Public recordExcellent
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-12 09:00 UTC
couchbase / couchbase-python-client
Couchbase Python Client Library (Official)
couchbase/couchbase-python-client holds a health index of 90 out of 100, placing it in the Excellent band. It scores highest on Engineering Quality (87/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (64/100). It was last updated 10 days ago. 2 contributors account for most of its recent work.
90
overall / 100Software health index
Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.
90
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
Score profile
Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.
The weighted overall 76 is calibrated to 90 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).
Ownership
Couchbase, Inc.Organization
427 followers263 public repossince Feb 2011
This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.
Package ecosystems
| Registry | Package | Version | Downloads / mo | Versions | Last publish | Tags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PyPI | couchbase | 4.6.3 | 506,988 | 169 | 17 days ago | couchbasenosqlpycouchbaselibcouchbase |
Metrics by category
Vitality
Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?
80
Development activity
80Excellent
How it's scored
| 28.8/36 | Push recency — last push 10 days ago |
| 23.5/36 | Commit cadence — 34/52 weeks with commits |
| 18/18 | Commit volume — 136 commits in the last year |
| 10/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
Inputs used
| commits_last_year | 136 |
| human_commit_share | 1 |
| days_since_last_push | 10 |
| active_weeks_last_year | 34 |
Release discipline
80Excellent
How it's scored
| 16.2/27 | Ships releases — 97 version tags (no GitHub releases) |
| 36/36 | Release recency — latest release 21 days ago |
| 19.8/27 | Release cadence — a release every ~63.4 days |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data |
Inputs used
| releases_count | 97 |
| latest_release_tag | 4.5.1 |
| releases_from_tags | yes |
| days_since_latest_release | 21 |
| mean_days_between_releases | 63.4 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
Community & Adoption
Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?
74
Popularity & adoption
64Moderate
How it's scored
| 38.8/60 | Stars — 248 stars |
| 17.1/25 | Forks — 113 forks |
| 8/15 | Watchers — 29 watchers |
Inputs used
| forks | 113 |
| stars | 248 |
| watchers | 29 |
| growth_state | unverified |
| growth_factor_pct | 100 |
| growth_unverified_reason | no_history |
Community health
70Good
How it's scored
| 22.5/22.5 | README |
| 22.5/22.5 | License — recognized license (Apache-2.0) |
| 18/18 | CONTRIBUTING guide |
| 0/13.5 | Code of conduct |
| 0/7.2 | Issue template |
| 0/6.3 | PR template |
Inputs used
| has_readme | yes |
| has_license | yes |
| readme_badges | 0 |
| has_contributing | yes |
| has_issue_template | no |
| has_code_of_conduct | no |
| readme_badge_services | — |
| has_pull_request_template | no |
Ecosystem adoption (downloads)
95Exceptional
How it's scored
| 76.1/80 | Monthly downloads — 506,988 downloads/month across pypi |
| 0/20 | Registry dependents — not reported by this ecosystem |
Inputs used
| packages | couchbase |
| dependents | — |
| ecosystems | pypi |
| total_downloads | — |
| monthly_downloads | 506,988 |
| unverified_packages_excluded | — |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Registry dependents. Remaining weights renormalized.
Sustainability & Governance
Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?
72
Maintainer resilience (bus factor)
62Moderate
How it's scored
| 25.2/54 | Bus factor — 2 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| 13.1/22.5 | Commit distribution — top contributor authored 42% of commits |
| 13.5/13.5 | Contributor breadth — 27 contributors |
| 10/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 13 contributing companies or organizations |
Inputs used
| bus_factor | 2 |
| contributors_sampled | 27 |
| top_contributor_share | 0.417 |
Issue & PR responsiveness
59Moderate
How it's scored
| 36.4/42 | Issue resolution — 87% of issues closed |
| 0/30 | PR acceptance — 0/52 decided PRs merged |
| 0/13 | Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d |
| 15/15 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — all changesets reviewed |
Inputs used
| merged_prs | 0 |
| open_issues | 2 |
| closed_issues | 13 |
| prs_merged_7d | 0 |
| prs_decided_7d | 0 |
| prs_merged_30d | 0 |
| prs_decided_30d | 0 |
| issue_closed_ratio | 0.867 |
| closed_unmerged_prs | 52 |
| first_time_authors_30d | 0 |
| first_time_prs_merged_30d | 0 |
| first_time_prs_decided_30d | 0 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
Ownership & stewardship
74Good
How it's scored
| 30/30 | Ownership backing — organization-owned |
| 0/20 | Verified domain |
| 18.9/25 | Owner reach — 427 followers of couchbase |
| 25/25 | Track record — 263 public repos, account ~15 yr old |
Inputs used
| followers | 427 |
| owner_type | Organization |
| is_verified | no |
| owner_login | couchbase |
| public_repos | 263 |
| account_age_days | 5,695 |
Package maintenance
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 25/25 | Published & resolvable — 1 package(s) on pypi |
| 35/35 | Publish recency — latest publish 17 days ago |
| 20/20 | Version history — 169 published versions |
| 20/20 | Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked |
Inputs used
| packages | couchbase |
| ecosystems | pypi |
| any_deprecated | no |
| min_days_since_publish | 17 |
Engineering Quality
Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?
87
Engineering practices
92Excellent
How it's scored
| 24/24 | CI workflows — 3 workflow(s) |
| 24/24 | Tests present |
| 16/16 | Linter config — .flake8, pyproject.toml ([tool.isort], [tool.autopep8]) |
| 9.6/9.6 | Pre-commit hooks |
| 0/6.4 | .editorconfig |
| 0/20 | OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — no data |
Inputs used
| has_ci | yes |
| has_tests | yes |
| has_editorconfig | no |
| has_linter_config | yes |
| has_precommit_config | yes |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests. Remaining weights renormalized.
Documentation
80Excellent
How it's scored
| 30/30 | README |
| 25/25 | Documentation directory |
| 15/15 | Documentation / homepage site — https://www.couchbase.com/ |
| 10/10 | Repository description |
| 0/10 | Topics |
| 0/10 | Wiki |
Inputs used
| topics | — |
| has_wiki | no |
| homepage | https://www.couchbase.com/ |
| docs_site | https://www.couchbase.com/ |
| has_readme | yes |
| has_docs_dir | yes |
| has_description | yes |
Security
Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?
66
Security posture
58Moderate
How it's scored
| 7.5/7.5 | Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo |
| 0/7.5 | Branch-Protection — no data |
| 0/2.5 | CI-Tests — no data |
| 0/2.5 | CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| 7.5/7.5 | Code-Review — all changesets reviewed |
| 2.5/2.5 | Contributors — project has 13 contributing companies or organizations |
| 10/10 | Dangerous-Workflow — no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| 0/7.5 | Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected |
| 0/5 | Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed |
| 2.5/2.5 | License — license file detected |
| 7.5/7.5 | Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| 0/5 | Packaging — no data |
| 0/5 | Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0/5 | SAST — no SAST tool detected |
| 0/5 | Security-Policy — security policy file not detected |
| 0/7.5 | Signed-Releases — no data |
| 6.8/7.5 | Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| 3.8/7.5 | Vulnerabilities — 5 existing vulnerabilities detected |
Inputs used
| source | openssf_scorecard |
| checks_evaluated | 14 |
| scorecard_version | v5.5.0 |
| checks_inconclusive | 4 |
| scorecard_aggregate | 5.8 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection, CI-Tests, Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.
Dependency advisories
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 35/35 | Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory |
| 0/25 | Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope |
| 0/40 | No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date |
Inputs used
| source | osv |
| advisories | 1 |
| affected_packages | 1 |
| assessed_packages | 3 |
| unassessed_packages | 25 |
| affected_by_severity | high 1 |
| direct_affected_packages | 0 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 3 resolved dependencies against OSV. 25 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.
AI Readiness
How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.
64
Agent context & guidance
55Moderate
How it's scored
| 0/45 | Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules |
| 15/15 | Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://docs.couchbase.com/llms.txt) |
| 40/40 | Legible commit history — 100 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body) |
Inputs used
| has_llms_txt | yes |
| llms_txt_url | https://docs.couchbase.com/llms.txt |
| legible_history_share | 1 |
| agent_instruction_files | — |
| agent_instruction_max_bytes | — |
Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)
61Moderate
How it's scored
| 18/18 | One-command bootstrap — docs/Makefile |
| 22/22 | Automated tests |
| 11/11 | Lint / format config — .flake8, pyproject.toml ([tool.isort], [tool.autopep8]) |
| 0/11 | Static type checking |
| 10/10 | Reproducible environment — Dockerfile |
| 0/10 | Demonstrated agent practice — no agent-authored commits among the last 100 |
| 0/8 | Automated maintenance — no automated dependency updates observed |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
Inputs used
| has_nix | no |
| has_tests | yes |
| lockfiles | — |
| has_dockerfile | yes |
| typed_language | no |
| bootstrap_files | docs/Makefile |
| has_devcontainer | no |
| has_linter_config | yes |
| typecheck_configs | — |
| agent_commit_share | 0 |
| toolchain_manifests | — |
| dependency_bot_commit_share | 0 |
Code legibility for models
54Moderate
How it's scored
| 0/45 | Type-checkable code — Python without a type-check config |
| 53.6/55 | Manageable file sizes — 12/465 source files over 60KB |
Inputs used
| primary_language | Python |
| largest_source_bytes | 125,699 |
| source_files_sampled | 465 |
| oversized_source_files | 12 |
Machine-readable interfaces
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 40/40 | API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — tools/fit_performer/proto/hooks.transactions.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/meta.workload.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/metrics.top_level.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/observability.config.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/observability.top.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/performer.caps.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/performer.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/run.config.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/run.top_level.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/run.workloads.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/sdk.bucket.collection_manager.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/sdk.caps.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/sdk.circuit_breaker.config.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/sdk.cluster.bucket_manager.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/sdk.cluster.eventing_function_manager.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/sdk.cluster.query.index_manager.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/sdk.cluster.search.index_manager.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/sdk.cluster.wait_until_ready.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/sdk.collection.query.index_manager.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/sdk.kv.binary.commands.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/sdk.kv.binary.options.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/sdk.kv.commands.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/sdk.kv.lookup_in.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/sdk.kv.mutate_in.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/sdk.kv.options.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/sdk.kv.rangescan.top_level.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/sdk.query.index_manager.options.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/sdk.query.index_manager.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/sdk.query.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/sdk.scope.search.index_manager.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/sdk.search.index_manager.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/sdk.search.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/sdk.workload.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/shared.basic.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/shared.bounds.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/shared.cluster.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/shared.collection.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/shared.content.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/shared.doc_location.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/shared.echo.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/shared.exceptions.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/shared.latch.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/shared.transaction_config.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/shared.transcoders.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/streams.top_level.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/transactions.basic.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/transactions.cleanup.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/transactions.client_record.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/transactions.commands.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/transactions.extensions.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/transactions.legacy.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/transactions.options.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/transactions.performer.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/transactions.workload.proto |
| 0/20 | MCP server — not applicable to this kind of software |
| 40/40 | Runnable examples — examples |
Inputs used
| example_dirs | examples |
| has_mcp_signal | no |
| api_schema_files | tools/fit_performer/proto/hooks.transactions.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/meta.workload.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/metrics.top_level.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/observability.config.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/observability.top.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/performer.caps.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/performer.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/run.config.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/run.top_level.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/run.workloads.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/sdk.bucket.collection_manager.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/sdk.caps.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/sdk.circuit_breaker.config.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/sdk.cluster.bucket_manager.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/sdk.cluster.eventing_function_manager.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/sdk.cluster.query.index_manager.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/sdk.cluster.search.index_manager.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/sdk.cluster.wait_until_ready.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/sdk.collection.query.index_manager.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/sdk.kv.binary.commands.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/sdk.kv.binary.options.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/sdk.kv.commands.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/sdk.kv.lookup_in.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/sdk.kv.mutate_in.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/sdk.kv.options.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/sdk.kv.rangescan.top_level.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/sdk.query.index_manager.options.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/sdk.query.index_manager.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/sdk.query.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/sdk.scope.search.index_manager.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/sdk.search.index_manager.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/sdk.search.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/sdk.workload.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/shared.basic.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/shared.bounds.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/shared.cluster.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/shared.collection.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/shared.content.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/shared.doc_location.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/shared.echo.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/shared.exceptions.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/shared.latch.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/shared.transaction_config.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/shared.transcoders.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/streams.top_level.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/transactions.basic.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/transactions.cleanup.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/transactions.client_record.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/transactions.commands.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/transactions.extensions.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/transactions.legacy.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/transactions.options.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/transactions.performer.proto, tools/fit_performer/proto/transactions.workload.proto |
| interfaces_expected_of | — |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): MCP server. Remaining weights renormalized.
Key facts
248GitHub stars
27contributors
136commits, last 12 months
10days since last push
97releases
2bus factor
2open issues
PyPIpackage ecosystems
Data collection warnings
- Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
More detail
Star and fork history 0 ★ / 113 ⇿
0Stars
113Forks
95Releases
When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.
Major 2Minor 11Patch 69
Each point covers 14 days.
OpenSSF Scorecard 5.8 / 10
5.8aggregate
Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).
| 10 | Binary-Artifacts | no binaries found in the repo |
| n/a | Branch-Protection | internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md |
| n/a | CI-Tests | no pull request found |
| 0 | CII-Best-Practices | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| 10 | Code-Review | all changesets reviewed |
| 10 | Contributors | project has 13 contributing companies or organizations |
| 10 | Dangerous-Workflow | no dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| 0 | Dependency-Update-Tool | no update tool detected |
| 0 | Fuzzing | project is not fuzzed |
| 10 | License | license file detected |
| 10 | Maintained | 30 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| n/a | Packaging | packaging workflow not detected |
| 0 | Pinned-Dependencies | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0 |
| 0 | SAST | no SAST tool detected |
| 0 | Security-Policy | security policy file not detected |
| n/a | Signed-Releases | no releases found |
| 9 | Token-Permissions | detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| 5 | Vulnerabilities | 5 existing vulnerabilities detected |
All dependencies 28
Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 28 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.
| Registry | Package | Version | Relation |
|---|---|---|---|
| PyPI | autopep8 | — | indirect |
| PyPI | clang | — | indirect |
| PyPI | click | 8.3.1 | indirect |
| PyPI | enum-tools | — | indirect |
| PyPI | faker | — | indirect |
| PyPI | faker-vehicle | — | indirect |
| PyPI | googleapis-common-protos | — | indirect |
| PyPI | grpcio | — | indirect |
| PyPI | grpcio-tools | — | indirect |
| PyPI | jinja2 | 3.1.6 | indirect |
| PyPI | mypy-protobuf | — | indirect |
| PyPI | opentelemetry-api | — | indirect |
| PyPI | opentelemetry-exporter-otlp-proto-grpc | — | indirect |
| PyPI | opentelemetry-sdk | — | indirect |
| PyPI | pre-commit | — | indirect |
| PyPI | psutil | — | indirect |
| PyPI | pytest | — | indirect |
| PyPI | pytest-asyncio | — | indirect |
| PyPI | pytest-rerunfailures | — | indirect |
| PyPI | pyyaml | 6.0.3 | indirect |
| PyPI | requests | — | indirect |
| PyPI | setuptools | — | indirect |
| PyPI | sphinx | — | indirect |
| PyPI | sphinx-copybutton | — | indirect |
| PyPI | sphinx-rtd-theme | — | indirect |
| PyPI | sphinx-toolbox | — | indirect |
| PyPI | twisted | — | indirect |
| PyPI | typing-extensions | — | indirect |
Dependency advisories 1
This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 3 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 1 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 25 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.
| Package | Version | Relation | Severity | Advisories | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| click | 8.3.1 | indirect | high | 1 | 8.3.3 |
An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.
Raw JSON report machine-readable
Feedback
Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.
Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.
Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.
How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — PyPI.