Software health reportschema 0.31.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-08-08 22:39 UTC

coseto6125 / websocket-rs

High-performance WebSocket client library for Python using Rust

Rust · PythonMIT★ 11 stars⑂ 3 forkssince Feb 2025View on GitHub ↗

KindLibraryApplicationhow this is determined

coseto6125/websocket-rs holds a health index of 65 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (78/100) and lowest on Security (41/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

Good

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 60 is calibrated to 65 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

E-NoRPersonal account

1 follower37 public repossince Mar 2021Independent

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
crates.io	websocket_rspoints to another repo — not scored	0.1.4	8	5	2243 days ago	—
PyPI	websocket-rs	0.7.5	4,479	13	0 days ago	websocket rust async high-performance client

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

78Good · 21% of overall

Development activity

70Good

How it's scored

36/36	Push recency — last push 0 days ago
5.5/36	Commit cadence — 8/52 weeks with commits
18/18	Commit volume — 110 commits in the last year
10/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10

Inputs used

commits_last_year	110
human_commit_share	1
days_since_last_push	0
active_weeks_last_year	8

Release discipline

90Excellent

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 13 releases published
36/36	Release recency — latest release 0 days ago
27/27	Release cadence — a release every ~28.5 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.

Inputs used

releases_count	13
latest_release_tag	v0.7.5
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	0
mean_days_between_releases	28.5

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

50Moderate · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

19Critical

How it's scored

16.2/60	Stars — 11 stars
2.5/25	Forks — 3 forks
0/15	Watchers — 1 watchers

Inputs used

forks	3
stars	11
watchers	1
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

77Good

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (MIT)
18/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
6.3/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	3
has_contributing	yes
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	github.com, shields.io
has_pull_request_template	yes

Ecosystem adoption (downloads)

61Moderate

How it's scored

48.7/80	Monthly downloads — 4,479 downloads/month across pypi
0/20	Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem

Inputs used

packages	websocket-rs
dependents	—
ecosystems	pypi
total_downloads	—
monthly_downloads	4,479
unverified_packages_excluded	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

55Moderate · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

15Critical

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
0.2/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 99% of commits
2.7/13.5	Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
3/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	2
top_contributor_share	0.992

Issue & PR responsiveness

79Good

How it's scored

42/42	Issue resolution — 100% of issues closed
26.3/30	PR acceptance — 36/41 decided PRs merged
0/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
0/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

merged_prs	36
open_issues	0
closed_issues	1
prs_merged_7d	5
prs_decided_7d	5
prs_merged_30d	22
prs_decided_30d	22
issue_closed_ratio	1
closed_unmerged_prs	5
first_time_authors_30d	0
first_time_prs_merged_30d	0
first_time_prs_decided_30d	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

43Weak

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
2.2/25	Owner reach — 1 followers of coseto6125
22.3/25	Track record — 37 public repos, account ~5 yr old

Inputs used

followers	1
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	coseto6125
public_repos	37
account_age_days	1,979

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional

How it's scored

25/25	Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi
35/35	Publish recency — latest publish 0 days ago
20/20	Version history — 13 published versions
20/20	Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked

Inputs used

packages	websocket-rs
ecosystems	pypi
any_deprecated	no
min_days_since_publish	0

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

68Good · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

64Moderate

How it's scored

24/24	CI workflows — 3 workflow(s)
24/24	Tests present
0/16	Linter config
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
16/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 13 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8

Inputs used

has_ci	yes
has_tests	yes
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	no
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

75Good

How it's scored

30/30	README
25/25	Documentation directory
0/15	Documentation / homepage site
10/10	Repository description
0/10	Topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	—
has_wiki	yes
homepage	—
docs_site	—
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	yes
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

41Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

37Weak

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
2/2.5	CI-Tests — 13 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0/7.5	Code-Review — Found 0/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
0.8/2.5	Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
7.5/7.5	Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
5/5	Packaging — packaging workflow detected
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
3.8/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 5 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	18
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	0
scorecard_aggregate	3.7

Dependency advisories

59Moderate

How it's scored

12/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — 2 affected: tokio 0.2.25 (high 8.1), tracing-subscriber 0.2.25 (low)
17.7/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — 2 affected: ansi_term 0.12.1 (unknown), net2 0.2.39 (unknown)
29/40	No advisories left outstanding — 4 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 2,290 days ago

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	10
affected_packages	4
assessed_packages	102
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	high 1, low 1, unknown 2
direct_affected_packages	2

Matched the crates:websocket_rs@0.1.4 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 102 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

65Good · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

40Weak

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
40/40	Legible commit history — 84 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	no
llms_txt_url	—
legible_history_share	0.84
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

71Good

How it's scored

18/18	One-command bootstrap — Makefile
22/22	Automated tests
0/11	Lint / format config
11/11	Static type checking — websocket_rs/py.typed
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
10/10	Demonstrated agent practice — 44 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited
0/8	Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	yes
lockfiles	Cargo.lock, uv.lock
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	yes
bootstrap_files	Makefile
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	no
typecheck_configs	websocket_rs/py.typed
agent_commit_share	0.44
toolchain_manifests	Cargo.toml
dependency_bot_commit_share	0

Code legibility for models

97Exceptional

How it's scored

45/45	Type-checkable code — Rust (statically typed)
51.9/55	Manageable file sizes — 1/18 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	Rust
largest_source_bytes	93,442
source_files_sampled	18
oversized_source_files	1

Key facts

11GitHub stars

2contributors

110commits, last 12 months

0days since last push

13releases

1bus factor

0open issues

crates.io, PyPIpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
crates package 'websocket_rs' points at a different repository (https://github.com/euvoor/hawk/tree/master/daemon/websocket); excluded from ecosystem scoring

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 3 ⇿

0Stars

3Forks

5Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Major 0Minor 3Patch 2

OpenSSF Scorecard 3.7 / 10

3.7aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-08-08 22:38 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
8	CI-Tests	13 out of 15 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 8
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0	Code-Review	Found 0/15 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0
3	Contributors	project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
10	Dangerous-Workflow	no dangerous workflow patterns detected
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
10	Maintained	30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
10	Packaging	packaging workflow detected
0	Pinned-Dependencies	dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
0	Signed-Releases	Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
0	Token-Permissions	detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
5	Vulnerabilities	5 existing vulnerabilities detected

Direct dependencies 25

Registry	Package	Version constraint	Manifest
crates.io	fastwebsockets	`0.10`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	hyper	`1`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	hyper-util	`0.1`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	http-body-util	`0.1`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	pyo3	`0.28`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	tokio-tungstenite	`0.29`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	tungstenite	`0.29`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	tokio	`1`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	futures	`0.3`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	futures-util	`0.3`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	parking_lot	`0.12`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	pyo3-async-runtimes	`0.28`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	bytes	`1.11.0`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	url	`2.5`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	tokio-socks	`0.5.2`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	tokio-rustls	`0.26`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	rustls	`0.23`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	rustls-pki-types	`1`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	rustls-native-certs	`0.8`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	rustls-pemfile	`2`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	sha1	`0.11`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	base64	`0.22`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	rand	`0.10`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	flate2	`1`	Cargo.toml
crates.io	libc	`0.2`	Cargo.toml

All dependencies 222

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 29 direct and 193 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
crates.io	base64	`0.21.7`	direct
crates.io	base64	`0.22.1`	direct
crates.io	bytes	`1.11.1`	direct
crates.io	fastwebsockets	`0.10.0`	direct
crates.io	flate2	`1.1.9`	direct
crates.io	futures	`0.3.32`	direct
crates.io	futures-util	`0.3.32`	direct
crates.io	http-body-util	`0.1.3`	direct
crates.io	hyper	`1.9.0`	direct
crates.io	hyper-util	`0.1.20`	direct
crates.io	libc	`0.2.186`	direct
crates.io	parking_lot	`0.12.5`	direct
crates.io	pyo3	`0.28.3`	direct
crates.io	pyo3-async-runtimes	`0.28.0`	direct
crates.io	rand	`0.10.1`	direct
crates.io	rand	`0.8.6`	direct
crates.io	rand	`0.9.4`	direct
crates.io	rustls	`0.23.40`	direct
crates.io	rustls-native-certs	`0.8.3`	direct
crates.io	rustls-pemfile	`2.2.0`	direct
crates.io	rustls-pki-types	`1.14.1`	direct
crates.io	sha1	`0.10.6`	direct
crates.io	sha1	`0.11.0`	direct
crates.io	tokio	`1.52.3`	direct
crates.io	tokio-rustls	`0.26.4`	direct
crates.io	tokio-socks	`0.5.2`	direct
crates.io	tokio-tungstenite	`0.29.0`	direct
crates.io	tungstenite	`0.29.0`	direct
crates.io	url	`2.5.8`	direct
crates.io	adler2	`2.0.1`	indirect
crates.io	anyhow	`1.0.102`	indirect
crates.io	atomic-waker	`1.1.2`	indirect
crates.io	bitflags	`2.11.1`	indirect
crates.io	block-buffer	`0.10.4`	indirect
crates.io	block-buffer	`0.12.0`	indirect
crates.io	cc	`1.2.62`	indirect
crates.io	cfg-if	`1.0.4`	indirect
crates.io	chacha20	`0.10.0`	indirect
crates.io	const-oid	`0.10.2`	indirect
crates.io	core-foundation	`0.10.1`	indirect
crates.io	core-foundation-sys	`0.8.7`	indirect
crates.io	cpufeatures	`0.2.17`	indirect
crates.io	cpufeatures	`0.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	crc32fast	`1.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	crypto-common	`0.1.7`	indirect
crates.io	crypto-common	`0.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	data-encoding	`2.11.0`	indirect
crates.io	digest	`0.10.7`	indirect
crates.io	digest	`0.11.3`	indirect
crates.io	displaydoc	`0.2.5`	indirect
crates.io	either	`1.15.0`	indirect
crates.io	equivalent	`1.0.2`	indirect
crates.io	errno	`0.3.14`	indirect
crates.io	find-msvc-tools	`0.1.9`	indirect
crates.io	foldhash	`0.1.5`	indirect
crates.io	form_urlencoded	`1.2.2`	indirect
crates.io	futures-channel	`0.3.32`	indirect
crates.io	futures-core	`0.3.32`	indirect
crates.io	futures-executor	`0.3.32`	indirect
crates.io	futures-io	`0.3.32`	indirect
crates.io	futures-macro	`0.3.32`	indirect
crates.io	futures-sink	`0.3.32`	indirect
crates.io	futures-task	`0.3.32`	indirect
crates.io	generic-array	`0.14.7`	indirect
crates.io	getrandom	`0.2.17`	indirect
crates.io	getrandom	`0.3.4`	indirect
crates.io	getrandom	`0.4.2`	indirect
crates.io	hashbrown	`0.15.5`	indirect
crates.io	hashbrown	`0.17.1`	indirect
crates.io	heck	`0.5.0`	indirect
crates.io	http	`1.4.0`	indirect
crates.io	http-body	`1.0.1`	indirect
crates.io	httparse	`1.10.1`	indirect
crates.io	httpdate	`1.0.3`	indirect
crates.io	hybrid-array	`0.4.12`	indirect
crates.io	icu_collections	`2.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	icu_locale_core	`2.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	icu_normalizer	`2.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	icu_normalizer_data	`2.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	icu_properties	`2.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	icu_properties_data	`2.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	icu_provider	`2.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	id-arena	`2.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	idna	`1.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	idna_adapter	`1.2.2`	indirect
crates.io	indexmap	`2.14.0`	indirect
crates.io	itoa	`1.0.18`	indirect
crates.io	leb128fmt	`0.1.0`	indirect
crates.io	litemap	`0.8.2`	indirect
crates.io	lock_api	`0.4.14`	indirect
crates.io	log	`0.4.29`	indirect
crates.io	memchr	`2.8.0`	indirect
crates.io	miniz_oxide	`0.8.9`	indirect
crates.io	mio	`1.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	once_cell	`1.21.4`	indirect
crates.io	openssl-probe	`0.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	parking_lot_core	`0.9.12`	indirect
crates.io	percent-encoding	`2.3.2`	indirect
crates.io	pin-project	`1.1.13`	indirect
crates.io	pin-project-internal	`1.1.13`	indirect
crates.io	pin-project-lite	`0.2.17`	indirect
crates.io	portable-atomic	`1.13.1`	indirect
crates.io	potential_utf	`0.1.5`	indirect
crates.io	ppv-lite86	`0.2.21`	indirect
crates.io	prettyplease	`0.2.37`	indirect
crates.io	proc-macro2	`1.0.106`	indirect
crates.io	pyo3-build-config	`0.28.3`	indirect
crates.io	pyo3-ffi	`0.28.3`	indirect
crates.io	pyo3-macros	`0.28.3`	indirect
crates.io	pyo3-macros-backend	`0.28.3`	indirect
crates.io	quote	`1.0.45`	indirect
crates.io	r-efi	`5.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	r-efi	`6.0.0`	indirect
crates.io	rand_chacha	`0.3.1`	indirect
crates.io	rand_chacha	`0.9.0`	indirect
crates.io	rand_core	`0.10.1`	indirect
crates.io	rand_core	`0.6.4`	indirect
crates.io	rand_core	`0.9.5`	indirect
crates.io	redox_syscall	`0.5.18`	indirect
crates.io	ring	`0.17.14`	indirect
crates.io	rustls-webpki	`0.103.13`	indirect
crates.io	schannel	`0.1.29`	indirect
crates.io	scopeguard	`1.2.0`	indirect
crates.io	security-framework	`3.7.0`	indirect
crates.io	security-framework-sys	`2.17.0`	indirect
crates.io	semver	`1.0.28`	indirect
crates.io	serde	`1.0.228`	indirect
crates.io	serde_core	`1.0.228`	indirect
crates.io	serde_derive	`1.0.228`	indirect
crates.io	serde_json	`1.0.149`	indirect
crates.io	shlex	`1.3.0`	indirect
crates.io	signal-hook-registry	`1.4.8`	indirect
crates.io	simd-adler32	`0.3.9`	indirect
crates.io	simdutf8	`0.1.5`	indirect
crates.io	slab	`0.4.12`	indirect
crates.io	smallvec	`1.15.1`	indirect
crates.io	socket2	`0.6.3`	indirect
crates.io	stable_deref_trait	`1.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	subtle	`2.6.1`	indirect
crates.io	syn	`2.0.117`	indirect
crates.io	synstructure	`0.13.2`	indirect
crates.io	target-lexicon	`0.13.5`	indirect
crates.io	thiserror	`1.0.69`	indirect
crates.io	thiserror	`2.0.18`	indirect
crates.io	thiserror-impl	`1.0.69`	indirect
crates.io	thiserror-impl	`2.0.18`	indirect
crates.io	tinystr	`0.8.3`	indirect
crates.io	tokio-macros	`2.7.0`	indirect
crates.io	try-lock	`0.2.5`	indirect
crates.io	typenum	`1.20.0`	indirect
crates.io	unicode-ident	`1.0.24`	indirect
crates.io	unicode-xid	`0.2.6`	indirect
crates.io	untrusted	`0.9.0`	indirect
crates.io	utf-8	`0.7.6`	indirect
crates.io	utf8_iter	`1.0.4`	indirect
crates.io	version_check	`0.9.5`	indirect
crates.io	want	`0.3.1`	indirect
crates.io	wasi	`0.11.1+wasi-snapshot-preview1`	indirect
crates.io	wasip2	`1.0.3+wasi-0.2.9`	indirect
crates.io	wasip3	`0.4.0+wasi-0.3.0-rc-2026-01-06`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-encoder	`0.244.0`	indirect
crates.io	wasm-metadata	`0.244.0`	indirect
crates.io	wasmparser	`0.244.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows-link	`0.2.1`	indirect
crates.io	windows-sys	`0.52.0`	indirect
crates.io	windows-sys	`0.61.2`	indirect
crates.io	windows-targets	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_aarch64_gnullvm	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_aarch64_msvc	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_gnu	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_gnullvm	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_i686_msvc	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_gnu	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_gnullvm	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	windows_x86_64_msvc	`0.52.6`	indirect
crates.io	wit-bindgen	`0.51.0`	indirect
crates.io	wit-bindgen	`0.57.1`	indirect
crates.io	wit-bindgen-core	`0.51.0`	indirect
crates.io	wit-bindgen-rust	`0.51.0`	indirect
crates.io	wit-bindgen-rust-macro	`0.51.0`	indirect
crates.io	wit-component	`0.244.0`	indirect
crates.io	wit-parser	`0.244.0`	indirect
crates.io	writeable	`0.6.3`	indirect
crates.io	yoke	`0.8.2`	indirect
crates.io	yoke-derive	`0.8.2`	indirect
crates.io	zerocopy	`0.8.48`	indirect
crates.io	zerocopy-derive	`0.8.48`	indirect
crates.io	zerofrom	`0.1.8`	indirect
crates.io	zerofrom-derive	`0.1.7`	indirect
crates.io	zeroize	`1.8.2`	indirect
crates.io	zerotrie	`0.2.4`	indirect
crates.io	zerovec	`0.11.6`	indirect
crates.io	zerovec-derive	`0.11.3`	indirect
crates.io	zmij	`1.0.21`	indirect
PyPI	aiofastnet	`0.5.0`	indirect
PyPI	cffi	`2.0.0`	indirect
PyPI	click	`8.3.2`	indirect
PyPI	colorama	`0.4.6`	indirect
PyPI	gevent	`26.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	granian	`2.7.4`	indirect
PyPI	greenlet	`3.4.0`	indirect
PyPI	iniconfig	`2.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	maturin	`1.13.3`	indirect
PyPI	multidict	`6.7.1`	indirect
PyPI	packaging	`26.0`	indirect
PyPI	picows	`1.20.0`	indirect
PyPI	pluggy	`1.6.0`	indirect
PyPI	pycparser	`3.0`	indirect
PyPI	pygments	`2.20.0`	indirect
PyPI	pytest	`9.0.3`	indirect
PyPI	pytest-asyncio	`1.3.0`	indirect
PyPI	python-socks	`2.8.1`	indirect
PyPI	rloop	`0.2.0`	indirect
PyPI	ruff	`0.15.12`	indirect
PyPI	typing-extensions	`4.15.0`	indirect
PyPI	uvloop	`0.22.1`	indirect
PyPI	websocket	`0.2.1`	indirect
PyPI	websocket-client	`1.9.0`	indirect
PyPI	websocket-rs	`0.7.0`	indirect
PyPI	websockets	`16.0`	indirect
PyPI	zope-event	`6.1`	indirect
PyPI	zope-interface	`8.3`	indirect

Dependency advisories 4

Installing crates:websocket_rs@0.1.4 pulls in 102 packages, direct and transitive: 4 carry known advisories, of which 2 are direct dependencies.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
tokio	`0.2.25`	direct	high	6	`1.44.2`
tracing-subscriber	`0.2.25`	direct	low	2	`0.3.20`
ansi_term	`0.12.1`	indirect	unknown	1	—
net2	`0.2.39`	indirect	unknown	1	—

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.31.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — crates.io, PyPI.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records