Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-28 03:14 UTC

chmln / sd

Intuitive find & replace CLI (sed alternative)

RustMIT★ 7,328 stars⑂ 168 forkssince Dec 2018View on GitHub ↗

KindCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

#command-line #rust #terminal #text-processing #regex #cli

chmln/sd holds a health index of 59 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (69/100) and lowest on Vitality (32/100). It was last updated 183 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 56 is calibrated to 59 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

GregoryPersonal account

393 followers40 public repossince Mar 2015

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
crates.io	sd	1.0.0	2,880	23	1024 days ago	sed replace regex find development-tools text-processing command-line-utilities
crates.io	xtaskpoints to another repo — not scored	0.1.4	297	5	58 days ago	automation codesign macos release xtask command-line-utilities

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

32At Risk · 21% of overall

Development activity

16Critical

How it's scored

3.6/36	Push recency — last push 183 days ago
2.1/36	Commit cadence — 3/52 weeks with commits
10.3/18	Commit volume — 13 commits in the last year
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

commits_last_year	13
human_commit_share	0.83
days_since_last_push	183
active_weeks_last_year	3

Release discipline

56Moderate

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 12 releases published
16.2/36	Release recency — latest release 183 days ago
12.6/27	Release cadence — a release every ~239.7 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.

Inputs used

releases_count	12
latest_release_tag	v1.1.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	183
mean_days_between_releases	239.7

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

67Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

87Excellent

How it's scored

60/60	Stars — 7,328 stars
18.5/25	Forks — 168 forks
8.3/15	Watchers — 32 watchers

Inputs used

forks	168
stars	7,328
watchers	32
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

50Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

58Moderate

How it's scored

46.1/80	Monthly downloads — 2,880 downloads/month across crates
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	sd
dependents	—
ecosystems	crates
total_downloads	508,641
monthly_downloads	2,880
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

59Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

39Weak

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
6.5/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 71% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 33 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	33
top_contributor_share	0.71

Issue & PR responsiveness

68Good

How it's scored

29.3/42	Issue resolution — 70% of issues closed
24/30	PR acceptance — 108/135 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
6/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 7/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4

Inputs used

merged_prs	108
open_issues	58
closed_issues	134
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	0.698
closed_unmerged_prs	27
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

66Good

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
18.7/25	Owner reach — 393 followers of chmln
23.7/25	Track record — 40 public repos, account ~11 yr old

Inputs used

followers	393
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	chmln
public_repos	40
account_age_days	4,192

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

69Good

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on crates
4/35	Publish recency — latest publish 1,024 days ago
20/20	Version history — 23 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	sd
ecosystems	crates
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	1,024

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

69Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

72Good

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — .rustfmt.toml
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4	.editorconfig
2/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 2 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 1

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	yes
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

65Good

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://docs.rs/sd
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 6 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	command-line, rust, terminal, text-processing, regex, cli
has_wiki	no
homepage	—
docs_site	https://docs.rs/sd
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

51Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

39Weak

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — no data
0.2/2.5	CI-Tests — 2 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 1
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3/7.5	Code-Review — Found 7/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
0/7.5	Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
3/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 6 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	16
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	2
scorecard_aggregate	3.9

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	7
affected_packages	5
assessed_packages	103
unassessed_packages	13
affected_by_severity	moderate 1, low 1, unknown 3
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 103 resolved dependencies against OSV. 13 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

68Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 73 of 83 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.88
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

77Good

How it's scored

12.6/18	One-command bootstrap — Cargo.toml, sd-cli/Cargo.toml, sd/Cargo.toml (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — .rustfmt.toml
11/11	Static type checking — Rust (statically typed)
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
2/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 1 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8	Automated maintenance — 17 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	Cargo.lock
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0.01
toolchain_manifests	Cargo.toml, sd-cli/Cargo.toml, sd/Cargo.toml, xtask/Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.17

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/13 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Rust
largest_source_bytes	17,992
source_files_sampled	13
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

7,328GitHub stars

33contributors

13commits, last 12 months

183days since last push

12releases

1bus factor

58open issues

crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
crates package 'xtask' points at a different repository (https://github.com/arcboxlabs/xtask); excluded from ecosystem scoring
Could not fetch crates package 'sd-cli' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 168 ⇿

0Stars

168Forks

12Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 1Minor 1Patch 7

Each point covers 8 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.9 / 10

3.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-28 03:14 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
n/a	Branch-Protection	internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
1	CI-Tests	2 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 1
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
4	Code-Review	Found 7/16 approved changesets -- score normalized to 4
10	Contributors	project has 3 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 10
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
0	Maintained	0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
0	Signed-Releases	Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
4	Vulnerabilities	6 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 10

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
crates.io	sd	`—`	sd-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.io	clap	`—`	sd-cli/Cargo.toml
crates.io	regex	`1.10.2`	sd/Cargo.toml
crates.io	rayon	`1.8.0`	sd/Cargo.toml
crates.io	thiserror	`1.0.50`	sd/Cargo.toml
crates.io	tempfile	`—`	sd/Cargo.toml
crates.io	clap	`—`	xtask/Cargo.toml
crates.io	clap_complete	`4.4.3`	xtask/Cargo.toml
crates.io	clap_mangen	`0.2.14`	xtask/Cargo.toml
crates.io	roff	`0.2.1`	xtask/Cargo.toml

