Public record
Software health reportschema 0.11.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-16 11:37 UTC

cloudboss / go-player

IaC Factories in One Binary

GoMIT★ 16 stars⑂ 1 forksince Jan 2020View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolhow this is determined

cloudboss/go-player holds a health index of 56 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (82/100) and lowest on Sustainability & Governance (29/100). It was last updated 5 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

56
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

56
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 54 is calibrated to 56 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

cloudbossOrganization
4 followers59 public repossince Nov 2015

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Gogithub.com/cloudboss/unobinpoints to another repo — not scoredv0.10.2-9614 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

78Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 5 days ago
6.9/36Commit cadence10/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume1,338 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year1,338
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push5
active_weeks_last_year10
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases23 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recencylatest release 5 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~1.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count23
latest_release_tagv0.11.0-a.3
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release5
mean_days_between_releases1.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

33At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
19.1/60Stars16 stars
0/25Forks1 forks
0/15Watchers1 watchers
Inputs used
forks1
stars16
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

29At Risk · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth1 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolutionno issues or no data
0/30PR acceptanceno decided pull requests or no data
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, PR acceptance, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
5/25Owner reach4 followers of cloudboss
24.9/25Track record59 public repos, account ~10 yr old
Inputs used
followers4
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_logincloudboss
public_repos59
account_age_days3,896
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

82Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows1 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.golangci.yml
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Testsno data
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

85Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics5 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsconfiguration-management, automation, cloud, iac, infrastructure-as-code
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

47Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Testsno data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTno SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
6.8/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6.8/7.5Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate4.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

57Moderate · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.golangci.yml
11/11Static type checkingeditors/vscode/tsconfig.json
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
0/8Automated maintenanceno data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configseditors/vscode/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeGo (statically typed)
54.6/55Manageable file sizes4/625 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageGo
largest_source_bytes349,586
source_files_sampled625
oversized_source_files4
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

16GitHub stars
1contributors
1,338commits, last 12 months
5days since last push
23releases
1bus factor
0open issues
Go, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • go package 'github.com/cloudboss/unobin' points at a different repository (https://github.com/cloudboss/unobin); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • Could not fetch npm package 'tree-sitter-unobin' from its registry

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.6 / 10
4.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-16 11:37 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
9Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
9Vulnerabilities1 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 17
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2v1.41.7go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/configv1.32.17go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/credentialsv1.19.16go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/kmsv1.52.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/s3v1.101.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/stsv1.42.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/aws/smithy-gov1.25.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/cloudboss/cachedepsv0.2.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/go-git/go-git/v5v5.19.1go.mod
Gogithub.com/go-viper/mapstructure/v2v2.5.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/pmezard/go-difflibv1.0.0go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.10.2go.mod
Gogithub.com/spf13/pflagv1.0.9go.mod
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.11.1go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/modv0.36.0go.mod
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.56.0go.mod
Gogoogle.golang.org/apiv0.286.0go.mod
All dependencies 80

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 17 direct and 63 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2v1.41.7direct
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/configv1.32.17direct
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/credentialsv1.19.16direct
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/kmsv1.52.0direct
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/s3v1.101.0direct
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/stsv1.42.1direct
Gogithub.com/aws/smithy-gov1.25.1direct
Gogithub.com/cloudboss/cachedepsv0.2.1direct
Gogithub.com/go-git/go-git/v5v5.19.1direct
Gogithub.com/go-viper/mapstructure/v2v2.5.0direct
Gogithub.com/pmezard/go-difflibv1.0.0direct
Gogithub.com/spf13/cobrav1.10.2direct
Gogithub.com/spf13/pflagv1.0.9direct
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.11.1direct
Gogolang.org/x/modv0.36.0direct
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.56.0direct
Gogoogle.golang.org/apiv0.286.0direct
Gocloud.google.com/go/authv0.20.0indirect
Gocloud.google.com/go/auth/oauth2adaptv0.2.8indirect
Gocloud.google.com/go/compute/metadatav0.9.0indirect
Godario.cat/mergov1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/aws/protocol/eventstreamv1.7.10indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/feature/ec2/imdsv1.18.23indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/configsourcesv1.4.23indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/endpoints/v2v2.7.23indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/v4av1.4.24indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/accept-encodingv1.13.9indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/checksumv1.9.15indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/presigned-urlv1.13.23indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/s3sharedv1.19.23indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/signinv1.0.11indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/ssov1.30.17indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/ssooidcv1.35.21indirect
Gogithub.com/cespare/xxhash/v2v2.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/cloudflare/circlv1.6.3indirect
Gogithub.com/cyphar/filepath-securejoinv0.6.1indirect
Gogithub.com/davecgh/go-spewv1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/emirpasic/godsv1.18.1indirect
Gogithub.com/felixge/httpsnoopv1.0.4indirect
Gogithub.com/go-git/gcfgv1.5.1-0.20230307220236-3a3c6141e376indirect
Gogithub.com/go-git/go-billy/v5v5.9.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/logrv1.4.3indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logr/stdrv1.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/golang/groupcachev0.0.0-20241129210726-2c02b8208cf8indirect
Gogithub.com/google/s2a-gov0.1.9indirect
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/googleapis/enterprise-certificate-proxyv0.3.16indirect
Gogithub.com/googleapis/gax-go/v2v2.22.0indirect
Gogithub.com/inconshreveable/mousetrapv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/jbenet/go-contextv0.0.0-20150711004518-d14ea06fba99indirect
Gogithub.com/kevinburke/ssh_configv1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/klauspost/cpuid/v2v2.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/microsoft/go-winiov0.6.2indirect
Gogithub.com/mna/pigeonv1.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/pjbgf/sha1cdv0.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/protonmail/go-cryptov1.1.6indirect
Gogithub.com/sergi/go-diffv1.3.2-0.20230802210424-5b0b94c5c0d3indirect
Gogithub.com/skeema/knownhostsv1.3.1indirect
Gogithub.com/xanzy/ssh-agentv0.3.3indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/auto/sdkv1.2.1indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/contrib/instrumentation/net/http/otelhttpv0.67.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otelv1.43.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/metricv1.43.0indirect
Gogo.opentelemetry.io/otel/tracev1.43.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.53.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/oauth2v0.36.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.21.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.46.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.38.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/toolsv0.45.0indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/genproto/googleapis/rpcv0.0.0-20260610212136-7ab31c22f7adindirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/grpcv1.81.1indirect
Gogoogle.golang.org/protobufv1.36.11indirect
Gogopkg.in/warnings.v0v0.1.2indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1indirect
npm@types/node22.10.1indirect
npm@types/vscode1.95.0indirect
npmtree-sitter-cli0.26.9indirect
npmtypescript5.8.3indirect
npmvscode-languageclient10.0.1indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.11.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsGo.