com/alecthomas/chroma/v2	`v2.27.0`	direct
Go	github.com/aymanbagabas/git-module	`v1.8.4-0.20250826192401-1f81c5471e53`	direct
Go	github.com/caarlos0/duration	`v0.0.0-20241219124531-2bb7dc683aa4`	direct
Go	github.com/caarlos0/env/v11	`v11.4.1`	direct
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/colorprofile	`v0.4.3`	direct
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/git-lfs-transfer	`v0.1.1-0.20240708204110-bacbfdb68d92`	direct
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/keygen	`v0.5.4`	direct
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/x/ansi	`v0.11.7`	direct
Go	github.com/dustin/go-humanize	`v1.0.1`	direct
Go	github.com/go-git/go-git/v5	`v5.19.2`	direct
Go	github.com/go-jose/go-jose/v3	`v3.0.5`	direct
Go	github.com/gobwas/glob	`v0.2.3`	direct
Go	github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v5	`v5.3.1`	direct
Go	github.com/google/go-querystring	`v1.2.0`	direct
Go	github.com/google/uuid	`v1.6.0`	direct
Go	github.com/gorilla/handlers	`v1.5.2`	direct
Go	github.com/gorilla/mux	`v1.8.1`	direct
Go	github.com/hashicorp/golang-lru/v2	`v2.0.7`	direct
Go	github.com/jmoiron/sqlx	`v1.4.0`	direct
Go	github.com/lib/pq	`v1.12.3`	direct
Go	github.com/lrstanley/bubblezone/v2	`v2.0.0`	direct
Go	github.com/matryer/is	`v1.4.1`	direct
Go	github.com/muesli/mango-cobra	`v1.3.0`	direct
Go	github.com/muesli/reflow	`v0.3.0`	direct
Go	github.com/muesli/roff	`v0.1.0`	direct
Go	github.com/prometheus/client_golang	`v1.24.1`	direct
Go	github.com/robfig/cron/v3	`v3.0.1`	direct
Go	github.com/rogpeppe/go-internal	`v1.16.0`	direct
Go	github.com/sergi/go-diff	`v1.4.0`	direct
Go	github.com/spf13/cobra	`v1.10.2`	direct
Go	go.uber.org/automaxprocs	`v1.6.0`	direct
Go	golang.org/x/crypto	`v0.54.0`	direct
Go	golang.org/x/sync	`v0.22.0`	direct
Go	gopkg.in/yaml.v3	`v3.0.1`	direct
Go	modernc.org/sqlite	`v1.56.0`	direct
Go	github.com/anmitsu/go-shlex	`v0.0.0-20200514113438-38f4b401e2be`	indirect
Go	github.com/atotto/clipboard	`v0.1.4`	indirect
Go	github.com/aymerick/douceur	`v0.2.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/beorn7/perks	`v1.0.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/cespare/xxhash/v2	`v2.3.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/ultraviolet	`v0.0.0-20260730003005-19049f296fa9`	indirect
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/x/conpty	`v0.2.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/x/exp/slice	`v0.0.0-20260727090823-41c9e6be3365`	indirect
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/x/term	`v0.2.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/x/termios	`v0.1.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/x/windows	`v0.2.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/charmbracelet/x/xpty	`v0.1.4`	indirect
Go	github.com/clipperhouse/displaywidth	`v0.11.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/clipperhouse/uax29/v2	`v2.7.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/creack/pty	`v1.1.24`	indirect
Go	github.com/dlclark/regexp2/v2	`v2.5.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/felixge/httpsnoop	`v1.1.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/git-lfs/pktline	`v0.0.0-20230103162542-ca444d533ef1`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-git/gcfg	`v1.5.1-0.20230307220236-3a3c6141e376`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-logfmt/logfmt	`v0.6.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/gorilla/css	`v1.0.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/inconshreveable/mousetrap	`v1.1.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/lucasb-eyer/go-colorful	`v1.4.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/mattn/go-isatty	`v0.0.24`	indirect
Go	github.com/mattn/go-runewidth	`v0.0.27`	indirect
Go	github.com/mcuadros/go-version	`v0.0.0-20190830083331-035f6764e8d2`	indirect
Go	github.com/microcosm-cc/bluemonday	`v1.0.27`	indirect
Go	github.com/muesli/cancelreader	`v0.2.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/muesli/mango	`v0.2.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/muesli/mango-pflag	`v0.2.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/munnerz/goautoneg	`v0.0.0-20191010083416-a7dc8b61c822`	indirect
Go	github.com/ncruces/go-strftime	`v1.0.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/pires/go-proxyproto	`v0.15.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/prometheus/client_model	`v0.6.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/prometheus/common	`v0.70.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/prometheus/procfs	`v0.21.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/remyoudompheng/bigfft	`v0.0.0-20230129092748-24d4a6f8daec`	indirect
Go	github.com/rivo/uniseg	`v0.4.7`	indirect
Go	github.com/sahilm/fuzzy	`v0.1.3`	indirect
Go	github.com/spf13/pflag	`v1.0.10`	indirect
Go	github.com/xo/terminfo	`v0.0.0-20220910002029-abceb7e1c41e`	indirect
Go	github.com/yuin/goldmark	`v1.8.5`	indirect
Go	github.com/yuin/goldmark-emoji	`v1.0.6`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/exp	`v0.0.0-20260727155853-b88d891fe743`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/net	`v0.57.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/sys	`v0.47.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/text	`v0.40.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/tools	`v0.48.0`	indirect
Go	google.golang.org/protobuf	`v1.36.11`	indirect
Go	gopkg.in/warnings.v0	`v0.1.2`	indirect
Go	modernc.org/libc	`v1.74.4`	indirect
Go	modernc.org/mathutil	`v1.7.1`	indirect
Go	modernc.org/memory	`v1.11.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 95 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
golang.org/x/crypto	`v0.54.0`	direct	unknown	4	`0.56.0`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records