Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-18 20:25 UTC

cloud-barista / cm-data-mold

Go · CSS · HTMLApache-2.0★ 2 stars⑂ 2 forkssince Sep 2023View on GitHub ↗

KindNetwork serviceCommand-line toolLibraryhow this is determined

cloud-barista/cm-data-mold holds a health index of 32 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on AI Readiness (61/100) and lowest on Vitality (20/100). It was last updated 302 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 42 is calibrated to 38 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Cloud-BaristaOrganization

57 followers59 public repossince Feb 2019

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
Go	github.com/cloud-barista/cm-data-mold	v0.1.0	-	1	1002 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

20At Risk · 21% of overall

Development activity

4Critical

Abandonment alert

Work has arrived and nobody has attended to it

no human commit in 1002 daysautomated commits excludedpull requests left unansweredOpenSSF Scorecard reports it unmaintained

Silence alone is never the finding — a small, finished library may need no commits for years. This alert requires both: no human commit for a long time, and obligations the project is visibly not discharging. Automated commits do not count as maintenance.

How abandonment is assessed

How it's scored

3.6/36	Push recency — last push 302 days ago
0/36	Commit cadence — 0/52 weeks with commits
0/18	Commit volume — 0 commits in the last year
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

commits_last_year	0
human_commit_share	0.97
days_since_last_push	302
active_weeks_last_year	0

Release discipline

44Weak

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 1 releases published
0/36	Release recency — latest release 1,002 days ago
12.6/27	Release cadence — cadence unknown (single release)
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	1
latest_release_tag	v0.1.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	1,002
mean_days_between_releases	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

41Weak · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

3Critical

How it's scored

0/60	Stars — 2 stars
0/25	Forks — 2 forks
3.3/15	Watchers — 5 watchers

Inputs used

forks	2
stars	2
watchers	5
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

85Excellent

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	yes
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

53Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

31At Risk

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
8.1/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 64% of commits
4.1/13.5	Contributor breadth — 3 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	3
top_contributor_share	0.638

Issue & PR responsiveness

65Good

How it's scored

28/42	Issue resolution — 67% of issues closed
25.6/30	PR acceptance — 35/41 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
3/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 5/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2

Inputs used

merged_prs	35
open_issues	4
closed_issues	8
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	0
prs_decided_30d	0
issue_closed_ratio	0.667
closed_unmerged_prs	6
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

68Good

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
12.7/25	Owner reach — 57 followers of cloud-barista
24.9/25	Track record — 59 public repos, account ~7 yr old

Inputs used

followers	57
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	no
owner_login	cloud-barista
public_repos	59
account_age_days	2,786

Package maintenance

53Moderate

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on go
4/35	Publish recency — latest publish 1,002 days ago
4/20	Version history — 1 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	github.com/cloud-barista/cm-data-mold
ecosystems	go
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	1,002

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

51Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

48Weak

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 1 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
0/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

55Moderate

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
0/10	Repository description
0/10	Topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	—
has_wiki	no
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	no

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

38Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

34At Risk

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5	CI-Tests — 0 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1.5/7.5	Code-Review — Found 5/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
0/7.5	Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 47 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	16
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	2
scorecard_aggregate	3.4

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

55Moderate

How it's scored

10.7/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 3 affected: github.com/labstack/echo/v4 4.11.3 (high 7.5), github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/s3 1.42.0 (moderate 5.9), go.mongodb.org/mongo-driver 1.12.1 (moderate 6.5)
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
30.5/40	No advisories left outstanding — 2 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 219 days ago

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	79
affected_packages	12
assessed_packages	89
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	critical 2, high 4, moderate 4, unknown 2
direct_affected_packages	3

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 89 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

61Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 80 of 97 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.825
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

69Good

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — Makefile, websrc/Makefile
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — Go (statically typed)
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8	Automated maintenance — 3 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	go.sum
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	Makefile, websrc/Makefile
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.03

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/65 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Go
largest_source_bytes	22,550
source_files_sampled	65
oversized_source_files	0

Machine-readable interfaces

40Weak

How it's scored

40/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — websrc/docs/swagger.json, websrc/docs/swagger.yaml
0/20	MCP server
0/40	Runnable examples

Inputs used

example_dirs	—
has_mcp_signal	no
api_schema_files	websrc/docs/swagger.json, websrc/docs/swagger.yaml
interfaces_expected_of	network-service

Key facts

2GitHub stars

3contributors

0commits, last 12 months

302days since last push

1releases

1bus factor

4open issues

Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 2 ⇿

0Stars

2Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.4 / 10

3.4aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-18 20:25 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0	CI-Tests	0 out of 11 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2	Code-Review	Found 5/17 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
10	Contributors	project has 5 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
0	Maintained	0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0	Vulnerabilities	47 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 18

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Go	cloud.google.com/go/firestore	`v1.14.0`	go.mod
Go	cloud.google.com/go/storage	`v1.34.1`	go.mod
Go	github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2	`v1.22.1`	go.mod
Go	github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/config	`v1.22.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/credentials	`v1.15.1`	go.mod
Go	github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/feature/dynamodb/attributevalue	`v1.12.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/feature/s3/manager	`v1.13.1`	go.mod
Go	github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/dynamodb	`v1.25.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/s3	`v1.42.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/brianvoe/gofakeit/v6	`v6.24.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/go-sql-driver/mysql	`v1.7.1`	go.mod
Go	github.com/spf13/cobra	`v1.7.0`	go.mod
Go	go.mongodb.org/mongo-driver	`v1.12.1`	go.mod
Go	google.golang.org/api	`v0.150.0`	go.mod
Go	github.com/sirupsen/logrus	`v1.9.3`	go.mod
Go	github.com/swaggo/swag	`v1.16.2`	go.mod
Go	github.com/labstack/echo/v4	`v4.11.3`	go.mod
Go	github.com/swaggo/echo-swagger	`v1.4.1`	go.mod

All dependencies 89

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 18 direct and 71 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Go	cloud.google.com/go/firestore	`1.14.0`	direct
Go	cloud.google.com/go/storage	`1.34.1`	direct
Go	github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2	`1.22.1`	direct
Go	github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/config	`1.22.0`	direct
Go	github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/credentials	`1.15.1`	direct
Go	github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/feature/dynamodb/attributevalue	`1.12.0`	direct
Go	github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/feature/s3/manager	`1.13.1`	direct
Go	github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/dynamodb	`1.25.0`	direct
Go	github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/s3	`1.42.0`	direct
Go	github.com/brianvoe/gofakeit/v6	`6.24.0`	direct
Go	github.com/go-sql-driver/mysql	`1.7.1`	direct
Go	github.com/labstack/echo/v4	`4.11.3`	direct
Go	github.com/sirupsen/logrus	`1.9.3`	direct
Go	github.com/spf13/cobra	`1.7.0`	direct
Go	github.com/swaggo/echo-swagger	`1.4.1`	direct
Go	github.com/swaggo/swag	`1.16.2`	direct
Go	go.mongodb.org/mongo-driver	`1.12.1`	direct
Go	google.golang.org/api	`0.150.0`	direct
Go	cloud.google.com/go	`0.110.10`	indirect
Go	cloud.google.com/go/compute	`1.23.3`	indirect
Go	cloud.google.com/go/compute/metadata	`0.2.3`	indirect
Go	cloud.google.com/go/iam	`1.1.5`	indirect
Go	cloud.google.com/go/longrunning	`0.5.4`	indirect
Go	github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/aws/protocol/eventstream	`1.5.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/feature/ec2/imds	`1.14.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/configsources	`1.2.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/endpoints/v2	`2.5.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/ini	`1.5.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/v4a	`1.2.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/dynamodbstreams	`1.17.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/accept-encoding	`1.10.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/checksum	`1.2.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/endpoint-discovery	`1.8.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/presigned-url	`1.10.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/s3shared	`1.16.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/sso	`1.17.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/ssooidc	`1.19.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/sts	`1.25.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/aws/smithy-go	`1.16.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/ghodss/yaml	`1.0.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-openapi/jsonpointer	`0.20.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-openapi/jsonreference	`0.20.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-openapi/spec	`0.20.9`	indirect
Go	github.com/go-openapi/swag	`0.22.4`	indirect
Go	github.com/golang-jwt/jwt	`3.2.2+incompatible`	indirect
Go	github.com/golang/groupcache	`0.0.0-20210331224755-41bb18bfe9da`	indirect
Go	github.com/golang/protobuf	`1.5.3`	indirect
Go	github.com/golang/snappy	`0.0.4`	indirect
Go	github.com/google/s2a-go	`0.1.7`	indirect
Go	github.com/google/uuid	`1.4.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/googleapis/enterprise-certificate-proxy	`0.3.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/googleapis/gax-go/v2	`2.12.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/inconshreveable/mousetrap	`1.1.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/jmespath/go-jmespath	`0.4.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/josharian/intern	`1.0.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/klauspost/compress	`1.13.6`	indirect
Go	github.com/kylebanks/depth	`1.2.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/labstack/gommon	`0.4.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/mailru/easyjson	`0.7.7`	indirect
Go	github.com/mattn/go-colorable	`0.1.13`	indirect
Go	github.com/mattn/go-isatty	`0.0.20`	indirect
Go	github.com/montanaflynn/stats	`0.0.0-20171201202039-1bf9dbcd8cbe`	indirect
Go	github.com/rogpeppe/go-internal	`1.11.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/spf13/pflag	`1.0.5`	indirect
Go	github.com/swaggo/files/v2	`2.0.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/valyala/bytebufferpool	`1.0.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/valyala/fasttemplate	`1.2.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/xdg-go/pbkdf2	`1.0.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/xdg-go/scram	`1.1.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/xdg-go/stringprep	`1.0.4`	indirect
Go	github.com/youmark/pkcs8	`0.0.0-20181117223130-1be2e3e5546d`	indirect
Go	go.opencensus.io	`0.24.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/crypto	`0.31.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/net	`0.25.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/oauth2	`0.13.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/sync	`0.10.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/sys	`0.28.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/text	`0.21.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/time	`0.4.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/tools	`0.21.1-0.20240508182429-e35e4ccd0d2d`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/xerrors	`0.0.0-20231012003039-104605ab7028`	indirect
Go	google.golang.org/appengine	`1.6.8`	indirect
Go	google.golang.org/genproto	`0.0.0-20231106174013-bbf56f31fb17`	indirect
Go	google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/api	`0.0.0-20231106174013-bbf56f31fb17`	indirect
Go	google.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpc	`0.0.0-20231106174013-bbf56f31fb17`	indirect
Go	google.golang.org/grpc	`1.59.0`	indirect
Go	google.golang.org/protobuf	`1.31.0`	indirect
Go	gopkg.in/yaml.v2	`2.4.0`	indirect
Go	gopkg.in/yaml.v3	`3.0.1`	indirect

Dependency advisories 12

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 89 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 12 carry known advisories, of which 3 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
golang.org/x/crypto	`0.31.0`	indirect	critical	37	`0.56.0`
google.golang.org/grpc	`1.59.0`	indirect	critical	10	`1.85.0-dev.0.20260825072537-93e31b48545e`
github.com/labstack/echo/v4	`4.11.3`	direct	high	2	`5.2.0`
github.com/golang-jwt/jwt	`3.2.2+incompatible`	indirect	high	2	`5.2.2`
golang.org/x/oauth2	`0.13.0`	indirect	high	2	`0.27.0`
google.golang.org/protobuf	`1.31.0`	indirect	high	2	`1.33.0`
github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/s3	`1.42.0`	direct	moderate	2	`1.97.3`
go.mongodb.org/mongo-driver	`1.12.1`	direct	moderate	2	`2.4.2`
github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/aws/protocol/eventstream	`1.5.0`	indirect	moderate	2	`1.97.3`
golang.org/x/net	`0.25.0`	indirect	moderate	16	`1.27.0-rc.3`
golang.org/x/sys	`0.28.0`	indirect	unknown	1	`0.44.0`
golang.org/x/text	`0.21.0`	indirect	unknown	1	`0.39.0`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records