Software health reportschema 0.32.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-19 22:44 UTC

containeroo / heartbeats

Wait for heartbeats and notify if they are missing

Go · TypeScriptApache-2.0★ 5 stars⑂ 2 forkssince Nov 2022View on GitHub ↗

containeroo/heartbeats holds a health index of 71 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (91/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (32/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 63 is calibrated to 71 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

containerooOrganization

16 followers51 public repossince Sep 2019

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish
Go	github.com/containeroo/heartbeats	v0.23.2	-	119	27 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

91Excellent · 21% of overall

Development activity

92Excellent

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
28.4/36	Commit cadence — 41/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 151 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	151
human_commit_share	0.09
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	41

Release discipline

90Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 73 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 27 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~34.8 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.

Inputs used

releases_count	73
latest_release_tag	v0.23.2
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	27
mean_days_between_releases	34.8

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

32At Risk · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

10Critical

How it's scored

9.8/60	Stars — 5 stars
0/25	Forks — 2 forks
0/15	Watchers — 1 watchers

Inputs used

forks	2
stars	5
watchers	1
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

57Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
6.3/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	7
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	github.com, goreportcard.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_template	yes

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

62Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

18Critical

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.1/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 100% of commits
2.7/13.5	Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
6/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	2
top_contributor_share	0.995

Issue & PR responsiveness

68Good

How it's scored

21/42	Issue resolution — 50% of issues closed
29/30	PR acceptance — 241/249 decided PRs merged
13/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — 2/2 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
4.5/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 2/6 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3

Inputs used

merged_prs	241
open_issues	1
closed_issues	1
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	2
prs_decided_30d	2
issue_closed_ratio	0.5
closed_unmerged_prs	8
first_time_authors_30d	1
first_time_prs_merged_30d	2
first_time_prs_decided_30d	2

Ownership & stewardship

79Good

How it's scored

30/30	Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20	Verified domain — verified-domain status not read for this organization
8.8/25	Owner reach — 16 followers of containeroo
24.5/25	Track record — 51 public repos, account ~6 yr old

Inputs used

followers	16
owner_type	Organization
is_verified	—
owner_login	containeroo
public_repos	51
account_age_days	2,522

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on go
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 27 days ago
20/20	Version history — 119 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	github.com/containeroo/heartbeats
ecosystems	go
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	27

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

65Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

68Good

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
20/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 27 out of 27 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

60Moderate

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 3 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	golang, heartbeats, monitoring
has_wiki	yes
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

61Moderate · 16% of overall

Security posture

51Moderate

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2.5/2.5	CI-Tests — 27 out of 27 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2.2/7.5	Code-Review — Found 2/6 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
1.5/2.5	Contributors — project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0.5/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
6.8/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 1 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	18
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	0
scorecard_aggregate	5.1

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	1
affected_packages	1
assessed_packages	94
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	high 1
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 94 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

51Moderate · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

1Critical

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40	Legible commit history — no data

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	—
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

70Good

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — web/tsconfig.json
10/10	Reproducible environment — Dockerfile, lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8	Automated maintenance — 91 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
1/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	go.sum, package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	yes
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	Makefile
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	web/tsconfig.json
agent_commit_share	0
toolchain_manifests	go.mod
dependency_bot_commit_share	0.91

Code legibility for models

100Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — Go (statically typed)
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/98 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Go
largest_source_bytes	12,760
source_files_sampled	98
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

5GitHub stars

2contributors

151commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

73releases

1bus factor

1open issues

Go, npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 2 ⇿

0Stars

2Forks

56Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 12Patch 44

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 5.1 / 10

5.1aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-19 22:44 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
10	CI-Tests	27 out of 27 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3	Code-Review	Found 2/6 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
6	Contributors	project has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
10	Dependency-Update-Tool	update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 1 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
1	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 1
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
0	Signed-Releases	Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
9	Vulnerabilities	1 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 10

