Public record
Software health reportschema 0.15.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-19 11:53 UTC

crawlbase / crawlbase-node

Fast dependency free library for Crawlbase API

JavaScriptApache-2.0★ 9 stars⑂ 2 forkssince Jun 2023View on GitHub ↗

crawlbase/crawlbase-node holds a health index of 29 out of 100, placing it in the At Risk band. It scores highest on Vitality (41/100) and lowest on Security (17/100). It was last updated 4 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

29
overall / 100
At Risk

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

29
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 35 is calibrated to 29 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

CrawlbasePersonal account
83 followers44 public repossince May 2018Crawlbase

This repository is owned by a personal account. A single-owner project carries more continuity risk than an organization-backed one.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publishTags
npmcrawlbasepoints to another repo — not scored1.0.28,5402759 days agoscrapingcrawlingscraperscrapecrawlercrawlbasescraping-websitesscraping-frameworkcrawlbase-apileadsleads-api

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

41Weak · 21% of overall
How it's scored
36/36Push recencylast push 4 days ago
0.7/36Commit cadence1/52 weeks with commits
2.7/18Commit volume1 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year1
human_commit_share
days_since_last_push4
active_weeks_last_year1
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases2 releases published
0/36Release recencylatest release 759 days ago
12.6/27Release cadencea release every ~350.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count2
latest_release_tagv1.0.2
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release759
mean_days_between_releases350.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

31At Risk · 17% of overall
How it's scored
14.6/60Stars9 stars
0/25Forks2 forks
0/15Watchers1 watchers
Inputs used
forks2
stars9
watchers1
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (Apache-2.0)
0/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingno
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

41Weak · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
4.1/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 82% of commits
2.7/13.5Contributor breadth2 contributors
3/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled2
top_contributor_share0.818
How it's scored
0/42Issue resolutionno issues or no data
20/30PR acceptance2/3 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
1.5/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 2/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Inputs used
merged_prs2
open_issues0
closed_issues0
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio
closed_unmerged_prs1
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Issue resolution, Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
10/30Ownership backingpersonal (user) account
0/20Verified domainnot applicable to user accounts
13.8/25Owner reach83 followers of crawlbase
24/25Track record44 public repos, account ~8 yr old
Inputs used
followers83
owner_typeUser
is_verified
owner_logincrawlbase
public_repos44
account_age_days2,976
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

40Weak · 19% of overall
How it's scored
0/24CI workflows
0/24Tests present
16/16Linter configeslint.config.mjs
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
0/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests0 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_cino
has_testsno
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configyes
has_precommit_configno
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
15/15Documentation / homepage sitehttps://crawlbase.com
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics5 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicscrawler, crawling, scraper, scraping-node, scraping-websites
has_wikiyes
homepagehttps://crawlbase.com
docs_sitehttps://crawlbase.com
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

17Critical · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0/2.5CI-Tests0 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
0.8/7.5Code-ReviewFound 2/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
0.8/2.5Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
0/10Dangerous-Workflowno data
0/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0/7.5Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesno data
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0/5Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsno data
0/7.5Vulnerabilities12 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated13
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive5
scorecard_aggregate1.6
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Dangerous-Workflow, Packaging, Pinned-Dependencies, Signed-Releases, Token-Permissions. Remaining weights renormalized.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

24At Risk · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
0/40Legible commit historyno data
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Legible commit history. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
0/22Automated tests
11/11Lint / format configeslint.config.mjs
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno data
0/8Automated maintenanceno data
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesno data
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsno
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configyes
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Demonstrated agent practice, Automated maintenance, OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependencies. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codeJavaScript without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes0/19 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languageJavaScript
largest_source_bytes5,165
source_files_sampled19
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

9GitHub stars
2contributors
1commits, last 12 months
4days since last push
2releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npmpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • npm package 'crawlbase' points at a different repository (https://github.com/crawlbase-source/crawlbase-node); excluded from ecosystem scoring

More detail

OpenSSF Scorecard 1.6 / 10
1.6aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-19 11:53 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
0CI-Tests0 out of 2 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 0
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1Code-ReviewFound 2/11 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
3Contributorsproject has 1 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 3
n/aDangerous-Workflowno workflows found
0Dependency-Update-Toolno update tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
n/aPinned-Dependenciesno dependencies found
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
0Security-Policysecurity policy file not detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
n/aToken-PermissionsNo tokens found
0Vulnerabilities12 existing vulnerabilities detected
All dependencies 185

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 0 direct and 185 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npm@babel/code-frame7.27.1indirect
npm@babel/helper-validator-identifier7.27.1indirect
npm@commitlint/cli19.8.1indirect
npm@commitlint/config-conventional19.8.1indirect
npm@commitlint/config-validator19.8.1indirect
npm@commitlint/ensure19.8.1indirect
npm@commitlint/execute-rule19.8.1indirect
npm@commitlint/format19.8.1indirect
npm@commitlint/is-ignored19.8.1indirect
npm@commitlint/lint19.8.1indirect
npm@commitlint/load19.8.1indirect
npm@commitlint/message19.8.1indirect
npm@commitlint/parse19.8.1indirect
npm@commitlint/read19.8.1indirect
npm@commitlint/resolve-extends19.8.1indirect
npm@commitlint/rules19.8.1indirect
npm@commitlint/to-lines19.8.1indirect
npm@commitlint/top-level19.8.1indirect
npm@commitlint/types19.8.1indirect
npm@eslint-community/eslint-utils4.7.0indirect
npm@eslint-community/regexpp4.12.1indirect
npm@eslint/config-array0.21.0indirect
npm@eslint/config-helpers0.3.0indirect
npm@eslint/core0.14.0indirect
npm@eslint/core0.15.1indirect
npm@eslint/eslintrc3.3.1indirect
npm@eslint/js9.30.1indirect
npm@eslint/object-schema2.1.6indirect
npm@eslint/plugin-kit0.3.3indirect
npm@humanfs/core0.19.1indirect
npm@humanfs/node0.16.6indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/module-importer1.0.1indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/retry0.3.1indirect
npm@humanwhocodes/retry0.4.3indirect
npm@pkgr/core0.2.7indirect
npm@types/conventional-commits-parser5.0.1indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.8indirect
npm@types/json-schema7.0.15indirect
npm@types/node24.0.12indirect
npmacorn8.15.0indirect
npmacorn-jsx5.3.2indirect
npmajv6.12.6indirect
npmajv8.17.1indirect
npmansi-regex5.0.1indirect
npmansi-styles4.3.0indirect
npmargparse2.0.1indirect
npmarray-ify1.0.0indirect
npmbalanced-match1.0.2indirect
npmbrace-expansion1.1.12indirect
npmcallsites3.1.0indirect
npmchalk4.1.2indirect
npmchalk5.4.1indirect
npmcliui8.0.1indirect
npmcolor-convert2.0.1indirect
npmcolor-name1.1.4indirect
npmcompare-func2.0.0indirect
npmconcat-map0.0.1indirect
npmconventional-changelog-angular7.0.0indirect
npmconventional-changelog-conventionalcommits7.0.2indirect
npmconventional-commits-parser5.0.0indirect
npmcosmiconfig9.0.0indirect
npmcosmiconfig-typescript-loader6.1.0indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.6indirect
npmdargs8.1.0indirect
npmdebug4.4.1indirect
npmdeep-is0.1.4indirect
npmdot-prop5.3.0indirect
npmemoji-regex8.0.0indirect
npmenv-paths2.2.1indirect
npmerror-ex1.3.2indirect
npmescalade3.2.0indirect
npmescape-string-regexp4.0.0indirect
npmeslint9.30.1indirect
npmeslint-config-prettier10.1.5indirect
npmeslint-plugin-prettier5.5.1indirect
npmeslint-scope8.4.0indirect
npmeslint-visitor-keys3.4.3indirect
npmeslint-visitor-keys4.2.1indirect
npmespree10.4.0indirect
npmesquery1.6.0indirect
npmesrecurse4.3.0indirect
npmestraverse5.3.0indirect
npmesutils2.0.3indirect
npmfast-deep-equal3.1.3indirect
npmfast-diff1.3.0indirect
npmfast-json-stable-stringify2.1.0indirect
npmfast-levenshtein2.0.6indirect
npmfast-uri3.0.6indirect
npmfile-entry-cache8.0.0indirect
npmfind-up5.0.0indirect
npmfind-up7.0.0indirect
npmflat-cache4.0.1indirect
npmflatted3.3.3indirect
npmget-caller-file2.0.5indirect
npmgit-raw-commits4.0.0indirect
npmglob-parent6.0.2indirect
npmglobal-directory4.0.1indirect
npmglobals14.0.0indirect
npmhas-flag4.0.0indirect
npmhusky9.1.7indirect
npmignore5.3.2indirect
npmimport-fresh3.3.1indirect
npmimport-meta-resolve4.1.0indirect
npmimurmurhash0.1.4indirect
npmini4.1.1indirect
npmis-arrayish0.2.1indirect
npmis-extglob2.1.1indirect
npmis-fullwidth-code-point3.0.0indirect
npmis-glob4.0.3indirect
npmis-obj2.0.0indirect
npmis-text-path2.0.0indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmjiti2.4.2indirect
npmjs-tokens4.0.0indirect
npmjs-yaml4.1.0indirect
npmjson-buffer3.0.1indirect
npmjson-parse-even-better-errors2.3.1indirect
npmjson-schema-traverse0.4.1indirect
npmjson-schema-traverse1.0.0indirect
npmjson-stable-stringify-without-jsonify1.0.1indirect
npmjsonparse1.3.1indirect
npmJSONStream1.3.5indirect
npmkeyv4.5.4indirect
npmlevn0.4.1indirect
npmlines-and-columns1.2.4indirect
npmlocate-path6.0.0indirect
npmlocate-path7.2.0indirect
npmlodash.camelcase4.3.0indirect
npmlodash.isplainobject4.0.6indirect
npmlodash.kebabcase4.1.1indirect
npmlodash.merge4.6.2indirect
npmlodash.mergewith4.6.2indirect
npmlodash.snakecase4.1.1indirect
npmlodash.startcase4.4.0indirect
npmlodash.uniq4.5.0indirect
npmlodash.upperfirst4.3.1indirect
npmmeow12.1.1indirect
npmminimatch3.1.2indirect
npmminimist1.2.8indirect
npmms2.1.3indirect
npmnatural-compare1.4.0indirect
npmoptionator0.9.4indirect
npmp-limit3.1.0indirect
npmp-limit4.0.0indirect
npmp-locate5.0.0indirect
npmp-locate6.0.0indirect
npmparent-module1.0.1indirect
npmparse-json5.2.0indirect
npmpath-exists4.0.0indirect
npmpath-exists5.0.0indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmprelude-ls1.2.1indirect
npmprettier3.6.2indirect
npmprettier-linter-helpers1.0.0indirect
npmpunycode2.3.1indirect
npmrequire-directory2.1.1indirect
npmrequire-from-string2.0.2indirect
npmresolve-from4.0.0indirect
npmresolve-from5.0.0indirect
npmsemver7.7.2indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmsplit24.2.0indirect
npmstring-width4.2.3indirect
npmstrip-ansi6.0.1indirect
npmstrip-json-comments3.1.1indirect
npmsupports-color7.2.0indirect
npmsynckit0.11.8indirect
npmtext-extensions2.4.0indirect
npmthrough2.3.8indirect
npmtinyexec1.0.1indirect
npmtype-check0.4.0indirect
npmtypescript5.8.3indirect
npmundici-types7.8.0indirect
npmunicorn-magic0.1.0indirect
npmuri-js4.4.1indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmword-wrap1.2.5indirect
npmwrap-ansi7.0.0indirect
npmy18n5.0.8indirect
npmyargs17.7.2indirect
npmyargs-parser21.1.1indirect
npmyocto-queue0.1.0indirect
npmyocto-queue1.2.1indirect
Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.15.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsnpm.