Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-22 11:52 UTC

codeigniter4 / CodeIgniter4

Open Source PHP Framework (originally from EllisLab)

PHPMIT★ 5,966 stars⑂ 1,994 forkssince Aug 2015View on GitHub ↗

codeigniter4/CodeIgniter4 holds a health index of 98 out of 100, placing it in the Exceptional band. It scores highest on Vitality (96/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (75/100). It was last updated today. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

98
overall / 100
Exceptional

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

98
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 87 is calibrated to 98 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

623 followers16 public repossince Oct 2018

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Packagistcodeigniter4/appstarterpoints to another repo — not scoredv4.7.419,5647892 days ago
Packagistcodeigniter4/frameworkpoints to another repo — not scoredv4.7.4150,4287946 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

96Exceptional · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 0 days ago
35.3/36Commit cadence51/52 weeks with commits
18/18Commit volume553 commits in the last year
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained30 commit(s) and 9 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
commits_last_year553
human_commit_share0.76
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year51
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases80 releases published
36/36Release recencylatest release 46 days ago
19.8/27Release cadencea release every ~47.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count80
latest_release_tagv4.7.4
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release46
mean_days_between_releases47.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

96Exceptional · 17% of overall
How it's scored
60/60Stars5,966 stars
25/25Forks1,994 forks
13.6/15Watchers278 watchers
Inputs used
forks1,994
stars5,966
watchers278
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

92Excellent
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
13.5/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges9
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductyes
readme_badge_servicescoveralls.io, github.com, poser.pugx.org, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

81Excellent · 23% of overall
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
13.5/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 40% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth99 contributors
10/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 30 contributing companies or organizations
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled99
top_contributor_share0.401
How it's scored
41.6/42Issue resolution99% of issues closed
25.3/30PR acceptance6,506/7,713 decided PRs merged
13/13Newcomer PR acceptance2/2 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs6,506
open_issues25
closed_issues2,712
prs_merged_7d8
prs_decided_7d8
prs_merged_30d31
prs_decided_30d33
issue_closed_ratio0.991
closed_unmerged_prs1,207
first_time_authors_30d1
first_time_prs_merged_30d2
first_time_prs_decided_30d2
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
20.1/25Owner reach623 followers of codeigniter4
21/25Track record16 public repos, account ~7 yr old
Inputs used
followers623
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_logincodeigniter4
public_repos16
account_age_days2,856
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

80Excellent · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows22 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
16/16Linter config.php-cs-fixer.dist.php
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
20/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://codeigniter.com/
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics7 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsphp, codeigniter, codeigniter4, framework-php, hacktoberfest, php-framework, php8
has_wikino
homepagehttps://codeigniter.com/
docs_sitehttps://codeigniter.com/
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

84Excellent · 16% of overall

Security posture

80Excellent
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionno data
2.5/2.5CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
2.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 30 contributing companies or organizations
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
7.5/7.5Maintained30 commit(s) and 9 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated12
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive6
scorecard_aggregate8
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages1
unassessed_packages30
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 1 resolved dependencies against OSV. 30 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

75Good · 4% of overall
How it's scored
45/45Agent instructions.github/copilot-instructions.md, .github/instructions/database.instructions.md, .github/instructions/framework-core.instructions.md, .github/instructions/tests.instructions.md, .github/instructions/user-guide.instructions.md, .github/instructions/worker-mode.instructions.md, AGENTS.md
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history73 of 76 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.961
agent_instruction_files.github/copilot-instructions.md, .github/instructions/database.instructions.md, .github/instructions/framework-core.instructions.md, .github/instructions/tests.instructions.md, .github/instructions/user-guide.instructions.md, .github/instructions/worker-mode.instructions.md, AGENTS.md
agent_instruction_max_bytes6,603
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrapuser_guide_src/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config.php-cs-fixer.dist.php
0/11Static type checking
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance24 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfiles
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesuser_guide_src/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0.24
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codePHP without a type-check config
54.9/55Manageable file sizes7/2,989 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes106,621
source_files_sampled2,989
oversized_source_files7
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)not applicable to this kind of software
0/20MCP servernot applicable to this kind of software
40/40Runnable examplesexamples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files
interfaces_expected_of
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto), MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.

Key facts

5,966GitHub stars
99contributors
553commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
80releases
2bus factor
25open issues
Packagist, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch packagist package 'codeigniter4/codeigniter4' from its registry
  • packagist package 'codeigniter4/appstarter' points at a different repository (https://github.com/codeigniter4/appstarter); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • packagist package 'codeigniter4/framework' points at a different repository (https://github.com/codeigniter4/framework); excluded from ecosystem scoring

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 1,994 ⇿
0Stars
1,994Forks
62Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.

5001,0001,5002,0001,994192021-012023-102026-08
Major 0Minor 7Patch 55

Each point covers 6 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 8.0 / 10
8.0aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-22 11:52 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
n/aBranch-Protectioninternal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md
10CI-Tests30 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
10Contributorsproject has 30 contributing companies or organizations
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
10Maintained30 commit(s) and 9 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 10
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistlaminas/laminas-escaper^2.18composer.json
Packagistpsr/log^3.0composer.json
Packagistcodeigniter/coding-standard^1.7utils/composer.json
Packagistergebnis/composer-normalize^2.28utils/composer.json
Packagistfriendsofphp/php-cs-fixer^3.76utils/composer.json
Packagistnexusphp/cs-config^3.26utils/composer.json
Packagistvimeo/psalm^6.14utils/composer.json
Packagistlaminas/laminas-escaper^2.18admin/framework/composer.json
Packagistpsr/log^3.0admin/framework/composer.json
Packagistcodeigniter4/framework^4.7admin/starter/composer.json
All dependencies 31

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 8 direct and 23 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Packagistcodeigniter/coding-standarddirect
Packagistcodeigniter4/frameworkdirect
Packagistergebnis/composer-normalizedirect
Packagistfriendsofphp/php-cs-fixerdirect
Packagistlaminas/laminas-escaperdirect
Packagistnexusphp/cs-configdirect
Packagistpsr/logdirect
Packagistvimeo/psalmdirect
Packagistboundwize/structarmedindirect
Packagistcodeigniter/phpstan-codeigniterindirect
Packagistext-intlindirect
Packagistext-mbstringindirect
Packagistfakerphp/fakerindirect
Packagistkint-php/kintindirect
Packagistmikey179/vfsstreamindirect
Packagistnexusphp/tachycardiaindirect
Packagistphpindirect
Packagistphpmetrics/phpmetricsindirect
Packagistphpstan/extension-installerindirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstanindirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-strict-rulesindirect
Packagistphpunit/phpcovindirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunitindirect
Packagistpredis/predisindirect
Packagistrector/rector2.6.1indirect
Packagistshipmonk/phpstan-baseline-per-identifierindirect
PyPIdocutilsindirect
PyPIjinja2indirect
PyPIsphinxindirect
PyPIsphinx-rtd-themeindirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-phpdomainindirect
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 1 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 30 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPackagist.