Public record
Software health reportschema 0.14.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-19 00:52 UTC

cnpryer / huak

My experimental Python package manager.

RustMIT★ 602 stars⑂ 33 forkssince Aug 2022View on GitHub ↗

cnpryer/huak holds a health index of 53 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (80/100) and lowest on Vitality (25/100). It was last updated 805 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

53
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

53
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 52 is calibrated to 53 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Chris PryerPersonal account
114 followers233 public repossince Sep 2015@twin-labs

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
PyPIhuak0.0.19370271163 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

25At Risk · 21% of overall
How it's scored
0/36Push recencylast push 805 days ago
0/36Commit cadence0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume0 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push805
active_weeks_last_year0
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases30 releases published
0/36Release recencylatest release 1,163 days ago
27/27Release cadencea release every ~5.2 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count30
latest_release_tagv0.0.19
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release1,163
mean_days_between_releases5.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

65Good · 17% of overall
How it's scored
45.1/60Stars602 stars
12.5/25Forks33 forks
3.3/15Watchers5 watchers
Inputs used
forks33
stars602
watchers5
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

85Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
34.3/80Monthly downloads370 downloads/month across pypi
0/20Registry dependentsnot reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packageshuak
dependents
ecosystemspypi
total_downloads
monthly_downloads370
unverified_packages_excluded
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

56Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
4.3/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 81% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth22 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 5 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled22
top_contributor_share0.807
How it's scored
30.3/42Issue resolution72% of issues closed
25.8/30PR acceptance552/641 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 1/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs552
open_issues70
closed_issues181
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio0.721
closed_unmerged_prs89
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
14.8/25Owner reach114 followers of cnpryer
25/25Track record233 public repos, account ~10 yr old
Inputs used
followers114
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_logincnpryer
public_repos233
account_age_days3,956
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on pypi
4/35Publish recencylatest publish 1,163 days ago
20/20Version history27 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packageshuak
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish1,163

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

80Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows3 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config
9.6/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests0 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configyes

Documentation

90Excellent
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://cnpryer.github.io/huak/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics2 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsrust, python
has_wikino
homepagehttps://cnpryer.github.io/huak/
docs_sitehttps://cnpryer.github.io/huak/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

35Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
0/2.5CI-Tests0 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-ReviewFound 1/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 5 contributing companies or organizations
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0/7.5Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities32 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated15
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive3
scorecard_aggregate3.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

49Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checkingRust (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
5/8Automated maintenancedependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilesCargo.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable codeRust (statically typed)
54.1/55Manageable file sizes1/60 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageRust
largest_source_bytes140,732
source_files_sampled60
oversized_source_files1

Key facts

602GitHub stars
22contributors
0commits, last 12 months
805days since last push
30releases
1bus factor
70open issues
crates.io, PyPIpackage ecosystems

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.5 / 10
3.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-19 00:52 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
0CI-Tests0 out of 14 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 1/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
10Contributorsproject has 5 contributing companies or organizations
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities32 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 222

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 222 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
crates.ioaddr2line0.21.0indirect
crates.ioadler1.0.2indirect
crates.ioaho-corasick1.1.2indirect
crates.ioanstream0.6.4indirect
crates.ioanstyle1.0.4indirect
crates.ioanstyle-parse0.2.2indirect
crates.ioanstyle-query1.0.0indirect
crates.ioanstyle-wincon3.0.1indirect
crates.ioanyhowindirect
crates.ioanyhow1.0.75indirect
crates.ioautocfg1.1.0indirect
crates.iobacktrace0.3.69indirect
crates.iobase640.21.5indirect
crates.iobitflags1.3.2indirect
crates.iobitflags2.4.1indirect
crates.ioblock-buffer0.10.4indirect
crates.iobumpalo3.14.0indirect
crates.iobytes1.5.0indirect
crates.iocc1.0.83indirect
crates.iocfg-if1.0.0indirect
crates.ioclap4.4.7indirect
crates.ioclap_builder4.4.7indirect
crates.ioclap_completeindirect
crates.ioclap_complete4.4.4indirect
crates.ioclap_derive4.4.7indirect
crates.ioclap_lex0.6.0indirect
crates.iocolorchoice1.0.0indirect
crates.iocolored2.0.4indirect
crates.ioconsole0.15.7indirect
crates.iocore-foundation0.9.3indirect
crates.iocore-foundation-sys0.8.4indirect
crates.iocpufeatures0.2.11indirect
crates.iocrypto-common0.1.6indirect
crates.iodigest0.10.7indirect
crates.iodunceindirect
crates.iodunce1.0.4indirect
crates.ioencode_unicode0.3.6indirect
crates.ioencoding_rs0.8.33indirect
crates.ioequivalent1.0.1indirect
crates.ioerrno0.3.6indirect
crates.iofastrand2.0.1indirect
crates.iofiletime0.2.22indirect
crates.iofnv1.0.7indirect
crates.ioforeign-types0.3.2indirect
crates.ioforeign-types-shared0.1.1indirect
crates.ioform_urlencoded1.2.1indirect
crates.iofutures-channel0.3.29indirect
crates.iofutures-core0.3.29indirect
crates.iofutures-io0.3.29indirect
crates.iofutures-sink0.3.29indirect
crates.iofutures-task0.3.29indirect
crates.iofutures-util0.3.29indirect
crates.iogeneric-array0.14.7indirect
crates.iogetrandom0.2.11indirect
crates.iogimli0.28.0indirect
crates.iogit2indirect
crates.iogit20.17.2indirect
crates.ioglob0.3.1indirect
crates.ioh20.3.21indirect
crates.iohashbrown0.12.3indirect
crates.iohashbrown0.14.2indirect
crates.ioheck0.4.1indirect
crates.iohermit-abi0.3.3indirect
crates.iohex0.4.3indirect
crates.iohttp0.2.9indirect
crates.iohttp-body0.4.5indirect
crates.iohttparse1.8.0indirect
crates.iohttpdate1.0.3indirect
crates.iohuman-panic1.2.2indirect
crates.iohyper0.14.27indirect
crates.iohyper-tls0.5.0indirect
crates.ioidna0.5.0indirect
crates.ioindexmapindirect
crates.ioindexmap1.9.3indirect
crates.ioindexmap2.1.0indirect
crates.ioinsta1.34.0indirect
crates.ioinsta-cmdindirect
crates.ioinsta-cmd0.6.0indirect
crates.ioipnet2.9.0indirect
crates.iois-terminal0.4.9indirect
crates.ioitoa1.0.9indirect
crates.iojobserver0.1.27indirect
crates.iojs-sys0.3.65indirect
crates.iolazy_static1.4.0indirect
crates.iolibc0.2.150indirect
crates.iolibgit2-sys0.15.2+1.6.4indirect
crates.iolibssh2-sys0.3.0indirect
crates.iolibz-sys1.1.12indirect
crates.iolinked-hash-map0.5.6indirect
crates.iolinux-raw-sys0.4.11indirect
crates.iolog0.4.20indirect
crates.iomemchr2.6.4indirect
crates.iomime0.3.17indirect
crates.iominiz_oxide0.7.1indirect
crates.iomio0.8.9indirect
crates.ionative-tls0.2.11indirect
crates.ionum_cpus1.16.0indirect
crates.ioobject0.32.1indirect
crates.ioonce_cell1.19.0indirect
crates.ioopensslindirect
crates.ioopenssl0.10.59indirect
crates.ioopenssl-macros0.1.1indirect
crates.ioopenssl-probe0.1.5indirect
crates.ioopenssl-src300.1.6+3.1.4indirect
crates.ioopenssl-sys0.9.95indirect
crates.ioos_info3.7.0indirect
crates.iopep440_rs0.3.12indirect
crates.iopep440_rs0.4.0indirect
crates.iopep508_rs0.2.4indirect
crates.iopep508_rs0.3.0indirect
crates.iopercent-encoding2.3.1indirect
crates.iopin-project-lite0.2.13indirect
crates.iopin-utils0.1.0indirect
crates.iopkg-config0.3.27indirect
crates.ioproc-macro21.0.78indirect
crates.iopyproject-tomlindirect
crates.iopyproject-toml0.7.0indirect
crates.ioquote1.0.35indirect
crates.ioredox_syscall0.3.5indirect
crates.ioredox_syscall0.4.1indirect
crates.ioregex1.10.2indirect
crates.ioregex-automata0.4.3indirect
crates.ioregex-syntax0.8.2indirect
crates.ioreqwestindirect
crates.ioreqwest0.11.22indirect
crates.iorustc-demangle0.1.23indirect
crates.iorustix0.38.21indirect
crates.ioryu1.0.15indirect
crates.ioschannel0.1.22indirect
crates.iosecurity-framework2.9.2indirect
crates.iosecurity-framework-sys2.9.1indirect
crates.ioserdeindirect
crates.ioserde1.0.196indirect
crates.ioserde_derive1.0.196indirect
crates.ioserde_jsonindirect
crates.ioserde_json1.0.108indirect
crates.ioserde_spanned0.6.4indirect
crates.ioserde_urlencoded0.7.1indirect
crates.iosha20.10.8indirect
crates.iosimilar2.3.0indirect
crates.ioslab0.4.9indirect
crates.iosocket20.4.10indirect
crates.iosocket20.5.5indirect
crates.iostrsim0.10.0indirect
crates.iosyn2.0.48indirect
crates.iosystem-configuration0.5.1indirect
crates.iosystem-configuration-sys0.5.0indirect
crates.iotarindirect
crates.iotar0.4.40indirect
crates.iotempfile3.8.1indirect
crates.iotermcolor1.3.0indirect
crates.iothiserror1.0.50indirect
crates.iothiserror-impl1.0.50indirect
crates.iotinyvec1.6.0indirect
crates.iotinyvec_macros0.1.1indirect
crates.iotokio1.33.0indirect
crates.iotokio-native-tls0.3.1indirect
crates.iotokio-util0.7.10indirect
crates.iotomlindirect
crates.iotoml0.7.8indirect
crates.iotoml0.8.8indirect
crates.iotoml_datetime0.6.5indirect
crates.iotoml_edit0.19.15indirect
crates.iotoml_edit0.21.0indirect
crates.iotower-service0.3.2indirect
crates.iotracing0.1.40indirect
crates.iotracing-attributes0.1.27indirect
crates.iotracing-core0.1.32indirect
crates.iotry-lock0.2.4indirect
crates.iotypenum1.17.0indirect
crates.iounicode-bidi0.3.13indirect
crates.iounicode-ident1.0.12indirect
crates.iounicode-normalization0.1.22indirect
crates.iounicode-width0.1.11indirect
crates.iourlindirect
crates.iourl2.5.0indirect
crates.ioutf8parse0.2.1indirect
crates.iouuid1.5.0indirect
crates.iovcpkg0.2.15indirect
crates.ioversion_check0.9.4indirect
crates.iowant0.3.1indirect
crates.iowasi0.11.0+wasi-snapshot-preview1indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen0.2.88indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-backend0.2.88indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-futures0.4.38indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-macro0.2.88indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-macro-support0.2.88indirect
crates.iowasm-bindgen-shared0.2.88indirect
crates.ioweb-sys0.3.65indirect
crates.iowinapi0.3.9indirect
crates.iowinapi-i686-pc-windows-gnu0.4.0indirect
crates.iowinapi-util0.1.6indirect
crates.iowinapi-x86_64-pc-windows-gnu0.4.0indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.45.0indirect
crates.iowindows-sys0.48.0indirect
crates.iowindows-targets0.42.2indirect
crates.iowindows-targets0.48.5indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_gnullvm0.42.2indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_gnullvm0.48.5indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_msvc0.42.2indirect
crates.iowindows_aarch64_msvc0.48.5indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_gnu0.42.2indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_gnu0.48.5indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_msvc0.42.2indirect
crates.iowindows_i686_msvc0.48.5indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnu0.42.2indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnu0.48.5indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnullvm0.42.2indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_gnullvm0.48.5indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_msvc0.42.2indirect
crates.iowindows_x86_64_msvc0.48.5indirect
crates.iowinnow0.5.19indirect
crates.iowinreg0.50.0indirect
crates.ioxattr1.0.1indirect
crates.ioyaml-rust0.4.5indirect
crates.iozstdindirect
crates.iozstd0.13.0indirect
crates.iozstd-safe7.0.0indirect
crates.iozstd-sys2.0.9+zstd.1.5.5indirect
PyPIclick8.1.7indirect
PyPIpolars0.19.8indirect
PyPIrequests2.31.0indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.14.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPyPI.