Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-19 17:20 UTC

ckaznable / tenki

tty-clock with weather effect

RustMIT★ 170 stars⑂ 5 forkssince Jan 2024View on GitHub ↗
KindTerminal interfaceCommand-line toolhow this is determined

ckaznable/tenki holds a health index of 42 out of 100, placing it in the Weak band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (54/100) and lowest on Security (34/100). It was last updated 88 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

42
overall / 100
Weak

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

42
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 45 is calibrated to 42 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

ckaznablePersonal account
96 followers104 public repossince Apr 2016~

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
crates.iotenkipoints to another repo — not scored0.0.1822222 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

52Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
18/36Push recency — last push 88 days ago
0.7/36Commit cadence — 1/52 weeks with commits
5.4/18Commit volume — 3 commits in the last year
2/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 3 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
commits_last_year3
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push88
active_weeks_last_year1
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 15 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 88 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~98.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count15
latest_release_tagv1.12.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release88
mean_days_between_releases98.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

45Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
36.1/60Stars — 170 stars
5/25Forks — 5 forks
0/15Watchers — 2 watchers
Inputs used
forks5
stars170
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

54Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
1.6/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 93% of commits
8.1/13.5Contributor breadth — 6 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled6
top_contributor_share0.929
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
28.4/30PR acceptance — 18/19 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 2/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs18
open_issues0
closed_issues10
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs1
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
14.3/25Owner reach — 96 followers of ckaznable
25/25Track record — 104 public repos, account ~10 yr old
Inputs used
followers96
owner_typeUser
is_verified—
owner_loginckaznable
public_repos104
account_age_days3,840
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

35Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

85Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 6 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsclock, rust, rust-lang, tty, cli, ratatui
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

34At Risk · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
2.2/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — 0 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 2/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
1.5/7.5Maintained — 3 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 2
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
2.2/7.5Vulnerabilities — 7 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate2.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
18.3/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 3 affected: tokio 1.35.1 (moderate 5.3), rand 0.8.5 (low), anyhow 1.0.79 (unknown)
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
32.5/40No advisories left outstanding — 3 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 560 days ago
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories11
affected_packages7
assessed_packages245
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severityhigh 1, moderate 2, low 1, unknown 3
direct_affected_packages3
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 245 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

52Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 91 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.91
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — Rust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfilesCargo.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_filesMakefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/19 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes5,862
source_files_sampled19
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

170GitHub stars
6contributors
3commits, last 12 months
88days since last push
15releases
1bus factor
0open issues
crates.iopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • crates package 'tenki' points at a different repository (https://github.com/mattjperez/tenki); excluded from ecosystem scoring

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 5 ⇿
0Stars
5Forks
9Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

2334455522024-022025-052026-07
Major 0Minor 8Patch 1

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 2.5 / 10
2.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-19 17:20 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 7 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 2/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
2Maintained3 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 2
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
3Vulnerabilities7 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 12
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
crates.ioanyhow1.0.79Cargo.toml
crates.iocrossterm0.29.0Cargo.toml
crates.ioratatui0.30.2Cargo.toml
crates.iotokio1.35.1Cargo.toml
crates.ioserde1.0Cargo.toml
crates.iofutures0.3.30Cargo.toml
crates.iorand0.8.5Cargo.toml
crates.iotinyvec1.6.0Cargo.toml
crates.ioitertools0.15.0Cargo.toml
crates.iochrono0.4.31Cargo.toml
crates.ioclap4.4.18Cargo.toml
crates.ioclap-num1.1.1Cargo.toml
All dependencies 245

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 13 direct and 232 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.ioanyhow1.0.79direct
crates.iochrono0.4.31direct
crates.ioclap4.4.18direct
crates.ioclap-num1.1.1direct
crates.iocrossterm0.29.0direct
crates.iofutures0.3.30direct
crates.ioitertools0.14.0direct
crates.ioitertools0.15.0direct
crates.iorand0.8.5direct
crates.ioratatui0.30.2direct
crates.ioserde1.0.229direct
crates.iotinyvec1.6.0direct
crates.iotokio1.35.1direct
crates.ioaddr2line0.21.0indirect
crates.ioadler1.0.2indirect
crates.ioaho-corasick1.1.4indirect
crates.ioallocator-api20.2.16indirect
crates.ioandroid-tzdata0.1.1indirect
crates.ioandroid_system_properties0.1.5indirect
crates.ioanstream0.6.11indirect
crates.ioanstyle1.0.4indirect
crates.ioanstyle-parse0.2.3indirect
crates.ioanstyle-query1.0.2indirect
crates.ioanstyle-wincon3.0.2indirect
crates.ioapprox0.5.1indirect
crates.ioatomic0.6.1indirect
crates.ioautocfg1.1.0indirect
crates.iobacktrace0.3.69indirect
crates.iobase640.22.1indirect
crates.iobit-set0.5.3indirect
crates.iobit-vec0.6.3indirect
crates.iobitflags1.3.2indirect
crates.iobitflags2.13.1indirect
crates.ioblock-buffer0.10.4indirect
crates.iobumpalo3.14.0indirect
crates.ioby_address1.2.1indirect
crates.iobytemuck1.25.2indirect
crates.iobytes1.5.0indirect
crates.iocastaway0.2.4indirect
crates.iocc1.0.83indirect
crates.iocfg-if1.0.4indirect
crates.iocfg_aliases0.2.2indirect
crates.ioclap_builder4.4.18indirect
crates.ioclap_derive4.4.7indirect
crates.ioclap_lex0.6.0indirect
crates.iocolorchoice1.0.0indirect
crates.iocompact_str0.9.1indirect
crates.ioconvert_case0.10.0indirect
crates.iocore-foundation-sys0.8.6indirect
crates.iocpufeatures0.2.17indirect
crates.iocritical-section1.2.0indirect
crates.iocrossterm_winapi0.9.1indirect
crates.iocrypto-common0.1.7indirect
crates.iocsscolorparser0.6.2indirect
crates.iodarling0.23.0indirect
crates.iodarling_core0.23.0indirect
crates.iodarling_macro0.23.0indirect
crates.iodeltae0.3.2indirect
crates.ioderanged0.5.8indirect
crates.ioderive_more2.1.1indirect
crates.ioderive_more-impl2.1.1indirect
crates.iodigest0.10.7indirect
crates.iodocument-features0.2.12indirect
crates.ioeither1.9.0indirect
crates.ioequivalent1.0.2indirect
crates.ioerrno0.3.14indirect
crates.ioeuclid0.22.14indirect
crates.iofancy-regex0.11.0indirect
crates.iofast-srgb81.0.0indirect
crates.iofiledescriptor0.8.3indirect
crates.iofinl_unicode1.4.0indirect
crates.iofixedbitset0.4.2indirect
crates.iofnv1.0.7indirect
crates.iofoldhash0.2.0indirect
crates.iofutures-channel0.3.30indirect
crates.iofutures-core0.3.30indirect
crates.iofutures-executor0.3.30indirect
crates.iofutures-io0.3.30indirect
crates.iofutures-macro0.3.30indirect
crates.iofutures-sink0.3.30indirect
crates.iofutures-task0.3.30indirect
crates.iofutures-util0.3.30indirect
crates.iogeneric-array0.14.7indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.2.12indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.3.4indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.4.3indirect
crates.iogimli0.28.1indirect
crates.iohashbrown0.16.1indirect
crates.iohashbrown0.17.1indirect
crates.ioheck0.4.1indirect
crates.ioheck0.5.0indirect
crates.iohermit-abi0.3.3indirect
crates.iohex0.4.3indirect
crates.ioiana-time-zone0.1.59indirect
crates.ioiana-time-zone-haiku0.1.2indirect
crates.ioident_case1.0.1indirect
crates.ioindoc2.0.7indirect
crates.ioinstability0.3.12indirect
crates.ioitoa1.0.10indirect
crates.iojs-sys0.3.95indirect
crates.iokasuari0.4.12indirect
crates.iolab0.11.0indirect
crates.iolazy_static1.5.0indirect
crates.iolibc0.2.189indirect
crates.iolibm0.2.16indirect
crates.ioline-clipping0.3.7indirect
crates.iolinux-raw-sys0.12.1indirect
crates.iolitrs1.0.0indirect
crates.iolock_api0.4.11indirect
crates.iolog0.4.20indirect
crates.iolru0.18.1indirect
crates.iomac_address1.1.8indirect
crates.iomemchr2.7.1indirect
crates.iomemmem0.1.1indirect
crates.iomemoffset0.9.1indirect
crates.iominimal-lexical0.2.1indirect
crates.iominiz_oxide0.7.1indirect
crates.iomio0.8.10indirect
crates.iomio1.2.2indirect
crates.ionix0.29.0indirect
crates.ionom7.1.3indirect
crates.ionum-conv0.2.2indirect
crates.ionum-derive0.4.2indirect
crates.ionum-traits0.2.17indirect
crates.ionum_cpus1.16.0indirect
crates.ionum_threads0.1.7indirect
crates.ioobject0.32.2indirect
crates.ioonce_cell1.19.0indirect
crates.ioordered-float4.6.0indirect
crates.iopalette0.7.6indirect
crates.iopalette_derive0.7.6indirect
crates.ioparking_lot0.12.1indirect
crates.ioparking_lot_core0.9.9indirect
crates.iopest2.8.8indirect
crates.iopest_derive2.8.8indirect
crates.iopest_generator2.8.8indirect
crates.iopest_meta2.8.8indirect
crates.iophf0.11.3indirect
crates.iophf_codegen0.11.3indirect
crates.iophf_generator0.11.3indirect
crates.iophf_macros0.11.3indirect
crates.iophf_shared0.11.3indirect
crates.iopin-project-lite0.2.13indirect
crates.iopin-utils0.1.0indirect
crates.ioportable-atomic1.14.0indirect
crates.iopowerfmt0.2.0indirect
crates.ioppv-lite860.2.17indirect
crates.ioproc-macro21.0.107indirect
crates.ioquote1.0.35indirect
crates.ior-efi5.3.0indirect
crates.ior-efi6.0.0indirect
crates.iorand_chacha0.3.1indirect
crates.iorand_core0.6.4indirect
crates.ioratatui-core0.1.2indirect
crates.ioratatui-crossterm0.1.2indirect
crates.ioratatui-macros0.7.2indirect
crates.ioratatui-termina0.1.0indirect
crates.ioratatui-termwiz0.1.2indirect
crates.ioratatui-widgets0.3.2indirect
crates.ioredox_syscall0.4.1indirect
crates.ioregex1.13.1indirect
crates.ioregex-automata0.4.16indirect
crates.ioregex-syntax0.8.11indirect
crates.iorustc-demangle0.1.23indirect
crates.iorustc_version0.4.1indirect
crates.iorustix1.1.4indirect
crates.iorustversion1.0.14indirect
crates.ioryu1.0.16indirect
crates.ioscopeguard1.2.0indirect
crates.iosemver1.0.28indirect
crates.ioserde_core1.0.229indirect
crates.ioserde_derive1.0.229indirect
crates.iosha20.10.9indirect
crates.iosignal-hook0.3.17indirect
crates.iosignal-hook-mio0.2.5indirect
crates.iosignal-hook-registry1.4.1indirect
crates.iosiphasher1.0.3indirect
crates.ioslab0.4.9indirect
crates.iosmallvec1.11.2indirect
crates.iostatic_assertions1.1.0indirect
crates.iostrsim0.10.0indirect
crates.iostrsim0.11.1indirect
crates.iostrum0.28.0indirect
crates.iostrum_macros0.28.0indirect
crates.iosyn1.0.109indirect
crates.iosyn2.0.119indirect
crates.iosyn3.0.3indirect
crates.iotermina0.3.3indirect
crates.ioterminfo0.9.0indirect
crates.iotermios0.3.3indirect
crates.iotermwiz0.23.3indirect
crates.iothiserror1.0.69indirect
crates.iothiserror2.0.19indirect
crates.iothiserror-impl1.0.69indirect
crates.iothiserror-impl2.0.19indirect
crates.iotime0.3.54indirect
crates.iotime-core0.1.9indirect
crates.iotokio-macros2.2.0indirect
crates.iotypenum1.20.1indirect
crates.ioucd-trie0.1.7indirect
crates.iounicode-ident1.0.12indirect
crates.iounicode-segmentation1.13.3indirect
crates.iounicode-truncate2.0.1indirect
crates.iounicode-width0.2.2indirect
crates.ioutf8parse0.2.1indirect
crates.iouuid1.24.0indirect
crates.ioversion_check0.9.4indirect
crates.iovtparse0.6.2indirect
crates.iowasi0.11.0+wasi-snapshot-preview1indirect
crates.iowasip21.0.4+wasi-0.2.12indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen0.2.118indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-macro0.2.118indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-macro-support0.2.118indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-shared0.2.118indirect
crates.iowezterm-bidi0.2.3indirect
crates.iowezterm-blob-leases0.1.1indirect
crates.iowezterm-color-types0.3.0indirect
crates.iowezterm-dynamic0.2.1indirect
crates.iowezterm-dynamic-derive0.1.1indirect
crates.iowezterm-input-types0.1.0indirect
crates.iowinapi0.3.9indirect
crates.iowinapi-i686-pc-windows-gnu0.4.0indirect
crates.iowinapi-x86_64-pc-windows-gnu0.4.0indirect
crates.iowindows-core0.52.0indirect
crates.iowindows-link0.2.1indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.48.0indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.52.0indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.61.2indirect
crates.iowindows-targets0.48.5indirect
crates.iowindows-targets0.52.0indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_gnullvm0.48.5indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_gnullvm0.52.0indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_msvc0.48.5indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_msvc0.52.0indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_gnu0.48.5indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_gnu0.52.0indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_msvc0.48.5indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_msvc0.52.0indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnu0.48.5indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnu0.52.0indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnullvm0.48.5indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnullvm0.52.0indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_msvc0.48.5indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_msvc0.52.0indirect
crates.iowit-bindgen0.57.1indirect
Dependency advisories 7

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 245 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 7 carry known advisories, of which 3 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
mio0.8.10indirecthigh20.8.11
tokio1.35.1directmoderate21.44.2
bytes1.5.0indirectmoderate21.11.1
rand0.8.5directlow20.10.1
anyhow1.0.79directunknown11.0.103
adler1.0.2indirectunknown1—
lru0.18.1indirectunknown10.18.2

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io.