Public record
Software health reportschema 0.29.0 · metrics 2.5.0 · 2026-08-02 18:04 UTC

coronabytes / dotnet-arangodb

.NET Driver for ArangoDB

C#Apache-2.0★ 71 stars⑂ 18 forkssince Jan 2020archivedView on GitHub ↗

coronabytes/dotnet-arangodb holds a health index of 19 out of 100, placing it in the Critical band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (60/100) and lowest on Engineering Quality (42/100). The repository is archived, so no further maintenance is expected.

19
overall / 100
Critical

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

19
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 52 is calibrated to 53 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

Andreas D JungPersonal account
6 followers7 public repossince Mar 2014

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
NuGetCore.Arango3.12.3-860 days agoarangodbdriver

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

59Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recency — last push 0 days ago
1.4/36Commit cadence — 2/52 weeks with commits
7.6/18Commit volume — 6 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — project is archived
Inputs used
commits_last_year6
human_commit_share0.99
days_since_last_push0
active_weeks_last_year2
How it's scored
16.2/27Ships releases — 91 version tags (no GitHub releases)
36/36Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
19.8/27Release cadence — a release every ~99.5 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data
Inputs used
releases_count91
latest_release_tag3.12.3
releases_from_tagsyes
days_since_latest_release0
mean_days_between_releases99.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

52Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
29.9/60Stars — 71 stars
10.3/25Forks — 18 forks
1.7/15Watchers — 3 watchers
Inputs used
forks18
stars71
watchers3
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges11
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_servicesgithub.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
56/80Total downloads — 243,867 downloads all-time across nuget
0/20Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem
Inputs used
packagesCore.Arango
dependents
ecosystemsnuget
total_downloads243,867
monthly_downloads
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

60Moderate · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
2/22.5Commit distribution — top contributor authored 91% of commits
13.5/13.5Contributor breadth — 10 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled10
top_contributor_share0.91
How it's scored
39.3/42Issue resolution — 94% of issues closed
29.2/30PR acceptance — 36/37 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
4.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 10/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
merged_prs36
open_issues3
closed_issues44
prs_merged_7d2
prs_decided_7d3
prs_merged_30d2
prs_decided_30d3
issue_closed_ratio0.936
closed_unmerged_prs1
first_time_authors_30d0
first_time_prs_merged_30d0
first_time_prs_decided_30d0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): newcomer_pr_acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
6.1/25Owner reach — 6 followers of coronabytes
18.6/25Track record — 7 public repos, account ~12 yr old
Inputs used
followers6
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_logincoronabytes
public_repos7
account_age_days4,517
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on nuget
35/35Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20Version history — 86 published versions
20/20Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagesCore.Arango
ecosystemsnuget
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

42Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows — 2 workflow(s)
0/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
6.4/6.4.editorconfig
6/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 4 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsno
has_editorconfigyes
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

50Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics — 8 topics
0/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicsarangodb, arangodb-client, netcore, driver, database, linq, graph, csharp
has_wikino
homepage
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

45Weak · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0.8/2.5CI-Tests — 4 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 3
0/2.5CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2.2/7.5Code-Review — Found 10/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
0.8/2.5Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected
0/5Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5License — license file detected
0/7.5Maintained — project is archived
5/5Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
7.5/7.5Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated17
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive1
scorecard_aggregate4.5
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): signed_releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

43Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
16.7/40Legible commit history — 31 of 99 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
legible_history_share0.313
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
12.6/18One-command bootstrap — Core.Arango.Tests/Core.Arango.Tests.csproj, Core.Arango/Core.Arango.csproj (toolchain convention, no task runner)
0/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
11/11Static type checking — C# (statically typed)
10/10Reproducible environment — Dockerfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100
8/8Automated maintenance — 1 of the last 100 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfiles
has_dockerfileyes
typed_languageyes
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifestsCore.Arango.Tests/Core.Arango.Tests.csproj, Core.Arango/Core.Arango.csproj
dependency_bot_commit_share0.01
How it's scored
45/45Type-checkable code — C# (statically typed)
55/55Manageable file sizes — 0/448 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageC#
largest_source_bytes55,639
source_files_sampled448
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

71GitHub stars
10contributors
6commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
91releases
1bus factor
3open issues
NuGetpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 18 ⇿
0Stars
18Forks
88Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

0481216201812020-052023-012025-10
Major 2Minor 11Patch 75

Each point covers 5 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.5 / 10
4.5aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-02 18:04 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
3CI-Tests4 out of 12 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 3
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
3Code-ReviewFound 10/29 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintainedproject is archived
10Packagingpackaging workflow detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
10Vulnerabilities0 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 17
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
NuGetMicrosoft.NET.Test.Sdk18.0.1Core.Arango.Tests/Core.Arango.Tests.csproj
NuGetxunit2.9.3Core.Arango.Tests/Core.Arango.Tests.csproj
NuGetXunit.Priority1.1.6Core.Arango.Tests/Core.Arango.Tests.csproj
NuGetxunit.runner.visualstudio3.1.5Core.Arango.Tests/Core.Arango.Tests.csproj
NuGetcoverlet.collector6.0.4Core.Arango.Tests/Core.Arango.Tests.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection10.0.0Core.Arango.Tests/Core.Arango.Tests.csproj
NuGetNewtonsoft.Json13.0.4Core.Arango/Core.Arango.csproj
NuGetSystem.IdentityModel.Tokens.Jwt8.14.0Core.Arango/Core.Arango.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection.Abstractions8.0.0Core.Arango/Core.Arango.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection.Abstractions9.0.0Core.Arango/Core.Arango.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection.Abstractions10.0.0Core.Arango/Core.Arango.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection.Abstractions8.0.0Core.Arango/Core.Arango.csproj
NuGetSystem.Text.Json8.0.5Core.Arango/Core.Arango.csproj
NuGetSystem.Text.Encodings.Web8.0.0Core.Arango/Core.Arango.csproj
NuGetMicrosoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection.Abstractions8.0.0Core.Arango/Core.Arango.csproj
NuGetSystem.Text.Json8.0.5Core.Arango/Core.Arango.csproj
NuGetSystem.Text.Encodings.Web8.0.0Core.Arango/Core.Arango.csproj
All dependencies 0

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 0 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
Dependency advisories not assessed

Advisory matching could not run for this report: No resolved dependencies to assess

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.5.0, schema v0.29.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsNuGet.