Public record
Software health reportschema 0.26.0 · metrics 2.10.0 · 2026-07-22 19:35 UTC

creagia / laravel-sign-pad

A Laravel package to sign documents and optionally generate certified PDFs associated with Eloquent models.

PHPMIT★ 545 stars⑂ 53 forkssince Sep 2022View on GitHub ↗

creagia/laravel-sign-pad holds a health index of 63 out of 100, placing it in the Moderate band. It scores highest on Sustainability & Governance (68/100) and lowest on AI Readiness (37/100). It was last updated 30 days ago. A single contributor accounts for most of its recent work.

63
overall / 100
Moderate

Software health index

Metrics are grouped into weighted categories on one standardized 1–100 scale. Overall starts as their weighted mean, calibrated against the distribution of the public record so bands carry percentile meaning; when public evidence triggers the High-Risk Jurisdiction Policy, the rating is adjusted and receives an At Risk ceiling of 34.

63
Exceptional93-100The record's top tier (≈ top 5%); essentially all checked criteria met
Excellent80-92Strong across the board; minor gaps
Good65-79Healthy; gaps are limited and manageable
Moderate50-64Acceptable with notable gaps; review recommended
Weak35-49Material weaknesses across several areas
At Risk20-34Significant weaknesses; adoption warrants caution
Critical1-19Severe problems (abandoned, single-maintainer, no hygiene)
VitalityCommunity &AdoptionSustainability &GovernanceEngineeringQualitySecurityAI Readiness

Score profile

Each axis is a category. The shape matters more than the average — a healthy subject fills the whole shape, while a spike-and-crater profile means strength in one dimension is masking risk in another.

The weighted overall 59 is calibrated to 63 on the published index scale (record calibration 2026-08-02).

Ownership

CreagiaOrganization
8 followers8 public repossince Apr 2020

This repository is backed by an organization — shared, accountable stewardship that can outlive any single maintainer.

Package ecosystems

RegistryPackageVersionDownloads / moVersionsLast publish
Packagistcreagia/laravel-sign-pad3.0.110,16615129 days ago

Metrics by category

Vitality

Is the project alive — is code being written and are releases shipping?

56Moderate · 21% of overall
How it's scored
28.8/36Push recencylast push 30 days ago
4.8/36Commit cadence7/52 weeks with commits
10.8/18Commit volume15 commits in the last year
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
commits_last_year15
human_commit_share0.447
days_since_last_push30
active_weeks_last_year7
How it's scored
27/27Ships releases15 releases published
27/36Release recencylatest release 129 days ago
12.6/27Release cadencea release every ~124.9 days
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releasesno data
Inputs used
releases_count15
latest_release_tag3.0.1
releases_from_tagsno
days_since_latest_release129
mean_days_between_releases124.9
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): OpenSSF Scorecard: Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Community & Adoption

Does the project have users, downloads, attention, and a welcoming setup for contributors?

63Moderate · 17% of overall
How it's scored
44.4/60Stars545 stars
14.3/25Forks53 forks
5/15Watchers9 watchers
Inputs used
forks53
stars545
watchers9
growth_stateunverified
growth_factor_pct100
growth_unverified_reasonno_history
How it's scored
22.5/22.5README
22.5/22.5Licenserecognized license (MIT)
18/18CONTRIBUTING guide
0/13.5Code of conduct
0/7.2Issue template
0/6.3PR template
Inputs used
has_readmeyes
has_licenseyes
readme_badges
has_contributingyes
has_issue_templateno
has_code_of_conductno
readme_badge_services
has_pull_request_templateno
How it's scored
53.4/80Monthly downloads10,166 downloads/month across packagist
0/20Registry dependents0 packages depend on it
Inputs used
packagescreagia/laravel-sign-pad
dependents0
ecosystemspackagist
total_downloads134,496
monthly_downloads10,166
unverified_packages_excluded

Sustainability & Governance

Will the project survive its people — bus factor, responsiveness, who backs it, and package upkeep?

68Good · 23% of overall
How it's scored
9/54Bus factor1 contributor(s) cover half of all commits
8.9/22.5Commit distributiontop contributor authored 61% of commits
10.8/13.5Contributor breadth8 contributors
6/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
Inputs used
bus_factor1
contributors_sampled8
top_contributor_share0.606
How it's scored
42/42Issue resolution100% of issues closed
26/30PR acceptance46/53 decided PRs merged
0/13Newcomer PR acceptanceno first-time contributor's PR decided in 30d
3/15OpenSSF Scorecard: Code-ReviewFound 2/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
Inputs used
merged_prs46
open_issues0
closed_issues5
prs_merged_7d
prs_decided_7d
prs_merged_30d
prs_decided_30d
issue_closed_ratio1
closed_unmerged_prs7
first_time_authors_30d
first_time_prs_merged_30d
first_time_prs_decided_30d
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Newcomer PR acceptance. Remaining weights renormalized.
How it's scored
30/30Ownership backingorganization-owned
0/20Verified domainverified-domain status not read for this organization
6.9/25Owner reach8 followers of creagia
18.9/25Track record8 public repos, account ~6 yr old
Inputs used
followers8
owner_typeOrganization
is_verified
owner_logincreagia
public_repos8
account_age_days2,290
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Verified domain. Remaining weights renormalized.

Package maintenance

100Exceptional
How it's scored
25/25Published & resolvable1 package(s) on packagist
35/35Publish recencylatest publish 129 days ago
20/20Version history15 published versions
20/20Not deprecatedactive, not deprecated or yanked
Inputs used
packagescreagia/laravel-sign-pad
ecosystemspackagist
any_deprecatedno
min_days_since_publish129

Engineering Quality

Are baseline engineering and documentation practices in place?

59Moderate · 19% of overall
How it's scored
24/24CI workflows4 workflow(s)
24/24Tests present
0/16Linter config
0/9.6Pre-commit hooks
0/6.4.editorconfig
10/20OpenSSF Scorecard: CI-Tests11 out of 20 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
Inputs used
has_ciyes
has_testsyes
has_editorconfigno
has_linter_configno
has_precommit_configno

Documentation

60Moderate
How it's scored
30/30README
0/25Documentation directory
0/15Documentation / homepage site
10/10Repository description
10/10Topics4 topics
10/10Wiki
Inputs used
topicslaravel, pdf, signature, signature-pad
has_wikiyes
homepage
docs_site
has_readmeyes
has_docs_dirno
has_descriptionyes

Security

Are visible security and supply-chain practices strong, without unresolved high-risk jurisdiction exposure?

54Moderate · 16% of overall
How it's scored
7.5/7.5Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0/7.5Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
1.2/2.5CI-Tests11 out of 20 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0/2.5CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
1.5/7.5Code-ReviewFound 2/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
1.5/2.5Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10/10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
7.5/7.5Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0/5Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
2.5/2.5Licenselicense file detected
0/7.5Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
0/5Packagingno data
0/5Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0/5SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
4.5/5Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
0/7.5Signed-Releasesno data
0/7.5Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
3/7.5Vulnerabilities6 existing vulnerabilities detected
Inputs used
sourceopenssf_scorecard
checks_evaluated16
scorecard_versionv5.5.0
checks_inconclusive2
scorecard_aggregate4.2
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Packaging, Signed-Releases. Remaining weights renormalized.

Dependency advisories

100Exceptional
How it's scored
35/35Direct dependencies free of known advisoriesno direct dependency carries a known advisory
0/25Indirect dependencies free of known advisoriestransitive set not separable from development and test dependencies in this scope
0/40No advisories left outstandingno advisory carries a publication date
Inputs used
sourceosv
advisories6
affected_packages3
assessed_packages116
unassessed_packages15
affected_by_severityhigh 2, moderate 1
direct_affected_packages0
Excluded from scoring (no data or not applicable): Indirect dependencies free of known advisories, No advisories left outstanding. Remaining weights renormalized. Matched 116 resolved dependencies against OSV. 15 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list. This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so the repository dependency graph was assessed instead. That graph mixes development and test pins with shipped dependencies, so only the declared runtime dependencies are scored; transitive findings are reported as context and excluded from the score. Reachability is not analyzed.

AI Readiness

How well is the repo equipped to be developed and maintained with AI coding agents? Carries a deliberately small weight (4%): agent tooling is a real maintenance signal, but a repository with none can still reach 100/100.

37Weak · 4% of overall
How it's scored
0/45Agent instructionsno CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md / editor rules
0/15Machine-readable docs (llms.txt)
25.1/40Legible commit history16 of 34 human commits state their intent (structured subject or explanatory body)
Inputs used
has_llms_txtno
llms_txt_url
legible_history_share0.471
agent_instruction_files
agent_instruction_max_bytes
How it's scored
0/18One-command bootstrap
22/22Automated tests
0/11Lint / format config
0/11Static type checking
10/10Reproducible environmentlockfile
0/10Demonstrated agent practiceno agent-authored commits among the last 76
8/8Automated maintenance26 of the last 76 commits are automated dependency updates
0/10OpenSSF Scorecard: Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Inputs used
has_nixno
has_testsyes
lockfilespackage-lock.json
has_dockerfileno
typed_languageno
bootstrap_files
has_devcontainerno
has_linter_configno
typecheck_configs
agent_commit_share0
toolchain_manifests
dependency_bot_commit_share0.342
How it's scored
0/45Type-checkable codePHP without a type-check config
55/55Manageable file sizes0/33 source files over 60KB
Inputs used
primary_languagePHP
largest_source_bytes10,833
source_files_sampled33
oversized_source_files0

Key facts

545GitHub stars
8contributors
15commits, last 12 months
30days since last push
15releases
1bus factor
0open issues
npm, Packagistpackage ecosystems

Data collection warnings

  • Star history unavailable: GitHub GraphQL error: Resource not accessible by personal access token
  • Could not fetch npm package 'laravel-sign-pad' from its registry

More detail

Star and fork history 0 ★ / 53 ⇿
0Stars
53Forks
14Releases

When each star and fork was added, collected from GitHub and bucketed by day. Cumulative growth sits directly above the daily additions it is made of, so the two read against each other: steady organic accretion looks nothing like an abrupt, short-lived burst. Where that difference is measurable, it is reported as growth authenticity.

01020304050605322022-102024-082026-06
Major 2Minor 2Patch 10

Each point covers 4 days.

OpenSSF Scorecard 4.2 / 10
4.2aggregate

Independent, tool-agnostic security assessment from the open-source OpenSSF Scorecard. Each check rewards a security practice, not a specific vendor's tool. Checks Scorecard could not determine are marked n/a and excluded from the security score (never counted as zero).Scorecard v5.5.0 · 2026-07-22 19:35 UTC

10Binary-Artifactsno binaries found in the repo
0Branch-Protectionbranch protection not enabled on development/release branches
5CI-Tests11 out of 20 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 5
0CII-Best-Practicesno effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
2Code-ReviewFound 2/7 approved changesets -- score normalized to 2
6Contributorsproject has 2 contributing companies or organizations -- score normalized to 6
10Dangerous-Workflowno dangerous workflow patterns detected
10Dependency-Update-Toolupdate tool detected
0Fuzzingproject is not fuzzed
10Licenselicense file detected
0Maintained0 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
n/aPackagingpackaging workflow not detected
0Pinned-Dependenciesdependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
0SASTSAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
9Security-Policysecurity policy file detected
n/aSigned-Releasesno releases found
0Token-Permissionsdetected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
4Vulnerabilities6 existing vulnerabilities detected
Direct dependencies 5
RegistryPackageVersion constraintManifest
Packagistilluminate/contracts^11.0|^12.0|^13.0composer.json
Packagistspatie/laravel-package-tools^1.12.1composer.json
Packagistsetasign/fpdi^v2.0.0composer.json
Packagisttecnickcom/tcpdf^6.6.0composer.json
npmsignature_pad^4.0.0package.json
All dependencies 131

Full resolved dependency set from the GitHub dependency graph: 5 direct and 126 indirect (transitive) packages. The transitive closure is complete when the repository commits a lockfile.

RegistryPackageVersionRelation
npmsignature_pad4.0.0direct
Packagistilluminate/contractsdirect
Packagistsetasign/fpdidirect
Packagistspatie/laravel-package-toolsdirect
Packagisttecnickcom/tcpdfdirect
npm@discoveryjs/json-ext0.5.7indirect
npm@jridgewell/gen-mapping0.3.13indirect
npm@jridgewell/resolve-uri3.1.2indirect
npm@jridgewell/source-map0.3.11indirect
npm@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec1.5.5indirect
npm@jridgewell/trace-mapping0.3.31indirect
npm@types/eslint9.6.1indirect
npm@types/eslint-scope3.7.7indirect
npm@types/estree1.0.8indirect
npm@types/json-schema7.0.15indirect
npm@types/node25.0.8indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/ast1.14.1indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/floating-point-hex-parser1.13.2indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/helper-api-error1.13.2indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/helper-buffer1.14.1indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/helper-numbers1.13.2indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/helper-wasm-bytecode1.13.2indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/helper-wasm-section1.14.1indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/ieee7541.13.2indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/leb1281.13.2indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/utf81.13.2indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/wasm-edit1.14.1indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/wasm-gen1.14.1indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/wasm-opt1.14.1indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/wasm-parser1.14.1indirect
npm@webassemblyjs/wast-printer1.14.1indirect
npm@webpack-cli/configtest1.2.0indirect
npm@webpack-cli/info1.5.0indirect
npm@webpack-cli/serve1.7.0indirect
npm@xtuc/ieee7541.2.0indirect
npm@xtuc/long4.2.2indirect
npmacorn8.15.0indirect
npmacorn-import-phases1.0.4indirect
npmajv8.17.1indirect
npmajv-formats2.1.1indirect
npmajv-keywords5.1.0indirect
npmbaseline-browser-mapping2.9.14indirect
npmbrowserslist4.28.1indirect
npmbuffer-from1.1.2indirect
npmcaniuse-lite1.0.30001764indirect
npmchrome-trace-event1.0.3indirect
npmclone-deep4.0.1indirect
npmcolorette2.0.19indirect
npmcommander2.20.3indirect
npmcommander7.2.0indirect
npmcross-spawn7.0.3indirect
npmelectron-to-chromium1.5.267indirect
npmenhanced-resolve5.18.4indirect
npmenvinfo7.8.1indirect
npmes-module-lexer2.0.0indirect
npmescalade3.2.0indirect
npmeslint-scope5.1.1indirect
npmesrecurse4.3.0indirect
npmestraverse4.3.0indirect
npmestraverse5.3.0indirect
npmevents3.3.0indirect
npmfast-deep-equal3.1.3indirect
npmfast-uri3.1.0indirect
npmfastest-levenshtein1.0.16indirect
npmfind-up4.1.0indirect
npmfunction-bind1.1.1indirect
npmglob-to-regexp0.4.1indirect
npmgraceful-fs4.2.11indirect
npmhas1.0.3indirect
npmhas-flag4.0.0indirect
npmimport-local3.1.0indirect
npminterpret2.2.0indirect
npmis-core-module2.10.0indirect
npmis-plain-object2.0.4indirect
npmisexe2.0.0indirect
npmisobject3.0.1indirect
npmjest-worker27.5.1indirect
npmjson-parse-even-better-errors2.3.1indirect
npmjson-schema-traverse1.0.0indirect
npmkind-of6.0.3indirect
npmloader-runner4.3.1indirect
npmlocate-path5.0.0indirect
npmmerge-stream2.0.0indirect
npmmime-db1.52.0indirect
npmmime-types2.1.35indirect
npmneo-async2.6.2indirect
npmnode-releases2.0.27indirect
npmp-limit2.3.0indirect
npmp-locate4.1.0indirect
npmp-try2.2.0indirect
npmpath-exists4.0.0indirect
npmpath-key3.1.1indirect
npmpath-parse1.0.7indirect
npmpicocolors1.1.1indirect
npmpkg-dir4.2.0indirect
npmrechoir0.7.1indirect
npmrequire-from-string2.0.2indirect
npmresolve1.22.1indirect
npmresolve-cwd3.0.0indirect
npmresolve-from5.0.0indirect
npmschema-utils4.3.3indirect
npmshallow-clone3.0.1indirect
npmshebang-command2.0.0indirect
npmshebang-regex3.0.0indirect
npmsource-map0.6.1indirect
npmsource-map-support0.5.21indirect
npmsupports-color8.1.1indirect
npmsupports-preserve-symlinks-flag1.0.0indirect
npmtapable2.3.0indirect
npmterser5.45.0indirect
npmterser-webpack-plugin5.3.17indirect
npmundici-types7.16.0indirect
npmupdate-browserslist-db1.2.3indirect
npmwatchpack2.5.1indirect
npmwebpack5.104.1indirect
npmwebpack-cli4.10.0indirect
npmwebpack-merge5.8.0indirect
npmwebpack-sources3.3.3indirect
npmwhich2.0.2indirect
npmwildcard2.0.0indirect
Packagistlarastan/larastanindirect
Packagistlaravel/pintindirect
Packagistnunomaduro/collisionindirect
Packagistorchestra/testbenchindirect
Packagistpestphp/pestindirect
Packagistpestphp/pest-plugin-laravelindirect
Packagistphpindirect
Packagistphpstan/extension-installerindirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-deprecation-rulesindirect
Packagistphpstan/phpstan-phpunitindirect
Packagistphpunit/phpunitindirect
Dependency advisories 3

This repository publishes no package the index resolves, so its own dependency graph was assessed — 116 packages, which also include development and test pins that never ship: 3 carry known advisories, of which 0 are direct. 15 could not be assessed — no resolved version, an unsupported ecosystem, or beyond the reported package list.

PackageVersionRelationSeverityAdvisoriesFixed in
cross-spawn7.0.3indirecthigh17.0.5
fast-uri3.1.0indirecthigh44.1.1
ajv8.17.1indirectmoderate18.18.0

An advisory means the version recorded in the dependency graph falls inside an advisory’s affected range. Reachability is not analysed, and the graph includes development and test pins — a finding may concern tooling rather than shipped software.

Raw JSON report machine-readable

Feedback

Spotted something off in this report, or have thoughts to share? Wrong measurements, missed tooling, ideas, questions — anything is welcome. Every message is read and gets a response.

The message is kept through sign-in.

Scores are signals, not warranties. They reflect publicly visible practices on GitHub — not a code audit, and not a security guarantee.

Missing data is excluded and weights renormalized, never scored as zero. Methodology is versioned and open: metrics v2.10.0, schema v0.26.0 — full methodology · metrics wiki.

How one result sits in the wider record: aggregate statisticsPackagist.