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
Go	github.com/coder/websocket	`v1.8.15`	go.mod
Go	github.com/containeroo/httpgrace	`v0.1.2`	go.mod
Go	github.com/containeroo/httpprefix	`v0.0.2`	go.mod
Go	github.com/containeroo/notifykit	`v0.0.11`	go.mod
Go	github.com/containeroo/tinyflags	`v0.0.80`	go.mod
Go	github.com/prometheus/client_golang	`v1.24.1`	go.mod
Go	github.com/stretchr/testify	`v1.12.0`	go.mod
Go	gopkg.in/yaml.v3	`v3.0.1`	go.mod
npm	react	`^19.0.0`	web/package.json
npm	react-dom	`^19.0.0`	web/package.json

All dependencies 94

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 10 direct and 84 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
Go	github.com/coder/websocket	`v1.8.15`	direct
Go	github.com/containeroo/httpgrace	`v0.1.2`	direct
Go	github.com/containeroo/httpprefix	`v0.0.2`	direct
Go	github.com/containeroo/notifykit	`v0.0.11`	direct
Go	github.com/containeroo/tinyflags	`v0.0.80`	direct
Go	github.com/prometheus/client_golang	`v1.24.1`	direct
Go	github.com/stretchr/testify	`v1.12.0`	direct
Go	gopkg.in/yaml.v3	`v3.0.1`	direct
npm	react	`19.2.8`	direct
npm	react-dom	`19.2.8`	direct
Go	github.com/beorn7/perks	`v1.0.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/cespare/xxhash/v2	`v2.3.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/containeroo/tmplfuncs	`v0.0.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/containeroo/uuidv7	`v0.0.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/kylelemons/godebug	`v1.1.0`	indirect
Go	github.com/munnerz/goautoneg	`v0.0.0-20191010083416-a7dc8b61c822`	indirect
Go	github.com/prometheus/client_model	`v0.6.2`	indirect
Go	github.com/prometheus/common	`v0.70.1`	indirect
Go	github.com/prometheus/procfs	`v0.21.1`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/sync	`v0.21.0`	indirect
Go	golang.org/x/sys	`v0.47.0`	indirect
Go	google.golang.org/protobuf	`v1.36.11`	indirect
npm	@emnapi/core	`2.0.0-alpha.3`	indirect
npm	@emnapi/runtime	`2.0.0-alpha.3`	indirect
npm	@emnapi/wasi-threads	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	@napi-rs/wasm-runtime	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	@oxc-project/types	`0.142.0`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-android-arm64	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-darwin-arm64	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-darwin-x64	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-freebsd-x64	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-gnu	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-arm64-musl	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-ppc64-gnu	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-s390x-gnu	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-linux-x64-musl	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-openharmony-arm64	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-wasm32-wasi	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-win32-arm64-msvc	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/binding-win32-x64-msvc	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	@rolldown/pluginutils	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@tybys/wasm-util	`0.10.3`	indirect
npm	@types/react	`19.2.18`	indirect
npm	@types/react-dom	`19.2.4`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-aix-ppc64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-darwin-arm64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-darwin-x64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-freebsd-arm64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-freebsd-x64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-arm	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-arm64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-loong64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-mips64el	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-ppc64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-riscv64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-s390x	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-linux-x64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-netbsd-arm64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-netbsd-x64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-openbsd-arm64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-openbsd-x64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-sunos-x64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-win32-arm64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@typescript/typescript-win32-x64	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	@vitejs/plugin-react	`6.0.5`	indirect
npm	csstype	`3.2.3`	indirect
npm	detect-libc	`2.1.2`	indirect
npm	fdir	`6.5.0`	indirect
npm	fsevents	`2.3.3`	indirect
npm	lightningcss	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-android-arm64	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-darwin-arm64	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-darwin-x64	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-freebsd-x64	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-arm-gnueabihf	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-arm64-gnu	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-arm64-musl	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-x64-gnu	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-linux-x64-musl	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-win32-arm64-msvc	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	lightningcss-win32-x64-msvc	`1.33.0`	indirect
npm	nanoid	`3.3.16`	indirect
npm	picocolors	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	picomatch	`4.0.5`	indirect
npm	postcss	`8.5.25`	indirect
npm	rolldown	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	scheduler	`0.27.0`	indirect
npm	source-map-js	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	tinyglobby	`0.2.17`	indirect
npm	tslib	`2.8.1`	indirect
npm	typescript	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	vite	`8.2.1`	indirect

Dependency advisories 1

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 94 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
nanoid	`3.3.16`	indirect	high	1	`5.1.6`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.32.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Go.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records