Public record
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-19 17:00 UTC

copenhagenatomics / CA_DataUploader

C# software package to upload temperature data from CA temperature hub product

C#MIT★ 4 stars⑂ 2 forkssince Apr 2018View on GitHub ↗

copenhagenatomics/CA_DataUploader holds a health index of 59 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Vitality (70/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (38/100). It was last updated 14 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

59
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

59
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 56 is calibrated to 59 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

170 followers14 public repossince Nov 2017

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetCA.LoopControlPluginBase1.3.0-7340 days agoraspberrypiiotdatalogger
NuGetCA_DataUploaderLib22.4.0-12327 days agoraspberrypiiotdatalogger

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

70Good · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recency — last push 14 days ago
11.8/36Commit cadence — 17/52 weeks with commits
12.7/18Commit volume — 25 commits in the last year
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 4 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
commits_last_year25
human_commit_share1
days_since_last_push14
active_weeks_last_year17
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases — 100 releases published
36/36Release recency — latest release 27 days ago
27/27Release cadence — a release every ~24.1 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Inputs used
releases_count100
latest_release_tag22.4.0
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release27
mean_days_between_releases24.1

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

38Weak · 17% of overall
How it's scored
7.7/60Stars — 4 stars
0/25Forks — 2 forks
0/15Watchers — 2 watchers
Inputs used
forks2
stars4
watchers2
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (MIT)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges0
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services—
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
54/80Total downloads — 157,327 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesCA.LoopControlPluginBase, CA_DataUploaderLib
dependents—
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads157,327
monthly_downloads—
unverified_packages_excluded—
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

67Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
4.5/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 80% of commits
9.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 7 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled7
top_contributor_share0.798
How it's scored
36.1/42Issue resolution — 86% of issues closed
29.1/30PR acceptance — 355/366 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
13.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 24/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
merged_prs355
open_issues9
closed_issues55
prs_merged_7d0
prs_decided_7d0
prs_merged_30d1
prs_decided_30d1
issue_closed_ratio0.859
closed_unmerged_prs11
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backing — organization-owned
0/20Verified domain
16.1/25Owner reach — 170 followers of copenhagenatomics
20.6/25Track record — 14 public repos, account ~8 yr old
Inputs used
followers170
owner_typeOrganization
is_verifiedno
owner_logincopenhagenatomics
public_repos14
account_age_days3,244

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 2 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 27 days ago
20/20Version history — 123 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesCA.LoopControlPluginBase, CA_DataUploaderLib
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish27

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

45Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
18/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 24 out of 25 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
0/10Topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topics—
has_wikiyes
homepage—
docs_site—
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

58Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
4.5/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
2.2/2.5CI-Tests — 24 out of 25 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
6.8/7.5Code-Review — Found 24/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
2.2/7.5Maintained — 4 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
1/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated18
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive0
scorecard_aggregate4.8

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories0
affected_packages0
assessed_packages16
unassessed_packages0
affected_by_severitynone
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 16 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

44Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40Legible commit history — 81 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url—
legible_history_share0.81
agent_instruction_files—
agent_instruction_max_bytes—
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — CA.LoopControlPluginBase.Tests/CA.LoopControlPluginBase.Tests.csproj, CA.LoopControlPluginBase/CA.LoopControlPluginBase.csproj, CA_DataUploader/CA_DataUploader.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
0/10Reproducible environment
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
0/8Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
2/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles—
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files—
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs—
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCA.LoopControlPluginBase.Tests/CA.LoopControlPluginBase.Tests.csproj, CA.LoopControlPluginBase/CA.LoopControlPluginBase.csproj, CA_DataUploader/CA_DataUploader.csproj, CA_DataUploaderLib/CA_DataUploaderLib.csproj, UnitTests/CA_DataUploader.UnitTests.csproj, UnitTests/UnitTests.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/126 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes55,011
source_files_sampled126
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

4GitHub stars
7contributors
25commits, last 12 months
14days since last push
100releases
1bus factor
9open issues
NuGetpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 2 ⇿
0Stars
2Forks
83Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

111222212023-062024-082025-11
Major 14Minor 18Patch 49

Each point covers 3 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.8 / 10
4.8aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-10-19 17:00 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
6Branch-Protectionbranch protection is not maximal on development and all release branches
9CI-Tests24 out of 25 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 9
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
9Code-ReviewFound 24/26 approved changesets -- score normalized to 9
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
3Maintained4 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 3
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
2Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 2
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0Signed-ReleasesProject has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 21
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetMSTest.Analyzers4.0.2CA.LoopControlPluginBase.Tests/CA.LoopControlPluginBase.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.0.1CA.LoopControlPluginBase.Tests/CA.LoopControlPluginBase.Tests.csproj
NuGetMSTest.TestAdapter4.0.2CA.LoopControlPluginBase.Tests/CA.LoopControlPluginBase.Tests.csproj
NuGetMSTest.TestFramework4.0.2CA.LoopControlPluginBase.Tests/CA.LoopControlPluginBase.Tests.csproj
NuGetMinVer3.1.0CA.LoopControlPluginBase/CA.LoopControlPluginBase.csproj
NuGetMinVer3.1.0CA_DataUploader/CA_DataUploader.csproj
NuGetCoreCLR-NCalc3.1.253CA_DataUploaderLib/CA_DataUploaderLib.csproj
NuGetMinVer7.0.0CA_DataUploaderLib/CA_DataUploaderLib.csproj
NuGetSystem.IO.Ports6.0.0CA_DataUploaderLib/CA_DataUploaderLib.csproj
NuGetCA.LoopControlPluginBase1.3.0CA_DataUploaderLib/CA_DataUploaderLib.csproj
NuGetSystem.IO.Pipelines6.0.3CA_DataUploaderLib/CA_DataUploaderLib.csproj
NuGetUdpToHttpGateway.Client0.2.1CA_DataUploaderLib/CA_DataUploaderLib.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.1.0UnitTests/CA_DataUploader.UnitTests.csproj
NuGetMSTest.TestAdapter2.2.10UnitTests/CA_DataUploader.UnitTests.csproj
NuGetMSTest.TestFramework2.2.10UnitTests/CA_DataUploader.UnitTests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.TimeProvider.Testing8.0.0-rc.2.23510.2UnitTests/CA_DataUploader.UnitTests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.0.1UnitTests/UnitTests.csproj
NuGetMoq4.20.72UnitTests/UnitTests.csproj
NuGetMSTest.TestAdapter4.0.2UnitTests/UnitTests.csproj
NuGetMSTest.TestFramework4.0.2UnitTests/UnitTests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.TimeProvider.Testing10.2.0UnitTests/UnitTests.csproj
All dependencies 16

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 16 direct and 0 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
NuGetCA.LoopControlPluginBase1.3.0direct
NuGetCoreCLR-NCalc3.1.253direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.TimeProvider.Testing10.2.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.TimeProvider.Testing8.0.0-rc.2.23510.2direct
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk17.1.0direct
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.0.1direct
NuGetMinVer3.1.0direct
NuGetMinVer7.0.0direct
NuGetMoq4.20.72direct
NuGetMSTest.TestAdapter2.2.10direct
NuGetMSTest.TestAdapter4.0.2direct
NuGetMSTest.TestFramework2.2.10direct
NuGetMSTest.TestFramework4.0.2direct
NuGetSystem.IO.Pipelines6.0.3direct
NuGetSystem.IO.Ports6.0.0direct
NuGetUdpToHttpGateway.Client0.2.1direct
Dependency advisories 0

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 16 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 0 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

No known advisories affect the assessed dependencies.

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — NuGet.