Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-20 03:04 UTC

charmbracelet / wish

Make SSH apps, just like that! 💫

GoMIT★ 5,513 stars⑂ 124 forkssince Dec 2019View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryApplicationhow this is determined

charmbracelet/wish holds a health index of 88 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Community & Adoption (81/100) and lowest on Security (63/100). It was last updated 9 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

88
overall / 100
Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

88
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 74 is calibrated to 88 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

CharmOrganization
16,234 followers56 public repossince Nov 2019

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gocharm.land/wish/v2v2.0.4-59 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

79Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 9 days ago
14.5/36Commit cadence — 21/52 weeks with commits
17/18Commit volume — 77 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 26 commit(s) and 6 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year77
human_commit_share0.53
days_since_last_push9
active_weeks_last_year21
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 31 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 9 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~81.8 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count31
latest_release_tagv2.0.4
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release9
mean_days_between_releases81.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

81Excellent · 17% of overall
How it's scored
60/60Stars — 5,513 stars
17.4/25Forks — 124 forks
6.2/15Watchers — 14 watchers
Inputs used
forks124
stars5,513
watchers14
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges4
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, goreportcard.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

77Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
12.8/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 43% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 23 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 27 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled23
top_contributor_share0.43
How it's scored
36.2/42Issue resolution — 86% of issues closed
24.5/30PR acceptance — 414/506 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
4.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 8/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
merged_prs414
open_issues7
closed_issues44
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio0.863
closed_unmerged_prs92
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
25/25Owner reach — 16,234 followers of charmbracelet
24.8/25Track record — 56 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers16,234
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_logincharmbracelet
public_repos56
account_age_days2,511

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on go
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 9 days ago
20/20Version history — 5 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagescharm.land/wish/v2
ecosystemsgo
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish9

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

70Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 6 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .golangci.yml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
12/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 11 out of 17 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 2 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicshacktoberfest, ssh
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

63Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
1.5/2.5CI-Tests — 11 out of 17 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2.2/7.5Code-Review — Found 8/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
2.5/2.5Contributors — project has 27 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained — 26 commit(s) and 6 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6.8/7.5Vulnerabilities — 1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate5.7
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
26.6/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 1 affected: golang.org/x/crypto v0.57.0 (unknown)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
40/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory has been public longer than 90 days
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories1
affected_packages1
assessed_packages59
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityunknown 1
direct_affected_packages1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 59 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

74Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 46 of 53 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.868
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Taskfile.yaml
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .golangci.yml
11/11Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 46 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesTaskfile.yaml
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsexamples/go.mod, go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0.46
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/55 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes14,585
source_files_sampled55
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_of—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

5,513GitHub stars
23contributors
77commits, last 12 months
9days since last push
31releases
2bus factor
7open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 124 ⇿
0Stars
124Forks
29Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

025507510012512432021-122024-042026-09
Major 2Minor 10Patch 17

Each point covers 5 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.7 / 10
5.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-20 03:04 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
6CI-Tests11 out of 17 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 6
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3Code-ReviewFound 8/21 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
10Contributorsproject has 27 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained26 commit(s) and 6 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
9Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 13
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gocharm.land/bubbletea/v2v2.0.9go.mod
Gocharm.land/log/v2v2.0.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/colorprofilev0.4.3go.mod
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/keygenv0.5.4go.mod
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/x/xptyv0.1.4go.mod
Gogithub.com/go-git/go-git/v5v5.19.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/google/go-cmpv0.7.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/golang-lru/v2v2.0.7go.mod
Gogithub.com/matryer/isv1.4.1go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.57.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.23.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/timev0.16.0go.mod
Gocharm.land/sshv0.4.3go.mod
All dependencies 59

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 13 direct and 46 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gocharm.land/bubbletea/v2v2.0.9direct
Gocharm.land/log/v2v2.0.1direct
Gocharm.land/sshv0.4.3direct
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/colorprofilev0.4.3direct
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/keygenv0.5.4direct
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/x/xptyv0.1.4direct
Gogithub.com/go-git/go-git/v5v5.19.2direct
Gogithub.com/google/go-cmpv0.7.0direct
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/golang-lru/v2v2.0.7direct
Gogithub.com/matryer/isv1.4.1direct
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.57.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.23.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/timev0.16.0direct
Gocharm.land/bubbles/v2v2.2.1indirect
Gocharm.land/lipgloss/v2v2.0.6indirect
Godario.cat/mergov1.0.2indirect
Gogithub.com/anmitsu/go-shlexv0.0.0-20200514113438-38f4b401e2beindirect
Gogithub.com/atotto/clipboardv0.1.4indirect
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/ultravioletv0.0.0-20260906173415-0277a179edd9indirect
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/x/ansiv0.11.8indirect
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/x/conptyv0.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/x/editorv0.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/x/termv0.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/x/termiosv0.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/x/windowsv0.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/clipperhouse/displaywidthv0.11.0indirect
Gogithub.com/clipperhouse/uax29/v2v2.7.0indirect
Gogithub.com/cloudflare/circlv1.6.5indirect
Gogithub.com/creack/ptyv1.1.24indirect
Gogithub.com/cyphar/filepath-securejoinv0.7.0indirect
Gogithub.com/emirpasic/godsv1.18.1indirect
Gogithub.com/go-git/gcfgv1.5.1-0.20230307220236-3a3c6141e376indirect
Gogithub.com/go-git/go-billy/v5v5.9.1indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logfmt/logfmtv0.6.1indirect
Gogithub.com/golang/groupcachev0.0.0-20241129210726-2c02b8208cf8indirect
Gogithub.com/inconshreveable/mousetrapv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/jbenet/go-contextv0.0.0-20150711004518-d14ea06fba99indirect
Gogithub.com/kevinburke/ssh_configv1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/klauspost/cpuid/v2v2.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/kr/fsv0.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/lucasb-eyer/go-colorfulv1.4.1indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-runewidthv0.0.30indirect
Gogithub.com/microsoft/go-winiov0.6.2indirect
Gogithub.com/muesli/cancelreaderv0.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/pires/go-proxyprotov0.15.0indirect
Gogithub.com/pjbgf/sha1cdv0.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/pkg/sftpv1.13.11indirect
Gogithub.com/protonmail/go-cryptov1.4.1indirect
Gogithub.com/rivo/unisegv0.4.7indirect
Gogithub.com/sergi/go-diffv1.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/skeema/knownhostsv1.3.3indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.10.2indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/pflagv1.0.10indirect
Gogithub.com/xanzy/ssh-agentv0.3.3indirect
Gogithub.com/xo/terminfov1.0.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/expv0.0.0-20260908205506-85c1c2202abaindirect
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.59.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.48.0indirect
Gogopkg.in/warnings.v0v0.1.2indirect
Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 59 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 1 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
golang.org/x/cryptov0.57.0directunknown1—

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.