Pre-indexed code knowledge graph, auto syncs on code changes, for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, Cursor, OpenCode, AntiGravity, Kiro, and Hermes Agent — fewer tokens, fewer tool calls, 100% local
colbymchenry/codegraph holds a health index of 77 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (84/100) and lowest on Security (41/100). It was last updated 3 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.
77
overall / 100
Good
Software health index
Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.
77
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
Score profile
Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.
The weighted overall 66 is calibrated to 77 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).
Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25
Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40
No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
source
osv
advisories
0
affected_packages
0
assessed_packages
6
unassessed_packages
0
affected_by_severity
none
direct_affected_packages
0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:@colbymchenry/codegraph@1.5.0 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 6 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.
How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.
API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software
20/20
MCP server
0/40
Runnable examples
Inputs used
example_dirs
—
has_mcp_signal
yes
api_schema_files
—
interfaces_expected_of
—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.
Key facts
64,513GitHub stars
39contributors
780commits, last 12 months
3days since last push
30releases
1bus factor
132open issues
crates.io, npmpackage ecosystems
Data collection warnings
Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
Star history carried forward from 2026-07-21: GitHub restricted the stargazers API to repository admins, so it can no longer be collected. The repository has 64513 stars today.
First-time contributor figures cover 12 of 14 authors (cap 12)
Could not fetch crates package 'codegraph-kernel' from its registry
GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository
More detail
Star and fork history 61,400 ★ / 4,060 ⇿
61,400Stars
4,060Forks
13Releases
When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.
Only the most recent history is shown — this repository exceeds the collection window, so the earliest history is not captured.
Star history is shown as collected on 2026-07-21. GitHub restricted the stargazers API to repository administrators in July 2026, so this series can no longer be extended; the current star total above remains live.
Major 0Minor 5Patch 8
OpenSSF Scorecard 2.5 / 10
2.5aggregate
Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-04 23:25 UTC
The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository
Dependency advisories 0
Installing npm:@colbymchenry/codegraph@1.5.0 pulls in 6 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.
No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.
An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.
Raw JSON report machine-readable
Feedback
Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.
Related records
Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with colbymchenry/codegraph. Read them side by side →
Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.
Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.
