Public recordGood
Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-10-19 10:48 UTC
covia-ai / covia
Covia Main Repository: Open-source runtime for governing multi-agent execution
covia-ai/covia holds a health index of 73 out of 100, placing it in the Good band. It scores highest on Vitality (92/100) and lowest on Community & Adoption (45/100). It was last updated today. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.
73
overall / 100Software health index
Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.
73
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
Score profile
Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.
The weighted overall 64 is calibrated to 73 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).
Ownership
CoviaOrganization
6 followers14 public repossince May 2024
This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.
Package ecosystems
| Registry | Package | Version | Downloads / mo | Versions | Last publish |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maven | ai.covia:venue | 0.9.11 | - | 16 | 3 days ago |
| Maven | ai.covia:covia-sql | 0.9.11 | - | 14 | 3 days ago |
| Maven | ai.covia:workbench | 0.9.11 | - | 16 | 3 days ago |
| Maven | ai.covia:covia-core | 0.9.11 | - | 16 | 3 days ago |
| Maven | ai.covia:covia-slack | 0.9.11 | - | 3 | 3 days ago |
| Maven | ai.covia:covia-python | 0.9.11 | - | 12 | 3 days ago |
| Maven | ai.covia:covia-discord | 0.9.11 | - | 8 | 3 days ago |
Metrics by category
Vitality
Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?
92
Development activity
94Exceptional
How it's scored
| 36/36 | Push recency — last push 0 days ago |
| 29.8/36 | Commit cadence — 43/52 weeks with commits |
| 18/18 | Commit volume — 1,343 commits in the last year |
| 10/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 30 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
Inputs used
| commits_last_year | 1,343 |
| human_commit_share | 1 |
| days_since_last_push | 0 |
| active_weeks_last_year | 43 |
Release discipline
90Excellent
How it's scored
| 27/27 | Ships releases — 23 releases published |
| 36/36 | Release recency — latest release 0 days ago |
| 27/27 | Release cadence — a release every ~6.2 days |
| 0/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |
Inputs used
| releases_count | 23 |
| latest_release_tag | latest-snapshot |
| releases_from_tags | no |
| days_since_latest_release | 0 |
| mean_days_between_releases | 6.2 |
Community & Adoption
Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?
45
Popularity & adoption
17Critical
How it's scored
| 11.3/60 | Stars — 6 stars |
| 4/25 | Forks — 4 forks |
| 1.7/15 | Watchers — 3 watchers |
Inputs used
| forks | 4 |
| stars | 6 |
| watchers | 3 |
| growth_state | unverified |
| growth_factor_pct | 100 |
| growth_unverified_reason | no_history |
Community health
77Good
How it's scored
| 22.5/22.5 | README |
| 22.5/22.5 | License — recognized license (EPL-2.0) |
| 18/18 | CONTRIBUTING guide |
| 0/13.5 | Code of conduct |
| 0/7.2 | Issue template |
| 6.3/6.3 | PR template |
Inputs used
| has_readme | yes |
| has_license | yes |
| readme_badges | 4 |
| has_contributing | yes |
| has_issue_template | no |
| has_code_of_conduct | no |
| readme_badge_services | github.com, shields.io |
| has_pull_request_template | yes |
Sustainability & Governance
Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?
58
Maintainer resilience (bus factor)
29At Risk
How it's scored
| 9/54 | Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits |
| 2/22.5 | Commit distribution — top contributor authored 91% of commits |
| 8.1/13.5 | Contributor breadth — 6 contributors |
| 10/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations |
Inputs used
| bus_factor | 1 |
| contributors_sampled | 6 |
| top_contributor_share | 0.913 |
How it's scored
| 34.6/42 | Issue resolution — 82% of issues closed |
| 25.4/30 | PR acceptance — 132/156 decided PRs merged |
| 0/13 | Newcomer PR acceptance — no first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d |
| 0/15 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
Inputs used
| merged_prs | 132 |
| open_issues | 77 |
| closed_issues | 357 |
| prs_merged_7d | 6 |
| prs_decided_7d | 7 |
| prs_merged_30d | 16 |
| prs_decided_30d | 19 |
| issue_closed_ratio | 0.823 |
| closed_unmerged_prs | 24 |
| first_time_authors_30d | 0 |
| first_time_prs_merged_30d | 0 |
| first_time_prs_decided_30d | 0 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
Ownership & stewardship
49Weak
How it's scored
| 30/30 | Ownership backing — organization-owned |
| 0/20 | Verified domain |
| 6.1/25 | Owner reach — 6 followers of covia-ai |
| 13.3/25 | Track record — 14 public repos, account ~2 yr old |
Inputs used
| followers | 6 |
| owner_type | Organization |
| is_verified | no |
| owner_login | covia-ai |
| public_repos | 14 |
| account_age_days | 870 |
Package maintenance
100Exceptional
How it's scored
| 25/25 | Published & resolvable — 7 package(s) on maven |
| 35/35 | Publish recency — latest publish 3 days ago |
| 20/20 | Version history — 16 published versions |
| 20/20 | Not deprecated — active, not deprecated or yanked |
Inputs used
| packages | ai.covia:venue, ai.covia:covia-sql, ai.covia:workbench, ai.covia:covia-core, ai.covia:covia-slack, ai.covia:covia-python, ai.covia:covia-discord |
| ecosystems | maven |
| any_deprecated | no |
| min_days_since_publish | 3 |
Engineering Quality
Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?
57
Engineering practices
68Good
How it's scored
| 24/24 | CI workflows — 8 workflow(s) |
| 24/24 | Tests present |
| 0/16 | Linter config |
| 0/9.6 | Pre-commit hooks |
| 0/6.4 | .editorconfig |
| 20/20 | OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 3 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10 |
Inputs used
| has_ci | yes |
| has_tests | yes |
| has_editorconfig | no |
| has_linter_config | no |
| has_precommit_config | no |
Documentation
40Weak
How it's scored
| 30/30 | README |
| 0/25 | Documentation directory |
| 0/15 | Documentation / homepage site |
| 10/10 | Repository description |
| 0/10 | Topics |
| 0/10 | Wiki |
Inputs used
| topics | — |
| has_wiki | no |
| homepage | — |
| docs_site | — |
| has_readme | yes |
| has_docs_dir | no |
| has_description | yes |
Security
Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?
61
Security posture
59Moderate
How it's scored
| 7.5/7.5 | Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo |
| 0/7.5 | Branch-Protection — no data |
| 2.5/2.5 | CI-Tests — 3 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10 |
| 0/2.5 | CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| 0/7.5 | Code-Review — Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
| 2.5/2.5 | Contributors — project has 5 contributing companies or organizations |
| 0/10 | Dangerous-Workflow — dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| 7.5/7.5 | Dependency-Update-Tool — update tool detected |
| 0/5 | Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed |
| 2.5/2.5 | License — license file detected |
| 7.5/7.5 | Maintained — 30 commit(s) and 30 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| 5/5 | Packaging — packaging workflow detected |
| 2.5/5 | Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5 |
| 3.5/5 | SAST — SAST tool detected but not run on all commits |
| 5/5 | Security-Policy — security policy file detected |
| 0/7.5 | Signed-Releases — Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |
| 4.5/7.5 | Token-Permissions — detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| 7.5/7.5 | Vulnerabilities — 0 existing vulnerabilities detected |
Inputs used
| source | openssf_scorecard |
| checks_evaluated | 17 |
| scorecard_version | v5.5.0 |
| checks_inconclusive | 1 |
| scorecard_aggregate | 5.9 |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Branch-Protection. Remaining weights renormalized.
Dependency advisories
71Good
How it's scored
| 35/35 | Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory |
| 5.4/25 | Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — 6 affected: com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core 2.22.1 (high 7.5), com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind 2.22.1 (high 7.5), tools.jackson.core:jackson-core 3.1.4 (high 7.5), +3 more |
| 30.9/40 | No advisories left outstanding — 2 advisory-carrying package(s) unaddressed past 90 days; oldest published 464 days ago |
Inputs used
| source | osv |
| advisories | 18 |
| affected_packages | 6 |
| assessed_packages | 158 |
| unassessed_packages | 0 |
| affected_by_severity | high 4, moderate 2 |
| direct_affected_packages | 0 |
Matched the maven:ai.covia:venue@0.9.11 runtime dependency closure — what installing the published package pulls in — 158 packages. Reachability is not analyzed.
AI Readiness
How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.
79
Agent context & guidance
95Exceptional
How it's scored
| 45/45 | Agent instructions — AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, venue/CLAUDE.md |
| 15/15 | Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://docs.covia.ai/llms.txt) |
| 35.2/40 | Legible commit history — 66 of 100 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body) |
Inputs used
| has_llms_txt | yes |
| llms_txt_url | https://docs.covia.ai/llms.txt |
| legible_history_share | 0.66 |
| agent_instruction_files | AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, venue/CLAUDE.md |
| agent_instruction_max_bytes | 20,489 |
How it's scored
| 12.6/18 | One-command bootstrap — covia-claude-code/pom.xml, covia-core/pom.xml, covia-discord/pom.xml (toolchain convention, no task runner) |
| 22/22 | Automated tests |
| 0/11 | Lint / format config |
| 11/11 | Static type checking — Java (statically typed) |
| 10/10 | Reproducible environment — Dockerfile |
| 10/10 | Demonstrated agent practice — 62 of the last 100 commits agent-authored or agent-credited |
| 5/8 | Automated maintenance — dependency automation configured, none observed in the sampled commits |
| 5/10 | OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5 |
Inputs used
| has_nix | no |
| has_tests | yes |
| lockfiles | — |
| has_dockerfile | yes |
| typed_language | yes |
| bootstrap_files | — |
| has_devcontainer | no |
| has_linter_config | no |
| typecheck_configs | — |
| agent_commit_share | 0.62 |
| toolchain_manifests | covia-claude-code/pom.xml, covia-core/pom.xml, covia-discord/pom.xml, covia-documents/pom.xml, covia-python-adapter/pom.xml, covia-python/pom.xml, covia-slack/pom.xml, covia-sonnylabs/pom.xml, covia-speech/pom.xml, covia-sql/pom.xml, covia-telegram/pom.xml, covia-whatsapp/pom.xml, pom.xml, venue/pom.xml, workbench/pom.xml |
| dependency_bot_commit_share | 0 |
Code legibility for models
98Exceptional
How it's scored
| 45/45 | Type-checkable code — Java (statically typed) |
| 53.4/55 | Manageable file sizes — 19/634 source files over 60KB |
Inputs used
| primary_language | Java |
| largest_source_bytes | 303,586 |
| source_files_sampled | 634 |
| oversized_source_files | 19 |
Machine-readable interfaces
33At Risk
How it's scored
| 0/40 | API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto) — not applicable to this kind of software |
| 20/20 | MCP server |
| 0/40 | Runnable examples |
Inputs used
| example_dirs | — |
| has_mcp_signal | yes |
| api_schema_files | — |
| interfaces_expected_of | — |
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): API schema (OpenAPI/GraphQL/proto). Remaining weights renormalized.
Key facts
6GitHub stars
6contributors
1,343commits, last 12 months
0days since last push
23releases
1bus factor
77open issues
Mavenpackage ecosystems
Data collection warnings
- Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
- Could not fetch maven package 'ai.covia:covia-speech' from its registry
- GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository
More detail
Star and fork history 0 ★ / 4 ⇿
0Stars
4Forks
When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.
OpenSSF Scorecard 5.9 / 10
5.9aggregate
Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).
| 10 | Binary-Artifacts | no binaries found in the repo |
| n/a | Branch-Protection | internal error: error during GetBranch(master): error during branchesHandler.query: internal error: some github tokens can't read classic branch protection rules: https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/docs/authentication/fine-grained-auth-token.md |
| 10 | CI-Tests | 3 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10 |
| 0 | CII-Best-Practices | no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected |
| 0 | Code-Review | Found 0/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 0 |
| 10 | Contributors | project has 5 contributing companies or organizations |
| 0 | Dangerous-Workflow | dangerous workflow patterns detected |
| 10 | Dependency-Update-Tool | update tool detected |
| 0 | Fuzzing | project is not fuzzed |
| 10 | License | license file detected |
| 10 | Maintained | 30 commit(s) and 30 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10 |
| 10 | Packaging | packaging workflow detected |
| 5 | Pinned-Dependencies | dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 5 |
| 7 | SAST | SAST tool detected but not run on all commits |
| 10 | Security-Policy | security policy file detected |
| 0 | Signed-Releases | Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases. |
| 6 | Token-Permissions | detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions |
| 10 | Vulnerabilities | 0 existing vulnerabilities detected |
Direct dependencies 43
| Registry | Package | Version constraint | Manifest |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maven | world.convex:convex-core | ${convex.version} | covia-core/pom.xml |
| Maven | org.slf4j:slf4j-api | ${slf4j.version} | covia-core/pom.xml |
| Maven | net.dv8tion:JDA | ${jda.version} | covia-discord/pom.xml |
| Maven | org.apache.pdfbox:pdfbox | ${pdfbox.version} | covia-documents/pom.xml |
| Maven | org.apache.poi:poi-ooxml | ${poi.version} | covia-documents/pom.xml |
| Maven | org.apache.poi:poi-scratchpad | ${poi.version} | covia-documents/pom.xml |
| Maven | org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-api | ${log4j.version} | covia-documents/pom.xml |
| Maven | org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-to-slf4j | ${log4j.version} | covia-documents/pom.xml |
| Maven | ai.covia:covia-python | ${project.version} | covia-python-adapter/pom.xml |
| Maven | world.convex:convex-core | ${convex.version} | covia-python/pom.xml |
| Maven | io.github.jaredmdobson:concentus | 1.0.2 | covia-speech/pom.xml |
| Maven | world.convex:convex-db | ${convex.version} | covia-sql/pom.xml |
| Maven | com.github.pengrad:java-telegram-bot-api | ${telegram.version} | covia-telegram/pom.xml |
| Maven | org.commonmark:commonmark | ${commonmark.version} | covia-telegram/pom.xml |
| Maven | org.commonmark:commonmark-ext-gfm-tables | ${commonmark.version} | covia-telegram/pom.xml |
| Maven | org.commonmark:commonmark-ext-gfm-strikethrough | ${commonmark.version} | covia-telegram/pom.xml |
| Maven | ai.covia:covia-core | ${project.version} | venue/pom.xml |
| Maven | ch.qos.logback:logback-classic | ${logback.version} | venue/pom.xml |
| Maven | world.convex:convex-core | ${convex.version} | venue/pom.xml |
| Maven | world.convex:convex-peer | ${convex.version} | venue/pom.xml |
| Maven | world.convex:convex-dlfs | ${convex.version} | venue/pom.xml |
| Maven | world.convex:convex-java | ${convex.version} | venue/pom.xml |
| Maven | world.convex:convex-restapi | ${convex.version} | venue/pom.xml |
| Maven | world.convex:convex-p2p | ${convex.version} | venue/pom.xml |
| Maven | io.modelcontextprotocol.sdk:mcp | ${mcp.version} | venue/pom.xml |
| Maven | org.a2aproject.sdk:a2a-java-sdk-spec | ${a2a.version} | venue/pom.xml |
| Maven | org.a2aproject.sdk:a2a-java-sdk-client-transport-jsonrpc | ${a2a.version} | venue/pom.xml |
| Maven | org.a2aproject.sdk:a2a-java-sdk-http-client | ${a2a.version} | venue/pom.xml |
| Maven | dev.langchain4j:langchain4j | ${langchain.version} | venue/pom.xml |
| Maven | dev.langchain4j:langchain4j-ollama | ${langchain.version} | venue/pom.xml |
| Maven | dev.langchain4j:langchain4j-open-ai | ${langchain.version} | venue/pom.xml |
| Maven | dev.langchain4j:langchain4j-anthropic | ${langchain.version} | venue/pom.xml |
| Maven | com.j2html:j2html | 1.6.0 | venue/pom.xml |
| Maven | io.javalin:javalin | ${javalin.version} | venue/pom.xml |
| Maven | io.javalin.community.openapi:javalin-openapi-plugin | ${javalin.version} | venue/pom.xml |
| Maven | io.javalin.community.openapi:javalin-swagger-plugin | ${javalin.version} | venue/pom.xml |
| Maven | io.javalin.community.openapi:javalin-redoc-plugin | ${javalin.version} | venue/pom.xml |
| Maven | com.formdev:flatlaf | ${flatlaf.version} | workbench/pom.xml |
| Maven | com.formdev:flatlaf-intellij-themes | ${flatlaf.version} | workbench/pom.xml |
| Maven | ai.covia:venue | ${project.version} | workbench/pom.xml |
| Maven | org.commonmark:commonmark | ${commonmark.version} | workbench/pom.xml |
| Maven | org.commonmark:commonmark-ext-gfm-tables | ${commonmark.version} | workbench/pom.xml |
| Maven | org.commonmark:commonmark-ext-gfm-strikethrough | ${commonmark.version} | workbench/pom.xml |
All dependencies not collected
The resolved dependency set could not be collected for this report: GitHub dependency-graph SBOM unavailable (404); the dependency graph may be disabled for this repository
Dependency advisories 6
Installing maven:ai.covia:venue@0.9.11 pulls in 158 packages, direct and transitive: 6 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct dependencies.
| Package | Version | Relation | Severity | Advisories | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core | 2.22.1 | indirect | high | 2 | 3.2.3 |
| com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-databind | 2.22.1 | indirect | high | 5 | 3.2.3 |
| tools.jackson.core:jackson-core | 3.1.4 | indirect | high | 2 | 3.2.3 |
| tools.jackson.core:jackson-databind | 3.1.4 | indirect | high | 7 | 3.2.3 |
| org.apache.commons:commons-lang3 | 3.17.0 | indirect | moderate | 1 | 3.18.0 |
| org.mozilla:rhino | 1.7.7.2 | indirect | moderate | 1 | 1.8.1 |
An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.
Raw JSON report machine-readable
Feedback
Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.
Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.
Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.
How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — Maven.