Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-10 14:34 UTC

chhsiao1981 / pttbbs-backend

go implementation of openbbs-middleware.

GoGPL-3.0★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Dec 2020forkView on GitHub ↗

KindNetwork servicehow this is determined

chhsiao1981/pttbbs-backend holds a health index of 39 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Vitality (68/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (12/100). It was last updated 12 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 43 is calibrated to 39 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Chuan-Heng HsiaoPersonal account

24 followers205 public repossince Dec 2012

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
Go	github.com/Ptt-official-app/pttbbs-backendpoints to another repo — not scored	v0.44.2	-	173	32 days ago
PyPI	apidocpoints to another repo — not scored	1.4.0	98	5	3777 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

68Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

54Moderate

How it's scored

28.8/36	Push recency — last push 12 days ago
8.3/36	Commit cadence — 12/52 weeks with commits
16.9/18	Commit volume — 76 commits in the last year
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

commits_last_year	76
human_commit_share	0.75
days_since_last_push	12
active_weeks_last_year	12

Release discipline

88Excellent

How it's scored

16.2/27	Ships releases — 99 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36	Release recency — latest release 32 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~8.1 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	99
latest_release_tag	v0.44.2
releases_from_tags	yes
days_since_latest_release	32
mean_days_between_releases	8.1

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

12Critical · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

1Critical

How it's scored

0/60	Stars — 0 stars
0/25	Forks — 0 forks
0/15	Watchers — 0 watchers

Inputs used

forks	0
stars	0
watchers	0
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

25At Risk

How it's scored

0/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (GPL-3.0)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	no
has_license	no
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

28At Risk · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

26At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.6/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 93% of commits
5.4/13.5	Contributor breadth — 4 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 26 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	4
top_contributor_share	0.927

Issue & PR responsiveness

1Critical

How it's scored

0/42	Issue resolution — no issues or no data
0/30	PR acceptance — no decided pull requests or no data
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	0
open_issues	0
closed_issues	0
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	—
closed_unmerged_prs	0
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, PR acceptance, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

56Moderate

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
10.1/25	Owner reach — 24 followers of chhsiao1981
25/25	Track record — 205 public repos, account ~13 yr old

Inputs used

followers	24
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	chhsiao1981
public_repos	205
account_age_days	5,027

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

62Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

80Excellent

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — .golangci.yaml
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
0/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

35Weak

How it's scored

0/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
0/10	Repository description
0/10	Topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	—
has_wiki	yes
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	no
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	no

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

35Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

33At Risk

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5	CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 26 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
0/7.5	Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5	SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 37 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	15
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	3
scorecard_aggregate	3.3

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

44Weak

How it's scored

7.2/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 3 affected: google.golang.org/grpc v1.78.0 (critical 9.1), go.mongodb.org/mongo-driver v1.17.6 (moderate 6.5), golang.org/x/net v0.52.0 (moderate 6.5)
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
25.8/40	No advisories left outstanding — 3 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 211 days ago

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	55
affected_packages	9
assessed_packages	77
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	critical 2, moderate 3, unknown 4
direct_affected_packages	3

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 77 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

64Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

37Weak

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
37/40	Legible commit history — 52 of 75 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.693
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

80Excellent

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — .golangci.yaml
11/11	Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10	Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8	Automated maintenance — 25 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	go.sum
has_dockerfile	yes
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	Makefile
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.25

Code legibility for models

98Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
53.5/55	Manageable file sizes — 14/530 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Go
largest_source_bytes	287,136
source_files_sampled	530
oversized_source_files	14

Machine-readable interfaces

40Weak

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
0/20	MCP server
40/40	Runnable examples — examples

Inputs used

example_dirs	examples
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	—
interfaces_expected_of	network-service

Key facts

0GitHub stars

4contributors

76commits, last 12 months

12days since last push

99releases

1bus factor

0open issues

Go, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Community profile unavailable
go package 'github.com/Ptt-official-app/pttbbs-backend' points at a different repository (https://github.com/Ptt-official-app/pttbbs-backend); excluded from ecosystem scoring
pypi package 'apidoc' points at a different repository (http://solutionscloud.github.io/apidoc/); excluded from ecosystem scoring

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.3 / 10

3.3aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-10 14:34 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/a	CI-Tests	no pull request found
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10	Contributors	project has 26 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
0	Maintained	0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0	SAST	no SAST tool detected
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0	Vulnerabilities	37 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 17

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Go	github.com/Ptt-official-app/go-pttbbs	`v0.26.2`	go.mod
Go	github.com/appleboy/graceful	`v1.3.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/gin-gonic/gin	`v1.12.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/go-redis/redis/v8	`v8.11.5`	go.mod
Go	github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v4	`v4.5.2`	go.mod
Go	github.com/golang-queue/queue	`v0.5.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/google/go-querystring	`v1.2.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/google/uuid	`v1.6.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/sirupsen/logrus	`v1.9.3`	go.mod
Go	github.com/spf13/jwalterweatherman	`v1.1.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/spf13/viper	`v1.19.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/stretchr/testify	`v1.11.1`	go.mod
Go	go.mongodb.org/mongo-driver	`v1.17.6`	go.mod
Go	go.yaml.in/yaml/v3	`v3.0.4`	go.mod
Go	golang.org/x/net	`v0.52.0`	go.mod
Go	google.golang.org/grpc	`v1.78.0`	go.mod
Go	google.golang.org/protobuf	`v1.36.11`	go.mod

All dependencies 77

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 17 direct and 60 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Go	github.com/appleboy/graceful	`v1.3.0`	direct
Go	github.com/gin-gonic/gin	`v1.12.0`	direct
Go	github.com/go-redis/redis/v8	`v8.11.5`	direct
Go	github.com/golang-jwt/jwt/v4	`v4.5.2`	direct
Go	github.com/golang-queue/queue	`v0.5.0`	direct
Go	github.com/google/go-querystring	`v1.2.0`	direct
Go	github.com/google/uuid	`v1.6.0`	direct
Go	github.com/ptt-official-app/go-pttbbs	`v0.26.2`	direct
Go	github.com/sirupsen/logrus	`v1.9.3`	direct
Go	github.com/spf13/jwalterweatherman	`v1.1.0`	direct
Go	github.com/spf13/viper	`v1.19.0`	direct
Go	github.com/stretchr/testify	`v1.11.1`	direct
Go	go.mongodb.org/mongo-driver	`v1.17.6`	direct
Go	go.yaml.in/yaml/v3	`v3.0.4`	direct
Go	golang.org/x/net	`v0.52.0`	direct
Go	google.golang.org/grpc	`v1.78.0`	direct
Go	google.golang.org/protobuf	`v1.36.11`	direct
Go	github.com/bytedance/gopkg	`v0.1.3`	indirect
Go	github.com/bytedance/sonic	`v1.15.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/bytedance/sonic/loader	`v0.5.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/cespare/xxhash/v2	`v2.3.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/cloudwego/base64x	`v0.1.6`	indirect
Go	github.com/davecgh/go-spew	`v1.1.2-0.20180830191138-d8f796af33cc`	indirect
Go	github.com/dgryski/go-rendezvous	`v0.0.0-20200823014737-9f7001d12a5f`	indirect
Go	github.com/fsnotify/fsnotify	`v1.7.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/gabriel-vasile/mimetype	`v1.4.12`	indirect
Go	github.com/gin-contrib/sse	`v1.1.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-playground/locales	`v0.14.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-playground/universal-translator	`v0.18.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-playground/validator/v10	`v10.30.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/goccy/go-json	`v0.10.5`	indirect
Go	github.com/goccy/go-yaml	`v1.19.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/golang/snappy	`v0.0.4`	indirect
Go	github.com/hashicorp/hcl	`v1.0.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/jpillora/backoff	`v1.0.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/json-iterator/go	`v1.1.12`	indirect
Go	github.com/klauspost/compress	`v1.17.6`	indirect
Go	github.com/klauspost/cpuid/v2	`v2.3.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/leodido/go-urn	`v1.4.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/magiconair/properties	`v1.8.7`	indirect
Go	github.com/mattn/go-isatty	`v0.0.20`	indirect
Go	github.com/mitchellh/mapstructure	`v1.5.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/modern-go/concurrent	`v0.0.0-20180306012644-bacd9c7ef1dd`	indirect
Go	github.com/modern-go/reflect2	`v1.0.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/montanaflynn/stats	`v0.7.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/pelletier/go-toml/v2	`v2.2.4`	indirect
Go	github.com/pmezard/go-difflib	`v1.0.1-0.20181226105442-5d4384ee4fb2`	indirect
Go	github.com/quic-go/qpack	`v0.6.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/quic-go/quic-go	`v0.59.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/sagikazarmark/locafero	`v0.4.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/sagikazarmark/slog-shim	`v0.1.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/sourcegraph/conc	`v0.3.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/spf13/afero	`v1.11.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/spf13/cast	`v1.6.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/spf13/pflag	`v1.0.5`	indirect
Go	github.com/subosito/gotenv	`v1.6.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/twitchyliquid64/golang-asm	`v0.15.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/ugorji/go/codec	`v1.3.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/xdg-go/pbkdf2	`v1.0.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/xdg-go/scram	`v1.2.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/xdg-go/stringprep	`v1.0.4`	indirect
Go	github.com/youmark/pkcs8	`v0.0.0-20240726163527-a2c0da244d78`	indirect
Go	go.mongodb.org/mongo-driver/v2	`v2.5.0`	indirect
Go	go.uber.org/atomic	`v1.9.0`	indirect
Go	go.uber.org/mock	`v0.6.0`	indirect
Go	go.uber.org/multierr	`v1.9.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/arch	`v0.22.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/crypto	`v0.49.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/exp	`v0.0.0-20230905200255-921286631fa9`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/mod	`v0.33.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/sync	`v0.20.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/sys	`v0.42.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/text	`v0.35.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/tools	`v0.42.0`	indirect
Go	google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpc	`v0.0.0-20251029180050-ab9386a59fda`	indirect
Go	gopkg.in/ini.v1	`v1.67.0`	indirect
Go	gopkg.in/yaml.v3	`v3.0.1`	indirect

Dependency advisories 9

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 77 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 9 carry known advisories, of which 3 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
google.golang.org/grpc	`v1.78.0`	direct	critical	7	`1.85.0-dev.0.20260825072537-93e31b48545e`
golang.org/x/crypto	`v0.49.0`	indirect	critical	30	`0.56.0`
go.mongodb.org/mongo-driver	`v1.17.6`	direct	moderate	2	`2.4.2`
golang.org/x/net	`v0.52.0`	direct	moderate	9	`1.27.0-rc.3`
github.com/quic-go/quic-go	`v0.59.0`	indirect	moderate	2	`0.59.1`
github.com/klauspost/compress	`v1.17.6`	indirect	unknown	1	`1.18.7`
golang.org/x/mod	`v0.33.0`	indirect	unknown	2	`1.27.0-rc.3`
golang.org/x/sys	`v0.42.0`	indirect	unknown	1	`0.44.0`
golang.org/x/text	`v0.35.0`	indirect	unknown	1	`0.39.0`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go, PyPI.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records