Public record
Software health reportschema 0.27.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-25 13:06 UTC

coinbase / cdp-sdk-python

PythonCustom license★ 95 stars⑂ 33 forkssince Sep 2024View on GitHub ↗
KindLibraryhow this is determined

coinbase/cdp-sdk-python holds a health index of 50 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (78/100) and lowest on Vitality (31/100). It was last updated 270 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.

50
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

50
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 56 is calibrated to 59 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

CoinbaseOrganization
2,632 followers184 public repossince Jun 2012

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
PyPIcdp-sdk1.47.1-9336 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

31At Risk · 21% of overall

Development activity

7Critical
How it's scored
3.6/36Push recency — last push 270 days ago
0.7/36Commit cadence — 1/52 weeks with commits
2.7/18Commit volume — 1 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year1
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push270
active_weeks_last_year1

Release discipline

68Good
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 28 releases published
7.2/36Release recency — latest release 511 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count28
latest_release_tagv0.21.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release511
mean_days_between_releases5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

59Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

49Weak
How it's scored
32/60Stars — 95 stars
12.5/25Forks — 33 forks
4.7/15Watchers — 8 watchers
Inputs used
forks33
stars95
watchers8
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

71Good
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
16.9/22.5License — license file present, not a recognized license
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
6.3/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges—
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateyes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

78Good · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

57Moderate
How it's scored
25.2/54Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
12.1/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 46% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 15 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor2
contributors_sampled15
top_contributor_share0.464

Issue & PR responsiveness

64Moderate
How it's scored
12.6/42Issue resolution — 30% of issues closed
27.8/30PR acceptance — 101/109 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
15/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
Inputs used
merged_prs101
open_issues7
closed_issues3
prs_merged_7d—
prs_decided_7d—
prs_merged_30d—
prs_decided_30d—
issue_closed_ratio0.3
closed_unmerged_prs8
first_time_authors_30d—
first_time_prs_merged_30d—
first_time_prs_decided_30d—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

99Exceptional
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
24.6/25Owner reach — 2,632 followers of coinbase
25/25Track record — 184 public repos, account ~14 yr old
Inputs used
followers2,632
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified—
owner_logincoinbase
public_repos184
account_age_days5,144
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 36 days ago
20/20Version history — 93 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagescdp-sdk
ecosystemspypi
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish36

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

55Moderate · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

48Weak
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 1 out of 20 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

65Good
How it's scored
30/30README
25/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
0/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_diryes
has_descriptionno

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

53Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

41Weak
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
3.8/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — 1 out of 20 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
7.5/7.5Code-Review — all changesets reviewed
1.5/2.5Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.2/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
5/5Security-Policy — security policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 76 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4.1
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages61
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the pypi:cdp-sdk@1.47.1 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 61 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

57Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 80 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.8
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

61Moderate
How it's scored
18/18One-command bootstrap — Makefile, docs/Makefile
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — cdp/client/py.typed, cdp/py.typed
10/10Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespoetry.lock
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_filesMakefile, docs/Makefile
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configscdp/client/py.typed, cdp/py.typed
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

80Excellent
How it's scored
27/45Type-checkable code — Python with type-check config (cdp/client/py.typed, cdp/py.typed)
53.5/55Manageable file sizes — 7/260 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePython
largest_source_bytes114,730
source_files_sampled260
oversized_source_files7

Key facts

95GitHub stars
15contributors
1commits, last 12 months
270days since last push
28releases
2bus factor
7open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 33 ⇿
0Stars
33Forks
27Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

01325383222024-092025-082026-07
Major 0Minor 12Patch 15

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.1 / 10
4.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-25 13:06 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
5Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
0CI-Tests1 out of 20 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
10Code-Reviewall changesets reviewed
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
9Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
10Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
0Vulnerabilities76 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 8
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
PyPIurllib3^2.2.3pyproject.toml
PyPIpydantic^2.10.3pyproject.toml
PyPIweb3^7.6.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpyjwt^2.10.1pyproject.toml
PyPIcryptography^44.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIpython-dateutil^2.9.0.post0pyproject.toml
PyPIcoincurve^20.0.0pyproject.toml
PyPIbip-utils^2.9.3pyproject.toml
All dependencies 109

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 8 direct and 101 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
PyPIbip-utils2.9.3direct
PyPIcoincurve20.0.0direct
PyPIcryptography44.0.0direct
PyPIpydantic2.10.3direct
PyPIpyjwt2.10.1direct
PyPIpython-dateutil2.9.0.post0direct
PyPIurllib32.2.3direct
PyPIweb37.6.0direct
PyPIaiohappyeyeballs2.4.4indirect
PyPIaiohttp3.11.10indirect
PyPIaiosignal1.3.1indirect
PyPIalabaster1.0.0indirect
PyPIannotated-types0.7.0indirect
PyPIanyio4.7.0indirect
PyPIasn1crypto1.5.1indirect
PyPIasync-timeout5.0.1indirect
PyPIattrs24.2.0indirect
PyPIbabel2.16.0indirect
PyPIbitarray3.0.0indirect
PyPIcattrs24.1.2indirect
PyPIcbor25.6.5indirect
PyPIcertifi2024.8.30indirect
PyPIcffi1.17.1indirect
PyPIcharset-normalizer3.4.0indirect
PyPIckzg2.0.1indirect
PyPIclick8.1.7indirect
PyPIcolorama0.4.6indirect
PyPIcoverage7.6.9indirect
PyPIcrcmod1.7indirect
PyPIcytoolz1.0.0indirect
PyPIdocstring-to-markdown0.15indirect
PyPIdocutils0.21.2indirect
PyPIecdsa0.19.0indirect
PyPIed25519-blake2b1.4.1indirect
PyPIeth-abi5.1.0indirect
PyPIeth-account0.13.4indirect
PyPIeth-hash0.7.0indirect
PyPIeth-keyfile0.8.1indirect
PyPIeth-keys0.6.0indirect
PyPIeth-rlp2.1.0indirect
PyPIeth-typing5.0.1indirect
PyPIeth-utils5.1.0indirect
PyPIexceptiongroup1.2.2indirect
PyPIfrozenlist1.5.0indirect
PyPIh110.14.0indirect
PyPIhexbytes1.2.1indirect
PyPIidna3.10indirect
PyPIimagesize1.4.1indirect
PyPIiniconfig2.0.0indirect
PyPIjedi0.19.2indirect
PyPIjinja23.1.4indirect
PyPIlsprotocol2023.0.1indirect
PyPImarkdown-it-py3.0.0indirect
PyPImarkupsafe3.0.2indirect
PyPImdit-py-plugins0.4.2indirect
PyPImdurl0.1.2indirect
PyPImultidict6.1.0indirect
PyPImypy1.13.0indirect
PyPImypy-extensions1.0.0indirect
PyPImyst-parser4.0.0indirect
PyPIpackaging24.2indirect
PyPIparsimonious0.10.0indirect
PyPIparso0.8.4indirect
PyPIpluggy1.5.0indirect
PyPIpockets0.9.1indirect
PyPIpropcache0.2.1indirect
PyPIpy-sr25519-bindings0.2.1indirect
PyPIpycparser2.22indirect
PyPIpycryptodome3.21.0indirect
PyPIpydantic-core2.27.1indirect
PyPIpygls1.3.1indirect
PyPIpygments2.18.0indirect
PyPIpynacl1.5.0indirect
PyPIpytest8.3.4indirect
PyPIpytest-cov6.0.0indirect
PyPIpython-dotenv1.0.1indirect
PyPIpython-lsp-jsonrpc1.1.2indirect
PyPIpython-lsp-server1.12.0indirect
PyPIpyunormalize16.0.0indirect
PyPIpywin32308indirect
PyPIpyyaml6.0.2indirect
PyPIregex2024.11.6indirect
PyPIrequests2.32.3indirect
PyPIrlp4.0.1indirect
PyPIruff0.7.4indirect
PyPIruff-lsp0.0.58indirect
PyPIsix1.17.0indirect
PyPIsniffio1.3.1indirect
PyPIsnowballstemmer2.2.0indirect
PyPIsphinx8.1.3indirect
PyPIsphinx-autobuild2024.10.3indirect
PyPIsphinx-autodoc-typehints2.5.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-applehelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-devhelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-htmlhelp2.1.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-jsmath1.0.1indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-napoleon0.7indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-qthelp2.0.0indirect
PyPIsphinxcontrib-serializinghtml2.0.0indirect
PyPIstarlette0.41.3indirect
PyPItomli2.2.1indirect
PyPItoolz1.0.0indirect
PyPItypes-requests2.32.0.20241016indirect
PyPItyping-extensions4.12.2indirect
PyPIujson5.10.0indirect
PyPIuvicorn0.32.1indirect
PyPIwatchfiles1.0.0indirect
PyPIwebsockets13.1indirect
PyPIyarl1.18.3indirect
Dependency advisories 0

Installing pypi:cdp-sdk@1.47.1 pulls in 61 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with coinbase/cdp-sdk-python. Read them side by side →

100run-llama/llama_indexLlamaIndex is the leading document agent and OCR platformExceptional100envoyproxy/envoyCloud-native high-performance edge/middle/service proxyExceptional100wandb/wandbThe AI developer platform. Use Weights & Biases to train and fine-tune models, and manage models from experimentation to production.Exceptional100apache/airflowApache Airflow - A platform to programmatically author, schedule, and monitor workflowsExceptional100apache/arrowApache Arrow is the universal columnar format and multi-language toolbox for fast data interchange and in-memory analyticsExceptional100microsoft/onnxruntimeONNX Runtime: cross-platform, high performance ML inferencing and training acceleratorExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.27.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.