Public record
Software health reportschema 0.27.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-02 03:40 UTC

chieftools / sdk

Base functionality and helpers used for building for Chief Tools.

PHP · BladeMIT★ 8 stars⑂ 1 forksince Jan 2019View on GitHub ↗
KindNetwork serviceLibraryhow this is determined

chieftools/sdk holds a health index of 65 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (82/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (36/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

65
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

65
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 60 is calibrated to 65 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Chief ToolsOrganization
10 followers10 public repossince Feb 2018

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Packagistchieftools/sdkv0.113.08,4634240 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

82Excellent · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
14.5/36Commit cadence21/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume164 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained17 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year164
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year21
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases100 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recencylatest release 0 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~10.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tagv0.113.0
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases10.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

36Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
13.7/60Stars8 stars
0/25Forks1 forks
0/15Watchers2 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars8
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
52.4/80Monthly downloads8,463 downloads/month across packagist
0/20Registry dependents0 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packageschieftools/sdk
dependents0
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads24,152
monthly_downloads8,463
unverified_packages_excluded

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

48Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth1 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 4 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolutionno issues or no data
7.1/30PR acceptance9/38 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs9
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio
closed_unmerged_prs29
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
7.5/25Owner reach10 followers of chieftools
19.6/25Track record10 public repos, account ~8 yr old
Inputs used
followers10
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_loginchieftools
public_repos10
account_age_days3,096
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history424 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packageschieftools/sdk
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

79Good · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.php-cs-fixer.php, phpstan.neon
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://chief.app
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics2 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicslaravel, chief-tools
has_wikino
homepagehttps://chief.app
docs_sitehttps://chief.app
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

58Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
0/2.5CI-Testsno data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 4 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained17 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTno SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated11
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive7
scorecard_aggregate5.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, CI-Tests, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

36Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
14.9/40Legible commit history28 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.28
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.php-cs-fixer.php, phpstan.neon
0/11Static type checking
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
5/8Automated maintenancedependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codePHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes0/261 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes43,201
source_files_sampled261
oversized_source_files0
How it's scored
40/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)routes/graphql/interfaces.graphql, routes/graphql/mutations/mutations.graphql, routes/graphql/mutations/ping.graphql, routes/graphql/mutations/user.graphql, routes/graphql/mutations/user/preferenceReset.graphql, routes/graphql/mutations/user/preferenceSet.graphql, routes/graphql/queries/broadcasting.graphql, routes/graphql/queries/preference.graphql, routes/graphql/queries/team.graphql, routes/graphql/queries/user.graphql, routes/graphql/scalars.graphql, routes/graphql/schema-without-subscriptions.graphql, routes/graphql/schema.graphql, routes/graphql/types/application.graphql, routes/graphql/types/client.graphql, routes/graphql/types/preference.graphql, routes/graphql/types/team.graphql, routes/graphql/types/user.graphql
0/20MCP server
0/40Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_filesroutes/graphql/interfaces.graphql, routes/graphql/mutations/mutations.graphql, routes/graphql/mutations/ping.graphql, routes/graphql/mutations/user.graphql, routes/graphql/mutations/user/preferenceReset.graphql, routes/graphql/mutations/user/preferenceSet.graphql, routes/graphql/queries/broadcasting.graphql, routes/graphql/queries/preference.graphql, routes/graphql/queries/team.graphql, routes/graphql/queries/user.graphql, routes/graphql/scalars.graphql, routes/graphql/schema-without-subscriptions.graphql, routes/graphql/schema.graphql, routes/graphql/types/application.graphql, routes/graphql/types/client.graphql, routes/graphql/types/preference.graphql, routes/graphql/types/team.graphql, routes/graphql/types/user.graphql
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

8GitHub stars
1contributors
164commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npm, Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.8 / 10
5.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-02 03:40 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 4 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained17 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 12
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistguzzlehttp/guzzle^7.9|^8.0composer.json
Packagistlaracasts/utilities^3.2composer.json
Packagistlaravel/framework^12.58|^13.7composer.json
Packagistlaravel/helpers^1.7composer.json
Packagistlaravel/socialite^5.20composer.json
Packagistmll-lab/graphql-php-scalars^6.4composer.json
Packagistnuwave/lighthouse^6.66composer.json
Packagistpusher/pusher-php-server^7.2composer.json
Packagistsentry/sentry-laravel^4.15composer.json
Packagiststayallive/laravel-eloquent-observable^1.1composer.json
Packagiststayallive/laravel-eloquent-uuid^1.0composer.json
Packagiststayallive/random-tokens^1.0composer.json
All dependencies 19

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 12 direct and 7 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistguzzlehttp/guzzledirect
Packagistlaracasts/utilitiesdirect
Packagistlaravel/frameworkdirect
Packagistlaravel/helpersdirect
Packagistlaravel/socialitedirect
Packagistmll-lab/graphql-php-scalarsdirect
Packagistnuwave/lighthousedirect
Packagistpusher/pusher-php-serverdirect
Packagistsentry/sentry-laraveldirect
Packagiststayallive/laravel-eloquent-observabledirect
Packagiststayallive/laravel-eloquent-uuiddirect
Packagiststayallive/random-tokensdirect
npmprettier^3.8.3indirect
npmprettier-plugin-tailwindcss^0.7.3indirect
Packagistfriendsofphp/php-cs-fixerindirect
Packagistlarastan/larastanindirect
Packagistorchestra/testbenchindirect
Packagistpestphp/pestindirect
Packagistphpindirect
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies carried a version and a supported ecosystem

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.27.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPackagist.