Software health reportschema 0.34.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-09-11 11:52 UTC

crawlbase / crawlbase-node

Fast dependency free library for Crawlbase API

JavaScriptApache-2.0★ 9 stars⑂ 3 forkssince Jun 2023View on GitHub ↗

#crawler #crawling #scraper #scraping-node #scraping-websites

crawlbase/crawlbase-node holds a health index of 34 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (46/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (32/100). It was last updated 8 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

overall / 100

At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met

Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps

Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable

Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended

Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas

At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution

Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 39 is calibrated to 34 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

CrawlbasePersonal account

85 followers44 public repossince May 2018Crawlbase

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

Registry	Package	Version	Downloads / mo	Versions	Last publish	Tags
npm	crawlbasepoints to another repo — not scored	1.0.2	4,696	2	813 days ago	scraping crawling scraper scrape crawler crawlbase scraping-websites scraping-framework crawlbase-api leads leads-api

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

40Weak · 21% of overall

Development activity

37Weak

How it's scored

28.8/36	Push recency — last push 8 days ago
1.4/36	Commit cadence — 2/52 weeks with commits
5.4/18	Commit volume — 3 commits in the last year
1/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained — 2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1

Inputs used

commits_last_year	3
human_commit_share	—
days_since_last_push	8
active_weeks_last_year	2

Release discipline

44Weak

How it's scored

27/27	Ships releases — 2 releases published
0/36	Release recency — latest release 813 days ago
12.6/27	Release cadence — a release every ~350.9 days
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases — no data

Inputs used

releases_count	2
latest_release_tag	v1.0.2
releases_from_tags	no
days_since_latest_release	813
mean_days_between_releases	350.9

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

32At Risk · 17% of overall

Popularity & adoption

17Critical

How it's scored

14.6/60	Stars — 9 stars
2.5/25	Forks — 3 forks
0/15	Watchers — 1 watchers

Inputs used

forks	3
stars	9
watchers	1
growth_state	unverified
growth_factor_pct	100
growth_unverified_reason	no_history

Community health

50Moderate

How it's scored

22.5/22.5	README
22.5/22.5	License — recognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18	CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5	Code of conduct
0/7.2	Issue template
0/6.3	PR template

Inputs used

has_readme	yes
has_license	yes
readme_badges	0
has_contributing	no
has_issue_template	no
has_code_of_conduct	no
readme_badge_services	—
has_pull_request_template	no

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

46Weak · 23% of overall

Maintainer resilience (bus factor)

19Critical

How it's scored

9/54	Bus factor — 1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
4.1/22.5	Commit distribution — top contributor authored 82% of commits
2.7/13.5	Contributor breadth — 2 contributors
3/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3

Inputs used

bus_factor	1
contributors_sampled	2
top_contributor_share	0.818

Issue & PR responsiveness

66Good

How it's scored

0/42	Issue resolution — no issues or no data
22.5/30	PR acceptance — 3/4 decided PRs merged
13/13	Newcomer PR acceptance — 1/1 first-time contributors' PRs merged in 30d
3/15	OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-Review — Found 3/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2

Inputs used

merged_prs	3
open_issues	0
closed_issues	0
prs_merged_7d	0
prs_decided_7d	0
prs_merged_30d	1
prs_decided_30d	1
issue_closed_ratio	—
closed_unmerged_prs	1
first_time_authors_30d	1
first_time_prs_merged_30d	1
first_time_prs_decided_30d	1

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution. Remaining weights renormalized.

Ownership & stewardship

60Moderate

How it's scored

10/30	Ownership backing — personal (user) account
0/20	Verified domain — not applicable to user accounts
13.9/25	Owner reach — 85 followers of crawlbase
24/25	Track record — 44 public repos, account ~8 yr old

Inputs used

followers	85
owner_type	User
is_verified	—
owner_login	crawlbase
public_repos	44
account_age_days	3,030

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

40Weak · 19% of overall

Engineering practices

16Critical

How it's scored

0/24	CI workflows
0/24	Tests present
16/16	Linter config — eslint.config.mjs
0/9.6	Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4	.editorconfig
0/20	OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests — 0 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0

Inputs used

has_ci	no
has_tests	no
has_editorconfig	no
has_linter_config	yes
has_precommit_config	no

Documentation

75Good

How it's scored

30/30	README
0/25	Documentation directory
15/15	Documentation / homepage site — https://crawlbase.com
10/10	Repository description
10/10	Topics — 5 topics
10/10	Wiki

Inputs used

topics	crawler, crawling, scraper, scraping-node, scraping-websites
has_wiki	yes
homepage	https://crawlbase.com
docs_site	https://crawlbase.com
has_readme	yes
has_docs_dir	no
has_description	yes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

35Weak · 16% of overall

Security posture

19Critical

How it's scored

7.5/7.5	Binary-Artifacts — no binaries found in the repo
0/7.5	Branch-Protection — branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5	CI-Tests — 0 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5	CII-Best-Practices — no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1.5/7.5	Code-Review — Found 3/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
0.8/2.5	Contributors — project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
0/10	Dangerous-Workflow — no data
0/7.5	Dependency-Update-Tool — no update tool detected
0/5	Fuzzing — project is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5	License — license file detected
0.8/7.5	Maintained — 2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
0/5	Packaging — no data
0/5	Pinned-Dependencies — no data
0/5	SAST — SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5	Security-Policy — security policy file not detected
0/7.5	Signed-Releases — no data
0/7.5	Token-Permissions — no data
0/7.5	Vulnerabilities — 24 existing vulnerabilities detected

Inputs used

source	openssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated	13
scorecard_version	v5.5.0
checks_inconclusive	5
scorecard_aggregate	1.9

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional

How it's scored

35/35	Direct dependencies free of known advisories — no direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25	Indirect dependencies free of known advisories — transitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40	No advisories left outstanding — no advisory carries a publication date

Inputs used

source	osv
advisories	25
affected_packages	9
assessed_packages	185
unassessed_packages	0
affected_by_severity	critical 1, high 4, moderate 4
direct_affected_packages	0

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 185 resolved dependencies against OSV. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

32At Risk · 4% of overall

Agent context & guidance

25At Risk

How it's scored

0/45	Agent instructions — no CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
15/15	Machine-readable docs (llms.txt) — llms.txt served by the project website (https://crawlbase.com/llms.txt)
0/40	Legible commit history — no data

Inputs used

has_llms_txt	yes
llms_txt_url	https://crawlbase.com/llms.txt
legible_history_share	—
agent_instruction_files	—
agent_instruction_max_bytes	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.

Verify loop (build / test / typecheck)

29At Risk

How it's scored

0/18	One-command bootstrap
0/22	Automated tests
11/11	Lint / format config — eslint.config.mjs
0/11	Static type checking
10/10	Reproducible environment — lockfile
0/10	Demonstrated agent practice — no data
0/8	Automated maintenance — no data
0/10	OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies — no data

Inputs used

has_nix	no
has_tests	no
lockfiles	package-lock.json
has_dockerfile	no
typed_language	no
bootstrap_files	—
has_devcontainer	no
has_linter_config	yes
typecheck_configs	—
agent_commit_share	—
toolchain_manifests	—
dependency_bot_commit_share	—

Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance, OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.

Code legibility for models

55Moderate

How it's scored

0/45	Type-checkable code — JavaScript without a type-check config
55/55	Manageable file sizes — 0/19 source files over 60KB

Inputs used

primary_language	JavaScript
largest_source_bytes	5,165
source_files_sampled	19
oversized_source_files	0

Key facts

9GitHub stars

2contributors

3commits, last 12 months

8days since last push

2releases

1bus factor

0open issues

npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
npm package 'crawlbase' points at a different repository (https://github.com/crawlbase-source/crawlbase-node); excluded from ecosystem scoring

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 3 ⇿

0Stars

3Forks

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

Each point covers 2 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 1.9 / 10

1.9aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-09-11 11:52 UTC

10	Binary-Artifacts	no binaries found in the repo
0	Branch-Protection	branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0	CI-Tests	0 out of 3 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0	CII-Best-Practices	no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2	Code-Review	Found 3/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
3	Contributors	project has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
n/a	Dangerous-Workflow	no workflows found
0	Dependency-Update-Tool	no update tool detected
0	Fuzzing	project is not fuzzed
10	License	license file detected
1	Maintained	2 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 1
n/a	Packaging	packaging workflow not detected
n/a	Pinned-Dependencies	no dependencies found
0	SAST	SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0	Security-Policy	security policy file not detected
n/a	Signed-Releases	no releases found
n/a	Token-Permissions	No tokens found
0	Vulnerabilities	24 existing vulnerabilities detected

All dependencies 185

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 185 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

Registry	Package	Version	Relation
npm	@babel/code-frame	`7.27.1`	indirect
npm	@babel/helper-validator-identifier	`7.27.1`	indirect
npm	@commitlint/cli	`19.8.1`	indirect
npm	@commitlint/config-conventional	`19.8.1`	indirect
npm	@commitlint/config-validator	`19.8.1`	indirect
npm	@commitlint/ensure	`19.8.1`	indirect
npm	@commitlint/execute-rule	`19.8.1`	indirect
npm	@commitlint/format	`19.8.1`	indirect
npm	@commitlint/is-ignored	`19.8.1`	indirect
npm	@commitlint/lint	`19.8.1`	indirect
npm	@commitlint/load	`19.8.1`	indirect
npm	@commitlint/message	`19.8.1`	indirect
npm	@commitlint/parse	`19.8.1`	indirect
npm	@commitlint/read	`19.8.1`	indirect
npm	@commitlint/resolve-extends	`19.8.1`	indirect
npm	@commitlint/rules	`19.8.1`	indirect
npm	@commitlint/to-lines	`19.8.1`	indirect
npm	@commitlint/top-level	`19.8.1`	indirect
npm	@commitlint/types	`19.8.1`	indirect
npm	@eslint-community/eslint-utils	`4.7.0`	indirect
npm	@eslint-community/regexpp	`4.12.1`	indirect
npm	@eslint/config-array	`0.21.0`	indirect
npm	@eslint/config-helpers	`0.3.0`	indirect
npm	@eslint/core	`0.14.0`	indirect
npm	@eslint/core	`0.15.1`	indirect
npm	@eslint/eslintrc	`3.3.1`	indirect
npm	@eslint/js	`9.30.1`	indirect
npm	@eslint/object-schema	`2.1.6`	indirect
npm	@eslint/plugin-kit	`0.3.3`	indirect
npm	@humanfs/core	`0.19.1`	indirect
npm	@humanfs/node	`0.16.6`	indirect
npm	@humanwhocodes/module-importer	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	@humanwhocodes/retry	`0.3.1`	indirect
npm	@humanwhocodes/retry	`0.4.3`	indirect
npm	@pkgr/core	`0.2.7`	indirect
npm	@types/conventional-commits-parser	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	@types/estree	`1.0.8`	indirect
npm	@types/json-schema	`7.0.15`	indirect
npm	@types/node	`24.0.12`	indirect
npm	acorn	`8.15.0`	indirect
npm	acorn-jsx	`5.3.2`	indirect
npm	ajv	`6.12.6`	indirect
npm	ajv	`8.17.1`	indirect
npm	ansi-regex	`5.0.1`	indirect
npm	ansi-styles	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	argparse	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	array-ify	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	balanced-match	`1.0.2`	indirect
npm	brace-expansion	`1.1.12`	indirect
npm	callsites	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	chalk	`4.1.2`	indirect
npm	chalk	`5.4.1`	indirect
npm	cliui	`8.0.1`	indirect
npm	color-convert	`2.0.1`	indirect
npm	color-name	`1.1.4`	indirect
npm	compare-func	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	concat-map	`0.0.1`	indirect
npm	conventional-changelog-angular	`7.0.0`	indirect
npm	conventional-changelog-conventionalcommits	`7.0.2`	indirect
npm	conventional-commits-parser	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	cosmiconfig	`9.0.0`	indirect
npm	cosmiconfig-typescript-loader	`6.1.0`	indirect
npm	cross-spawn	`7.0.6`	indirect
npm	dargs	`8.1.0`	indirect
npm	debug	`4.4.1`	indirect
npm	deep-is	`0.1.4`	indirect
npm	dot-prop	`5.3.0`	indirect
npm	emoji-regex	`8.0.0`	indirect
npm	env-paths	`2.2.1`	indirect
npm	error-ex	`1.3.2`	indirect
npm	escalade	`3.2.0`	indirect
npm	escape-string-regexp	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	eslint	`9.30.1`	indirect
npm	eslint-config-prettier	`10.1.5`	indirect
npm	eslint-plugin-prettier	`5.5.1`	indirect
npm	eslint-scope	`8.4.0`	indirect
npm	eslint-visitor-keys	`3.4.3`	indirect
npm	eslint-visitor-keys	`4.2.1`	indirect
npm	espree	`10.4.0`	indirect
npm	esquery	`1.6.0`	indirect
npm	esrecurse	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	estraverse	`5.3.0`	indirect
npm	esutils	`2.0.3`	indirect
npm	fast-deep-equal	`3.1.3`	indirect
npm	fast-diff	`1.3.0`	indirect
npm	fast-json-stable-stringify	`2.1.0`	indirect
npm	fast-levenshtein	`2.0.6`	indirect
npm	fast-uri	`3.0.6`	indirect
npm	file-entry-cache	`8.0.0`	indirect
npm	find-up	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	find-up	`7.0.0`	indirect
npm	flat-cache	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	flatted	`3.3.3`	indirect
npm	get-caller-file	`2.0.5`	indirect
npm	git-raw-commits	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	glob-parent	`6.0.2`	indirect
npm	global-directory	`4.0.1`	indirect
npm	globals	`14.0.0`	indirect
npm	has-flag	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	husky	`9.1.7`	indirect
npm	ignore	`5.3.2`	indirect
npm	import-fresh	`3.3.1`	indirect
npm	import-meta-resolve	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	imurmurhash	`0.1.4`	indirect
npm	ini	`4.1.1`	indirect
npm	is-arrayish	`0.2.1`	indirect
npm	is-extglob	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	is-fullwidth-code-point	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-glob	`4.0.3`	indirect
npm	is-obj	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	is-text-path	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	isexe	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	jiti	`2.4.2`	indirect
npm	js-tokens	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	js-yaml	`4.1.0`	indirect
npm	json-buffer	`3.0.1`	indirect
npm	json-parse-even-better-errors	`2.3.1`	indirect
npm	json-schema-traverse	`0.4.1`	indirect
npm	json-schema-traverse	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	json-stable-stringify-without-jsonify	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	jsonparse	`1.3.1`	indirect
npm	JSONStream	`1.3.5`	indirect
npm	keyv	`4.5.4`	indirect
npm	levn	`0.4.1`	indirect
npm	lines-and-columns	`1.2.4`	indirect
npm	locate-path	`6.0.0`	indirect
npm	locate-path	`7.2.0`	indirect
npm	lodash.camelcase	`4.3.0`	indirect
npm	lodash.isplainobject	`4.0.6`	indirect
npm	lodash.kebabcase	`4.1.1`	indirect
npm	lodash.merge	`4.6.2`	indirect
npm	lodash.mergewith	`4.6.2`	indirect
npm	lodash.snakecase	`4.1.1`	indirect
npm	lodash.startcase	`4.4.0`	indirect
npm	lodash.uniq	`4.5.0`	indirect
npm	lodash.upperfirst	`4.3.1`	indirect
npm	meow	`12.1.1`	indirect
npm	minimatch	`3.1.2`	indirect
npm	minimist	`1.2.8`	indirect
npm	ms	`2.1.3`	indirect
npm	natural-compare	`1.4.0`	indirect
npm	optionator	`0.9.4`	indirect
npm	p-limit	`3.1.0`	indirect
npm	p-limit	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	p-locate	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	p-locate	`6.0.0`	indirect
npm	parent-module	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	parse-json	`5.2.0`	indirect
npm	path-exists	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	path-exists	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	path-key	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	picocolors	`1.1.1`	indirect
npm	prelude-ls	`1.2.1`	indirect
npm	prettier	`3.6.2`	indirect
npm	prettier-linter-helpers	`1.0.0`	indirect
npm	punycode	`2.3.1`	indirect
npm	require-directory	`2.1.1`	indirect
npm	require-from-string	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	resolve-from	`4.0.0`	indirect
npm	resolve-from	`5.0.0`	indirect
npm	semver	`7.7.2`	indirect
npm	shebang-command	`2.0.0`	indirect
npm	shebang-regex	`3.0.0`	indirect
npm	split2	`4.2.0`	indirect
npm	string-width	`4.2.3`	indirect
npm	strip-ansi	`6.0.1`	indirect
npm	strip-json-comments	`3.1.1`	indirect
npm	supports-color	`7.2.0`	indirect
npm	synckit	`0.11.8`	indirect
npm	text-extensions	`2.4.0`	indirect
npm	through	`2.3.8`	indirect
npm	tinyexec	`1.0.1`	indirect
npm	type-check	`0.4.0`	indirect
npm	typescript	`5.8.3`	indirect
npm	undici-types	`7.8.0`	indirect
npm	unicorn-magic	`0.1.0`	indirect
npm	uri-js	`4.4.1`	indirect
npm	which	`2.0.2`	indirect
npm	word-wrap	`1.2.5`	indirect
npm	wrap-ansi	`7.0.0`	indirect
npm	y18n	`5.0.8`	indirect
npm	yargs	`17.7.2`	indirect
npm	yargs-parser	`21.1.1`	indirect
npm	yocto-queue	`0.1.0`	indirect
npm	yocto-queue	`1.2.1`	indirect

Dependency advisories 9

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 185 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 9 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct.

Package	Version	Relation	Severity	Advisories	Fixed in
flatted	`3.3.3`	indirect	critical	2	`3.4.2`
brace-expansion	`1.1.12`	indirect	high	4	`5.0.9`
fast-uri	`3.0.6`	indirect	high	7	`4.1.3`
js-yaml	`4.1.0`	indirect	high	5	`4.3.2`
minimatch	`3.1.2`	indirect	high	3	`10.2.3`
@eslint/plugin-kit	`0.3.3`	indirect	moderate	1	`0.3.4`
@humanfs/node	`0.16.6`	indirect	moderate	1	`0.16.8`
ajv	`6.12.6`	indirect	moderate	1	`8.18.0`
ajv	`8.17.1`	indirect	moderate	1	`8.18.0`

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.34.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statistics — npm.

Software health index

Score profile

Ownership

Package ecosystems

Metrics by category

Key facts

Data collection warnings

More detail

Feedback

Related records