Public record
Software health reportschema 0.27.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-01 10:39 UTC

cloudposse-terraform-components / aws-elasticache-redis

This component is responsible for provisioning ElastiCache Redis clusters

HCLNo license detected★ 1 star⑂ 3 forkssince Nov 2024View on GitHub ↗

cloudposse-terraform-components/aws-elasticache-redis holds a health index of 77 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (96/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (34/100). It was last updated 21 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

77
overall / 100
Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

77
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 66 is calibrated to 77 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

49 followers185 public repossince Dec 2023

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

70Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recencylast push 21 days ago
11.8/36Commit cadence17/52 weeks with commits
14.9/18Commit volume45 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year45
human_commit_share0.6
days_since_last_push21
active_weeks_last_year17
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases28 releases published
27/36Release recencylatest release 107 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~5.4 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count28
latest_release_tagv1.545.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release107
mean_days_between_releases5.4
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

34At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
0/60Stars1 stars
2.5/25Forks3 forks
3.9/15Watchers6 watchers
Inputs used
forks3
stars1
watchers6
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
0/22.5Licenseno license file detected
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseno
readme_badges
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

66Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
14.6/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 35% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth14 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 10 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled14
top_contributor_share0.353
How it's scored
10.5/42Issue resolution25% of issues closed
27.6/30PR acceptance81/88 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
12/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 5/6 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
Inputs used
merged_prs81
open_issues3
closed_issues1
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.25
closed_unmerged_prs7
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
12.2/25Owner reach49 followers of cloudposse-terraform-components
18.2/25Track record185 public repos, account ~2 yr old
Inputs used
followers49
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_logincloudposse-terraform-components
public_repos185
account_age_days956
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

96Exceptional · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

100Exceptional
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows5 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://cloudposse.com/accelerate
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics2 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsterraform, terraform-component
has_wikino
homepagehttps://cloudposse.com/accelerate
docs_sitehttps://cloudposse.com/accelerate
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

58Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
3.8/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6/7.5Code-ReviewFound 5/6 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 10 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0/2.5Licenselicense file not detected
0/7.5Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities30 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4.8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories55
affected_packages11
assessed_packages113
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitycritical 2, moderate 6, unknown 3
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 113 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

75Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructionsAGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history52 of 60 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.867
agent_instruction_filesAGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes2,652
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstraptest/go.mod (toolchain convention, no task runner)
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
10/10Demonstrated agent practice11 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
8/8Automated maintenance16 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesgo.sum
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0.11
toolchain_manifeststest/go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share0.16
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codeHCL without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes0/1 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageHCL
largest_source_bytes1,804
source_files_sampled1
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

1GitHub stars
14contributors
45commits, last 12 months
21days since last push
28releases
2bus factor
3open issues
Gopackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 3 ⇿
0Stars
3Forks
13Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

12233312024-122025-072026-02
Major 0Minor 5Patch 8

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.8 / 10
4.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-01 10:39 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
8Code-ReviewFound 5/6 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
10Contributorsproject has 10 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
0Licenselicense file not detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities30 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 113

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 113 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Godario.cat/mergov1.0.1indirect
Gofilippo.io/edwards25519v1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/agext/levenshteinv1.2.3indirect
Gogithub.com/apparentlymart/go-textseg/v15v15.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2v1.36.1indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/aws/protocol/eventstreamv1.6.8indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/configv1.29.6indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/credentialsv1.17.59indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/feature/ec2/imdsv1.16.28indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/feature/s3/managerv1.17.61indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/configsourcesv1.3.32indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/endpoints/v2v2.6.32indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/iniv1.8.2indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/internal/v4av1.3.32indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/acmv1.30.18indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/autoscalingv1.51.12indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/cloudwatchlogsv1.45.12indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/dynamodbv1.40.1indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/ec2v1.203.0indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/ecrv1.41.0indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/ecsv1.53.13indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/iamv1.39.1indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/accept-encodingv1.12.2indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/checksumv1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/endpoint-discoveryv1.10.13indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/presigned-urlv1.12.13indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/internal/s3sharedv1.18.13indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/kmsv1.37.18indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/lambdav1.69.12indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/rdsv1.93.12indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/route53v1.48.7indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/s3v1.76.1indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/secretsmanagerv1.34.18indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/snsv1.33.19indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/sqsv1.37.14indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/ssmv1.56.12indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/ssov1.24.15indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/ssooidcv1.28.14indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/stsv1.33.14indirect
Gogithub.com/aws/smithy-gov1.22.2indirect
Gogithub.com/aymanbagabas/go-osc52/v2v2.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/bgentry/go-netrcv0.0.0-20140422174119-9fd32a8b3d3dindirect
Gogithub.com/boombuler/barcodev1.0.2indirect
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/lipglossv0.10.0indirect
Gogithub.com/charmbracelet/logv0.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/cloudposse/test-helpersv0.19.0indirect
Gogithub.com/cpuguy83/go-md2man/v2v2.0.6indirect
Gogithub.com/davecgh/go-spewv1.1.2-0.20180830191138-d8f796af33ccindirect
Gogithub.com/fsnotify/fsnotifyv1.7.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-errors/errorsv1.5.1indirect
Gogithub.com/go-logfmt/logfmtv0.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/go-sql-driver/mysqlv1.8.1indirect
Gogithub.com/google/uuidv1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/gruntwork-io/go-commonsv0.17.2indirect
Gogithub.com/gruntwork-io/terratestv0.48.2indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/errwrapv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-cleanhttpv0.5.2indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-getter/v2v2.2.3indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-multierrorv1.1.1indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-safetempv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/go-versionv1.7.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/hclv1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/hcl/v2v2.22.0indirect
Gogithub.com/hashicorp/terraform-jsonv0.23.0indirect
Gogithub.com/jackc/pgpassfilev1.0.0indirect
Gogithub.com/jackc/pgservicefilev0.0.0-20240606120523-5a60cdf6a761indirect
Gogithub.com/jackc/pgx/v5v5.7.2indirect
Gogithub.com/jackc/puddle/v2v2.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/jinzhu/copierv0.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/klauspost/compressv1.17.2indirect
Gogithub.com/lucasb-eyer/go-colorfulv1.2.0indirect
Gogithub.com/magiconair/propertiesv1.8.7indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-isattyv0.0.20indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-runewidthv0.0.15indirect
Gogithub.com/mattn/go-zglobv0.0.6indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/go-homedirv1.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/go-testing-interfacev1.14.1indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/go-wordwrapv1.0.1indirect
Gogithub.com/mitchellh/mapstructurev1.5.0indirect
Gogithub.com/muesli/reflowv0.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/muesli/termenvv0.15.2indirect
Gogithub.com/pelletier/go-toml/v2v2.2.2indirect
Gogithub.com/pmezard/go-difflibv1.0.1-0.20181226105442-5d4384ee4fb2indirect
Gogithub.com/pquerna/otpv1.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/rivo/unisegv0.4.7indirect
Gogithub.com/rogpeppe/go-internalv1.13.1indirect
Gogithub.com/russross/blackfriday/v2v2.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/sagikazarmark/locaferov0.4.0indirect
Gogithub.com/sagikazarmark/slog-shimv0.1.0indirect
Gogithub.com/sourcegraph/concv0.3.0indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/aferov1.11.0indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/castv1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/pflagv1.0.5indirect
Gogithub.com/spf13/viperv1.19.0indirect
Gogithub.com/stretchr/testifyv1.10.0indirect
Gogithub.com/subosito/gotenvv1.6.0indirect
Gogithub.com/tmccombs/hcl2jsonv0.6.4indirect
Gogithub.com/ulikunitz/xzv0.5.14indirect
Gogithub.com/urfave/cli/v2v2.27.5indirect
Gogithub.com/xrash/smetricsv0.0.0-20240521201337-686a1a2994c1indirect
Gogithub.com/zclconf/go-ctyv1.15.0indirect
Gogo.uber.org/atomicv1.9.0indirect
Gogo.uber.org/multierrv1.9.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/cryptov0.45.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/expv0.0.0-20231006140011-7918f672742dindirect
Gogolang.org/x/modv0.29.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/netv0.47.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/syncv0.18.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/sysv0.38.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/textv0.31.0indirect
Gogolang.org/x/toolsv0.38.0indirect
Gogopkg.in/ini.v1v1.67.0indirect
Gogopkg.in/yaml.v3v3.0.1indirect
Dependency advisories 11

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 113 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 11 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
github.com/jackc/pgx/v5v5.7.2indirectcritical65.9.2
golang.org/x/cryptov0.45.0indirectcritical270.52.0
github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/aws/protocol/eventstreamv1.6.8indirectmoderate21.97.3
github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/cloudwatchlogsv1.45.12indirectmoderate21.97.3
github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/lambdav1.69.12indirectmoderate21.97.3
github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/service/s3v1.76.1indirectmoderate21.97.3
github.com/ulikunitz/xzv0.5.14indirectmoderate20.5.15
golang.org/x/netv0.47.0indirectmoderate91.26.3
github.com/klauspost/compressv1.17.2indirectunknown11.18.7
golang.org/x/sysv0.38.0indirectunknown10.44.0
golang.org/x/textv0.31.0indirectunknown10.39.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.27.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics.