Software health reportschema 0.27.0 · metrics 2.5.0 · 2026-07-30 09:44 UTC

cloudsmith-io / cloudsmith-cli

Cloudsmith Command Line Interface (CLI)

PythonApache-2.0★ 73 stars⑂ 37 forkssince Nov 2016View on GitHub ↗

KindCommand-line toolMCP serverLibraryhow this is determined

#cloudsmith #cli #command-line #api #cloudsmith-cli

cloudsmith-io/cloudsmith-cli holds a health index of 90 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Vitality (86/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (61/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Excellent

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 76 is calibrated to 90 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

CloudsmithOrganization

88 followers49 public repossince May 2014

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
PyPI	cloudsmith-cli	1.20.0	324,009	139	0 days ago	cloudsmith cli devops

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

86Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

83Excellent

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
19.4/36	Commit cadence — 28/52 weeks with commits
17.4/18	Commit volume — 86 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	86
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	28

Release discipline

90Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 39 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 48 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~15.5 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.

Inputs used

releases_count	39
latest_release_tag	v1.19.0
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	48
mean_days_between_releases	15.5

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

70Good · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

50Moderate

How it's scored

30.1/60	Stars — 73 stars
13/25	Forks — 37 forks
7.1/15	Watchers — 20 watchers

Inputs used

forks	37
stars	73
watchers	20
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

77Good

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
6.3/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	—
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	yes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

92Excellent

How it's scored

73.5/80	Monthly downloads — 324,009 downloads/month across pypi
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	cloudsmith-cli
dependents	—
ecosystems	pypi
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	324,009

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

71Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

42Weak

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
9.8/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 56% of commits
13.5/13.5	Contributor breadth — 35 contributors
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 8 contributing companies or organizations

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	35
top_contributor_share	0.564

Issue & PR responsiveness

84Excellent

How it's scored

33.6/42	Issue resolution — 80% of issues closed
24.9/30	PR acceptance — 236/284 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed

Inputs used

merged_prs	236
open_issues	7
closed_issues	28
prs_merged_7d	—
prs_decided_7d	—
prs_merged_30d	—
prs_decided_30d	—
issue_closed_ratio	0.8
closed_unmerged_prs	48
first_time_authors_30d	—
first_time_prs_merged_30d	—
first_time_prs_decided_30d	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): newcomer_pr_acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

68Good

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain
14/25	Owner reach — 88 followers of cloudsmith-io
24.4/25	Track record — 49 public repos, account ~12 yr old

Inputs used

followers	88
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	—
owner_login	cloudsmith-io
public_repos	49
account_age_days	4,452

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20	Version history — 139 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	cloudsmith-cli
ecosystems	pypi
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

86Excellent · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

100Exceptional

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 5 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — .flake8, .pylintrc
9.6/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	yes
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	yes

Documentation

65Good

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://docs.cloudsmith.com/developer-tools/cli
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 5 topics
0/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	cloudsmith, cli, command-line, api, cloudsmith-cli
has_wiki	no
homepage	https://docs.cloudsmith.com/developer-tools/cli
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

66Good · 16% of overall

Security posture

68Good

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3.8/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5	Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 8 contributing companies or organizations
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
4/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
5/5	SAST — SAST tool is run on all commits
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
7.5/7.5	Token-Permissions — GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
6/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 2 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	18
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	0
scorecard_aggregate	6.8

Dependency advisories

59Moderate

How it's scored

10.5/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 3 affected: click 8.3.1 (high 7.2), mcp 1.27.2 (high), pyjwt 2.12.1 (high 7.4)
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
33.9/40	No advisories left outstanding — 1 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 90 days ago

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	20
affected_packages	7
assessed_packages	144
unassessed_packages	1
affected_by_severity	high 5, moderate 2
direct_affected_packages	3

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 144 resolved dependencies against OSV. 1 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

61Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

85Excellent

How it's scored

45/45	Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 99 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
legible_history_share	0.99
agent_instruction_files	AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes	7,172

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

61Moderate

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
22/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — .flake8, .pylintrc
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
10/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 26 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
8/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	uv.lock
has_dockerfile	yes
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	0.26
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Code legibility for models

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — Python without a type-check config
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/176 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Python
largest_source_bytes	56,862
source_files_sampled	176
oversized_source_files	0

Machine-readable interfaces

20At Risk

How it's scored

0/40	API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
20/20	MCP server
0/40	Runnable examples

Inputs used

example_dirs	—
has_mcp_signal	yes
api_schema_files	—

Key facts

73GitHub stars

35contributors

86commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

39releases

1bus factor

7open issues

PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
deps.dev does not index pypi:cloudsmith-cli@1.20.0; advisories assessed against the repository dependency graph instead

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 37 ⇿

0Stars

37Forks

33Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 10Patch 23

Each point covers 8 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 6.8 / 10

6.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-30 09:44 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
5	Branch-Protection	branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
10	CI-Tests	30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10	Code-Review	all changesets reviewed
10	Contributors	project has 8 contributing companies or organizations
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
8	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
10	SAST	SAST tool is run on all commits
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
0	Signed-Releases	Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
10	Token-Permissions	GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
8	Vulnerabilities	2 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 15

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
PyPI	click	`>=8.1.8,!=8.3.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	click-configfile	`>=0.2.3`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	click-didyoumean	`>=0.0.3`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	click-spinner	`>=0.1.7`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	json5	`>=0.9.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	cloudsmith-api	`>=2.0.29,<3.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	keyring	`>=25.4.1`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	mcp	`==1.27.2`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	PyJWT	`>=2.0.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	python-toon	`==0.1.2`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	requests	`>=2.18.4`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	requests_toolbelt	`>=1.0.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	rich	`>=13.0.0`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	semver	`>=2.7.9`	pyproject.toml
PyPI	urllib3	`>=2.5`	pyproject.toml

All dependencies 145

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 19 direct and 126 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
PyPI	click	`8.3.1`	direct
PyPI	click	`8.4.1`	direct
PyPI	click-configfile	`0.2.3`	direct
PyPI	click-didyoumean	`0.3.1`	direct
PyPI	click-spinner	`0.1.10`	direct
PyPI	cloudsmith-api	`2.0.27`	direct
PyPI	cloudsmith-api	`2.0.29`	direct
PyPI	json5	`0.13.0`	direct
PyPI	json5	`0.14.0`	direct
PyPI	keyring	`25.7.0`	direct
PyPI	mcp	`1.27.2`	direct
PyPI	pyjwt	`2.12.1`	direct
PyPI	pyjwt	`2.13.0`	direct
PyPI	python-toon	`0.1.2`	direct
PyPI	requests	`2.34.2`	direct
PyPI	requests-toolbelt	`1.0.0`	direct
PyPI	rich	`14.3.3`	direct
PyPI	semver	`3.0.4`	direct
PyPI	urllib3	`2.7.0`	direct
PyPI	altgraph	`0.17.5`	indirect
PyPI	annotated-types	`0.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	anyio	`4.12.1`	indirect
PyPI	astroid	`4.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	astroid	`4.0.4`	indirect
PyPI	attrs	`26.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	awscrt	`0.32.2`	indirect
PyPI	backports-tarfile	`1.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	boto3	`—`	indirect
PyPI	boto3	`1.43.29`	indirect
PyPI	botocore	`1.43.29`	indirect
PyPI	build	`1.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	build	`1.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	bump2version	`1.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	bumpversion	`0.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	certifi	`2026.1.4`	indirect
PyPI	cffi	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	cfgv	`3.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	charset-normalizer	`3.4.4`	indirect
PyPI	charset-normalizer	`3.4.7`	indirect
PyPI	check-wheel-contents	`0.6.3`	indirect
PyPI	colorama	`0.4.6`	indirect
PyPI	configparser	`7.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	coverage	`7.13.1`	indirect
PyPI	coverage	`7.14.1`	indirect
PyPI	cryptography	`48.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	cryptography	`49.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	dill	`0.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	distlib	`0.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	distlib	`0.4.3`	indirect
PyPI	docutils	`0.23`	indirect
PyPI	exceptiongroup	`1.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	filelock	`3.20.3`	indirect
PyPI	filelock	`3.29.4`	indirect
PyPI	freezegun	`1.5.5`	indirect
PyPI	h11	`0.16.0`	indirect
PyPI	httpcore	`1.0.9`	indirect
PyPI	httpretty	`1.1.4`	indirect
PyPI	httpx	`0.28.1`	indirect
PyPI	httpx-sse	`0.4.3`	indirect
PyPI	id	`1.6.1`	indirect
PyPI	identify	`2.6.16`	indirect
PyPI	identify	`2.6.19`	indirect
PyPI	idna	`3.18`	indirect
PyPI	importlib-metadata	`8.7.1`	indirect
PyPI	importlib-metadata	`9.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	iniconfig	`2.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	isort	`7.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	isort	`8.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	jaraco-classes	`3.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	jaraco-context	`6.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	jaraco-context	`6.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	jaraco-functools	`4.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	jaraco-functools	`4.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	jeepney	`0.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	jmespath	`1.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	jsonschema	`4.26.0`	indirect
PyPI	jsonschema-specifications	`2025.9.1`	indirect
PyPI	macholib	`1.16.4`	indirect
PyPI	markdown-it-py	`4.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	markdown-it-py	`4.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	mccabe	`0.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	mdurl	`0.1.2`	indirect
PyPI	more-itertools	`10.8.0`	indirect
PyPI	more-itertools	`11.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	nh3	`0.3.5`	indirect
PyPI	nodeenv	`1.10.0`	indirect
PyPI	packaging	`26.0`	indirect
PyPI	packaging	`26.2`	indirect
PyPI	pefile	`2024.8.26`	indirect
PyPI	pip-tools	`7.5.2`	indirect
PyPI	platformdirs	`4.10.0`	indirect
PyPI	platformdirs	`4.5.1`	indirect
PyPI	pluggy	`1.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	pre-commit	`4.5.1`	indirect
PyPI	pre-commit	`4.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	pycparser	`3.0`	indirect
PyPI	pydantic	`2.12.5`	indirect
PyPI	pydantic-core	`2.41.5`	indirect
PyPI	pydantic-settings	`2.12.0`	indirect
PyPI	pydantic-settings	`2.14.2`	indirect
PyPI	pygments	`2.20.0`	indirect
PyPI	pyinstaller	`6.20.0`	indirect
PyPI	pyinstaller-hooks-contrib	`2026.5`	indirect
PyPI	pylint	`4.0.4`	indirect
PyPI	pylint	`4.0.6`	indirect
PyPI	pyproject-hooks	`1.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytest	`9.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	pytest	`9.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-cov	`7.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-cov	`7.1.0`	indirect
PyPI	python-dateutil	`2.9.0.post0`	indirect
PyPI	python-discovery	`1.4.2`	indirect
PyPI	python-dotenv	`1.2.2`	indirect
PyPI	python-multipart	`0.0.32`	indirect
PyPI	pywin32	`312`	indirect
PyPI	pywin32-ctypes	`0.2.3`	indirect
PyPI	pyyaml	`6.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	readme-renderer	`45.0`	indirect
PyPI	referencing	`0.37.0`	indirect
PyPI	rfc3986	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	rpds-py	`0.30.0`	indirect
PyPI	s3transfer	`0.18.0`	indirect
PyPI	secretstorage	`3.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	setuptools	`82.0.1`	indirect
PyPI	six	`1.17.0`	indirect
PyPI	sse-starlette	`3.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	sse-starlette	`3.4.4`	indirect
PyPI	starlette	`1.2.1`	indirect
PyPI	starlette	`1.3.1`	indirect
PyPI	tomli	`2.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	tomli	`2.4.1`	indirect
PyPI	tomlkit	`0.14.0`	indirect
PyPI	tomlkit	`0.15.0`	indirect
PyPI	twine	`6.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	typing-extensions	`4.15.0`	indirect
PyPI	typing-inspection	`0.4.2`	indirect
PyPI	uvicorn	`0.40.0`	indirect
PyPI	uvicorn	`0.49.0`	indirect
PyPI	virtualenv	`20.36.1`	indirect
PyPI	virtualenv	`21.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	wheel	`0.46.3`	indirect
PyPI	wheel	`0.47.0`	indirect
PyPI	wheel-filename	`1.4.2`	indirect
PyPI	zipp	`3.23.0`	indirect
PyPI	zipp	`4.1.0`	indirect

Dependency advisories 7

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 144 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 7 carry known advisories, of which 3 are direct. 1 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
click	`8.3.1`	direct	high	1	`8.3.3`
mcp	`1.27.2`	direct	high	2	`1.28.1`
pyjwt	`2.12.1`	direct	high	9	`2.13.0`
cryptography	`48.0.0`	indirect	high	1	`48.0.1`
starlette	`1.2.1`	indirect	high	4	`1.3.1`
pydantic-settings	`2.12.0`	indirect	moderate	1	`2.14.2`
setuptools	`82.0.1`	indirect	moderate	2	`83.0.0`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.5.0, schema v0.27.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Related records