Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-06 02:10 UTC

constructive-io / jobs

📚 postgres queue - jobs and job scheduling

JavaScriptMIT★ 0 stars⑂ 0 forkssince Jul 2020View on GitHub ↗
KindCommand-line toolLibraryNetwork servicehow this is determined

constructive-io/jobs holds a health index of 21 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (40/100) and lowest on Vitality (1/100). It was last updated 2073 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

21
overall / 100
At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

21
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 27 is calibrated to 21 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

ConstructiveOrganization
10 followers73 public repossince Nov 2025

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
npm@launchql/job-pg0.3.44310262 days ago
npm@launchql/job-utils0.4.32812262 days ago
npm@launchql/job-worker0.3.65314262 days ago
npm@launchql/job-scheduler0.3.65013262 days ago
npm@launchql/openfaas-job-fnpoints to another repo — not scored0.1.330122090 days ago
npm@launchql/openfaas-job-serverpoints to another repo — not scored0.2.22442111 days ago
npm@launchql/openfaas-job-workerpoints to another repo — not scored0.4.077232073 days ago
npm@launchql/openfaas-job-servicepoints to another repo — not scored0.3.016102073 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

1Critical · 21% of overall

Development activity

1Critical
How it's scored
0/36Push recency — last push 2,073 days ago
0/36Commit cadence — 0/52 weeks with commits
0/18Commit volume — 0 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year0
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push2,073
active_weeks_last_year0

Release discipline

1Critical
How it's scored
0/27Ships releases — no releases published
0/36Release recency — no releases
0/27Release cadence — no releases
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

27At Risk · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

1Critical
How it's scored
0/60Stars — 0 stars
0/25Forks — 0 forks
0/15Watchers — 0 watchers
Inputs used
forks0
stars0
watchers0
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history

Community health

50Moderate
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

37Weak
How it's scored
29.9/80Monthly downloads — 174 downloads/month across npm
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packages@launchql/job-pg, @launchql/job-utils, @launchql/job-worker, @launchql/job-scheduler
dependents—
ecosystemsnpm
total_downloads—
monthly_downloads174
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

40Weak · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

13Critical
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
1.4/13.5Contributor breadth — 1 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled1
top_contributor_share1

Issue & PR responsiveness

18Critical
How it's scored
10.5/42Issue resolution — 25% of issues closed
0/30PR acceptance — no decided pull requests or no data
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
merged_prs0
open_issues3
closed_issues1
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d0
prs_decided_30d0
issue_closed_ratio0.25
closed_unmerged_prs0
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): PR acceptance, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

52Moderate
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
7.5/25Owner reach — 10 followers of constructive-io
14.6/25Track record — 73 public repos, account ~0 yr old
Inputs used
followers10
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_loginconstructive-io
public_repos73
account_age_days290

Package maintenance

91Excellent
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 4 package(s) on npm
26/35Publish recency — latest publish 262 days ago
20/20Version history — 14 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packages@launchql/job-pg, @launchql/job-utils, @launchql/job-worker, @launchql/job-scheduler
ecosystemsnpm
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish262

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

37Weak · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

28At Risk
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
0/24Tests present
16/16Linter config — .eslintrc.js
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsno
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

32At Risk · 16% of overall

Security posture

15Critical
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests — no data
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
0/10Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — 0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packaging — no data
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — no SAST tool detected
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — no data
0/7.5Vulnerabilities — 135 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate1.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): CI-Tests, Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
25/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — no indirect dependency carries a known advisory
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages24
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched the npm:@launchql/job-pg@0.3.4 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 24 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

33At Risk · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

34At Risk
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
33.7/40Legible commit history — 43 of 68 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.632
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

21At Risk
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
0/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format config — .eslintrc.js
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 68
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfilesyarn.lock
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests—
dependency_bot_commit_share0

Code legibility for models

55Moderate
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable code — JavaScript without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/45 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes5,222
source_files_sampled45
oversized_source_files0

Machine-readable interfaces

40Weak
How it's scored
0/40API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto)
0/20MCP server
40/40Runnable examples — examples
Inputs used
example_dirsexamples
has_mcp_signalno
api_schema_files—
interfaces_expected_ofnetwork-service

Key facts

0GitHub stars
1contributors
0commits, last 12 months
2,073days since last push
0releases
1bus factor
3open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • npm package '@launchql/openfaas-job-fn' points at a different repository (https://github.com/launchql/jobs); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • npm package '@launchql/openfaas-job-server' points at a different repository (https://github.com/launchql/jobs); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • npm package '@launchql/openfaas-job-worker' points at a different repository (https://github.com/launchql/jobs); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • npm package '@launchql/openfaas-job-service' points at a different repository (https://github.com/launchql/jobs); excluded from ecosystem scoring
  • GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 1.5 / 10
1.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-06 02:10 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
n/aCI-Testsno pull request found
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0Code-ReviewFound 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTno SAST tool detected
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
0Vulnerabilities135 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 41
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
npm@babel/runtime^7.11.2packages/job-pg/package.json
npmenvalid6.0.2packages/job-pg/package.json
npmpg8.3.3packages/job-pg/package.json
npm@babel/runtime^7.11.2packages/job-scheduler/package.json
npm@launchql/job-pg^0.2.2packages/job-scheduler/package.json
npm@launchql/job-utils^0.2.2packages/job-scheduler/package.json
npmenvalid6.0.2packages/job-scheduler/package.json
npmnode-schedule1.3.2packages/job-scheduler/package.json
npm@babel/runtime^7.11.2packages/job-utils/package.json
npmenvalid6.0.2packages/job-utils/package.json
npm@babel/runtime^7.11.2packages/job-worker/package.json
npm@launchql/job-utils^0.2.2packages/job-worker/package.json
npmenvalid6.0.2packages/job-worker/package.json
npmpg8.3.3packages/job-worker/package.json
npm@babel/runtime^7.11.2packages/openfaas-job-example/package.json
npm@launchql/openfaas-job-fn^0.1.3packages/openfaas-job-example/package.json
npmenvalid6.0.2packages/openfaas-job-example/package.json
npm@babel/runtime^7.11.2packages/openfaas-job-fn/package.json
npmbody-parser1.19.0packages/openfaas-job-fn/package.json
npmexpress4.17.1packages/openfaas-job-fn/package.json
npm@babel/runtime^7.11.2packages/openfaas-job-server/package.json
npm@launchql/job-pg^0.2.2packages/openfaas-job-server/package.json
npm@launchql/job-utils^0.2.2packages/openfaas-job-server/package.json
npmbody-parser1.19.0packages/openfaas-job-server/package.json
npmenvalid6.0.2packages/openfaas-job-server/package.json
npmexpress4.17.1packages/openfaas-job-server/package.json
npmpg8.3.3packages/openfaas-job-server/package.json
npm@babel/runtime^7.11.2packages/openfaas-job-service/package.json
npm@launchql/job-pg^0.2.2packages/openfaas-job-service/package.json
npm@launchql/job-scheduler^0.2.2packages/openfaas-job-service/package.json
npm@launchql/openfaas-job-server^0.2.2packages/openfaas-job-service/package.json
npm@launchql/openfaas-job-worker^0.4.0packages/openfaas-job-service/package.json
npmasync-retry1.3.1packages/openfaas-job-service/package.json
npmenvalid6.0.2packages/openfaas-job-service/package.json
npmpg8.3.3packages/openfaas-job-service/package.json
npm@babel/runtime^7.11.2packages/openfaas-job-worker/package.json
npm@launchql/job-pg^0.2.2packages/openfaas-job-worker/package.json
npm@launchql/job-utils^0.2.2packages/openfaas-job-worker/package.json
npmenvalid6.0.2packages/openfaas-job-worker/package.json
npmpg8.3.3packages/openfaas-job-worker/package.json
npmrequest2.88.2packages/openfaas-job-worker/package.json
All dependencies not collected

The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository

Dependency advisories 0

Installing npm:@launchql/job-pg@0.3.4 pulls in 24 packages, direct and transitive: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Related records

Inspected repositories sharing catalogue tags or ecosystems with constructive-io/jobs. Read them side by side →

100apache/airflowApache Airflow - A platform to programmatically author, schedule, and monitor workflowsExceptional100deepset-ai/haystackOpen-source AI orchestration framework for building context-engineered, production-ready LLM applications. Design modular pipelines and agent workflows with explicit control over retrieval, routing, memory, and generation. Built for scalable agents, RAG, multimodal applications, semantic search, and conversational systems.Exceptional100microsoft/onnxruntimeONNX Runtime: cross-platform, high performance ML inferencing and training acceleratorExceptional100mlco2/codecarbonTrack emissions from Compute and recommend ways to reduce their impact on the environment.Exceptional100Azure/azure-sdk-for-jsThis repository is for active development of the Azure SDK for JavaScript (NodeJS & Browser). For consumers of the SDK we recommend visiting our public developer docs at https://docs.microsoft.com/javascript/azure/ or our versioned developer docs at https://azure.github.io/azure-sdk-for-js. Exceptional100clerk/javascriptOfficial JavaScript repository for Clerk authenticationExceptional

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.