All dependencies 116

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 14 direct and 102 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
crates.io	clap	`4.4.6`	direct
crates.io	clap_complete	`—`	direct
crates.io	clap_complete	`4.4.3`	direct
crates.io	clap_mangen	`—`	direct
crates.io	clap_mangen	`0.2.14`	direct
crates.io	rayon	`—`	direct
crates.io	rayon	`1.8.0`	direct
crates.io	regex	`—`	direct
crates.io	regex	`1.10.2`	direct
crates.io	roff	`—`	direct
crates.io	roff	`0.2.1`	direct
crates.io	tempfile	`3.8.0`	direct
crates.io	thiserror	`—`	direct
crates.io	thiserror	`1.0.50`	direct
crates.io	aho-corasick	`1.1.4`	indirect
crates.io	ansi-to-html	`—`	indirect
crates.io	ansi-to-html	`0.1.3`	indirect
crates.io	anstream	`0.6.4`	indirect
crates.io	anstyle	`1.0.13`	indirect
crates.io	anstyle-parse	`0.2.2`	indirect
crates.io	anstyle-query	`1.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	anstyle-wincon	`3.0.1`	indirect
crates.io	anyhow	`—`	indirect
crates.io	anyhow	`1.0.75`	indirect
crates.io	assert_cmd	`—`	indirect
crates.io	assert_cmd	`2.1.1`	indirect
crates.io	autocfg	`1.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	bit-set	`0.5.3`	indirect
crates.io	bit-vec	`0.6.3`	indirect
crates.io	bitflags	`1.3.2`	indirect
crates.io	bitflags	`2.4.1`	indirect
crates.io	bstr	`1.12.0`	indirect
crates.io	cfg-if	`1.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	clap_builder	`4.4.6`	indirect
crates.io	clap_derive	`4.4.2`	indirect
crates.io	clap_lex	`0.5.1`	indirect
crates.io	colorchoice	`1.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	console	`—`	indirect
crates.io	console	`0.15.7`	indirect
crates.io	crossbeam-deque	`0.8.3`	indirect
crates.io	crossbeam-epoch	`0.9.15`	indirect
crates.io	crossbeam-utils	`0.8.16`	indirect
crates.io	difflib	`0.4.0`	indirect
crates.io	either	`1.15.0`	indirect
crates.io	encode_unicode	`0.3.6`	indirect
crates.io	errno	`0.3.5`	indirect
crates.io	fastrand	`2.0.1`	indirect
crates.io	fnv	`1.0.7`	indirect
crates.io	getrandom	`0.2.10`	indirect
crates.io	heck	`0.4.1`	indirect
crates.io	insta	`—`	indirect
crates.io	insta	`1.34.0`	indirect
crates.io	lazy_static	`1.4.0`	indirect
crates.io	libc	`0.2.177`	indirect
crates.io	libm	`0.2.8`	indirect
crates.io	linked-hash-map	`0.5.6`	indirect
crates.io	linux-raw-sys	`0.4.10`	indirect
crates.io	memchr	`2.7.6`	indirect
crates.io	memoffset	`0.9.0`	indirect
crates.io	num-traits	`0.2.17`	indirect
crates.io	ppv-lite86	`0.2.17`	indirect
crates.io	predicates	`3.1.3`	indirect
crates.io	predicates-core	`1.0.9`	indirect
crates.io	predicates-tree	`1.0.12`	indirect
crates.io	proc-macro2	`1.0.103`	indirect
crates.io	proptest	`—`	indirect
crates.io	proptest	`1.3.1`	indirect
crates.io	quick-error	`1.2.3`	indirect
crates.io	quote	`1.0.42`	indirect
crates.io	rand	`0.8.5`	indirect
crates.io	rand_chacha	`0.3.1`	indirect
crates.io	rand_core	`0.6.4`	indirect
crates.io	rand_xorshift	`0.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	rayon-core	`1.12.0`	indirect
crates.io	redox_syscall	`0.3.5`	indirect
crates.io	regex-automata	`—`	indirect
crates.io	regex-automata	`0.4.13`	indirect
crates.io	regex-syntax	`0.7.5`	indirect
crates.io	regex-syntax	`0.8.8`	indirect
crates.io	rustix	`0.38.20`	indirect
crates.io	rusty-fork	`0.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	scopeguard	`1.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	serde	`1.0.228`	indirect
crates.io	serde_core	`1.0.228`	indirect
crates.io	serde_derive	`1.0.228`	indirect
crates.io	similar	`2.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	strsim	`0.10.0`	indirect
crates.io	syn	`2.0.111`	indirect
crates.io	terminal_size	`0.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	termtree	`0.5.1`	indirect
crates.io	thiserror-impl	`1.0.50`	indirect
crates.io	unarray	`0.1.4`	indirect
crates.io	unicode-ident	`1.0.22`	indirect
crates.io	unicode-width	`0.1.11`	indirect
crates.io	utf8parse	`0.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	wait-timeout	`0.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	wasi	`0.11.0+wasi-snapshot-preview1`	indirect
crates.io	windows-sys	`0.45.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows-sys	`0.48.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows-targets	`0.42.2`	indirect
crates.io	windows-targets	`0.48.5`	indirect
crates.io	windows_aarch64_gnullvm	`0.42.2`	indirect
crates.io	windows_aarch64_gnullvm	`0.48.5`	indirect
crates.io	windows_aarch64_msvc	`0.42.2`	indirect
crates.io	windows_aarch64_msvc	`0.48.5`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_gnu	`0.42.2`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_gnu	`0.48.5`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_msvc	`0.42.2`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_msvc	`0.48.5`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_gnu	`0.42.2`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_gnu	`0.48.5`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_gnullvm	`0.42.2`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_gnullvm	`0.48.5`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_msvc	`0.42.2`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_msvc	`0.48.5`	indirect
crates.io	yaml-rust	`0.4.5`	indirect

Dependency advisories 5

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 103 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 5 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 13 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
anstream	`0.6.4`	indirect	moderate	2	`0.6.8`
rand	`0.8.5`	indirect	low	2	`0.10.1`
anyhow	`1.0.75`	indirect	unknown	1	`1.0.103`
crossbeam-epoch	`0.9.15`	indirect	unknown	1	`0.9.20`
yaml-rust	`0.4.5`	indirect	unknown	1	—

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records